Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 372 of 373
FirstPreviousNextLast
CommanderByron (568 D (S))
Sat 20 May UTC
Gauging Interest: Econ-Dip
See Inside
31 replies
Open
Namejeff (279 D)
Mon 10 AM UTC
GTA 7
Does anyone have GTA 12 that I can borrow for my comrade
1 reply
Open
bobarctor1977 (65 D)
Thu 18 May UTC
Would anyone be interested in joining a game with some friends of mine and I?
I have 3 friends that I would like to introduce to the game, but can't seem to talk anyone else into playing with us for a full Ancient Med game. Just a casual, low-bet game, probably 2 day turns.
18 replies
Open
Hippopankake (0 D)
Sat 20 May UTC
New game
I'm thinking about making a game where you have to have a war goal and a justification for going to war similar to paradox games thoughts ?
7 replies
Open
leon1122 (183 D)
Thu 18 May UTC
(+1)
German Man Imprisoned for 10 years for Holocaust Denial
See below
381 replies
Open
brainbomb (279 D)
Sun 21 May UTC
Lawmaker threatened with Lynching after calling for Trumps impeachment.
http://www.ketv.com/article/racial-slurs-hurled-at-lawmaker-after-calling-for-trumps-impeachment/9901862
4 replies
Open
Hauta (1423 D (S))
Sun 21 May UTC
(+1)
Hehe, Trump just bowed to Saudi king and curtsied too
Just another example of Trump hypocrisy. He slammed Obama for merely bowing. The curtsy was bigly over the top.
32 replies
Open
brainbomb (279 D)
Sat 20 May UTC
Juggernaut is actually a horrible alliance
Despite the fearmongering ive seen in Press games about Juggernauts over the past 5 years ive been here...I cant help but note its low rate of success and how its paranoia often benefits France or England most. Please share games where Juggernauts fail miserably. But also include ones which work out in a 2wd (if there even is such a situtation)
10 replies
Open
peterwiggin (14532 D Mod (S))
24 Mar 17 UTC
Spring 2017 SoW Study Game
This thread is for commentary and discussion on the spring 2017 School of War Study Game: gameID=194603

233 replies
Open
Jamiet99uk (29 D (B))
Sat 20 May UTC
(+1)
Mafia
It's been a while since the last game of Mafia. When does the next one start?
19 replies
Open
brainbomb (279 D)
Thu 18 May UTC
(+1)
Is it Treason to sympathize with the Confederacy?
Shouldnt it be treason to sympathize with the Confederacy? We fought a war and defeated them. Hundreds of thousands died more than any war fought by America. For people who still wish the south had won- chant the south shall rise again or fly its flags isnt this treason?
Page 3 of 3
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
TrPrado (372 D)
Fri 19 May UTC
(+2)
What would you do if someone asked you to burn your house down for their cause?
Hauta (1423 D (S))
Fri 19 May UTC
No one burned down Kentucky for sticking with the Union!
TrPrado (372 D)
Sat 20 May UTC
(+2)
And? That's hardly relevant to Lee's decision. The Union asked him to go to war with Virginia i.e. burn down his home.
Hauta (1423 D (S))
Sat 20 May UTC
Would Virginia have seceded at all if Lee stayed with Lincoln?
Puddle (461 D)
Sat 20 May UTC
(+5)
As a southerner, its honestly pretty simple. The people of the South fought one truly great war as the South. The fact that it was a war fundamentally for slavery, is an aspect of the culture and specific history of Southerners, and obviously colors the controversy, but is mostly immaterial to the why.

Southerners, like all people, fondly remember the time when they were at the most powerful, their most ascendant, their most energetic. All people memorialize their dead, even entire generations when a great war is lost or won, and the nation with it.

The people of the South were slavers, who gave up their mastery not willingly but by fact of force. Whenever a People is cast from their own power, and subsumed to a larger entity, their self-idealization tends to become frozen at the point were they were last in control of their own course and powerful.

Is it treason? Here and now? No. Southerners are not trying to secede, and even the people I know who are the "visible" supporters of the Confederacy, are not even remotely serious about it.

It's distasteful, certainly, for one's culture-heroes to be a generation of slavers pulling their countrymen along to a bloody war to preserve their grotesque way of life, but if that's you're history, that's your culture. Attempting to force or cajole Southerners to give up This aspect of their culture will only prolong the struggle. These heroes can only be replaced by new ones, and unfortunately the South is largely devoid of heroes.
TrPrado (372 D)
Sat 20 May UTC
(+3)
"Would Virginia have seceded at all if Lee stayed with Lincoln?"

Yes. They did.
Hauta (1423 D (S))
Sat 20 May UTC
As it turns out, Lincoln offered Lee command of the army on the day AFTER Virginia seceded. The firing on Fort Sumpter is what changed Virginia's vote from "stay" just 2 weeks earlier to "leave".

@Puddle, if the South wasn't constantly trying to suppress black votes and otherwise keep Blacks down, memorializing their dead would be much less of an issue. It is the combination of the 2 things that offends me -- as if they are trying to "win the peace" having lost the war.
Puddle (461 D)
Sat 20 May UTC
(+1)
@Hauta, well Southerners are racist, they used to be slavers, what do you expect?

They definitely should not be left alone with their minorities (speaking about the populations as a whole), I'll say that.
eturnage (503 D (B))
Sat 20 May UTC
(+1)
As I explained above, Jeff, logic compels the conclusion States may secede as they obviously have the power to secede.

The fact the Constitution does not have any special mechanism for the process is irrelevant. More relevant is the fact that the Constitution has no provision that the federal or central government may prohibit a State from seceding. If the power is not enumerated, then the States have it: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Amendment X.

Second, the right to secede is clearly implied by the constant reference to the United States in the plural throughout, 34 times in total, as "these several States." This confirms that the sovereign powers under our form of republican government are the States and we the people. The central government is not the sovereign.
Hauta (1423 D (S))
Sat 20 May UTC
@eturnage, why don't you let the supreme court interpret the constitution? That is their job. I have no doubt they will find what they need to prohibit secession. Maybe the "necessary and proper" clause.
TrPrado (372 D)
Sat 20 May UTC
@Hauta, individuals are allowed to have their own readings and interpretations of the Constitution, they just don't have legal weight. Texas v White occurred during Reconstriction, so it was never going to go any other way.

@eturnage, but at the exact same time, lacking a unified and consistent process that states can follow in the Constitution to secede, the federal government will have an easy excuse to view the secession as illegitimate.
Hauta (1423 D (S))
Sat 20 May UTC
@Prado, the reasoning of the Supreme Court in Texas v White was that the Articles of Confederation literally called for a *perpetual* Union and that the Constitution was designed to strengthen that Union. So in response to @eturnage, the right to secede is given away from the state to the federal government upon admission to the Union. I can't see this decision going any other way today or anytime after the Civil War.
JamesYanik (329 D)
Sat 20 May UTC
technically any powers not expressed specifically for the federal government, are handed to the states. so wouldn't that mean technically each state has the legal right to secede?
brainbomb (279 D)
Sat 20 May UTC
The problem with secession is the realization that overall sure it hurts the strength of the country but its far worse for the state. As soon as they revoke membership their citizens lose: social security, medicare, federal funding for schools, disaster relief, farm subsidy, airport security, drug enfircement, jails/prisons and so much more. Its political suicide for any states other than texas - cali - or maybe florida.

Alternatively I could see alaska being okay with little govt aid
Hauta (1423 D (S))
Sat 20 May UTC
Calling for a PERPETUAL Union IS an express transfer of power.
JamesYanik (329 D)
Sat 20 May UTC
(+1)
@Puddle

you do realize that a small fraction of the people in the south ACTUALLY owned slaves: correct? the racism was usually indirect, as it would be people in the lowest socioeconomic class, while still being "above" slavery, who had nothing better to do than to shout down upon slaves. Others sympathized, but neither group had any actual control on slavery.

Then you also have another demographic in the mountainous areas of the south, where there was virtually no slavery, and little state control. here we see MANY accounts of slaves escaping to, and not even continuing north to the union. these places even supported the Union during the war.

to paint every southerner as a racist, and every northerner as a non-racist is very flawed. racism was deeply ingrained in the culture, the problem being addressed was the abolition of slavery.

you had openly racist men in the north still saying that there was no right to slavery for the south, and people in the south who denounced slavery in the south who still fought for the confederacy.

it's a really interesting time in our history, that requires a lot more research and insight. the problem is that there wasn't a true dichotomy between the north and the south in terms of culture.
JamesYanik (329 D)
Sat 20 May UTC
@Hauta

but we have the Supremacy clause, so the articles, when conflicting with the constitution, become void.
brainbomb (279 D)
Sat 20 May UTC
If a state like West Virginia decided to secede what would really happen?
Theyd be completely fucked - totally land locked by a country they just left on all sides. They could maybe survive mining coal but selling it to who? And how? All america would need to do is build a wall around them like were doing to mexico and say oh... yea its a no fly zone around and in all ways to get there too.

And boom
Desire to secede gone
Hauta (1423 D (S))
Sat 20 May UTC
@Yanik, where's the conflict? The right to secede was already given away. 10th Amendment merely prevented transfer of any additional rights. Further, check out this link:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/nakrnsm/26169011284

It awesomely describes why this confederate monument was erected. Very much is said about preserving slavery and very little about the lives lost.
TrPrado (372 D)
Sat 20 May UTC
The preamble of the Comstitution doesn't actually hold legal weight, Hauta.
Hauta (1423 D (S))
Sat 20 May UTC
Why not? Anything that gives context to the text can be used by the Supreme Court. Texas v White is the law of the land and has not been reversed. Accordingly, the constitution is currently still written to prohibit secession. Maybe one day that decision will be reversed. Until then, no secession is EXACTLY what the constitution says (or necessarily implies).
TrPrado (372 D)
Sat 20 May UTC
Giving context to the document doesn't mean that it prescribes or denies specific rights to or from the states.
Hauta (1423 D (S))
Sat 20 May UTC
Context is used to interpret the text. It's the way laws are interpreted. Check with a lawyer.
eturnage (503 D (B))
Sun 21 May UTC
@Hauta, of course the courts of the central government would rule States have no right to secede. The US Supreme Court is part of the federal government. It naturally aligns with central authority. The SCOTUS has been f'ed up since Marshall wrote Marbury v Madison.
Hauta (1423 D (S))
Sun 21 May UTC
@eturnage, interesting take but bear in mind that the states could always amend the constitution to take the power back.
TrPrado (372 D)
Sun 21 May UTC
And should, in this case. But that'll be a while.


86 replies
Crazy Anglican (201 D)
Sat 20 May UTC
Dresden Files rpg
Anybody here played it or better yet GM'ed it?
0 replies
Open
Fluminator (309 D)
Thu 18 May UTC
Should otherkin be forced to give up their human rights?
Are there any otherkin on this site? I'm genuinely curious to understand this culture more. If you identify as something non-human, do you think you have a right to get the privileges that all humans deserve? Or do you believe you're in a separate category and thus have different standards and base rules to start off with?
20 replies
Open
Hippopankake (0 D)
Sat 20 May UTC
New game
I'm thinking about making a game where you have to have a war goal and a justification for going to war similar to paradox games thoughts ?
0 replies
Open
Fat backstab (75 D)
Mon 15 May UTC
(+1)
WebDiplomacy
I feel this would be a much better game if you destroyed all of the thots accounts
52 replies
Open
Jamiet99uk (29 D (B))
Mon 15 May UTC
(+2)
Trump hands highly classified information to the Russians
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-revealed-highly-classified-information-to-russian-foreign-minister-and-ambassador/2017/05/15/530c172a-3960-11e7-9e48-c4f199710b69_story.html?tid=ss_fb&utm_term=.ef65b5b012be

What a liability this man is.
43 replies
Open
Hauta (1423 D (S))
Tue 16 May UTC
Hillary's secret agenda
Someone made a comment that they voted for Trump because they were worried about Hillary's secret agenda. What was she going to do that was so bad?
44 replies
Open
CAPT Brad (1739 D (B))
Wed 17 May UTC
Why Should Hillary Have Been Elected President
Explain concrete reasons why.
81 replies
Open
TrPrado (372 D)
Thu 18 May UTC
Betty Shelby Found Not Guilty of Manslaughter
I'm just left wondering how the DA bungled what should have been an open-shut conviction.
6 replies
Open
Yoyoyozo (1104 D Mod)
Sat 13 May UTC
Does .999... equal to 1?
I'm drunk and I havent seen this thread in a while. What do you guys think?
45 replies
Open
peterlund (1084 D (G))
Thu 18 May UTC
Robert Mueller my hero!
At last you are getting something right over there. Put that traitor into prison where he belongs!
12 replies
Open
DemonOverlord (447 D)
Tue 16 May UTC
WDC
Is in Oxford this year. Anyone going?
11 replies
Open
WyattS14 (10 D)
Tue 16 May UTC
(+1)
History of The Entire World, I Guess
If you haven't watched this video, I urge you to do so right now. (And let's start a discussion, why not? I'd like to hear what Zmaj and James have to say.
https://youtu.be/xuCn8ux2gbs
8 replies
Open
stranger (665 D)
Wed 17 May UTC
convoy rules
If my opponent moves his army from Tuscany to Piedmont and I convoy my Piedmont army to Tuscany via the gulf of lyons at the same time, will they swap places?
8 replies
Open
rojimy1123 (572 D)
Thu 18 May UTC
Chris Cornell, 1964-2017
My inner teenager is crying. RIP.
8 replies
Open
Jacob63831 (61 D)
Tue 16 May UTC
What is the meaning of life?
Is it Memes?
Is it Bill Cosby?
18 replies
Open
kaner406 (366 D)
28 Mar 17 UTC
(+2)
Advertise your NON-live games here!
In an effort to combat advertising for games inside otherwise unrelated threads: Post here for your non-live games to cut down on the number of ads that thread readers are subjected to. Post game link, game type and the bet. Note: this doesn't count for special rules games.
58 replies
Open
orathaic (1009 D (B))
Mon 15 May UTC
Interesting read
I'd like to hear what the right wing thinkers (and not trolls) think of this article, as well as the liberals here.

Mostly a criticism of market liberalism: https://jacobinmag.com/2017/05/handmaids-tale-margaret-atwood-trump-abortion-theocracy
15 replies
Open
wasdok (0 D X)
Thu 18 May UTC
SSD AUTOMATIC CHEMICAL SOLUTION FOR
SSD AUTOMATIC CHEMICAL SOLUTION FOR CLEANING DEFACED
ssdsolutionlab1@gmail.com

7 replies
Open
orathaic (1009 D (B))
Wed 17 May UTC
Tax dodging and capital flight
Ok, this youtube video discusses it. In brief, company extracts mineral wealth, sells for a low price to parent company based in a tax haven, declares no/very little profit. ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ocm42ytXto )
13 replies
Open
Page 372 of 373
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top