Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 1062 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
yassem (2533 D)
08 Jun 13 UTC
Why isn't Heartland in Fall of American Empire brown?
Ok, I do realise that this might seem a bit OCD and this is even more useless than my last discussion about the inflation, AND, what would be worst, might have been already mentioned, but

WHY THE HELL ISN'T HEARTLAND BROOOOOOOWN?!
10 replies
Open
orathaic (1009 D(B))
21 May 13 UTC
(+1)
Advertising?
...speaking of banning things...
81 replies
Open
Jamiet99uk (808 D)
06 Jun 13 UTC
"Banned by a moderator: refer to jmo"
User "eddardstark" has recently been banned. ( userID=53127 ) The ban message in the account profile says "Banned by a moderator: refer to jmo"

I hereby refer to jmo. Jmo, what on earth does that mean?
30 replies
Open
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
06 Jun 13 UTC
MLB Draft
Since no ESPN anchor never said, "Let's go look at our latest MLB Mock Draft," let's watch the MLB Draft tonight. Yay.

And when Trey gets drafted by the Red Sox, I get to call him up and tell him he plays for my boys now.
16 replies
Open
rs2excelsior (600 D)
07 Jun 13 UTC
(Minor) Issue with new map
I recently noticed that, on the new modern diplomacy variant map, the northwestern peninsula of France is called Brittany on the normal map, but on the large map it is called Brest. There's really no effect on the game, it's just something I noticed. I don't have units over that way so I don't know how the order windows show it.
12 replies
Open
Mintyboy4 (100 D)
06 Jun 13 UTC
How does banning multis work?
Whenever I see a player banned for multi I have a tendency to look over their games. And in pretty much every game they play they are the only player banned from that game. How can they be a multi if in every game they play they are the only banned player. Or am I to assume you let the individual keep 1 account on the site? This seems odd to me.
10 replies
Open
VirtualBob (209 D)
06 Jun 13 UTC
(+1)
Map Exploration
I was talking about travel in another thread and I go to thinking ... How many of us have traveled the Diplomacy map? I am about to convoy from BEL to LON (via Chunnel) and thence to LVN (via Lufthansa). I do not live on the map, but I have been many places on it. More ...
6 replies
Open
redhouse1938 (429 D)
07 Jun 13 UTC
Complexity of taxes and subsidies
Hi guys, I have a question that I will pose in a general form for you all to debate.
3 replies
Open
abgemacht (1076 D(G))
06 Jun 13 UTC
(+1)
In need of a whitepaper
I'm trying to get a copy of a whitepaper. I know there are some people here connected to Universities. Does anyone have access to the following paper? Thanks!
Cosart, L. "Precision Packet Delay Measurements Using IEEE 1588v2," in IEEE International Symposium on Precision Clock Synchronization for Measurement, Control and Communication." Vienna, Austria. 2007.
7 replies
Open
markturrieta (400 D)
07 Jun 13 UTC
Joining a particular game
I've looked in the FAQ. I've looked in the joinable games. I found the game but it doesn't have the join option at the bottom. Help me, Spock.

gameID=118105
4 replies
Open
Kool-Aid Man (0 DX)
06 Jun 13 UTC
live game cancelling
If a live game gets cancelled after everyone goes into civil disorder, do your get your points back?
14 replies
Open
NigeeBaby (100 D(G))
06 Jun 13 UTC
Verizon collecting phone call data for US Govt.....
........I expect you guys already knew this, that does sound like a lot of data though
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22793851
8 replies
Open
tendmote (100 D(B))
07 Jun 13 UTC
Why not cancel at the beginning?
In a game where England and Austria are missing from the beginning; Italy holds out and refuses to cancel, so everyone is stuck in a crappy game; the moment Italy starts to see it's lead falter 90 minutes later, it cancels. WTF?


9 replies
Open
yaks (218 D)
07 Jun 13 UTC
Sitting
Hey all. I'm flying away for a weekend and I've got 3 ongoing games that need tending to.
Can someone please sit my account from tomorrow until Monday?
PM me if you can. Thanks.
0 replies
Open
yassem (2533 D)
05 Jun 13 UTC
The inflation rate
I wonder - has anyone ever cared to count the inflation rate of points in WebDiplomacy? I know this would me most likely the most useless task ever, but I actually like knowing such useless things : D
54 replies
Open
grtek (610 D)
06 Jun 13 UTC
Possibility to build everywhere in Modern variant
Isnt it mistake? It changes the game completely...
3 replies
Open
ckroberts (3548 D)
05 Jun 13 UTC
Ol' Faithful EoGs
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=117291
35 replies
Open
MajorMitchell (1874 D)
06 Jun 13 UTC
God botherers plague village
God botherer and pestilential provocative proselytiser, Forbes Morrison has returned to the sleepy village between two rivers by the sea where I reside.
1 reply
Open
superchick1168 (100 D)
04 Jun 13 UTC
Country Assignments
Does anybody know how countries are assigned to players? I've noticed I'm assigned certain countries more often than others.
29 replies
Open
steephie22 (182 D(S))
05 Jun 13 UTC
1-2 minute phases
It would be fun I think... Besides, I can actually be sure I'm around until it finishes, I normally can't commit to something that may take 3 hours...

36 minutes, however...
I think it would be ideal for some people, we could actually play a tournament in an evening if it's well planned, imagine that :)
30 replies
Open
krellin (80 DX)
05 Jun 13 UTC
Mod Response Time?
General Question: What has been your typical response time from the Mods? Do they reply to all inquiries, even if they have decided to "pass" on an issue?

(Yeah...if your a mod...you have mail...it's growing old and moldy in terms of game time...)
52 replies
Open
eltiothehun (10 DX)
06 Jun 13 UTC
Live game
Wilson style (public messages only) before we go to bed. classic map...anyone down?
0 replies
Open
mapleleaf (0 DX)
05 Jun 13 UTC
What's the least amount of units you ever got 18 supply centers with?
gameID=117894

I just did it with 14, but there's got to be way better than that.
4 replies
Open
steephie22 (182 D(S))
05 Jun 13 UTC
Just print some extra money instead of taxing?
Of course this is a crazy idea, I know, but why? That's what I'm trying to find out. It's less administration, it stimulates the economy in a way, since money quickly becomes worth less, so people spend or invest it as soon as they get it, meaning more money goes around instead of sitting on banks doing nothing...
61 replies
Open
Monkey D Luffy (100 D)
05 Jun 13 UTC
12th Doctor Possibilities
Who will be the Twelfth Doctor
9 replies
Open
Tolstoy (1962 D)
05 Jun 13 UTC
Thought-controlled helicopter
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-22764978
3 replies
Open
TheMinisterOfWar (553 D)
03 Jun 13 UTC
(+1)
Lies, deceptions, untruths
I once hear the rule: 'never get caught lying by any power with more than one SC'. This is something I use in-game, because I believe it gets better results. But I may be missing out, so please share your experiences.

When do you lie in-game? What is worth it for you? One SC? Two? Never?
And what do you expect from others? Is lying part of a good alliance? Or is an alliance over when it is no longer to be trusted?
18 replies
Open
ARuzzier (0 DX)
05 Jun 13 UTC
how can i leave a game?
i wish to leave a game and don't know how. can somebody help me out?
1 reply
Open
gavrilop (357 D)
04 Jun 13 UTC
No moves received options: Wait for all players
This is awesome. How does it work? When the NMR'd player returns to the game board, will they be given hold orders if they don't enter anything, or will the game wait indefinitely for them to enter some orders?
13 replies
Open
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
01 Jun 13 UTC
Oh Yes...It's The End...But The Moment Has MOST DEFINITELY Been Prepared For!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/doctorwho/articles/Matt-Smith-to-leave-Doctor-Who FINALLY! He'll be leaving at the end of the year, and we'll get a new Doctor...hopefully one that doesn't act like a 5-year old on a sugar rush (to be fair, he wasn't the worst Doctor...but definitely not a fan...who would you like to see as the next Doctor, what direction should the show go--and sure, why not, an obligatory "Rank the Doctors, Best/Favorite to Worst/Least Favorite" List.)
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
01 Jun 13 UTC
First of all, I'd like to see them go a bit older with the Doctor this time...

Doesn't have to be William Harntell old, but a bit older than Smith and Tennant were, as much as I liked the latter.

I really wish Moffat would leave the show, NOT a fan of a lot of what he's done this era.

And I'd go 4, 5, 10, 2, 3, 9, 1, 6, and 11 in my ordering...leaving out 7 and 8 as I haven't seen them yet, so not really fair to rank them.
rosaville.bain (382 D)
01 Jun 13 UTC
The new doctor who is an old mad tho
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
01 Jun 13 UTC
1. Link?
2. Do you mean John Hurt?
3. Nothing wrong with an older Doctor...
largeham (149 D)
02 Jun 13 UTC
(+2)
The best thing about David Tennant (from a Whovian perspective, I guess) is that he got a lot of people who are not Dr Who fans (e.g. me) to watch the show.
Draugnar (0 DX)
02 Jun 13 UTC
Obi - You are a self-professed hater of the Doctor. Might I suggest your opinion on who was best or worst and who should replace Matt is total bullshit? Besides, we already saw another incarnation in John Hurt.
If they go for a guy then Hugh Laurie or Benedict Cumberbatch.

If they go for a woman, then it's got to be Suranne Jones who was "The Doctor's Wife" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-B0FXbGnyQ.
Doshy II (128 D)
02 Jun 13 UTC
I think they need to bring in some new, scary monsters. How many of the recent ones have been completely original. I'll grant that the Old God (ep 2), WiFi (ep 1) and Mr Sweet(ep 6) but the cybermen? The silurians and sontarans? The Great Intelligence, Doctor Simeon and the Ice Warriors? However, I quite liked all the time zombies. The transformations and as one of them was ripping out the salvager's flesh, his muscle spasm... the camera angles were great!
SpeakerToAliens (147 D(S))
02 Jun 13 UTC
(+1)
@Draug - If Obi is a Dr Who hater, he certainly knows his enemy, the title of this thread contains a recognisable quote from the regeneration of the 5th doctor.

John Hurt is playing an earlier incarnation of the Doctor, not the next Doctor. The Doctor has met and worked with his past selves several times, The Three Doctors, The Five Doctors, The Two doctors and Time-Crash (a short for Children In Need). Only his older self seems to remember the encounter once they part.
Draugnar (0 DX)
02 Jun 13 UTC
No Hurt is a later regeneration lile the Valeyard. We have seen every regeneration so there is no room for some guy in between and it was made clear in Trial of a Time Lord that. that the Valeyard was a later regeneration. I'm just wondering how they will handle running out of regenerations though. After all, the Master had to literally steal a body to get more.

And Obi was the one on here writing about how he hated the Doctor cause the storylines didn't male sense and all, so either he was trolling way back then, has had a change of heart, or has had his account hijacked either then or now.
SacredDigits (102 D)
02 Jun 13 UTC
Like many things, obi dismissed it as dumb children's programming previous to watching it and with only the shallowest of notions of what it was about. See also: Stephen King, Hunger Games, etc etc.
Octavious (2701 D)
02 Jun 13 UTC
It would be hard to improve on Tennant. Smith took a bit of getting used to but I became quite fond of him as things went on. An older, grizzled doctor would be quite fun... something a bit Gandalfesque. As long as we don't get the Dirk Gently chap I'll be happy.
Pete U (293 D)
02 Jun 13 UTC
I'm sad Matt is leaving, but (apart from the awful Colin Baker), I love every incarnation. I grew up in the Tom Baker years, but I've seen enough of the older doctors, and every one after.

He is as good as Eccleston and Tennant, and Moffat is a far far better writer than RTD. While the last season was uneven, the final episode more than made up for it.

I like the call backs to 'Old Who', and returning villains are good.

@Draugnar - there is one regeneration we HAVEN'T seen - McGann to Eccleston. Pre- and post Time War - I'll be prepared to bet this is where Hurt's character sits. Although that does put us dangerously close to the regen limit as well.

I do hope they go older this time
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
02 Jun 13 UTC
...I think there's a misconception about me here...

I don't hate Doctor Who AT ALL.

I QUOTED the 4th Doctor's (read: THE BEST DOCTOR'S) words of farewell...

Why would I do that if I hated the Doctor?

I RANKED MY FAVORITE DOCTORS ABOVE! xD

Why would I do THAT if I hated DW? (Now, as you can see I have Matt Smith last, not a fan of his era--though in fairness, while his hyperactive antics aren't my thing, I blame the writing and the River Song/Amy/Rory fiasco more than Matt Smith himself, really--but again...4, 5, and 10 are AMAZING Doctors, I just got finished watching "The Unicorn and the Wasp," actually...good episode, I liked it, nice to "meet" Mrs. Agatha Christie, thus continuing New Who's tradition of meeting writers...though I have to say, at the end...she's the best-selling novelist of all-time by the year 5 billion? Granted my only experience with AC is with her excellent play "The Mousetrap" and knowing her as the creator of Hercule Poirot and Miss Marple, but still...she sells better than Austen, Dickens, the Bronte Sisters, Dostoyevsky, or even popular contemporary authors like J.K Rowling? I'm not saying she's a bad writer, she's a good writer, for sure...but she's the best-selling novelist ever? With all the great authors of the past and all the great ones to come, for sure...I mean, surely we'll have great robot and alien authors in the DW universe...? ;) Just saying, it was a good episode, though.)

So no, don't hate DW AT ALL.

"Might I suggest your opinion on who was best or worst and who should replace Matt is total bullshit?"

Might I suggest you've jumped the gun, Draug...and clearly haven't heard me talk about DW for the last couple years (I mean, the thread I made disliking it was a couple years ago, and I STILL maintain that The Waters of Mars--the episode that really put me off the show at the time--is a bad one, despite how popular it is with fans...and then someone here--can't remember who--suggested "Genesis of the Daleks," citing that I like Holmes and Tom Baker played Holmes and reasoning he was the best of the Doctors, so if I was going to like anyone it'd probably be him...

Watched it, loved it, own it on DVD now, and the rest is history...history you haven't caught up on, clearly, which is fine, my fandom choices are none of your business, but do be careful your facts are up to date before you start calling my opinions bullshit...after all, there are so many GENUINE opinions of mine that are bullshit!)

;)

"Like many things, obi dismissed it as dumb children's programming previous to watching it and with only the shallowest of notions of what it was about. See also: Stephen King, Hunger Games, etc etc."

I refer you to the above, SacredDigits...

And I stated after I bashed The Hunger Games and someone here said (rightly) "Read it before you bash it" that I made a mistake...

I STILL contend that Suzanne Collins is a lot better at creating characters than worlds and I found the society this is set in implausible and the writing somewhat sloppy, which is a shame because I think this book could have been a lot better and something special...but for what it IS, yeah, it's an OK book...not one I'd buy for my bookcase, but glad I did actually read it--or listened to an audiobook of it on YouTube for free vs. paying $25 for a hardcopy version of it from Barnes and Noble--and certainly better and more substantial for kids than Twilight, which YES, I HAVE READ, so I can bash it freely, and OH MY GOD...

I mean, you go in knowing the obvious logical and character issues--I think those are well-enough known in the mainstream by now--but you're just not prepared for just how bad the actual prose itself is, it really does read like something a high school girl would have written...which is nothing against female authors--I believe I've already praised a few in this thread--but male or female...chances are, if you write something at age 15 or 16, it's gonna be shit, that's just the way things are...

But this is a fully grown woman writing these things and WOW...awful.

You know, I don't know if I've ever said this or not...but I'll say it with regard to Stephenie Meyer--

Long-winded run-ons here notwithstanding--*I* could do better than her. I think anyone here could write a better story than her. It's beyond bad; it just smacks of sheer incompetence.

Sorry, we were talking about how much I (DON'T!!!) hate Doctor Who?
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
02 Jun 13 UTC
P.S.--

I DO still dislike Stephen King though. Sorry.

But still--since I was charged with not liking King, THG, and DW...

Well, you guys got 1/3 right...a batting average of .333 isn't that bad...

Better than anyone on the Mets, anyway...
orathaic (1009 D(B))
02 Jun 13 UTC
(+1)
Ellen Page / Peter Dinklage. That is all...
SacredDigits (102 D)
02 Jun 13 UTC
I'm stating you hated it based on assumptions before you tried it and liked it, which I contend is true, and certainly was of Hunger Games.
Draugnar (0 DX)
02 Jun 13 UTC
Obidork - You just *confirmed* what I said. I said you hated DW (hated is past tense Mr. "I'm a lit major") so you had either trolled (apparently not), had your account hijacked (apparently not) or changed your point of view (which you just confirmed). As a fan of Doctor Who long before you were born, and knowing you opinion has only been formed in the last two Doctors, I stand by my statements 100%.
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
02 Jun 13 UTC
"I'm stating you hated it based on assumptions before you tried it and liked it, which I contend is true, and certainly was of Hunger Games."

Since I said I disliked it at first because of episodes like The Waters of Mars, that would constitute trying it, and thus I contend that is NOT true.

I'm hardly dissing it before I try it when I diss it due to my not liking episodes of it, yes? (We can argue degrees of "trying it," but surely my having not liked it on the basis of those episodes is grounds for my having "tried it" in some capacity, whereas I hadn't read THG before I opened my mouth in that instance?)

"Obidork"

Well, nice to know you're older than I am and yet sound like you're five...mapleleaf's "Fagnaur" taunts have rubbed off on you, I see (ALSO supposedly older than I am...hm...perhaps aging causes one to simply become more and more obstinate and childish...that'd explain the 11th Doctor's persona...)

"As a fan of Doctor Who long before you were born, and knowing you opinion has only been formed in the last two Doctors,"

How is that the case when I stated above,

"and then someone here--can't remember who--suggested "Genesis of the Daleks,"...Watched it, loved it, own it on DVD now, and the rest is history..."

Now, I may just be a young whippersnapper of a Whovian compared to someone as aged and experienced as you...

But I'm pretty sure Tom Baker doesn't fall into the category of "the last two Doctors?"

So how has my "opinion has only been formed in the last two Doctors" when I'm citing Tom Baker...?
SacredDigits (102 D)
02 Jun 13 UTC
I'm just saying that for a person whose opinion has often changed after getting a decent sample size, I'd think that eventually you'd stop going off about stuff that you know very little about so vehemently because it always ends with your legitimate threads derailed in the future by "remember when Obi hated this?"
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
02 Jun 13 UTC
I don't see it as a shame or problem that my opinion's been changed in some cases after sticking with something for a while or someone else making an effective counterargument...

It's good to see the evolution of an opinion, and to weigh first impressions vs. the impressions you get with more experience, and in any case, I'd rather my views evolve than remain as constant and obstinate those of some here and some past (Putin33's rather dogmatic stance on...just about everything I ever heard him discuss ever, for one...to discuss the dearly departed to...somewhere...wherever he is now...)
SacredDigits (102 D)
02 Jun 13 UTC
They're just always so vehement with so little to back them up at the first, and so fiercely held as well.

Always.
Draugnar (0 DX)
02 Jun 13 UTC
I am glad you changed your mind but watch *all* the episodes of *all* the Doctors and *then* form you best to worse list.
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
03 Jun 13 UTC
(+1)
"I am glad you changed your mind but watch *all* the episodes of *all* the Doctors and *then* form you best to worse list."

...Why?

Who the hell made you the Doctor Who police?

I mean, sure, seeing them all would be great and all, but surely you can at least make some assertion based on a sample size...I'd even say that yeah, someone who's seen every episode from every era, sure, your list will probably carry more validity than mine...

But still, no reason why we can't have the fun of a discussion rather than you pulling it out and showing me just how big it is.

...Your Nerd Card, that is, of course. ;)

Like I said, I've seen multiple episodes from 9 of the 11 Doctors...the ones I haven't seen are 7 (and I have a DVD of one of his in waiting) and 8, and I understand he just had one movie and that's it, so not much of a sample size for him as it is...

I even left 7 and 8 out of my own personal assessments as, yes, it doesn't make sense to form an opinion on them before even seeing them in action...

But surely we can have the fun of discussing the others?

Really, it's not like I'm ranking Presidents or arguing for or against something of the utmost importance here (like, you know, who's better, Kirk or Picard...and having seen all the episodes and films from THEIR respective shows I'll vote Picard, hands down, though Kirk easily has the better movies and would be more fun for a one-off adventure, but yeah...for a prolonged voyage, I'll take that tea-drinking Shakespeare-quoting most-English-sounding Frenchman Jean-Luc Picard any day. But it's close, and both are great.)

It's Doctor Flipping Who! xD Nothing to get so worked up about!
SacredDigits (102 D)
03 Jun 13 UTC
(+1)
It's tough for me to say, as I haven't seen the current season (I always catch it up on Netflix). I kind of want someone more in the serious mold at this point, and definitely not as emo.
EddardStark97 (143 D)
03 Jun 13 UTC
Rupert Grint for 12th Doctor. That is all
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
03 Jun 13 UTC
^Does that mean Emma Watson would be the next companion?

(I'd be OK With that...no, really, I think she's a talented actress...)
Draugnar (0 DX)
03 Jun 13 UTC
Well when evaluating some Doctors (Tom Baker) you need a big sampling across many series with a variety of companions. For instance, Tom's Doctor had so many companions that he and Romana were a very different show than he with Adrik, Nissan, and Teegan.
Draugnar (0 DX)
03 Jun 13 UTC
Nissa. stupid autocomplete.
abgemacht (1076 D(G))
03 Jun 13 UTC
(+2)
Watching two grown men argue about whether or not someone is truly a Doctor Who fan has brought a smile to my face.
mapleleaf (0 DX)
03 Jun 13 UTC
(+2)
Awwwwww I got referenced.

mapleleafisms were utilized.

Yay me.
Draugnar (0 DX)
03 Jun 13 UTC
LOL! Way to go maple!
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
03 Jun 13 UTC
*Nyssa and Adric (but then, am I qualified to even attempt to correct you?)

Also, Nyssa and Teegan are awesome, but fuck Adric...probably the most hated companion I've ever seen (gah, math genius my ass...) and...that is all.

And yeah, it's a different show, but my point is I can at least talk about it SOMEWHAT, Draugnar...I would never require my students to read all 37 (38 counting The Two Noble Kinsmen + whatever questionable apocrypha you wish to count for him) plays by Shakespeare before they form an opinion on the man...

The more they've read and the more eloquently they express and defend their views the more seriously I'll take that opinion, but yeah...

I've had students who read R&J and think he's awesome, and I've had one who read R?&J, Othello, and Two Gents of Verona and thought he sucked. Both have a right to their opinion.

Now, that being said, the one who thought he sucked ALSO said as her thesis that R&J ends with Romeo ALIVE at the end, laughing off the whole affair over Juliet's dead body and "realizing his mistake" so...um...yeah...this client may have read more Shakespeare than the first one but...yeah...anyone want to argue her view is more valid as a result? ;)

But hey, at least we brought a smile to abgemacht's face, and really, if that isn't the meaning of life, I ask you, what is?
SacredDigits (102 D)
03 Jun 13 UTC
Adric is your most hated? Obviously you haven't witnessed Ace yet.
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
03 Jun 13 UTC
Well, no, as I haven't seen a full episode with 7 yet...

But the idea sounds cool...I can get behind a teenage girl who apparently is a bit of an explosives bug a lot easier than a stuck-up mathlete washout who won't quit whining and saying the Doctor's being mean to him (which just doesn't work with the 5TH DOCTOR...I mean, yeah, he was with the 4th Doctor for a few episodes, but I associate Adric with 5, and 5 is pretty much the nicest, most amiable of the Doctors...2 and 10 can be pretty friendly too, but 5 especially just seems like Mr. Nice Guy, so Adric complaining about him is like someone complaining Jane Austen isn't romantic enough--I was HAPPY when that little sunspot died at the end of Earthshock--I'd leave it out for spoilers, but seeing as the episode's, what, 30 years old or so, I think it's safe to say--and I mean, I love the episode, have that one on DVD too, and the ending's still powerful because of just what a good climax it is and how affected by it the Doctor seems...but I'm sorry, I can't feel sorry for a pre schoo mathlete crossed with Anakin Skywalker getting offed--and getting offed for not listening to people at that! I can't imagine a no-nonsense teenage girl who likes to blow things up can be worse than that...what makes Ace so awful?)
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
03 Jun 13 UTC
*prep school mathlete, but whatever.
"I QUOTED the 4th Doctor's words of farewell..."
You did. Sorry. Haven't seen that episode since it was broadcast. Remembered the phrase, mixed up the Doctors.

"I'm just wondering how they will handle running out of regenerations though. After all, the Master had to literally steal a body to get more"
The BBC dumped the "12 regenerations limit" in an episode of "The Sarah Jane Adventures" - a Dr Who spin-off for children (never thought I'd claim Dr Who was made for adults - but then, in the '60s and '70s, it wasn't).

"We have seen every regeneration so there is no room for some guy in between..."
Hartnell was the first Doctor we saw, but has it ever been stated or implied that he was *the* first doctor [I don't know, so I'm asking]?
Do we know how many regenerations there were between Paul McGann and Christopher Eccleston? No.

"Who the hell made you the Doctor Who police?" - Obi+1
Draugnar (0 DX)
03 Jun 13 UTC
Well, Hartnell was the one who stole the Tardis. We got to revisit that in this series, finale. Clara tells him which one to steal. :-)

But yeah, I already confessed that I had forgotten about the potential regeneration(s) during the Time War.

And I don't recall that coming up in the SJA. Of course, I wasn't all that impressed with the SJA, but at least K-9 was back.
hecks (164 D)
03 Jun 13 UTC
[sheepishly] I actually like Matt Smith.
Draugnar (0 DX)
03 Jun 13 UTC
He's grown on me, but mostly cause he had a couple of the best companions in Amy and Clara plus his relationship with River, another great character in Whodom (not to be mistaken with Whoville :-) ).
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
03 Jun 13 UTC
"never thought I'd claim Dr Who was made for adults - but then, in the '60s and '70s, it wasn't"

I dunno--I mean, it DID start out as a family show...but then, for me, that's different than a kids show...

And I thought the Tom Baker era (for the most part) was dark enough for it to cease being kiddie programming, at least...if that's not what you meant I apologize, maybe I'm reading in a different connotation than you meant, but yeah, I think those shows have the feel of something made for kids and adults alike, and older kids at that...maybe it's a matter of the show's audience having grown up, so where in the earlier days it was marketed as something of a family show and more accessible to younger kids, by the late 70s, well, kids who were young in '63 or '66 would have grown up, so the show grew up with them?

Again, not a 5-star Whovian, just spitballing, I'm sure there's some official explanation for this (or several, if it's anything like Star Trek there are tons of explanations for all sorts of different developments with the franchise over the decades and many conflict, such as how Gene Roddenbery and the writer for "City on the Edge of Forever" had wildly different ideas on how to do that particular episode which many, myself included, rank as the best Original Series episode ever if not the best in all of Trek...so maybe there are a ton of conflicting stories on the evolution and maturing of DW.)

And if it was just in that spinoff show, does that mean the limit is hard-and-fast 12 regenerations?

Even if it is, I can't imagine them ending the show when it's doing so damn well and is enjoying so much popularity...even with British TV's reputation for ending series short and sweet and on top, as opposed to American TV that can allow shows to drift and drift for seasons--case in point "The Simpsons" and tied-favorite for a non-Trek/DW TV show, "House," which was golden Seasons 1-3, OK Season 4, and then steadily declined for a couple of seasons before slowly getting better again and (I thought) ended well in Season 8--even with all that...

No way they cancel/end the show if they reach that 12 regenerations limit...

I'm sure there's some White Crystal of Whothefuckknows the Doctor can find that'll give him extra lives or a Fountain of Youth in Space or something...

The magic of science fantasy--if you have sufficient viewership and fandom, it CAN be done.

"[sheepishly] I actually like Matt Smith."

I don't HATE him (well, I sort of do hate his earlier seasons, not a fan overall, but his early stuff especially is grating) and I don't think there's ever been a bad actor to play the Doctor (at least none of the ones I've seen...well, no, wait, I've seen 9/11 and I've seen McCoy in "King Lear" and Paul McGann in a version of Dickens' "Our Mutual Friend," so I know neither of them are bad actors either) but Matt Smith's Doctor...eh...

There's playful/mischievous, the way Tennant and Tom Baker could be sometimes (albeit in very different ways) and then there's just acting like a 5 year old.

And yes, it is sort of a novel idea to have such an old person act so young...but that only works for a short period of time...maybe bursts of that here or there, or concentrated into an episode or two...

When it's all the time--well, who here exactly likes hanging around with 50-year olds who are trying to look and act 15 still? Just...just no...

"He's grown on me, but mostly cause he had a couple of the best companions in Amy and Clara plus his relationship with River, another great character in Whodom"

I'll agree 110% on Clara...not so much on Amy (she always came off as a bit of a whiner and the typical example of the type of character who is told "Whatever you do, don't do X!" and the ONE OF THE FIRST DAMN THINGS SHE DOES IS X! It doesn't make me want to root for you when your biggest contribution to the adventures half the time is doing either something blatantly stupid or doing what you were told NOT to do and getting captured so the Doctor has to go save you...granted saving companions is as much a trope in DW as redshirts dying in Star Trek I guess, but still, there's a difference between someone like SJ, who seemed to really be rather competent and able to actually do things and so when she's captured it's not "Oh, great, she screwed up again and now the Doctor has to go save her ass" it's "Oh no, save her, Doctor!"...and to cap all that, I also have to say, not a fan of Damsel in Distress characters, especially new ones in this day and age--someone like Lois Lane or literary characters who were written that way centuries ago...OK, that's a bit more tolerable, especially considering nowadays they're usually updated and made stronger, the way Lois Lane was made more of a tenacious, intelligent reporter in the Christopher Reeve Superman movies...but to still be writing and creating Damsel in Distress characters in 2013? No. To be fair to Amy, though, I do blame Moffat's view of women on this to a degree--his making Irene Adler into a Damsel in Distress at the end of an episode of "Sherlock" was completely unnecessary, felt contrary to the character, and just sort of misogynistic and tarnished an otherwise-good episode of what is a pretty damn good modernization of Sherlock Holmes...in fairness he hasn't done this with Clara--yet--but I do think Moffat has a thing for Damsel in Distress characters and male characters acting out the part of the hero, and that's just tired and troublesome in 2013.)

And I HATE River Song--she feels like a tangled web of exposition every time she comes onscreen...I find her character grating (no slight against the actress, I'm sure she's fine, it's the lines that get on my nerves) and she just kills the drama for me (did she REALLY have to keep talking to Clara as she and the Doctor were going to see his grave in the last episode? You have this great atmosphere and building drama, but no, River Song has to interject her comments every five minutes like a child who needs attention and won't shut up.)

So yeah...not a fan of Amy or River. ;) But Clara's awesome, go her!
Draugnar (0 DX)
03 Jun 13 UTC
I guess it's just that I enjoyed the two season story arcs of Season 5 & 6 (Doctor Who revival seasons 5 & 6 of course)
I was 5 when Dr Who started in '63. My liking for science fiction was already well known. Family lore says that my mother told my aunt "Our Speaker will like that." when the first Dr Who trailer was shown.

It used to be said that children "watch Dr Who from behind the sofa", because it was scary, but not too scary.

In the 60's, 70's and 80's, when the story arcs were 4-6 episodes long, the "companions" (male as well as female) would *always* get separated from The Doctor and they'ed spend most of the time trying to get back together while seeing the problem of both sides.

I really don't like the Matt Smith Doctor. He's a bit of a prat to be honest (I wouldn't buy him a pint in the pub). I know. I know, it's partly or even mostly the way he's written but still. The only other one I didn't like was Colin Baker (number 6).

What can I say about Clara? Well she's pretty enough, but that's all. Except for her role in "Asylum" she could just as well not be there. She doesn't seem to contribute anything substantial. Yes, she has some large shoes to fill and yes she's doing what the script calls for but... Nah. Bring back Sally Sparrow!
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
04 Jun 13 UTC
You know, granted I've only seen two episodes (er, I guess I should say "stories," as they're comprised of multiple episodes) of his...

But I don't mind Colin Baker's 6th Doctor that much.

I mean, he's arrogant and rude, but I haven't seen him do anything to really warrant the ire he gets...maybe it's because that Peri girl also seems somewhat incompetent and so I can sympathize with his snapping at her and thinking he's better because...he is?

What'd he do that was so horrible?
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
04 Jun 13 UTC
As for the infamous coat...

Yeah, it's stupid-looking...but he's an alien, maybe he has a different sense of color?

And after all, Willy Wonka has a pretty colorful look too...and no one rags on Gene Wilder's get-up...or Tom Baker's multi-colored scarf...and at least it's distinctive--

By contrast, I always thought Eccelston's Doctor never was really "costumed" like the Doctor--

All the previous ones had had eccentric clothing or suits or else had at least something that was distinctive, like 7's celery stick and beige jacket (I'm told that's a cricket jacket, and yet I can't fathom playing an outdoor sport in a jacket, even cricket, so maybe I'm missing something) whereas Eccelston...

Just had a leather jacket. That's it. Not much of a unique look.
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
04 Jun 13 UTC
*5's celery stick obviously, sorry
Draugnar (0 DX)
04 Jun 13 UTC
But... Bowties are cool.
Colin Baker's Doctor gave the impression that everything he had to do was a chore and he'd rather be doing something else, anything else, if only he could work out what it was.
Draugnar (0 DX)
04 Jun 13 UTC
In Colin's defense, they spent almost 6 hours (14 episodes) on Trial of a Time Lord and the Valeyard was trying to show the Doctor at his worst, so we weren't seeing the Doctor in a positive light most of the time, nor were we seeiogn the real truth behind those stories as the Valeyard had altered them to suit his needs.


48 replies
Page 1062 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top