Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 373 of 387
FirstPreviousNextLast
Hauta (1592 D (S))
24 May 17 UTC
Time to end Obama era sanctions on Russia?
Would it be better to let job creating trade flourish rather than hurting both countries economically? Can Russia be our friend?
85 replies
Open
orathaic (1009 D (B))
25 May 17 UTC
The Phillipines
Just because i've been away for a few days, somehow there is no thread about this... One news headline (paraphrased) 'ISIS captures city in Philipines!' Is rather click baity... But goes in to refer to the 'Most Catholic country in south east asia'.
6 replies
Open
Carebear (95 D)
25 May 17 UTC
ODC @ PDET - Assignments Out
The assignments went out 24 hours ago and some of you all have not yet picked up your messages. Please come on over and join your games. :D
3 replies
Open
Refusing to draw in established stalemate
Is there a rule that if stalemate is made and it lasts for 3 years with no changes in a sc count, draw can be forced, or something like that?
3 replies
Open
orathaic (1009 D (B))
25 May 17 UTC
On dna databases
http://www.nature.com/news/china-expands-dna-data-grab-in-troubled-western-region-1.22033

This is what colonial/state oppression looks like. As far as anarchist are concerned they are one and the same, the state oppresses its own people, the colonial empire oppress other peoples. In China they have this lovely grey area...
5 replies
Open
brainbomb (128 D)
23 May 17 UTC
(+1)
Why is Terrorism the only time people feel a visceral response?
I noticed recently there was an incident where a man crashed his car into multiple people injuring many and killing someone. But because it was not terrorism, people did not seem motivated in the same manner against alcoholism as they would have if he were a terrorist. If he had indeed been from any Muslim country at all, and also under the influence of alcohol, one has to wonder if people would just automatically assume it was a terror plot.
91 replies
Open
Hauta (1592 D (S))
22 May 17 UTC
American reporter arrested for asking questions to Trump HHS Secretary
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/10/business/media/reporter-arrested-tom-price.html

Freedom of the press is an integral part of the 1st amendment. Just wondering how rightwing media handled or ignored this story about Dan Heyman, the reporter that was arrested for asking persistent questions to Tom Price, HHS Secretary.
54 replies
Open
JECE (1072 D)
11 May 17 UTC
(+2)
On how PPSC scoring does not encourage players to throw games
In our recent discussion (threadID=1432961), many mods and fellow pillars of the community claimed that when you have two Great Powers in a game that have between 12 and 16 supply centers, one of these Great Powers has a (D) points-incentive to throw the game. I disagreed and this puzzled my fellow users, but only Lethologica took the bait when I explained my position. Here it is again:
32 replies
Open
Oztra (27 D)
25 Mar 17 UTC
(+3)
Bump
Because I'm a new pleb, I'm not sure what bump means.
I've been seeing people use it a lot, and am unsure of the context and meaning behind this phrase
133 replies
Open
carder007s.com (0 D X)
23 May 17 UTC
Buy CC, Cvv , dumps Fullz of all countries
Buy CC, Cvv , dumps Fullz of all countries
0 replies
Open
Volmort (90 D)
22 May 17 UTC
Coast passing
Hi I have a question, can I move from mid-atlantic see to North Africa and next turn attack Tunis?

Or its prevented by coastal issues?
5 replies
Open
CommanderByron (699 D (S))
20 May 17 UTC
Gauging Interest: Econ-Dip
See Inside
31 replies
Open
Namejeff (366 D)
22 May 17 UTC
GTA 7
Does anyone have GTA 12 that I can borrow for my comrade
1 reply
Open
bobarctor1977 (250 D)
18 May 17 UTC
Would anyone be interested in joining a game with some friends of mine and I?
I have 3 friends that I would like to introduce to the game, but can't seem to talk anyone else into playing with us for a full Ancient Med game. Just a casual, low-bet game, probably 2 day turns.
18 replies
Open
Hippopankake (70 D)
20 May 17 UTC
New game
I'm thinking about making a game where you have to have a war goal and a justification for going to war similar to paradox games thoughts ?
7 replies
Open
leon1122 (158 D)
18 May 17 UTC
(+1)
German Man Imprisoned for 10 years for Holocaust Denial
See below
381 replies
Open
brainbomb (128 D)
21 May 17 UTC
Lawmaker threatened with Lynching after calling for Trumps impeachment.
http://www.ketv.com/article/racial-slurs-hurled-at-lawmaker-after-calling-for-trumps-impeachment/9901862
4 replies
Open
Hauta (1592 D (S))
21 May 17 UTC
(+1)
Hehe, Trump just bowed to Saudi king and curtsied too
Just another example of Trump hypocrisy. He slammed Obama for merely bowing. The curtsy was bigly over the top.
32 replies
Open
brainbomb (128 D)
20 May 17 UTC
Juggernaut is actually a horrible alliance
Despite the fearmongering ive seen in Press games about Juggernauts over the past 5 years ive been here...I cant help but note its low rate of success and how its paranoia often benefits France or England most. Please share games where Juggernauts fail miserably. But also include ones which work out in a 2wd (if there even is such a situtation)
10 replies
Open
peterwiggin (14554 D Mod (S))
24 Mar 17 UTC
Spring 2017 SoW Study Game
This thread is for commentary and discussion on the spring 2017 School of War Study Game: gameID=194603

Page 8 of 8
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
Ezio (1463 D)
15 May 17 UTC
bump
A_Tin_Can (1520 D)
15 May 17 UTC
Post coming! I've been flat out at work.
Ezio (1463 D)
18 May 17 UTC
bump?
Claesar (84 D)
19 May 17 UTC
I'm working on my EOG. Might take a while as I'm on holiday.
VillageIdiot (4305 D)
19 May 17 UTC
Aw, now i feel unsatisfied.

(′︿‵。)
A_Tin_Can (1520 D)
19 May 17 UTC
My EOG summary is going to read "possible Italian solo".

I'll do the post I had coming, too.
DemonOverlord (469 D)
19 May 17 UTC
I don't think it was possible by the end there, especially when everyone but Ezio had their draw votes up. I'll work on an EoG for next week. The first few years were really fun here.
Gen. Lee (7688 D (B))
19 May 17 UTC
It's hard to make an argument for a 5WD being a good result or even a 4WD imho.

Perhaps the professors can expand upon what could have been done here to move the game from stalled mid-game mode to end-game mode? I would love to hear how some of these players would have angled for advancing the game from different powers perspectives and also any thoughts about what could have broken down much earlier in the game that would prevent X from working/trusting Y.
Ezio (1463 D)
19 May 17 UTC
A 5WD is a great result for the players who were on the chopping block.
Gen. Lee (7688 D (B))
19 May 17 UTC
So for Austria? Everyone else had a nice position to work towards a better result with.
Ezio (1463 D)
19 May 17 UTC
Eh. I was straight up told: draw the game or we're going to cut you out, so I'm pretty sure I was on the chopping block.
Gen. Lee (7688 D (B))
19 May 17 UTC
Right, so your board position was fine. Something broke down in earlier relations or current pitches to other powers that would not allow 2 parties not already working together to come together for mutual benefit of a better result or a possible solo shot. It's interesting.

The best players I have seen find a way to shake up those stale positions and work with someone else to change board dynamics and continue to maneuver themselves into a better position.
DemonOverlord (469 D)
19 May 17 UTC
I personally hate cutting the draw, last time I did it with a game meme was in it was so fucking infuriating, and it didn't seem like it would be any different this game. Plus I'd rather a draw with Ogion in it than without him. And when Germany loses interest and desire to play it gets a lot harder. I suppose I could have tried more myself.
DemonOverlord (469 D)
19 May 17 UTC
This is why I prefer HDV. When I see everyone's draw vote up I get discouraged and irritated.
VillageIdiot (4305 D)
19 May 17 UTC
(+1)
There was TONNES of life left in this one. When all that's developed so far is that one player has just barely managed to scratch double digits in SC then a solo threat isn't really a card that should credibly be taken into consideration yet. Tonnes of alliance shifts that could have occured here, and while i appreciate there probably was the odd 'undying loyalty' between some players in the game i have my doubts one of the five players here wasn't open for a 'gun for hire' role who could have shift balance one way or the other so mob mentality needless bullied some of you into drawing. You're always going to hear cries of "hey it's going to end in a (insert prediction here), we may as well just draw now" from players who know the are on a downward slide and 99% of the time it's either bullshit or perspectives of players who aren't as much of a visionary as you are. Nothing has occured in this game other then one player was eliminated from each triangle on respective sides of the board due to a basic two-on-one attack. I'd personally feel like i wasted the two months of time to ultimately really prove all i can do is make one short-term friend and accomplish a minor easy victory.

From the sounds of things, this game ended due to apathy, which happens, but could have been used as leverage rather then caving in unless really everybody had the same attitude. Were i in that position i would have used that as an excuse for targetting the player holding looking to deflate the game or hold the game ransom as leverage for the 'bored' player to find his own way out of it.

There's a secret tool that a lot of very good players are aware of, and that's the importance of influncing the energy level of the game. Emotions and attitude play a HUGE role on the game. You'll find a lot of really good players putting a tonne of effort into being the "fun guy" in the room. Games can be won because you keep your minority partner motivated simply because he's having so much fun playing with you, whether its because your tactics are so high level or you're just a hoot to have rapport with. On the flip side you can demoralize an enemy by slowing down the games tempo,dropping off communications, tormenting them, or whatever makes it 'less fun' for them. Bored players start auto-piloting their orders and agitated players put more effort into their "come backs" and "moral counter-arguements" then tactics. I generally recommend boredom over tormenting, as sometimes hard feelings can have the reverse desired effect of making for a strong motivator depending on the player (and nobody really wants to be a dick if they can avoid it). There's always going to be some obstacle or other getting in the way of you and your win so you just need to find a way if climbing ratings is a goal for you.

But hey everybody is different and if you are the type who doesn't feel right in thinning out draws, then by all means. I like diversity in games and having less ambitious players in circulation only makes it easier for cold blooded sharks like me to thrive. ;)
Ezio (1463 D)
19 May 17 UTC
What's the best way to handle people simply ignoring your press?
DemonOverlord (469 D)
19 May 17 UTC
I think another factor is I should probably limit myself to one or two games versus playing 7 fp games.
VillageIdiot (4305 D)
19 May 17 UTC
(+1)
@DO - Probably for the best

@Enzo - that's a tough one, but sometimes I'll antagonize them to see if it gets a reaction just to reopen the channel. Outlandish accusations that they feel compelled to defend sometimes does the trick (i.e. "A little birdie just told me you had bragged about wanting to stab my from the very first round so now I know when you said ___ that you clearly were lying to me the entire game."). People love defending their good name and thirst to root out gossipers so stuff like that can often get a response you can then build off of.
Gen. Lee (7688 D (B))
19 May 17 UTC
Good post VI.

It's not thinning the draw if you are positioning to try and solo. This idea that thinning the draw is reprehensible is foolish and lazy.

If it's based on ppl doing it to go from 5 to 4, or 4 to 3 with no ambition to solo. Then yes it's dumb, if it's based on playing the game out trying to unbalance the board and look for a shot to win it I'm all for it.
VillageIdiot (4305 D)
20 May 17 UTC
I'm just programmed differently for that. As I was groomed on PlayDip, it's rating system designed to incentivized best possible results so if a player finishes with a poorer result then statistically they should have then they lose rating points. Here you get more of the "a draw is a draw is a draw" type stuff. I appreciate the general notion of that, but i find the overreaching culture of that mentality breeds more unambitious stalemate experts who like to end games earlier then typical solo opportunity tends to materialize. Push each game as far as you can, regardless of how your odds look at any given moment. I've seen extremely dramatic comebacks on more then one occasion.
Claesar (84 D)
20 May 17 UTC
My phone still refuses to post lenghty posts in the forum, so I refer to the public chat.
captainmeme (405 D Mod)
20 May 17 UTC
I'll just give my PoV on this...

I absolutely agree there was play left in this game. R approached me about me backing off him so that he could work with A against I, I approached me about knocking A and R out of the game before the draw, and A approached me about stabbing G a little earlier.

A lot of the proposals weren't possible simply because of Italy fleet position. I really did not want to lose Iberia (both because it increases the Italian solo threat and it puts me at massive risk against Germany if Italy then decides to back off a bit, because suddenly I'm not important) and Italy refused to consider giving up Marseilles or backing fleets off, so the moves for ECh, MAO, Spa & Por were on lock, as was the fact that I needed to stick with Germany to prevent that line falling.

The one that was possible was Ezio's suggestion of R/A attacking I together, but I was still concerned about G/R cooperating against me (as G had moved against me for a phase a year or so earlier) so I wasn't really happy with that solution either. If Italy was weakened then my units in Iberia would've been freed up, but that definitely would not be in time to save Norway and Holland if G did make a move.

More than anything, though, most of the players were fatigued. I'm not sure why but I think it was the fact that the early game was so dull - G/E mowed down the west, A/I mowed down the east, both sides thought they could get across the stalemate line first so neither were open to any kind of real negotiation about betrayal. There'd been very little press over that time and everyone except Ezio (Russia) was sort of detached from the game as a result. He was trying to get things going again, but nobody was enthusiastic because nobody was really having fun.

I know that's a bad excuse, but it's what happened, so... yeah. Sometimes players lose enthusiasm and early 5-ways result.

Thanks ATC for the commentary! Sorry we couldn't put on a better show for you all.
MajorMitchell (975 D)
21 May 17 UTC
Well done Demon Overlord. You took Italy to the top..ten sc's. I expect more success for England than what I saw in that game.


233 replies
Jamiet99uk (50 D X)
20 May 17 UTC
(+1)
Mafia
It's been a while since the last game of Mafia. When does the next one start?
19 replies
Open
brainbomb (128 D)
18 May 17 UTC
(+1)
Is it Treason to sympathize with the Confederacy?
Shouldnt it be treason to sympathize with the Confederacy? We fought a war and defeated them. Hundreds of thousands died more than any war fought by America. For people who still wish the south had won- chant the south shall rise again or fly its flags isnt this treason?
86 replies
Open
Crazy Anglican (271 D)
20 May 17 UTC
Dresden Files rpg
Anybody here played it or better yet GM'ed it?
0 replies
Open
Fluminator (324 D)
18 May 17 UTC
Should otherkin be forced to give up their human rights?
Are there any otherkin on this site? I'm genuinely curious to understand this culture more. If you identify as something non-human, do you think you have a right to get the privileges that all humans deserve? Or do you believe you're in a separate category and thus have different standards and base rules to start off with?
20 replies
Open
Hippopankake (70 D)
20 May 17 UTC
New game
I'm thinking about making a game where you have to have a war goal and a justification for going to war similar to paradox games thoughts ?
0 replies
Open
Fat backstab (100 D)
15 May 17 UTC
(+1)
WebDiplomacy
I feel this would be a much better game if you destroyed all of the thots accounts
52 replies
Open
Jamiet99uk (50 D X)
15 May 17 UTC
(+2)
Trump hands highly classified information to the Russians
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-revealed-highly-classified-information-to-russian-foreign-minister-and-ambassador/2017/05/15/530c172a-3960-11e7-9e48-c4f199710b69_story.html?tid=ss_fb&utm_term=.ef65b5b012be

What a liability this man is.
43 replies
Open
Hauta (1592 D (S))
16 May 17 UTC
Hillary's secret agenda
Someone made a comment that they voted for Trump because they were worried about Hillary's secret agenda. What was she going to do that was so bad?
44 replies
Open
CAPT Brad (1568 D (B))
17 May 17 UTC
Why Should Hillary Have Been Elected President
Explain concrete reasons why.
81 replies
Open
TrPrado (372 D)
18 May 17 UTC
Betty Shelby Found Not Guilty of Manslaughter
I'm just left wondering how the DA bungled what should have been an open-shut conviction.
6 replies
Open
Page 373 of 387
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top