@Yanik wrote, "there is freedom of press in public areas, but in places restricted from the public, you must be cleared before you can enter. furthermore, some places where you are legally allowed to be, have a different standard of conduct, of which if you violate it, you will be expelled from the building."
A "place restricted from the public" is a PRIVATE place. So why wasn't he arrested for trespassing? Clearly, wherever he was, he had a right to be. Why wasn't he arrested for disturbing the peace? Because he wasn't doing that either.
To me, the charge of "willful disruption of state government processes" is so hard to define that it fails to put the public on notice as to what it takes to commit this crime. Therefore, this charge seems like total bullshit, designed NOT to stand up in court but rather to cause the "violator" to incur legal fees and bail bondsmen fees. That is the pernicious effect of this situation.