Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 1157 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Maniac (184 D(B))
20 Apr 14 UTC
(+3)
I'm thinking of setting up a new passworded game
I'll be using your published stats to decide if I want to play against you or not.
I understand that statistics can sometimes be unreliable, as well as lies and, indeed, damn lies.
Apply within...
9 replies
Open
NigeeBaby (100 D(G))
19 Apr 14 UTC
(+1)
Why is there still so much war in the world?
2014 and there are still lots of wars going on, have we not progressed at all as a species, we think we are above animals but we are not because they only kill for food, we kill for all sorts of bullshit excuses. Is that what education has given us, more reasons to kill our fellow homo-sapiens?
38 replies
Open
Mujus (1495 D(B))
20 Apr 14 UTC
(+10)
Happy Easter/Happy Resurrection Sunday
This is just a note to wish all Christian web dippers a wonderful day of celebration.
45 replies
Open
Krediax (125 D)
20 Apr 14 UTC
(+1)
Quick question
How is determined which unit gets auto destoyed (no orders submitted/CD)?
3 replies
Open
yugoslavian (100 D)
20 Apr 14 UTC
(+1)
Replacement player unable to join
This issue relates to the following game:
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=139971
We have had Russia being banned for multi-accounting apparently, and we were told by GameMaster to try to find another player, which was promptly done. However, the replacement player allegedly cannot find the "join" button for the game and therefore cannot join. Could we please get some guidance as to what we should do in this case?
4 replies
Open
kasimax (243 D)
18 Apr 14 UTC
(+3)
is it just me or is there a reliability rating now?
heck yeah!
70 replies
Open
semck83 (229 D(B))
19 Apr 14 UTC
What is your opinion of this article?
http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/sunday-commentary/20140418-honey-i-want-to-move-to-mars.ece

Is he right? Is this a functional marriage? Is there anything blameworthy on either part?
25 replies
Open
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
17 Apr 14 UTC
Is it weird...
...that I skipped a class to play piano? Don't people go and get themselves arrested when they skip class, then there's me, rocking out to Let It Go at 8:30 in the morning...
15 replies
Open
MadMarx (36299 D(G))
22 Feb 14 UTC
(+3)
Lake Lowell Marathon
Sunday, April 13, 2014, Nampa Idaho
83 replies
Open
The Czech (39715 D(S))
20 Apr 14 UTC
gameID=140156
NOT COMMENTING! But, could you please post a message before you cancel? I am curious as to who and what.
8 replies
Open
Tolstoy (1962 D)
17 Apr 14 UTC
Mike Ruppert, Godfather of 9/11 Trutherism dead of suicide
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/04/15/911-truther-mike-ruppert-kills-himself-after-finishing-his-radio-show/
30 replies
Open
SYnapse (0 DX)
15 Apr 14 UTC
Ukranian anti-terror operation thread
Well it looks like this is under way in Kramatorsk now.
126 replies
Open
ssorenn (0 DX)
19 Apr 14 UTC
Web based diplomacy or face to face???
I got to play f2f for the first time in 25+ years. It was quite enjoyable to have open banter with other players and fully articulate what your thoughts are, but after returning to the game so many years later and now playing on the web, with drop down menus and computer making the moves for you. I think I like the web better. I would however like to play f2f every once in awhile.

What's the community's thought?
4 replies
Open
Jefe (100 D(S))
19 Apr 14 UTC
New Stats
I have a few questions . . .
1 reply
Open
jwalters93 (288 D)
04 Apr 14 UTC
(+1)
Guys, there's too many serious threads here. We need some fun. Let's write a story.
OK, here are the rules.

One by one, we each add on to the story. You can only add one sentence at a time, and each post must be separated by at least one other post. Your sentence must be grammatically correct and within the realm of possibility. If we do well with this one, we might move on to something more outlandish. I'll post a final edit of each paragraph, time permitting, when we get enough. Have fun with it!
85 replies
Open
taos (281 D)
15 Apr 14 UTC
(+4)
this is not a cheating accusation 2
In fact it is a negligence accusation
119 replies
Open
taos (281 D)
19 Apr 14 UTC
9 hours left ,join this game.
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=140072
4 replies
Open
NigeeBaby (100 D(G))
18 Apr 14 UTC
The Great FIFA 14 sell-off ....
....... anybody need any players or coins for FIFA 14 on the Xbox 360?
1 reply
Open
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
26 Jan 14 UTC
PPSC Series
I'd like to start a PPSC Series. Any interest? More specific details to come once we have enough participants.
53 replies
Open
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
17 Apr 14 UTC
Just Get the Hell Out...Not Again...
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/04/17/jews-ordered-to-register-in-east-ukraine/7816951/ The LAST TIME a militant power told Jews they had to "register"...well, how did that turn out? Just get the hell out, guys...the hell with Russia or Ukraine's "ethnic Russians," the Jews don't have to put up with this AGAIN--not with America and Israel. Come here or go there, we don't have to get singled out for persecution AGAIN. (And how do you justify all this, Putin33? Hm?)
55 replies
Open
wmort (180 D)
18 Apr 14 UTC
Potential Bug in Game #139262
Hey, I have a potential bug I would like to report to whomever I report to.
4 replies
Open
SYnapse (0 DX)
16 Apr 14 UTC
Making games using Unity3d
Anyone have experience of this? It seems very easy to use. Last night I created a small FPS with a flashlight and a health counter in about 20 lines of code.
1 reply
Open
stupidfighter (253 D)
18 Apr 14 UTC
In need of an Italy.
Spring 01, had a player banned. Full press, 1 day phase.
gameID=139906
2 replies
Open
CommanderByron (801 D(S))
17 Apr 14 UTC
Modern Europe 14
Please join we need 1 more player to make it a full game.
0 replies
Open
Gobbledydook (1389 D(B))
15 Apr 14 UTC
5-point Invitational
For old times' sake!
5 point buy-in WTA full press.
The 6 entrants with the earliest join date get to play with me!
Sign up below. Signups close when I feel there's enough old timers.
13 replies
Open
Vampiero (3525 D)
16 Apr 14 UTC
New kinda game
I got this idea from another forum post n I wanna play world diplomacy version. If u wanna play leave it emails n when I got 16 more players
I will email u the link b password. The game goes like this... Two teams. One 8 players nether
9 replies
Open
fearlessmidget (225 D)
16 Apr 14 UTC
Why F Mur?
Sorry if this question has been answered, I couldn't find it anywhere. In the Modern Diplomacy II variant, we have a fleet in Murmansk. But in the variant rules (that we link to!!!) there's supposed to be an army in Murmansk.

Why the change? It seems to me that it just gives Russia less options when Russia is already under a lot of pressure in the first year.
0 replies
Open
Draugnar (0 DX)
12 Apr 14 UTC
the Leagues are coming back...
And this time there are a couple twists...
41 replies
Open
yebellz (729 D(G))
15 Apr 14 UTC
With praise
I am glad to see that the mods these days are cracking down on these annoying live game ads.

threadID=1121742
threadID=1121721
7 replies
Open
Triumvir (1193 D)
16 Jan 14 UTC
(+2)
SoW Study Group: Official Thread
SoW Study Group Game: gameID=133722

Please reserve this thread for prof commentary and questions. Good luck to all the players.
Page 2 of 9
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
dyager_nh (619 D)
24 Jan 14 UTC
Yeah, I felt the same way in the build phase. Too many writeups can get overwhelming.
That said, players should fell free to toss up general questions which are not related to future moves.
A_Tin_Can (2234 D)
24 Jan 14 UTC
There was some discussion of not letting previous games affect current games- I agree that carrying a grudge between games is poor form. However, having played with someone before, you get an idea for their play style. This is the third game I've played with RAZ000 now, and his press in this game is very similar to the other two (and I'm sure he'd say the same about mine).

My question is, do higher level players mix up their style more to avoid becoming predictable or too easy to read? What do you think about this additional signal of a player's trustworthiness?
dyager_nh (619 D)
24 Jan 14 UTC
I find playing against the same player in back to back games to be very difficult especially if we had a good working relationship in the prior game.

I find I have a desire to want to team up with that person again, then a point in the game comes when you really need to stab one another. I end up delaying or hedging out of guilt, then he stabs me...thus making the stab hurt that much more.

So, like an emotionally scarred high school chick, I tend to refuse alliances with those who I played with before to avoid the betrayal. I have recently found that Anon game fixes alot of this problem.
dyager_nh (619 D)
24 Jan 14 UTC
So I guess what I am saying is, I do mix up my style by sucking in the 2nd game :)
RAZ000 (272 D(G))
25 Jan 14 UTC
Bump
rojimy1123 (597 D)
26 Jan 14 UTC
Bump
Triumvir (1193 D)
27 Jan 14 UTC
Fall 1902 – Things Become (Pretty) Clear

As typically happens during the second half of 1902, the game’s major alliances have been revealed. 1901 is a year for feeling out your fellow players (both in the press and by watching their moves). By Fall 1902 you’ve had a fair amount of time to press with people and so you ought to have a good feel for each of the players. You’ve had three movement phases and a build phase to see how people are going to act. Now it’s time to go to work.

That work got off to a good start in some sphere and not so much in others. Let’s take a look around the map to see how things are shaping up as we’re considering what to build.

AUSTRIA: The failed stab of this Spring has really thrown your strategy for a loop. This season you faced the difficult question “Do I keep pushing it or do I beg forgiveness and go another route?” From the looks of things you chose the 2nd option. At this point it’s too early to know how that will turn out for you. Italy helped you against BUL, which is good, but he also backed away from Turkey, which is not so good. You should be concerned about the German army in TYR (though perhaps not as concerned as Italy). You are going to have to work out some sort of alliance with someone soon, whether it’s Italy or someone else is irrelevant, or you’ll find yourself very lonely in 1903. And that’s a very bad thing. No build.

ENGLAND: Speaking of loneliness, all I can say is “I’ve been there and I’m sorry.” Well, that and “Why didn’t LON support hold in NTH, too?!” If LON had supported the NTH hold you wouldn’t have lost that sea and you’d be in a much better position. Still not a GOOD position, but hey one thing at a time. 1903 is going to be a very difficult year for you (possibly your last year if you don’t play your press and tactics right). Look for a friend. Although they may not see it, you would make a good ally for one of your neighbors if they’re looking to stab someone else early. Press. Press. Press. No build.

FRANCE: Dyager suggested that perhaps that you were drunk when submitting orders (not that I can judge – I’ve been there) and at first I was also confused. The more I looked, however, the more sense your movements became. This is how I read it – you made the push to move against England (as I assumed you would given your build from 1901) but Italy’s move to PIE and threw a wrench into things. Regardless of press, you didn’t feel MAR was safe, so you covered it. MAO had to take POR. The move to IRI was a good one given your anti-English campaign. And the GAS move tells me you want to push armies towards Italy soon.

Ultimately, I like your moves. You can easily take LVP next year and will probably hold it. You’ll have a hard time squeezing armies through PIE but you have an ally with a unit in TYR, so that will help. It’s too bad you weren’t sure MAR would be safe. Otherwise you could have taken POR from SPA, moved MAO to SPA(sc), and left MAR open for a build. Oh, well. I’m guessing you’ll put out another fleet.

GERMANY: If England’s problem is not enough friends, yours may be too many. You’ve done well so far to make friends out of France and Russia. That will likely get you the bigger share of English centers. But after that, where do you go? Do those fleets sit idle in England, or do they move against Scandinavia or northern France? Something that you (and your allies) should probably be thinking about. Also, I like the move to TYR. You are in position to take English territory without too much fuss. That army in TYR gives you a foothold against your next target – either Italy or Austria. Though, given your ally France’s moves, I’d venture to guess Italy has more to be worried about. I’d guess army over fleet. Not sure where. MUN probably.

ITALY: Like France, another curious set of moves at first glance. You support Austria towards BUL after his stab, but you also remove your fleets from the fight in the East. Then I put myself in your shoes. Austria just stabbed you and he has a fleet that can move into ION. You need to pick up TUN to assure yourself a build but you can’t risk vacating and letting Austria in. Hence the move back to ION. The move back from PIE to VEN was likewise defensive, not some sign of a new-found peace with France I think. Probably the same thing I would have done. It’s tough when your Fall moves simply undo everything you did in the Spring, but at least you’ll get a build out of it. Hard to say what that build will be. A fleet might be nice but may not be practical given the armies likely to head towards your peninsula soon.

RUSSIA: The more time I’ve had to look at it, the more I have really liked your opening two years. You secured yourself 2/3 of Scandinavia and got yourself RUM without getting yourself steeped in a brawl over the rest of the Balkans. You have a friend in Germany and don’t have an enemy in Austria. You’re free to choose your own adventure. Austria and Italy would do well to note that you tried to support Turkey into SER. That might turn some heads and may need to factor into your build. Your build is the one that I’m most interested to see. I expect an army in MOS and I expect it to move anti-Austria.

TURKEY: You had the unenviable task of stopping the Key attack and you did very well. I like a good aggressive defense. Good to see you garnering Russian support for your movement. He would be a good friend to keep. The move to AEG was necessary to cut possible support from there. Gaining access to that sea is a bonus. No build for you but I’d say things are looking up.

I look forward to seeing the builds. I hope I was right on a few of them (and I hope I was WAY wrong on a few – keeps things interesting).
uclabb (589 D)
27 Jan 14 UTC
Surely there is a comment to be made about the retreats phase? Namely England's choice to retreat to Edi.
virtuslex (483 D(S))
27 Jan 14 UTC
Certainly wrong on Germany's builds (or lack thereof) :). Thanks for the commentary.
Triumvir (1193 D)
27 Jan 14 UTC
Oh, of course! (re: no German build) I'll have to stop writing commentary drunk. ;)
Triumvir (1193 D)
27 Jan 14 UTC
Re: the English retreat to EDI.

It was the "safe" choice - falling back to the otherwise vacant home SC would seem the obvious choice. That does not necessarily mean, however, that it is the correct choice. I might have preferred to see something more provocative, like maybe a retreat to ENG. I reiterate - England should be making every effort to extend his game. The longer he can hold on, the more there is a chance of a stab among his enemies. Then he becomes valued ally rather than easy target.
uclabb (589 D)
27 Jan 14 UTC
What about a.... disband? Surely that is the obvious best choice.
Triumvir (1193 D)
27 Jan 14 UTC
Of course! Again, I should apologize for posting comments drunk. A disband would have allowed for a build (in LVP perhaps). Well pointed out, uclabb.
rojimy1123 (597 D)
28 Jan 14 UTC
Bump
Triumvir (1193 D)
28 Jan 14 UTC
Adjustments 1902

Not a whole lot to say about this phase since most of the builds came out pretty much as expected. There were a few variations and we'll talk about them now.

ENGLAND: As was pointed out by uclabb, if you had chosen to disband NTH rather than retreat, you would be building right now and could defend all of your SCs. Don't discount the "disband" option when you're faced with retreats - particularly in the Fall season.

FRANCE: Exactly the build we expected to see. The new fleet in BRE could move north to join the fight in England but I would look for it to move to MAO and then on into the Mediterranean. F/G seem to be heading in that direction.

GERMANY: I thought you were building for some reason. I was clearly intoxicated.

ITALY: The fleet build is both good and bad. On the positive side, you'll have the clear lead naval power once France breaks into the Mediterranean (since at least one of his fleets will be occupied in England for the immediate future). You may be able to push that advantage and put some pressure on France's southern centers. On the negative side, your build leaves you with only one army on the peninsula for defense. With Germany in TYR, expect to see French units coming under the Alps fairly soon.

As for positioning, I typically like to build fleets in NAP as the Italian player because that gives me options for moving either to TYS or ION. However in this case, with a hostile F/G encroaching on your turf, I wonder why you didn't build your fleet in ROM. It can still get to TYS and move West towards French centers, but ROM could also move to TUS and slow the advance of French armies into your peninsula.

RUSSIA: I'm a little surprised that you build in WAR rather than MOS this season, and wonder if you did so with German knowledge/consent. I still imagine that this build is anti-Austrian, but it is also possible that you mean to use this unit to head West rather than South. I'll be interested to see what comes of it. I think we'll see a Russian unit in GAL in the Spring, and which unit that is will tell us an awful lot about your intentions.
dyager_nh (619 D)
28 Jan 14 UTC
Couple quick tidbits to add regarding Fall 1902 and the build phase.

France/Germany - Everyone on the board should note the move of Paris to Gascony. I was under the impression France was drunk when he did this because who would move to Gascony when they could be in Burgundy? However, Triumvir wisely pointed out that this army is heading for Italy by way of the scenic route....a route which wont piss off any Germans. Actions speak louder than Diplomatic Press and that scenic route should speak volumes.

Italy - Like myself, Italy must have missed the significance of the Gascony move. Venice is in trouble and an army in Rome would have been the best way to defend both Venice and Tuscany (not an SC but significant in France's hope for a foothold in Italy). Now you must depend heavily on your beleaguered and untrustworthy ally Austria.

Warsaw - I like this build alot. It gives Russia alot of options, which he needs this year. He has completed his conquest of Scandanavia and now he needs to move onto the next phase of his world domination. Warsaw is the logical location for that springboard.
I concur with Triumvir Austria is the likely target, given his friendly relationships with both Turkey and Germany.
VirtualBob (209 D)
29 Jan 14 UTC
bump for star. Interesting game/commentary.
Triumvir (1193 D)
30 Jan 14 UTC
Saw the new moves. What the hell?!

But seriously, I'll write up my commentary tomorrow afternoon. I like to give you guys a day to think about the moves and form your own opinions before I give you mine. I will likely continue posting commentary at the midway point through phase. Look for it tomorrow.
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
30 Jan 14 UTC
Wow you guys had a weird turn there...
dyager_nh (619 D)
30 Jan 14 UTC
I looked at the Spring moves while eating dinner and I threw up on my children. They cried, then I showed them the map, then they threw up on my cats who then pooped on the floor.
Ogion (3882 D)
30 Jan 14 UTC
Well, I will say to this point, you have gotten some, but not all, of the logic behind the moves I had inside info on. I will confess there are some moves that I was perplexed by at first, but actually I think some players are making some fairly discerning guesses about diplomacy. I am going to suggest that some of your confusion stems from having misread a few things earlier on. Of course being privvy to the diplo makes it a TON easier to read. I don't envy your task.
Ogion (3882 D)
30 Jan 14 UTC
And yeah, this format does lend itself to doing things just because we know it will make the profs go "WTF?!?!?"

:D


jus' kiddin'
basvanopheusden (2176 D)
30 Jan 14 UTC
(+1)
I'd say all of these moves are pretty logical. Not all of them are necessarily the best in the situation, but I don't see that much drama happening here.

England is trying desperately to protect his home centers
France is eating those home centers and is otherwise content with his current position.
Germany has decided Russia is the largest power and must be resisted.
Russia didn't expect Germany's stab, attacked Austria instead
Austria continues to play the Key Lepanto, trusting his faithful ally Italy
Italy likes Austria and doesn't like Turkey
Turkey wants to play a juggernaut
A_Tin_Can (2234 D)
30 Jan 14 UTC
I was looking at the game last minute, and submitted Aeg->EMed just seconds after the deadline had passed. I'll be making final decisions earlier in the future :)
dyager_nh (619 D)
30 Jan 14 UTC
(+1)
After sleeping on it, my statement was made in haste (yes I had a dream about this game). I think I was so shocked by what happened and how wrong I was that I may may over reacted. Course my cat poops on the floor all the time, so thats just par for the course. :)
I will also have a writeup later on
dyager_nh (619 D)
30 Jan 14 UTC
With last year Falls movements, I felt for sure I was seeing the culmination of Germany and France’s long term plan. I literally did view the phase shift while eating dinner and food did spill from my mouth in shock (supporting my wife’s statement of no electronics at the table).
Germany
So you decided to pull back from your joint conquest of Italy and turn on the guy most interested in keeping you happy. Why? If I had to guess during the build phase, Austria and Italy played the Juggernaut card. All diplomacy players kiss their kids goodnight and tell them that if they are not good, the Juggernaut will come and eat their toys.
Although the move itself has a lot of merit (you have set up a guessing game in which you have the advantage of being the aggressor), I mostly disagree with the timing of the move because :

1. Russia wasn’t going anywhere in the north and he really seemed to want to keep you happy as he moved south. Warsaw, was extremely likely to move southward to Austria.
2. Turning on Russia before you had finished England means France is on his own to take England. It also throws in the possibility that England and Russia come up with a way to work against you. Seems Edinborough could have been yours at the end of this year (ideally with a supported move to Norwegian Sea). Now you leave England for France.
3. When France is done with England….where does he go next? Always look at your allies motivations. Pushing France and Italy into conflict ensures he wants to remain your friend.
4. Holland to Kiel would be more than capable of covering Berlin IF Warsaw moved west.

France
I bet your happy as a clam right now. Germany and Russia are going to fight (a fight which once started will be hard to pull back from). Italy/Austria are stalemated with Russia/Turkey. Russia aint growing much anymore. Just leaves you and little old England in your own little world.
I hate to see units standing around doing nothing (I am looking at you Gascony and Marseilles) but in this case, any movement by them that phase would have upset the delicate balance of the unfolding events. You didn’t even have to move Belgium as frosting on the cake.
I hate to say this but the best moves of the round was France not moving.
And I bet you thought I would bitch at you. 

Austria
If you played a role in Germany’s move against Russia I applaud you.
However, you probably needed to get Trieste to Vienna (ideally with a German move to Bohemia).
Sure you would have left Trieste open to Germany (had he not backed off) or Italy (who could take it whenever he wants) but you had to know Russia was coming.

Italy
Excellent job turning Germany and France aside. *Perhaps* this was a crazy ploy by the three of you all along but I doubt it. Now your back to committing to the Lepanto alliance, which thus far has managed to spin its wheels.

Russia
You invested a lot in making sure Germany felt safe from you. You made no fleet in the north, letting him know England was his if he wants it. You supported his move into the North Sea. What more could he damn well expect from you right?
I am a bold player…I don’t do subtle, I take risks and commit wholeheartedly which is why I liked the Warsaw build. I however would have moved Ukraine to I am curious if Triumvir was right that the Warsaw build opened up a can of worms for you.

Now you need to decide…what to do. A lot will depend on the answer to these two questions :
1. How pissed off is Austria and can we be friends?
2. Why did Germany do this and can I offer him something better?

Turkey
A lot of stuff is happening around you but I cannot tell if you are involved in any of it. Austria/Italy appear to have had a dustup in 1902. Italy appeared to be in trouble in 1903.
You are in a hole right now and the only way out is if you can offer someone something. I hope you made offers of support during each of those incidents and they just didn’t take them. Keep trying because your only way out is to find a friend who needs you.

England
What can I say? You have the unenviable task of defending England with 3 fleets.
Good news is Germany is distracted, so it may be just you and France. The bad news is that France appears to have units to spare and you do not.


**************I want to thank all of you guys for really making this an interesting and unpredictable game. You’re a tough bunch to read.
Triumvir (1193 D)
30 Jan 14 UTC
Some of this may echo the commentary Dyager wrote. I didn't read his and won't until after I post mine. Apologies if it's redundant.

@Bas and others: It’s not that I don’t understand what the current map says about the players’ relationships with one another. I, like Dyager, am simply surprised by the resolution to all the build-up. The German move to TYR in the spring and then straight back to MUN in the Fall is the perfect example. Whatever he was thinking then or is thinking now, in hindsight that will likely be counted as a wasted unit this year. The same can be said for several other moves. I’m sure we’ve said it before but it bears repeating: you’ve only got 4-5 units to order each phase, you can’t afford to waste orders.

Okay. Enough whining. Let’s see what’s going on here.

Spring 1903 – “I’m sorry. I take it back.”

AUSTRIA: You are ahead of the curve. You were apologizing before it was cool. You have patched things up with Italy and are now helping him beat his head against the stone wall that is Russian held RUM. Sure it’s nice that Germany backed down in TYR and that Italy is your friend again (at least for the time being – don’t think he’s forgotten your early stab) but eventually you’re going to have to find some more real-estate or you’re going to be in trouble. Hopefully your ally’s move behind Turkish lines will take some of the pressure off of you but that will only help so much. I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but it’s looking like it will be another dull adjustment phase for you this year.

ENGLAND: You’re still here but it looks like France and Germany are still friends. If that doesn’t change fairly soon you’ll be watching this one from the sidelines. Bad luck.

FRANCE: I don’t want you to get the wrong impression here. You’re doing well. You’ve got 6 centers with another one on the way (unless you do something crazy like walk out of it). Your alliance with Germany is serving its purpose and Italy seems busy with his Lepanto so you have nothing to do but take apart England. BUT you’re wasting so many units. Consider your original army from MAR. It moved to BUR and supported an army in BEL in 1901. That’s good. Then it moved to PAR (where it was useless) and then to GAS (plausibly to defend against Italy) in 1902. Now it’s just sitting there. I understand keeping armies at home to prevent the stab but a full half of your units collecting dust? I’d advise you strongly to get them involved somehow.

GERMANY: You move into position to stab Russia while he is still supporting your units. Harsh. Good maneuvers around Scandinavia. You’ll have a shot at either Norway or Sweden (and Russia can only defend one or the other) so you have a chance to take one. Chose well. As for your other units – I hope I was right that the move to TYR last season was actually intended to attack Italy and that you changed your mind. Otherwise, what a waste! If that army had just stayed in MUN last season you could be in SIL right now. The move to KIE from HOL was fine, assuming you trust France.

ITALY: In spite of the Austrian “stab” of ’02 and the feigned attack by Germany and France, you’re still ready to execute the Lepanto. Just one problem – no army to convoy into Turkish territory. You’ll have to do it with all fleets, which is much more difficult. Chances are that you, like your friend Austria, will have no build this season. Set yourself up well so that at least you can build in 1904.

RUSSIA: Congratulations. You’re in the lead. And not just by SC count. Consider the overall position of the other players. Austria is stuck for the time being (unless he stabs Italy again). England is on his way out. France will gain one this season but invading England is time consuming (especially with so many idle units). Germany’s only hope of immediate expansion is blind luck in Scandinavia. Italy and Turkey are going to dance for a while before either of them gains any ground. You, on the other hand, have a shot at VIE or BUD (or you could opt for no build but an even better offensive position for 1904). Germany and Austria (your two most immediate enemies) are for the most part out of position to oppose you.

Don’t let that go to your head, though. Unless you grab an Austrian home SC, you won’t be building this year, and a wrong guess in Scandinavia could even mean a disband. Add to that the fact that those two German armies on the mainland may be headed East and you could be looking at a tough ’04-05. Better have a plan, and make it a good one.

TURKEY: There’s no way around it. You’re stuck. On the upside, if Russia stays friendly you shouldn’t lose any SCs. On the downside, you’re not likely to get any new ones unless Austria and Italy turn on each other. Also there’s the Lepanto to worry about. You’re probably going to have to shift your focus from conquest to defense for the time being, at least until the diplomatic face of the East changes.
RAZ000 (272 D(G))
30 Jan 14 UTC
(+1)
Would last round have been more palatable if we had all yelled "Bazzinga!" after submitting orders? :D
A_Tin_Can (2234 D)
30 Jan 14 UTC
(+1)
For me? No :)
Triumvir (1193 D)
31 Jan 14 UTC
For all my complaining, it is still an entertaining game. I sincerely hope you're all having as much fun playing as I am watching and I suspect that you are (except you, England - I really feel bad for you).

Page 2 of 9
FirstPreviousNextLast
 

248 replies
Page 1157 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top