Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 1291 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
basvanopheusden (2176 D)
07 Dec 15 UTC
Help me buy a scientific computing desktop
Inspired by the other thread, can I ask you guys for some more advice? I'm looking to buy a desktop for $1000-2000, to use for my work in the lab. Almost every project I do has a serious numerical computation component to it, so I want to max out on computational power. I don't care about graphics though.
36 replies
Open
Jamiet99uk (808 D)
07 Dec 15 UTC
Trump: Ban ALL Muslims from entering the USA
Is this guy for real?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-35035190
21 replies
Open
Peregrine Falcon (9010 D(S))
03 Dec 15 UTC
Most or least favourite to play
I was just curious what people's most and least favourite countries to play were and why. Does it correspond to the rankings of which countries win the most games?
28 replies
Open
peterwiggin (15158 D)
16 Jul 15 UTC
(+6)
Welcome to the Peanut Gallery
A few of us have been talking about having a game where anybody not in the game can comment on it. Well, it's happening! gameID=164615
Page 10 of 20
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
Hellenic Riot (1626 D(G))
28 Jul 15 UTC
Ah, excellent. Lots to talk about here!

England: I am quite surprised by that. With weak Italy's and Turkey's, I expected you to hit France hard and fill the power vacuum in the Med very quickly. Instead, you've hit Germany, who appears to have double crossed you in Sweden despite attempting to leave Holland... a little puzzling. Either way, you've driven Germany & Russia into making amends, as I fully expect them to do here, and possibly cost yourself Norway in the process. If France now floats up into you as well, you're in big trouble. Of course, if you can keep France onside, you can convoy into Holland or Denmark and possibly try to support him to Kiel too. But your advantage has disappeared here, and you'll have to put in some more excellent press to win it back. I'm sure you're up to that challenge, but no cookie for you this time.

France: Well, that turned around nicely. Great diplomatic work on directing England into an inferior target in Germany, and despite being in Ruhr, you could actually still cut a deal with Germany to smash England here. A delayed Sealion between you, Germany, and Russia targetting England right now could cost him Belgium, Norway, and Liverpool in quick succession. You still have too many armies, but at least you have the chance to rectify that now. I'm unconvinced of the merits of sticking in an E/F here, as with Russia and Germany apparently sorting their differences out, England would gain far quicker than you would, but perhaps there are ways around that. Have a cookie for convincing England not to attack you!

Germany: Excellent stuff. Putting aside your differences with Russia is exactly what needs to be done here, and whilst moving to Baltic is a little odd, I assume it was a defensive move. By putting Russia in a place where he can attack Norway, you've blunted England's attack on you. Holland is a write-off unless you can convince France to support hold it with Ruhr (which isn't in his interests and probably isn't in yours either), but you have a chance to counter-attack next year. The best that can be expected here. Blocking France out of Burgundy also makes siding with you far more appealing to him. I have to say though - given a disband is almost inevitable, I'd be trying to keep that Baltic fleet, putting it in Kiel or Denmark, and giving yourself the ability to force North Sea next year. You can have a cookie for making England far less appealing an ally to both Russia and France - but you still have a lot of work to do to stop this just becoming an F/R that crushes both you AND England.

Italy: Well, that went pretty much entirely how I expected it to go. Aegean was an error that you've been punished for. Blocking Tyrolia and Ionian stops it being even worse, but unless you can convince Turkey to support you into Ionian, you could well be dead by the end of next year. Venice is gone, and this'll be quite something to turnaround now. It's a shame - the I/T could've worked extremely well if you'd gone for it, and I expect both of you to lose without it. 100 lines of "I must not rule out promising alliances without any benefit to myself".

Austria: Perfecto! Ignore all the Balki-hype, that's 3 phases (inc. builds) in a row where you've been the guy to watch on this board. Italy is likely to collapse extremely quickly unless Russia stabs you, but with the board so brilliantly set up for an A/R now, with weak Italy's and Turkey's, and a France who hasn't got the fleets to fill the med vacuum... there are huge amounts of options for you. Turkey will be desperate for your help, too, and an A/T isn't entirely out of the question. If you could get him to support you into the Ionian, that would be a true masterstroke - if you could afford the price he'd put on it. But really, he'll have to work very hard to convince you not to go for an A/R. The only downside is that, with Russia now gaining in the North again, he won't be quite as reliant on you as he might have been. Have a big cookie though. Onwards to greater things!

Russia: Fantastic turnaround! Moscow build may be even more futile now (England bouncing you in STP would've been a far worse turn), but patching things up with Germany was just the ticket you needed here. With Norway looking so juicy too, that's two feasible builds - not counting what you could snatch in the South. If anything, you need to moderate yourself not to grow too quickly and undo your hard diplomatic work here. Turkey staying in Armenia is an issue that could stop you truly hammering him down this year, but with chances at Bulgaria, Constantinople or Ankara in the south, you're definitely into a far nicer position. Austria kicking Italy off the board does rather tie you into an A/R, but given how nice the board is set up... that's not such a bad thing. A cookie for you, too.

Turkey: I'd have kept up the stalemated attack on Russia here. Italy was always going to be busy with Austria - but the position you WERE in would at least make you a fairly attractive ally to Austria later. Now, with Russia all over you, you don't even have that. Staying in Armenia was your one good move there - as it means that Russia has to worry about covering Sevastopol, which could rescue you elsewhere. To make it a great move, you'd have had to make an unsupported attack on Sevastopol though. It'll take some fantastic diplomatic work to salvage an A/T or, even less likely, a juggernaut here. With Russia in the shape he is now, it's very hard to say it's in his interests to keep you alive. You do have the Ionian Sea question as a bargaining chip with Austria; the only real chip you have. Use it well. I don't know what you were hoping for by withdrawing from Russia, but it clearly hasn't happened. If you'd not told Russia you were going to withdraw - so that he had to enter defensive moves, then you could've made a juggernaut plausible. Instead, you just invited him to shaft you harder than a night out in Brighton. 100 lines of "Don't tell my enemy where and how to attack me".
HR knows what he's talking about with shafts in Brighton late at night lol
(Regarding his warning to the Turk)
Hellenic Riot (1626 D(G))
28 Jul 15 UTC
(+2)
Sitting down is an overrated activity
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
28 Jul 15 UTC
Well lets see, that was quite the interesting turn. A lot of things were made very clear that past phase so I'll touch on what I see as the key points.

France's move to Pic along with the bounce in Bur makes me think that the bounce was arranged and that France and Germany are in an alliance against England that they are trying to disguise. I fully expect England to lose Belgium this coming turn. The bounce in Bur is key because if it was arranged it ensures that France cannot take Munich, while giving him the perfect path into Belgium. The move into MAO is probably part of this arrangement, with it being a sign of good faith from France to Germany.

Considering the dominate position England had I have to assume something went terribly wrong with his press. It could simply be that both Germany and France realized they were being played and decided to turn the tables. Regardless, England went from one of the top spots on the board to being one of the worst. His bitter post on the global press of the game strongly suggests he isn't in control in his diplomacy and in a game of players this high class, it's a huge mistake to make those kinds of posts. It's like ripping open your stitch in water filled with sharks...don't do it.

Russia, bloody brilliant. You ended up in Sweden. Unlike HR I do not find the move to Baltic surprising. The only way Germany agrees to support you into Sweden is in return for gains. The only gain you can offer him right now is Sweden. So I would assume that you are in an agreement with Germany to give him Sweden as soon as you're able to secure Norway. This is a great deal and gives you amazing positioning up north. I think your Moscow build was a great one. I am very doubtful you'd be in as good a position as you are now if your build hadn't been designed to lull everyone into the sense that you were in a defensive/watching mode.

In the south is where I disagree with HR. I see a A/R as possible, but not necessarily as likely as he thinks. Austria is on the verge of badly over-committing against Italy, and that could very easily cost him. While I find it stunningly unlikely, I would be thrilled to see a convoy from Arm to Bul, with Bul supported to Serbia. Even with Austria knowing it's a dim possibility he cannot afford to defend against it. That said, HR is correct in that a A/R is far more likely to come to pass.

Keep in mind though that Turkey's fleet holds the key for both Italy and Austria right now. Support to one of the other will dramatically shit the balance of power in the east.

The final key move, is Rum to the Black Sea. This is key because absolutely nobody besides Russia and Turkey knows if this was agreed upon or not, and the answer to that question will have massive impacts on the coming turn.

Overall, stunning turnaround for Russia and Germany (though I wonder if Germany is simply dancing to Russia's tune), terrible diplomatic failures for Italy and England. Both of them allowing good negotiating positions to fall apart.

I'm withholding judgement on Turkey, Austria, and France until I see the next turn, as it will decide all their futures in this game.
@HR: Russia's build in Moscow and play this turn is amazing, for exactly the reason you dislike it so much. By not committing to a direct attack, Russia has given himself options. Last move he could reasonably have sided with Germany or England, and with Austria or Turkey. This move he has made a decision to go after England (at least apparently so) but he still has options in the south. For example Bla-Sev, Rum S Bul-Ser, Ukr-Gal or Ukr-Sev, Bla S Rum-Bul, Rum-Bul. Both look pretty good, and I assume Austria and Turkey are making many promises to Russia right now. But Russia is the one with leverage right now.
Hellenic Riot (1626 D(G))
28 Jul 15 UTC
I don't think Moscow gave him any options that building in STP didn't give him, and it ruled out the options that Warsaw would have. Sure, it's worked out great - but the reason the South is going so well is that Turkey caved. And it was a risk that England would move to STP that was a risk I don't think was worth taking.

Whether or not he's giving up Sweden to take Norway is an interesting one - it's a huge risk that England doesn't just support hold Norway to try to make amends with Germany whilst Germany takes Sweden.
I will defend the Moscow build, too. I think the Moscow build almost ensured that England *wouldn't* move to StP, because the risk of a bounce was real. A Warsaw build instead of Moscow would have put StP at much more risk.

And I really doubt Turkey would have ordered Arm H if Russia had built an army in StP. Would Germany have been as eager to support Russia into Sweden if he were in Warsaw? Could Russia have possibly had the clarity and foresight needed last turn to know how the tides would change against England? I think the answer to all those questions really defends the Moscow build.

I agree that there's a lot to be said for making builds that give you options, but I have found that as Russia, you often have a lot of diplomatic demands in F01 and a lot of strategic needs, and the only way to pretend to meet all of them is to build an army in Moscow. And especially when you only have have one build in 1901 as Russia, you really don't want your build to generate an enemy for you in 1902 that you didn't have before.
zultar (4180 DMod(P))
28 Jul 15 UTC
(+3)
I have really appreciated the level of depths and analyses that people are giving to this game. In particular, I think jmo's analysis was thorough and insightful, almost as if he has some skills in playing Diplomacy.
Hellenic Riot (1626 D(G))
28 Jul 15 UTC
I'm not saying a Warsaw build was good - I preferred the STP build. Perhaps Turkey would have continued his attack instead; but I doubt it after Italy's Aeg move. It's all beside-the-point now, though.
Options: Mos-Stp, Mos S Sev, Mos-Ukr, Ukr-Gal. Yes, if Russia wanted to go North, Stp would have been a better build. If he wanted to attack Austria, War would have been better. For defense against Turkey, there wasn't anything better than Mos. But the key is that Mos could do either of those three.

For example, I think the option of ordering Mos S Sev was a big reason why Turkey decided to abandon the attack on Russia.
StackelbergFollower (1463 D(G))
28 Jul 15 UTC
(+1)
I also want to say, I like how everyone (myself included - I did not think his S01 moves were very good) has been ragging on France's moves pretty much every turn, and it's working out pretty good for him.
zultar (4180 DMod(P))
28 Jul 15 UTC
(+5)
I think we all have a tendency to judge a player's competence in that way when we are commenting frequently. We tend to forget that it is a game of alliances, of subtle words and swift strikes, and less of a game of logistics. It's hard to judge a player based on a single season and it's not always possible to tell how a game will play out because we don't know why people move the way they do due to what was said and how they think about the mid game. What's more interesting to me is what are the supposed alliances among the players, which ones are planned for the long runs, which ones are temporary, and how these moves shift these alliances around.
VillageIdiot (7813 D)
28 Jul 15 UTC
Completely agree with Zultar there. If people are doing weird things it's not because their morons (at least not in this group), it's because there's things going on beneath the surface that we aren't aware of. Sometimes they're working a con, sometimes they're getting worked. Unfortunately we don't get to know until the triggers been pulled and many times the ultimately action doesn't even follow what the original intention was.

I certainly hope everybody in the game is making very detailed notes for the EOG.

I certainly wouldn't count England, Turkey, or Italy out yet. These high level games have a habit of seeing some impressive resiliency and very impressive coxing of alliance shifts.

Given the option, I'd want to be part of an A/R alliance right now. Great opportunity to get a majority of the board quickly and maybe even get a headstart on blindsiding Germany in a couple years with the help of a probable struggling England.
ghug (5068 D(B))
28 Jul 15 UTC
Heh. Coxing.
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
29 Jul 15 UTC
bump
JamesYanik (548 D)
30 Jul 15 UTC
impressive by England...
Diadem (135 D)
30 Jul 15 UTC
What a fun concept this, a public game that we all talk about. I hope it's ok that I jump in, as a new member to this site?

It seems to me that Italy is done for. Venice will fall for sure. The next Austrian build will be an army in Trieste, with a supported convoy to Apu in S1903 and supported attack on Rome in F1903. What is Italy going to do about that? Their units are completely out of place to defend.

Italy desperately needs a gain elsewhere. But where? Try to sneak into a Turkish center? Even if it works, it won't be center they get to keep for long. Perhaps they can get Turkey to support them into Greece. Turkey doesn't want a hugely powerful Austria, and would probably be happy to see Italy move out of the Aegean. But Greece will just retreat to Ion, which is a nightmare scenario for Italy too. Maybe Italy can get a French support for an attack on Munich, but that's a pretty desperate move as well.

People were praising Italy here for their creative play. But creative plays brings you nowhere if you forget about the fundamentals. Often the most boring moves are the best ones.

Of course it ain't over till it's over. Maybe Italy can convince Austria that a juggernaut is coming and that Austria needs them.

And I also agree with a previous poster that it's likely that a French stab on England is coming. No smart France will allow unchecked English growth.

I do wonder how the fact that people are publicly discussing such things affects the in-game decision-making though.
Diadem (135 D)
30 Jul 15 UTC
First thoughts on the results:

- Italy: You were in a bad position, but those moves were terrible. How the hell did you manage to bounce with Turkey in ION? What kind of complete communication fail was that? Terrible.

- Turkey: Not much to say. You failed to convince Russia to back off, but that was a tough sell to begin with. Your only hope now is to fortify and hope you can survive until the Russian / Austrian alliance breaks up.

- Austria: Well played, very well played. This is pretty much the best case scenario for you. Both Boh and Aeg failed to move, so Italy is now wide open. And nice job on convincing Russia to help you against Turkey.

- Russia: Good job also. I assume the swap of Sweden was pre-arranged. Your only problem is that you blocked both of your obvious build spots. You really want a 3rd unit in the north.

- Germany: Why did you self-bounce in Kiel? You should have just moved the Berlin army there, if you were going to use it for nothing else. It's much better situated in Kiel than Berlin.

- England: Great job. I don't mean tactically, but diplomatically. You didn't gain a center, but your position improved a lot.

- France: What the hell were you thinking? Since you were working together with England, I must assume you had a pretty good idea of what he was going to do. How can you fail to exploit that? Move Gas to Bur and Mao to Iri and you pick up 2 English centers next year.
Yes, you are growing, and yes, you will continue to grow, by picking up a free Tunis next year. But you will never again be able to dominate England.
I can't stress enough how absolutely atrocious your moves were.
France's position is a bit better if you consider that he's probably a got a good alliance with Russia, or can at least make one happen when the time comes. England is all alone in the north with Russia coming up strong and not much ability to attack France or defend himself from France. If A/R keeps going then France is in a great position.

I think it's going to be easier for France to get another build next year than England, unless I'm very wrong about Russia's intentions. Looks to me like Russia and Germany are going to be putting up a fight against England together, and France isn't going anywhere.

Fantastic turn for Austria, good turn for France and Russia, so-so for England, terrible turn for Italy and Turkey, and good God, is there any possible defence for Germany ordering Munich to hold?
An Austria-Russia-France draw seems a very real option now. Wiyh Germany in shambles, and Tunis under French control, I think Austria/Russia even have to be careful not to allow France to grow too fast or he'll become a solo threat.

I really like the move to Pie, but France could have done thst in the spring too. Picardy seemed less valuable than Piedmont to me...

I'm also curious to hear how long Russia considered stabbing Austria here. Rum-Bud and Sev-Rum,extra armies in Sev & War, and a great opportunity for the juggernaut. Essentially, Turkey, Italy and Germany would be playing for him.
zultar (4180 DMod(P))
30 Jul 15 UTC
Either I am really rusty at Diplomacy (very possible since I don't play anymore) or I think about this game very differently than basva. It's 1902 and we are already talking about a 3-way draw? At this point, no one should be talking about a draw, particular with uclabb being Austria and ATC being Russia. In a very real way, it's a defeatist attitude and worst yet, draw-oriented. France, Austria, and Russia should each be thinking about who their mid term allies should be and how they will get to 10-12 and cross stalemate lines to stab for the win, while the underdogs, Italy, Turkey, and Germany, should think about how they can leverage each other's poor situation to get themselves out of a tough spot. England can play a big role in whether there will be a restoring of balance of powers or the complete downfall of Germany. In any event, we should be a long way from a 3-way talk.
TrPrado (461 D)
30 Jul 15 UTC
France-Austria alliance. Do it. So I command.
The quick deaths of I/T/G are bad news for anyone looking to solo
Someone will find a way to keep one of them around for a while longer, if they want to solo. I would wager that England might try to ally with Germany again. He's got a pretty good path to do that.
Hellenic Riot (1626 D(G))
30 Jul 15 UTC
(+1)
Well that turn went almost (but not quite) entirely how I expected, which is always pleasing for my big nutty ego.

England: Good job keeping France from stabbing you - that being the only surprise for me - clearly fixed your press issues there. Denmark was a risky move - support holding Norway was viable too to try and fuck G/R relations again, but Germany had seen that coming and cut North Sea, so you made the right the choice. Belgium and Holland are rather the wrong way around right now, but other than looking ugly on a map, that's not important for the time being. Germany is badly on the ropes here, and Russia can't help him anymore either. Could be the time to offer an olive branch and turn on France next year. Could also be the time to drive home your advantage and kick Germany off the map.

Still; I'm not sure how you managed to let Germany and Russia form an alliance after that 1901, and I remain disappointed in you for that failure of press. You should've been able to keep Norway there and really be on the front-foot. Now it's merely an average position. No cookie, no detention.


France: As the only player who surprised me this time: congratulations for that! I'm unconvinced that Italy was the right direction to go in, but there is a massive vacuum of power in the Med that you can sail into. The problem is whether you're ever going to get another shot at KO'ing England. F-Bre would be hard for him to stomach this year, so fighting him and Italy simultaneously is probably off the table too. At least with any element of surprise or success. You better build a fucking fleet though. Reasonable job.

Germany: Really? Munich-Hold AGAIN? Didn't you learn the first time? What's the point of even having that army if you're just going to sit there masturbating with it. The self bounce in Kiel was pointless too - why do you want to be in Berlin when you've allied with Russia? Failing to persuade France to stab England there, when you should've been able to do so as it was a great opportunity for him to make that stab, is another failure of press on your part. And given Holland wasn't being used to help France into Belgium, it's apparent you knew you'd failed to make that persuasion too. Not good enough. You get to choose between keeping your fleet or disbanding it and rebuilding as an army in Kiel this turn. This gives you a little bit of opportunity to cut deals with England or France - make sure you bloody do it. 250 lines of "I MUST NOT HOLD UNITS FOR NO REASON".

Italy: Well, this was a painfully short game. How on earth you and Turkey managed to end up bouncing each other out of Ionian whilst Austria rolled into Bulgaria I don't know, but Austria is making a total mockery of the pair of you here. France's invasion is barely even relevant to you now, either. I can't really make you write lines for that phase, so instead, here's a dunce's hat, with compliments from Austria. Go sit in the corner wearing it.

Austria: Woop woop! Excellent stuff. I had faith Russia would stand by you, and so did you. The A/R is really in a position to be a monstrosity now, and you're not weak to a Russian stab anymore. Fantastic job on arranging that Ionian bounce - that is truly hilarious. I will always buy someone a drink when they manage to get other people to bounce each other without you having to use any units yourself; so here's a girly fruit cider on me. France going into the Med is a problem - you really wanted him to hit England so that the Med vacuum could go to you. Building another fleet is an option here, if a risky one, but I think prioritising Naples over Rome could be a good move - there's no way France would be able to hold Rome against you after all. Either way; great stuff. Big cookie, a nice cider. Don't relax yet though!

Russia: I'm always happy when people prove me right, so thank you for that. Convincing Germany to cut North Sea instead of guarantee Sweden was a smooth move, and whilst it worked out for both of you, the risks were all his. Sticking with Austria down south was the right move - the lack of med power is going to bottleneck him at some point, and with France going south (good for you), they're likely to start squabbling over the spoils, leaving you free to deal with whatever front you see fit to move on. One thing though - Sevastopol was a disappointment. You should've either chanced leaving it empty, or arranged a self-bounce. Not being able to build a fleet this turn on either front is a disappointment. A-Moscow once again does very little for you. A-Warsaw is useful if you plan to invade Germany, but I don't think that's the correct move here. And it's a bit late to be invading Austria. Still, have a cookie.

Turkey: Man, what are you doing? Still? Bulgaria-Hold is terrible. You knew you had no deal with Russia (hence no support to Serbia). You knew you had no deal with Austria (hence no support to Rumania). You knew you had no deal with Italy (hence covering Smyrna, and the spectacular Ionian bounce). Any deal they offered that didn't require you to do SOMETHING with Bulgaria is just outright bullshit, and I don't know how you fell for that. Reactive sets of moves (other than Smyrna, and why you thought Austria would invite you into Ionian there I don't know), and you paid the price. Very poor. 150 lines of "I must make plausible deals with at least one of my god damn neighbours".
" What's the point of even having that army if you're just going to sit there masturbating with it." Ahahaha oh my good...
Diadem (135 D)
30 Jul 15 UTC
While I agree that holding Mun wasn't optimal, I think the self-bounce in Kiel was far worse. Why on earth would you prefer an army in Berlin over one in Kiel? It makes no god-damn sense. Just to illustrate how damn useless not going to Kiel was: The best thing Germany can do now is disband both his retreats and rebuild in Kiel.

Perhaps Germany thought he was somehow going to get a build this game, and he wanted to keep Kiel free for building? In that case I admire his optimism.


And no, no, no, the French lack of stab on England was really terrible. He will not get this big a chance again. If France had stabbed England he would have been in an excellent position for a solo victory. England would have collapsed very quickly, with Germany and Russia not in a position to profit. And with Italy in shambled and Turkey in a bad position there's little to fear in the Mediterranean. France straddles the usual stale-mate line, so it would have been very difficult for the other players to stop him once he really gets going.

He is not going to get that chance again. France can't solo when there is a strong England, and while England can still be defeated, it will take a looong time.

The French move into Piedmont should still have happened if he had attacked England, by the way. He should have moved there to support Italy. Keep Italy weak but alive while you roll over England and the solo is almost guaranteed.

France supporting Italy is still an option by the way. Judging from his previous moves though, I fear France is not smart enough to see it.

Unless some players really shape up, we are looking at early elimination of Germany, Italy and Turkey, and then a 4-way draw (Yes, 4-way, not 3-way. There is no way to whittle such a 4-player situation down to 3 if the people involved know what they are doing). Boring.
What French stab are you talking about? If he had moved mao-iri and taken belgium, england would disband norway and belgium and build A Lvp. Next turn convoy den-yor and disband hel. Sure, England's game would've been ruined, but france wouldn't pick up any english centers after Belgium. And he wouldn't have had Tunis, so no solo potential no matter how well he does in the north.. No, i think france was right to stick to his alliance with england.
Given Russia's position, I also do not think you can say France will never have an opportunity like that again. He (or Russia or Germany) can generate one if they work hard and are patient.

Plus, I think France should want to accelerate Italy's demise. There is a massive vacuum in the med, and mass eliminations are bad for solo chances, so a rapid Italian death will incentivize someone else to keep T/G around (maybe France himself) and muddy the waters for a solo run later on. Plus, of the three likely eliminations now, Italy's is by far the most valuable to France. I think France made the right call.

If Russia never attacks England, though, France's position won't pay off in the long run. Same goes if Austria ends up stabbing Russia and working with England instead of France.

Page 10 of 20
FirstPreviousNextLast
 

572 replies
sitting_ovation (0 DX)
07 Dec 15 UTC
Ideas for fun special rule variants
Hi all, I was wondering if anyone played or has any ideas to play some special ruled variants of the game just to shake things up?
2 replies
Open
brainbomb (290 D)
07 Dec 15 UTC
Idea for a Diplomacy Game
I know there is a vdip variant where you only have one SC but I think it would be interesting to get a game going on here where It has unique rules.
1. You can only move one unit per turn. And you can only move additional units for every SC you gain.
2. By Spring of the 2nd year you could be moving 2 units, and so on and so forth.
anyone ever done anything like that?
3 replies
Open
2ndWhiteLine (2601 D(B))
06 Dec 15 UTC
Metagaming Policy Reminder
I feel the need to clarify our stance on playing games with friends. See below.
41 replies
Open
Ranscott47 (2874 D)
07 Dec 15 UTC
Austria missed 1st turn. Any takers?
Game ID=170684 Looking for someone to take the challenge of taking over Austria in Fall 1901. Don't want to have to cancel game so please help!
3 replies
Open
jaydog (125 D)
06 Dec 15 UTC
Rules question?
Hi there, got a question about how the rules work.
14 replies
Open
Nescio (1059 D)
02 Dec 15 UTC
In California ...
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-34987697
14 replies
Open
ghug (5068 D(B))
06 Dec 15 UTC
(+2)
December GR
http://tournaments.webdiplomacy.net/theghost-ratingslist

Have fun!
17 replies
Open
brainbomb (290 D)
05 Dec 15 UTC
Iowa vs Michigan State
Id bet you anything Iowa fucks this up lol. Theres no way Iowa is gonna make the college football playoffs.

Mich State - 35
Iowa - 13
5 replies
Open
SandgooseXXI (113 D)
03 Dec 15 UTC
(+5)
That baby I was gonna have
Well he finally decided to show up and meet the world! Gents, and rare ladies of WebDip...my offspring!

http://imgur.com/8tDt1XO
12 replies
Open
Hellenic Riot (1626 D(G))
16 Nov 15 UTC
November Ghost Ratings
November GR is now up!
42 replies
Open
wjessop (100 DX)
03 Dec 15 UTC
Star Wars: The Force Awakens
Discussion, questions, concerns, excitement.
37 replies
Open
SkiingCougar (1581 D)
03 Dec 15 UTC
(+1)
Is this the longest game ever?
This game has been going for 2 (100 in game years) years as it is the 2012 world cup. It must be the longest or most back and forth game ever. In fact Austria was down to 1 supply centres near the 1/3 mark but is still alive! Imagine the commitment. If anyone has spectated all the way through I congratulate you, also well done to the players for the commitment they have shown.

http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=93086
19 replies
Open
brainbomb (290 D)
04 Dec 15 UTC
Endless Legend = amazing civ style thrill ride
Im gonna say this takes warlock master of the arcane and makes it about a thousand times cooler. very hard game actually.
1 reply
Open
brainbomb (290 D)
04 Dec 15 UTC
Wanna give a shout out to..
My DETROIT LIONS. I dont think weve swept the fudgepackers in my lifetime!!!
5 replies
Open
Baskineli (100 D(B))
03 Dec 15 UTC
New game
Two of my games are about to be finished. Anyone in for a game?

WTA, full press, high RR. Who's in?
2 replies
Open
KingCyrus (511 D)
28 Nov 15 UTC
(+1)
Our Almighty Master...
... has graced us with his presence today. I have seen a grand total of three, yes, THREE, whole comments by the omnipotent kestas today.

We must celebrate with a feast.
48 replies
Open
abgemacht (1076 D(G))
03 Dec 15 UTC
US Military to open all combat roles to women
http://hereandnow.wbur.org/2015/12/03/open-all-combat-jobs-to-women

Thoughts?
20 replies
Open
Valis2501 (2850 D(G))
04 Dec 15 UTC
ITT: MFW I send/receive press
as above, below.
7 replies
Open
wjessop (100 DX)
04 Dec 15 UTC
LIVE REPLACEMENT NEEDED
France gameID=170630
1 reply
Open
wjessop (100 DX)
03 Dec 15 UTC
Wjessop inteacts with...
It's a game where you can post any word or phrase that Wjessop interacts with.

It's fun. It's new. Everyone's doing it!
21 replies
Open
steephie22 (182 D(S))
28 Nov 15 UTC
So if I wanted to produce a pc-game...
How would I go about that? I probably need a team because I don't have the technical know-how. Where to start though?
No, I won't be jumping into this without knowing what the hell I'm doing. In fact, I won't start anytime soon. This is just the very first reconnaissance. What kind of people do I need and how do I know they'll do the job well? What can I reasonably do myself? I decide what the game should be like for the biggest part.
93 replies
Open
lauridsena (910 D)
03 Dec 15 UTC
Rules question
What happens to a unit if retreat orders are not entered for it?
7 replies
Open
Ludwig Van (50 DX)
02 Dec 15 UTC
New game special rules. World Match!
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=170504

This is special rules for a world game. It's a Role Play of a United nations meeting.
0 replies
Open
Octavious (2701 D)
02 Dec 15 UTC
(+1)
cancelled game message
An anonymous game was cancelled today and I never got the chance to say a final message to the Russian player who was at the centre of the game.

Sir, I salute you and your actions. Don't let that game get you down. Highest regards, Oct.
1 reply
Open
Ludwig Van (50 DX)
02 Dec 15 UTC
tell me this isn't slightly disturbing
http://m.bradfordexchange.com/products/301881001_lifelike-breathing-baby-doll-.html?CATALOG_UPSELL=Y&SOURCE=Y&RECOMM=Y
5 replies
Open
shield (3929 D)
27 Nov 15 UTC
Syrian Refugees
Http://www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/unnamed7.jpg

Does anyone recall how during ww2 when the Allies started discovering concentration camps they set up a 2 year background check to make sure the jews weren't serial killers and rapists? Me niether. Discuss.
45 replies
Open
Page 1291 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top