What I can't wait is for them to claim the source is a conservative source when the last four winners of liar of the year from this source (and this is only their fifth time slecting a lie of the year) were all Republicans. Nope. Epic fail if they try.

In a close second, krellin's "I've got $1000 that says Romney will win!"

Yep, that is a close second. :-) Of course, just like Obama's spin, there is the spin that no one took him up on the offer according to the term's of the bet he was willing to give. But, unlike Obama, he at least set out the terms. Obama said "You like it. You keep it. Period." then tried to spin it as "under specific conditions".

2WL - ..and I still have my $1000, thank you very much. Nobody ever accepted the bet *as presented*, meaning accept it, and find someone to hold the money.
See, unlike lying sack of shit Democrats, who say one thing but mean and do somethign else, I actualy mean what I say. I presented a specific proposal which noone accepted as is. Then, after the fact, all the lying sack of shit Libtards crawl out of their holes and say they accepted the bet *in some other form*...sorry, that's not how prinicpled people play. Principled people say what they mean...Libtards hear what they want to hear, regradless of what is said.

In otehr words, You *still* lose.

I must say, Obama was a great campaigner, gained a ton of support, but he really dropped the ball.

Oh my God...a politician LIED?!
And lied to get ELECTED?
And is the PRESIDENT?
And the other party runs a 24-hour news cycle about this being the biggest thing EVER?
And 5 years ago the other party ran a 24-hour news cycle against THAT party's guy?

:O

SAY IT AIN'T SO, KRELLIN! SAY IT AIN'T SO!

But, obi, what do you think about the fact that his lie and his trying to stick to it *then* suddenly spin and backpedal and lie about the original lie got hit selected as "lie of the year, 2013"?

I love it when I point out that a liberal source thinks Obama is a lying piece of shit. Sure shuts them up real quick.