Darwyn's answer in the 2nd paragraph is either wrong or I misunderstand it.
A & B are land with armies. X & Y are sea with fleets doing convoys.
A->B and B->A fails as units bump
X->Y and Y->X also fails
A->X->B and B->A succeeds
A->X->B and B->Y->A succeeds
Trading places without a convoy is not possible. Trading with one or two convoy is legal.
A round robin is also legal. A->B, B->C, C->A succeeds.
TDM6, back to the original question.
For A->X->B, B->Y->C, if the second succeeds the first does also. If the second fails the first is resolved as an attack on yourself and the unsupported attack fails. The answer to your 9:19 post is no disruption.
Since you are getting close to this one, here is the ugly case to watch for
A->B, C supports A->B C->D. If the last succeeds, so does the first. If the last fails, the first is resolved as an attack at 2 on 1. The attack of A succeeds. C is dislodged and must retreat.
Darwyn's last sentence is correct.
A convoy is only disrupted if the fleet is dislodged.
Attacking the fleet has no effect unless it is dislodged.
If the destination has a unit in it, enemy or friendly, the action is resolved as an attack.