The ocean is sad you don't like it Sbyvl... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pacific_garbage_patch

Hey bo sox. I just looked at your result, and it says you are 54% socialist. That means I am right in calling you a socialist, right?

I don't consider that an insult. So go for it.

Anyway, you'd call me a socialist even if I were 0% on that thing.

http://www.isidewith.com/results/284846413

Strange that I side with republicans on science. For stem cell research, believe in eviloution. I guess the AGW question is heavily weighted.

Personally I like to think that I side with science on science issues. To me creationism is the same as AGW. both pseudo-science. Yet politically, one party is fooled by one, and another is fooled by the other. Strange.

I don't think this quiz was any better than the other one though.

@ulytau: Who cares about the ocean? We live on land last I checked.

Philcore is an environMENTAList too. Sigh.

We are only one species.

Whatever happened to man vs beast?

They replaced it with a show called Man vs Food.

"To me creationism is the same as AGW. both pseudo-science. Yet politically, one party is fooled by one, and another is fooled by the other. Strange." - QFT!

To say that humanity is just another species is absolutely absurd. Do the fish or monkeys or ducks have civilization? Culture? Language? Accomplishments?

I didn't think so.

I think my last bit of respect for Draug just went out the window.

I think Sbyvl's ultimate torture chamber would be a month-long stay beautiful remote island off the shore of Nova Scotia with nothing but some beef jerky, a fishing pole, and a paperback copy of "Ishmael" by Daniel Quinn.

Sbyvl - I won't lose any sleep over it. Trust me.

Oh, and to make asbolutely certain you have lost all respect for me. Up to the first trimester, I am pro-choice. I am also a firm believer in abortion for victims of rape, incest, or where the mother's life i sin danger. I don't believe that a sperm and an eg is a life. It takes having brainwaves and feeling pain to be life.

No you've gone too far....

I am indeed sbyvyl! I love the environment. But I hate the political environMENTALists. I don't think they care as much about the environment as they claim to. Endangered species protection to stop people from hunting them? For it. Endangered species protection to stop a border fence or a pipeline? Fuck off. Thinning forests to make sure that a fire doesn't wipe out the whole damn thing? Of course! Never understood why the environMENTALists are against it. Even AGW ... If it was real, and a threat to the ENVIRONMENT, rather than just inconvieniencing some humans, i'd be for doing what we could to to stop it. But it just isn't real. More CO2 is better for the environment, not worse. Green things love that shit! And herbavores love green things. And carnivores love herbavores. Oh but some seaside village will get flooded if the oceans rise ... Fuck 'em. Build on the new beach a mile inland.

I do hate polution though. Actual man-made polution of the water and air and land is very sad. But for Fuck sake CO2 isn't a Goddamn pollutant! Plants breath it in and give us oxygen, which we breath in and give them back their CO2. If there is a simpler, more natural example of a symbiotic relationship, or of recycling, for that matter, please tell me about it.

Massive +1 philcore!

This is what I agree with:

"But I hate the political environMENTALists. I don't think they care as much about the environment as they claim to. Endangered species protection to stop people from hunting them? For it. Endangered species protection to stop a border fence or a pipeline? **** off. Thinning forests to make sure that a fire doesn't wipe out the whole damn thing? Of course! Never understood why the environMENTALists are against it. "

and:
"More CO2 is better for the environment"

No man is an island, sbyvl. But in your case, you're a one man island in a massive, polluted ocean of terrible ideas.

http://www.isidewith.com/results/284850395

@Philcore: I read through your answers:
"Do you believe the theory of Evolution?
You: No"
I think you accidentally selected the wrong answer here. This is why you side with Republicans on science.

2WL is 60% socialist. No surprise there.

Looks like 2WL toes the Democrat party line...

Just as Draugnar toes the Green party line...

@fasces: aha, that would certainly explain it. Oh well, I'm not going to spend the time to remake it, but at least it makes more sense now.

@draug: " Massive +1 philcore!"

Thanks, If only this had topped a new page, I could have that and "fuck off philcore" in the same thread as page toppers. ;-)

http://www.isidewith.com/results/284852793

http://www.politicalcompass.org/crowdchart.php?showform=&Sbyvl36=7.9%2C3.9&Krellin=1.8%2C-3.0&Bo+Sox+48=-7.0%2C-7.1&Yellow+Jacket=-5.9%2C-5.5&newname=obiwanobiwan&newec=-5.50&newsoc=-4.77

@Sbyvl - Hardly. My largest percentage was Republican, but I don't have any percentage larger than 60 something, IIRC.