"I'm not sure I follow your reasoning there awkward. Why does something being confusing at times necessarily mean the it's crazy to look further into it?
It's certainly your choice to look into it or not, but your choice not to doesn't have any bearing on its truth or usefulness."
Something being confusing does not mean it's crazy to look further into it. No statement of the sort was made.
Any system that attempts to explain the world should, as a measure of its effectiveness and validity, make things LESS confusing when it is genuinely looked into. Increased scrutiny of Christianity -- and other religions, mind you -- yields only more confusion. Mujus himself said so much: " learn to live with the fact that it's progressive revelation"... In other words, you keep "learning" new things to explain your current beliefs. The problem: Your belief system is basically an elaborate tapestry, each exquisitely woven thread made at least partly out of lies. Not necessarily INTENTIONAL lies, mind you, but the entire story behind The Big Three western religions was cobbled together piecemeal over time, parts were edited out, certain things are considered "canon" and others were omitted. All of this was done by humans. Fallible, silly humans.
You can either believe in the superstitions of ancient nomads who knew next to nothing about the world, or you can believe in what is actually true and verifiable.
I don't intend on getting in a huge argument here. More just trying to "plant a seed", to borrow a phrase.