Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 1043 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
abgemacht (1076 D(G))
08 Apr 13 UTC
Ethics Course
Currently "watching" an online ethics course for my job. Anyone have good ethics stories?
50 replies
Open
LStravaganz (407 D)
10 Apr 13 UTC
(+1)
On Education
As webDiplomacy is accessed by people from all over the globe, it might be interesting to hear people's opinions on the standard of education in their respective countries.
63 replies
Open
krellin (80 DX)
10 Apr 13 UTC
Sci Fi / Virtual Reality /Nano Stuff
Just read a sample download of "Ready Player One"...looking for a good sci-fi pub. Seeking modern sci-fi, virtual reality, but not old William Gibson crap. Let's talk sci-fi, peeps. (fyi: As a writer, I'm fascinated by the whole nano/embedded computer system stuff...it's what I'm writing about.)
12 replies
Open
JoSo (291 D)
10 Apr 13 UTC
noob questions
I'm fairly new here and figured out most things. Having played diplomacy before helped, but I've got a couple of questions that I don't find answers to in the FAQ's.
4 replies
Open
datapolitical (100 D)
10 Apr 13 UTC
You've been tagged
Rule 1: if you're it - pick someone online in one of your games and tag them.
Rule 2: if you're not it - troll the person who is it mercilessly.
15 replies
Open
Sbyvl36 (439 D)
08 Apr 13 UTC
(+2)
Its time for a Webdiplomacy app
I think the time has come for a webdip app. Honestly, this is my favorite website, and it would make it a lot easier for many people to have this site as an app. Preferably compatible for both Apple and Android
15 replies
Open
Fasces349 (0 DX)
08 Apr 13 UTC
So I finally installed adblock
I just wanted to say that I think the internet looks incredibly weird without ads. I don't like the change and I am thinking of reverting back.

Thoughts?
37 replies
Open
nudge (284 D)
09 Apr 13 UTC
Who has ruled you?
Monarchs? Presidents? Prime Ministers? List them all.
Who was the best?
Who was the worst?
56 replies
Open
SYnapse (0 DX)
09 Apr 13 UTC
A letter to the BBC
Hello there,
SYnapse (0 DX)
09 Apr 13 UTC
I would like to express my concern for an article featured in BBC History, "North Korea - a country never at peace" by Dhruti Shah. It is my belief that the BBC normally maintains a high standard of historical accuracy and impartial news and to see this breached by this article has led me to write to you today.

My concern is based upon the fact that I have spent a great deal of time reading about the history of Korea and that the portrayal of the history of North and South by Shah, who seems to have based his article on popular opinion, is highly inaccurate and creates a (possibly intended) bias towards the South, which in this current political climate, is not wise or fair.

In discussing the history of North Korea, a state created under the Soviets, he fails to make clear comparisons with the treatment of the South under involuntary U.S. military leadership. He paints the history of South Korea as utopic, and only mentions that "South Korea became really wealthy in the 1970s, while North Korea remained a typical example of Stalinist policy". Little would the average reader know about the South's struggle against fascism throughout the 70s and 80s, such as the Gwangju massacre. Little would they know of the economic prosperity of the North during the division of the two countries.

The reader also remains unaware of Kim il-Sung's seperation from Soviet policy. Like Mao or Tito, Kim il-Sung was a proponent of his own communist philosophies, and seeked to distance himself from the U.S.S.R. as much as possible.

And the most shocking fact that Shah leaves out regards the Armistice agreements, and the fact that Koreans were not invited to these agreements. This fact sheds more light on the Korean situation than anything, and it is purposefully omitted to create a damning report that we have heard all too often regarding the North Koreans.

Korean is a country invaded by Japan, invaded by the two great superpowers, divided involuntarily and bombed to oblivion in the 1950's. Koreans of both North and South, deserve better than the polarisation that East and West continue to force upon them.

I would hope that your news would reflect the tragic circumstances of the division of Korea more accurately, rather than simply stating that the North is a evil dictatorship and the South a democratic utopia. This issue is close to my heart and I feel that you do the people of Korea a disservice with such poorly-written articles.

Kind regards,
blankflag (0 DX)
09 Apr 13 UTC
communism was run by the world elite probably even more than fascism. the bankers loved the ussr. not only did it enrich them but it took out all future competition to their power by taking out any ability for the general public to advance. north korea is a disaster and is a lot more manipulated by world powers than you think. as i stated earlier rumsfeld was on the board of abb when it sold nuclear technology to north korea, essentially setting the foundation of their current nuclear program.

the western world powers want to destabilize asia, and world powers generally want conflict. dont think that just because north korea is "against" america that it is somehow against the world elite.
blankflag (0 DX)
09 Apr 13 UTC
actually maybe i should clarify. karl marx's "communism" was a utopia where the state did not exist. it "withered away" as people could rule themselves. so marx's dream communism is really anarchism. but when i say communism is a shithole i mean the eastern dictatorships that used orwellian type "there is no property" so therefore the state has to seize it all, and using a bunch of nonsense collectivist propaganda to take everything from the people. and in return supposedly promise to provide a decent welfare state. but really didnt and ended up starving populations sometimes for political reasons but lets not get into that.
SYnapse (0 DX)
09 Apr 13 UTC
(+1)
Blankflag, you know, I read your posts and struggle to get a meaning out of them..
blankflag (0 DX)
09 Apr 13 UTC
what i am saying is that south korea is a utopia compared to the north. north korea is a disaster. and i am not sure what think should have happened there.
blankflag (0 DX)
09 Apr 13 UTC
actually i guess it is an interesting question. lets say the world elite create a superpower in one part of the world and make them start invading countries. entering a country for the purposes of war is a crime. so under some imaginary circumstance where your country is not ruled by the same elite, what do you do?

it is a crime for you to enter those countries, but if you dont, it will allow a crime to occur. it would be nice if you could just intercept the army en-route to the country to conquer, but that is unrealistic. it is difficult.
blankflag (0 DX)
09 Apr 13 UTC
i guess it is analogous to families living in houses in the suburbs of an anarchist society. there is a rule, it is a crime to break into someone else's house. but then a gang decides they want a nice house, so they break into a mansion, take it over, and lock all the doors. how do you deal with that situation? you would be a house-breaker to bust in there but how else can the community get revenge for the original crime?
y2kjbk (4846 D(G))
09 Apr 13 UTC
(+1)
blankflag, when your posts start to resemble actual conversation/debate points rather than free-thought rambling, you'll get more responses from the community. Disorganized rambling isn't going to convince anyone of anything.
blankflag (0 DX)
09 Apr 13 UTC
people here are stupid then. maybe you didnt understand the op if you couldnt get anything from my response.
SYnapse (0 DX)
09 Apr 13 UTC
What should have happened blankflag, is that following the liberation of Korea from the Japanese, US and Russian troops should have formed a joint Korean government, and left those people to their own devices. Imperialism, both capitalist and communist, lies at the bottom of the Korean sinkhole.
spyman (424 D(G))
09 Apr 13 UTC
(+1)
SYnapse, just exploring this idea further, why do you think both Russia and the USA interfered with North Korea? You have already used the "Imperialism" but while there may be truth in this, avoiding such loaded terms, why do you think both nations thought it would be in their best interest to interfere? And if it were in their best interest why would they go against their own best interests?

I suppose what I am getting at is isn't blaming "Imperialism" a bit like blaming gravity for tides?
spyman (424 D(G))
09 Apr 13 UTC
^ That said, I think it was appalling that the USSR and the USA decided to partition Korea without even consulting the Koreans themselves. It was handled very badly.
SYnapse (0 DX)
10 Apr 13 UTC
Well, I think that it’s exactly the same decision as East and West Berlin. The Americans and Soviets didn’t want the other side to gain any military advantage, and they certainly didn’t want to let their enemies of WWII survive in any tangible way. Except the Koreans were an innocent 3rd party, and I don’t think that distinction was drawn at the time. I think leaving Korea would have been a “who blinks first” scenario, and neither could have done it without giving the other a significant advantage in the future.

I mean, if the US controlled all of Korea now we would probably have greater conflicts with China, and if the entire peninsula was a communist state pressure would flow the other way towards Japan. I don’t think either party could have done anything differently – but the nature of imperialism is that it demands you to do bad things in the name of preventing other bad things.

I do hope for a reunified Korea in the future, but I fear that a lot of lives will be lost in the process.
spyman (424 D(G))
10 Apr 13 UTC
(+1)
"I think leaving Korea would have been a “who blinks first” scenario, and neither could have done it without giving the other a significant advantage in the future."

I can understand their thinking. Both had just come out of a devastating war - Russia suffered more than twenty million dead, and while the US fared much better it too lost a lot of lives. Given the high-stakes the well-being of Koreans would have not been much of consideration. Who would want to be responsible for putting their nation in a position where they would lose the "next war"? One war ended and the moment that it did another, albeit a cold war, began. Still you would have thought they would have at least had the decency to at least pretend to consult the Korean people.
SYnapse (0 DX)
10 Apr 13 UTC
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/apr/09/nuclear-us-rogue-state-iran-north-korea


15 replies
Thucydides (864 D(B))
10 Apr 13 UTC
Portuguese skeptic, Francisco Sanches (1551-1623), from "That Nothing is Known"
Enjoy this excerpt. I transcribed it out of a philosophy textbook a few years ago. Since then it has been one of my favorites. I should note that I actually do agree, yes. I do not think true knowledge is possible.
3 replies
Open
dubmdell (556 D)
29 Mar 13 UTC
The Great Fun Debates!
Let's have some fun. Topics will be fun topics, debaters will write an argument, a rebuttal, and a counter-rebuttal. Three judges for each debate will post their opinion on arguments and grant a point to the winner. More inside.
40 replies
Open
datapolitical (100 D)
10 Apr 13 UTC
And another forum game (I'd rather have...)
I'd rather have...what blankflag is drinking.
Blankflag, what are you drinking? (If you're not drinking anything you have to get a drink or pick someone else to take your place)
0 replies
Open
Favio (385 D)
09 Apr 13 UTC
Thank you
I would like to thank all the people who create serious threads and all the trolls who destroy threads. You seriously give me hours of amusement. That is of course, if I actually cared to read all of them.
5 replies
Open
blankflag (0 DX)
01 Apr 13 UTC
(+1)
my website thread
so i am too lazy to figure out how to make a website myself, so after i have given so much wisdom to this community you can give back.
36 replies
Open
HeidelbergKid (130 D)
07 Apr 13 UTC
(+1)
Dinosaurs.
I don't know, but I felt like starting a thread about my favourite animals of the Mesozoic era, especially because they're bringing Jurassic Park back to the big screen.

(Anyone who complains or doesn't participate gets thrown in the raptor pit.)
41 replies
Open
krellin (80 DX)
09 Apr 13 UTC
Infertility in Gay Marriage
Since this forum seems generally agreeable to Gay Marriage under the concept of equal protection...should gay couples also be covered and treated for Infertility - the inability to have children, just as a heterosexual married couple?
41 replies
Open
Theheat (100 D)
10 Apr 13 UTC
non live game
0 replies
Open
datapolitical (100 D)
09 Apr 13 UTC
I need some diplomacy advice
I won't ask it publicly but if a solid player who's not in any of my publicly named games is willing to let me ask some questions via PM I'd greatly appreciate it.
0 replies
Open
Fortress Door (1837 D)
08 Apr 13 UTC
(+1)
Pluto is A Planet
I declare Pluto to be a planet. Discuss.
18 replies
Open
HumanWave (337 D)
09 Apr 13 UTC
Boot me from a game
Hello do moderators here have power to boot people from games? I joined by accident I was hoping I can be booted it doesn't start for an hour and thirty minutes. Thank you
7 replies
Open
orathaic (1009 D(B))
04 Apr 13 UTC
European Webdip meetup
Is there any interest in a European face-to-face tournament, perhaps near germany, france, or england?
31 replies
Open
SYnapse (0 DX)
09 Apr 13 UTC
Replace a cheater (game hasnt begun yet!)
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=114555

We need a replacement Russia following a ban please.
1 reply
Open
zultar (4180 DMod(P))
07 Apr 13 UTC
(+1)
The decision to the Agent K's reinstatement
Details inside
70 replies
Open
SYnapse (0 DX)
09 Apr 13 UTC
Federalist
Has anyone read the Federalist Papers by Madison, Hamilton and Jay? What did you make of it?
2 replies
Open
zultar (4180 DMod(P))
08 Apr 13 UTC
(+1)
Mama jokes: Let's bring them on
Your mama is so fat that she is a dwarf planet like Pluto.
Your mama is so fat that physicists can't solve a 2-body problem with her.
Your mama is so fat that her event horizon increases linearly with distance.
8 replies
Open
krellin (80 DX)
04 Apr 13 UTC
(+2)
SEQUESTRATION
Anyone "feeling its effects" yet?

ANYONE? And since most are not...can we *please* get on with *really* slashing the Federal budget??? Make you massive government cut proposals here!
82 replies
Open
SYnapse (0 DX)
08 Apr 13 UTC
Citing works
Okay, I understand if you quote a survey you would do it like this (Blankflag 2013)1

1. BLANKFLAG, M. 2013. Blankflag's news thread. Webdiplomacy.
17 replies
Open
murraysheroes (526 D(B))
08 Apr 13 UTC
What's the point in cheating?
I've wondered this about board games both board games and video/computer games. Please provide to me the behind-the-scenes into the psyche of the cheater.
-Does having more kills or WebDip points make you feel better about yourself?
-Is it really worth screwing over the other people involved in the game for you to get a meaningless win?
Please, help me get it.
9 replies
Open
dubmdell (556 D)
07 Apr 13 UTC
(+4)
Hey Draugnar
"I pledge $100 to the site if Agent K stays banned." Pay up, Draugy-boy! You got your wish! threadID=994301, page 4

Remember, http://i.imgur.com/O7Vmc.png
37 replies
Open
redhouse1938 (429 D)
07 Apr 13 UTC
Nuclear Proliferation
Why do we let a country like North Korea do nuclear tests? Isn't that dangerous? Isn't it even more dangerous because they might sell the knowledge they acquire to islamic nutcases? Discuss.
70 replies
Open
Page 1043 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top