but i'm so glad you are willing to take people within the context of their environment. That is very refreshing from you Krellin...

Don't blame the mum, blame society! Similarily don't blame the poor for being lazy, blame society for not encouraging them enough. Don't blame drug dealers for trying to make money blame the consumerist social ladder. Don't blame the gang member for their lack of education, blame their exclusion from society...

You know....if I were a bum starving in the cold night air....I'd offer Octomom a swig of my cheap wine if I could crawl up inside her vagina and sleep for the night in a warm place....

ROFL I love how the video blurs out the "semi nude" bottom half like she was naked there not wearing flesh colored bottom. Is this an ABC hit job?

Wait....how can you tell it was a :"flesh colored" anything versus just her pussy dripping that low? (Actually...didn't watch the video at all....have no ide what you are talkng about...)

Haha I love to defend liberalism too guys, but Krellin has a point. Anybody on public assistance should not be able to spend $520.00 on haircuts/waxes whatever over ANY time period.

It does appear that she is gaming the system. That doesn't mean the system is EVIL, Krellin, it just means it could be tweaked a bit.

lol you didn't watch the video? Then why are you complaining about liberalism?

Nooooo....it means the system is fucking CORRUPT. WHERE are the Liberals decrying this abuse? NOWHERE!! i.e. the system is fucking broken and beyond repair.

WITHOUT the system, this bitch would never had injected a turkey-baster full of fertilized eggs up her cooch to begin with, and never would have had 8 State-Sponsored illegitimate children for YOU to feed!

Give me a break...this is a 110%...no...a 1,000% indictment of the system!!!

But forget the system...come on....who wants to crawl right up inside that pussy with me to sleep tonight, like a living tent?

@YJ - So right about the $520. She says 14 haircuts, well that is still $37 a haircut. I mean c'mon. Is she getting her hair colored and curled every damn time? I'll gibe her a hint. Mastercuts will wash and cut for half that.

Anybody on public assistance should not be able to spend $520.00 on haircuts/waxes whatever over ANY time period.

$520 / 60 year = $8.6 per year.

And you would begrudge them that. (assuming average life expectancy...)

lol ora. If you want to take shit LITERALLY :P

Krellin: Yeah I know you'd totally hit that man. I know I would.

@YJ....Not only would I hit that....I clean out the inside of her baby-sc with my elongated tongue!

@ora - I know you were pointing out the flaw of YJ's argument. But she said 14 haircuts. That's $37 per cut. Jesus Christ! My wife doesn't pay that much and sje gets a wash, cut, and styling every time.

Draug -- I'd invite you up in there with me....but you might find that a little creepy. But it's kinda like a living sauna.

Bitch should buy hersef a suck-cut and cut her hair with the vacuum cleaner.

Gosh... (This "phenomenon" was new to me)
And her face... especially her lips are obviously "improved".

Well... liberalism or no... could only happen in America!

Well...her lips have been surgiclly altered to mimic her...eh hem....swollen baby-birthing...er.....lips...

By the way....for all of you that like to eat the after birth, IMAGINE the buffet line at Octomom's delivery....

@Draug - acutally, i'm sorry, but sound on my machine has failed for some reason (though i can login as a different user with sound :-/ ) so i haven't watched yet... I don't know what time frame she was talking about. Or where people choose to place their priorities/money.

I think i recall people making their own choices as being a good thing... can't remember who suggested that...

Lol Krelllin! I wouldn't have fancied you're a midwife! Is it common that the fathers want to eat the afterbirth?
Well, don't answer it...

1. I'm not a mid-wife....I'm just a dude looking for a warm place to sleep.

2. Afterbirth....talk about an aphrodisiac....fry it up in a little...er...a LOT of butter....spread it on a ltitle cracker or just slurp it down AS IS...oh my....I think I might orgasm....

hahaha, fixed my sound, an? 'this video is not available in your location'

Hooray, america! you've been foiled once more, censorship abounds!

*chortle* Krellin I find that mental image quite disturbing. Oddly enough I find the image of doing the same to an actual BABY rather entertaining. Go figure.

If you want to fix your sound....try stuffing your head in Octomom's cooch. ...just the blissful body sounds of a liberal whore....burps and farts regurgitating through her flesh.

have you been drinkin' again? i hear that's good for ya!

Why do you ask? Because I want to snuggle up inside a liberal welfare mom's cooch? after all, we are all paying for it....we might as well get some pleasure out of it...not sure what that has to do with drinking?

The real question is how do pigs manage to have children? He's a walking abuse case waiting to happen.

*pigs like Krellin

@ora- She says it was for 14 haircut not just the one on the day she wrote the check. Octomom says 14. Time frame is irrelevant. 14 is 14 and $520 is wasteful.

And ora - When you are government assistance, you give up the right to make choices involving extravagance and luxury. You need to actually see and hear the interview to understand that the American taxpayer is giving her more than $4000 (yes 4K) in welfare every month. That money is supposed to be for the kids, not her hair and nails. The moment she started accepting welfare, she gave up her right to choice beyond the basics like fried chicken or hamburgers. No prime rib. No filet mignon. No lobster. And no manicures and pedicures and $40 haircuts.

I soak my hair in used oil and then set it on fi-ere.

Here's the thing, krellin. I only have so much outrage, and it gets vented on the Lloyd Blankfeins and Rex Tillersons who extort us for billions rather than a petty grifter like the Octomom whose fraud will, over the course of her family's lifetime, fall well short of costing us a penny per taxpayer.

Oh, did the welfare payment specify no pedicures? Also are there not healthier options than fried chicken or ham burgers?? Maybe a nice organic salad??

And how do you know it wasn't all in the one day? 14 haircuts, sure but she's got like... Um... What? 14 kids, BAM ! (ok i think it is particularily wasteful - i
Might even argue that the hair salon is over-charging; further they only get away with over-charging because advertising and other media place a huge amount of importance on appearance - a woman's value seems to be determined by the amount she spends on hair&make-up - at least as valued by some women, fewer men (i suspect) and many many magazine editors, fashion critics and the like...

But guess what! That is the free market at it's best! Inventing unnecessary consumption.

You're all right! Free markets and socialist policies don't always mix well.)

@ora - Healthy options are fine. That is quibbling. I'm talkign about spending money on true luxuries versus everyday level food. When you live off the state and don't work a day you don't get as much say in hhow the money is spent. You can't buy alcohol with food stamps. It's against the law. So why would someone think it's OK to spend $40 on a haircut. And while she may have all those kids, she has a nanny and a housekeeper paid for by others (the housekeepr is a gift from Dr. Phil), so her workload isn't nearly what the typical housewife with 2 or 3 kids would have. No, she is a lazy ass piece of white trash getting freebies for her celebrity *and* livign off the taxpayers dime. Don't you see anything wrong here?

ok, i'm not blind. Of course i can see things wrong here. That doesn't mean i jump to conclude that all social welfare results in this kind of abuse.

I might be the case that she spent al the social money on her kids etc. And then she sold exclusive rights to her story to some stupid tabloid newspaper or book deal, meaning she continues to not work, still has no income, but has a tonne of cash to spend on frivolous things like haircuts...

Ok, there may be something wrong with the newspaper's freedom to make massive profit on her story (and it seems like she now want stop avoid the media crap or claims she is exploited...) there may be something wrong with a system which promotes this kind of celebrity... but that's not an issue with welfare...

now i admit the story i paint may not be 100% accurate, or even 50% accurate. But it is plausible, and I don't know where she got the money to spend on stupid haircuts...However, if the kids are indeed being looked after, then i don't see the fault in her spending habits.

Did *I* say anything about ending welfare? I was condemning this white trash fraud.

How do you know you're too loose after having a baby?

Put both hands inside your vagina. If you can clap, you're too loose.