@DemonOverboard.com ( for some reason the asinine algorithm that corrects script liked @DemonOverboard with a ".com" much better than without it & who am I to stand in the way of these newfangled gimcrack features of our brave new world ?)
Do we get to choose the "lucky" recipient of the nude photos of Ghug/Zultar/jmo/some other fortunate/unfortunate victim ? I can easily imagine the desirability of aquiring said photos for the purposes of inflicting the images on some other poor blighter..but if you're going to insist that whoever trades the name swap for the nude photos has to actually view the said nude photos, then you are, I would suggest, limiting potential accomplices to only those few deeply disturbed sadists amongst us, who might use said nude photographs for immoral purposes... whereas if you allow the said nude photos to be used for petty, spiteful purposes, or the legitimate reprisal against scoundrels who steal Liverpool from a decent chap or behave in similarly appalling ways then that's OK & you really massively increase the number of potential accomplices.
The other concern I have is that some of the subjects of your "revealing pics" may have still been minors at the time the photographs were taken, Ghug has allegedly only just been weaned off shorts & into long pants as an example & it's rumoured that jmo's mum still walks him to playSkool or pretendwork. I do hope we won't have to rename you "Mrs Robinson"