You would actually get drunk if you did this:
looking at http://webdiplomacy.net/profile.php?detail=replies&
userID=51201, here is how much you would drink, looking at the days leading up to april 9th. (the posts lag behind a few days, and the 9th is the last day where it actually shows all his posts). I'm using words such as elite, propaganda, bankers, etc. Maximum of one drink per sentence:
April 7th:
"companies were convicted (and for it faced an insignificant fine) of mixing animal antibodies into test subjects blood"
"the vaccine effectiveness conjecture is clouded by proven-to-be-fraudulent research, confusions over causality (well the disease is no longer lethal, it must have been the vaccine!) and propaganda."
"whenever i prove something really bad is happening in the world that goes against what the media is telling them they will convince themselves that it is what they wanted rather than consider that they may have made a mistake."
"yes but i am suggesting maybe the parents arent the main teachers. it probably should be officials deciding if kids have vaccines or what they wear to school or how late they stay out." (This one isn't more a complaint about the elite doing something wrong, but a suggestion that we the elite, not the parents, look after kids. So bonus points for irony?)
"if you think iran is craziest one then you obviously watch too much television."
"ask the jews living in iran who rejected israels offer to pay them to relocate there."
Final count: 6 drinks.
April 8th:
"consider the following http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3leCgi_xYHA&feature=player_embedded" (Not sure if the youtube video talks about elitism, too lazy to watch it. Lets just assume it does.)
"would be secretly paid off by the british elites."
"so could this have intelligence agency involvement since just a few people died and just a bit of terrorism?"
"thousands of american deaths could be by the intellingence agencies."
"governments or corporate media or academia can choose definitions to feel like they control the language in everyday use"
"the elite aristocracy and spies"
"knew full well what was happening but just fed propaganda to the public."
"the people in charge get enriched by those inefficiencies."
Final count: 8 drinks:
April 9th:
"the inefficiencies in the government are so large that they could easily handle sequestration by cutting those out. but they wont. because the people in charge get enriched by those inefficiencies."
"the problem is from drug companies / other medical corporations and monopolies created by the medical industry"
"artificially restrict entry into the medical profession based on nonsense."
"they control most of the world now"
"then the government couldnt convince people unproven medications are safe"
"the government couldnt force people to take vaccines"
"he government couldnt prevent you from getting help from someone who you trust unless he went to school for 10 years and got a 4.2 gpa in his undergraduate humanities major or whatever it takes." (If you read the full post here, he is actually suggesting that the only reason medical school takes 10 years is because the government wants to limit the number of doctors in America. I wish I was joking)
"communism was run by the world elite probably even more than fascism."
"the bankers loved the ussr."
"not only did it enrich them but it took out all future competition to their power by taking out any ability for the general public to advance."
"north korea is a disaster and is a lot more manipulated by world powers"
"the western world powers want to destabilize asia,"
"world powers generally want conflict."
"dont think that just because north korea is "against" america that it is somehow against the world elite."
"ended up starving populations sometimes for political reasons"
"lets say the world elite create a superpower in one part of the world and make them start invading countries"
Final count: 16 drinks.
)
gmo gene silencing?
)
)
)
