"As soon as proof becomes concrete I will reassess"
Said the court to Clinton's accusers.

Funny how it is the GOP that wants to deny the vote to US citizens, wants to torture people, wants to imprison political opponents wants to institute religious bans. THOSE are blatantly unconstitutional. And the democrats want to "rip up the constitution"? Yeah like you've ever read it.

Actually the court said "oh, now that you're under oath Ms Broaddick you say nothing's ever happened? I guess we are done here"

I actually taught the U.S. Constitution buddy.

-GOP doesn't want to deny the vote to U.S. citizens.
-GOP doesn't want to torture people or imprison political opponents

For everytime ND says GOP, Republican Party, Trump, or Conservatives, replace all those words with ND. Those are always things "ND" believes.

Democrats are the only party that imprisoned political opponents (Japanese in WWII) and denied the right to vote to U.S. citizens (jim crow, black codes, KKK = Democratic Party and not one republican were in favor of those things).

Well, you ought to look at caging efforts and the various violations of voting rights. And yes, Trump has said he wants to do much worse that water boarding and wants to imprison Clinton and has said he will instruct law enforcement to reach a verdict before trial or investigation.

You taught the constitution? Color me skeptical. So, what do you see as democrats tearing up the constitution. I will be amused to see what you come up with.

See above

Ah I see. So you mean "did a pair of unconstitutional things a half century ago. (And Japanese weren't political opponents, FYI). And the KKK and the Jim Crow proponents are the Republucan base and have been since 1964. Did you just walk out of a cryogenic chamber?

Nope. More Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 then Democrats.

The Big Flip that you are mentioning is not accurate.

https://pjmedia.com/michaelwalsh/2013/3/29/history-lesson/

-GOP doesn't want to torture people or imprison political opponents

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/07/trump-torture/

I believe some in the GOP (including Trump) are for enhanced interrogation. since it has been proven effective I see no issue with that practice continuing.

But as for jailing political prisoners and disenfranchising people only the Democratic Party has done that.

"since it has been proven effective"
What's your threshold for "effective?"

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/enhanced-interrogation-techniques-ineffective/

You do realize that your link says Trump wants to do more that water boarding. The US executed Japanese officers for waterbaording US soldiers after WWII. Also, your link shows it isn't effective. It is also a violation of the Geneva conventions and the eighth amendment. Which was my initial point that Conservative have very little respect for the Constitution. I'd be on with waterbaording after the Presidemt proposing it gets water boarded say fifty times

And no, your point about Japanese internment is incorrect. They weren't political opponents (are you really suggesting they were Republicans?).

But you're a conservative so of course your a fact free idiot.

*you're

1) I didn't post a link.

2) I didn't post a link.

3) Yes you right they were imprisoned because they were of a Japanese heritage. Thank you for correcting me on that.

4) Can you read or are you just a straight up moron?

Seriously though, keep it civil guys.

ND: "GOP doesn't want to torture people"
Me: "actually they do"
ND: "since 'enhanced interrogation' has been proven effective I see no issue with that continuing"

@DL: No reason not to continue a practice that *some* have judged effective. I don't trust sources from the Obama administration about it.

So the GOP wants to torture people?

I apologize for saying the word 'moron'

If someone is a terrorist I see no reason why enhanced interrogation shouldn't be used on them.

i) "If someone is a terrorist I see no reason why enhanced interrogation shouldn't be used on them."
ii) "GOP doesn't want to torture people or imprison political opponents" [implies that Democrats do]

pick one please

"I don't trust sources from the Obama administration"
Good thing it's a Senate Intelligence Commitee instead of a facet of the Obama administration.

Senate Intelligence committee during democratic domination of the Senate.

GOP doesn't want to imprison political opponents.

SOME in the GOP want to use enhanced interrogation.

I hope my answer clarifies DL.

The same Democratic majority that had to distance itself from Obama during campaign season to hope for seats. Also, Congress is inherently not "administration."

I just had a thought. New information isn't bringing Hillary down because it's too similar to old information. Going into the DNC, we knew there was collision with the media. We knew there was shady shit at the Clinton Foundation. We knew the paid speeches to Wall Street contained something that pandered to their interests even if at the detriment of workers (private and public position isn't some new revelation, since she's long been accused of pandering). Fracking was never even a secret.

You expect to find some bombshell against the Clintons that puts Trump in the lead, but she's one of the most constantly scrutinized people in the world. "New revelations" are old criticisms.