A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Start a new discussion in the public forum
Post a new thread
If your post relates to a particular game please include the URL or ID#
of the game.
If you are posting a feature request please check that it isn't mentioned in the todo list.
If you are posting a question please check the FAQ before posting.
If your message is long you may need to write a summary message, and add the full message as a reply.
Something needs to happen with the Masters Tournament, be it cancellation or continuation, but without the information from TrustMe I don't see how it can be continued. So does anyone have a way to contact him?
Remember that this is a tournament, so participant or not, don't talk about the games themselves. We're only here to discuss what can be done for the whole.
New game: WTA - 50 points - classical - full press - anonymous
Hey everyone, So I opened a new game and named it after a diplomat who -at an intellectual level- appeals to me (not passing any judgments on the man's politics, it's his way of arriving at a conclusion that I like)
There is an abundance of politics forums, but there need not be. Use this forum to exclusively post anything about politics, have debates, comment, or do whatever else you would like to do related to politics.
The monopoly that public schools have on secondary education is one of the major problems that is doing damage to American society today. Public schools not exist for teachers and administrators instead of for students.
Well, im paranoid, and im wondering what we do if the mods are multi accounting. And we all know they have multiple accounts to aid in spying, investigating, and all the other mod business that is in the grey area. We cant report it to the mods, but we can find out those accounts and not let them use them for such. And im just talking hypothetical here, not making any real accusations (for those of you fond of clue, im not to the point of making an accusation yet) ;)
EOG Gunboat Means Never Having to Say You're Sorry-12
Game Link: gameID=68341 Hey guys, thought I'd create a thread for anyone to offer their thoughts. For my part, I think my play as France highlights the importance of sticking with a game even if things look really tough - I was fighting off 3 countries for the first half of the game but still came out on top. To get such a stiff competition situation was great fun! Thanks for the interesting game all and I look forward to no. 13.
I messed up the French invasion as Italy; I was expecting English pressure. As it happened England attacked Germany instead, letting France concentrate his units and retake the poorly defended Italian centres. At the same time I had to hold Turkey off as best I could, then France came to the rescue. I'm still surprised how France recovered...
Turkey, you had a clear line to taking Naples and Rome. All you had to do was to convoy an army to Apulia and France could not defend both Piedmont and Rome. France should have moved a unit to Marseilles; it would have been a clear line then.
I was Germany. I turned around to deal with a possible Juggernaut, and got stabbed by England for my pains. I spent the rest of the game slowly dying, and at the end helping Turkey as best I could to screw England.
@Gobbledygook: Yeah, I saw that but it didn't seem worth it to keep going for two or three more years just to eliminate one more player. I was unable to solo, unfortunately, I'm not sure if I missed an opportunity or if it just a matter of England and France coming together at the exact right time.
Sarg, great game playing defense. I'm definitely up for a rematch anytime.
@Frank. IDK if you could have soloed or not, but I don't draw if there is a chance of me getting rid of another player. The pot and GR aren't my motivation, just pissing off a player who felt they "deserved" a share of the pot when they were the weakest link. Eliminating Italy should have been a priority for everyone, except Italy of course.
If I were Turkey, I'd wipe Italy out too. I don't think the "Eliminating Italy should have been a priority for everyone" is a fair comment though. No doubt you (and I) agree that eliminating small irrelevant countries before a draw is the correct play, but there are others (like Frank) who believe all countries who managed to hold the line deserve equally in a draw, and I respect them for their views. Imposing your views upon everyone else is wrong.