@HECKS " *pull off "

Was this a description of your current...er...uh...."activity"...a little one-handed typing, perhaps???

Draug, you aren't one to talk about typos, k bro?

Just vitamin enrich and flavor your water. Add a little fiber to get the bowels working and you'll take off the weight.

@Krellin,
No. In fact, right at the moment I am *sending pictures to* Victoria's Secret, not *receiving picture from* Victoria's Secret. True story.

I work at a museum, and one of our more space-cadet-ish board members has decided it would be great publicity for us to convince Victoria's Secret to shoot a catalog here. So at the moment I'm assembling a slide show of pictures to send them. It's a waste of a morning.

That said, if said board member miraculously succeeds, he'll be a god among men.

I didn't read it as a typo so much as you actually thought the phrase was bits of laughter. Of course, I do believe you thought it was bits of laughter, not fits. Fut ib it makes you beel fetter and less of a bool, so fe it.

@hecks - Please let us know if you and he succeed. We all want to come and watch that photo shoot! :-)

@Draug,
Screw you! Go get your own lingerie model. I'm doing the work, so they're all mine, and I'm not sharing!

LOL! OK, just send us the nip slips and lip slips that don't make it into the catalog!

Heck - where do you live? How do I meet you? You work in a museum? that's cool!

**NEED MORE haters here...CANT' STAND this Draug/Bo/Hecks lovefest going on. Ugh....

Bo ain't posted since I further insulted him. Hardly a love fest. And you are the one fawning over HEcks suddenly. You fucking hippocrite. :-)

I usually don't respond to whiny children.

Well, I made an exception and responded to you before. I try not to respond to people whose IQs are lower than that of a lab rat.

Then you're probably okay. I don't know of any of those on this forum.

Only one I can think of. He's a Boston Red Sox fan in Indy.

My IQ is 126. I'm not sure what lab rats are...

Lab Rats are about 128.

But seriously, I actually figured you for higher than that.

"I have been instructed to, and approved to, have this thread"

No one on the team instructed or approved anything (we never "approve" threads, as little forum moderation as possible). All I said in a very sarcastic way is that nothing about this thread is spam per the site rules.

The OP instructed KRellin to post his bullshit here and you gave it tacit approval by not declaring it spam, therefore Krellin is correct in his assertion. He didn't say the *mods* instructed him to, just that they granted this thread approval by not declaring it spam and that someone else instructed him to.

Sorry, JMO. But... Epic. Fucking. Fail. :-)

Must have been outdated. Or wrong. I just got 133 on some random site hosted by the "International High IQ Society" - who the fuck joins that?

@Draug, anyone is welcome to create any thread that doesn't violate any forum rules. Anyone is allowed to post anything they want in any thread so long as it does not violate any forum rules. My post simply reiterates that. All threads have tacit approval from the team if they don't violate forum rules. Should this thread begin violating forum rules in any way that approval is removed. If any user should violate spam rules then their approval is removed. However spam is defined as:

"Try to keep replies relevant to the conversation and don't start too many threads at once. Before posting a question relating to the software please read the FAQ."

So at the moment the replies are relevant to the conversation description, the number of threads is 1, and this is not a software issue. Let me know if you need any further clarification.

Every time I sit down at my desk, I have a moment of thinking, "Holy shit! Why is there a file called VictoriasSecret.pptx open on my computer! Then I remember and am deeply disappointed.

@Draug somebody needs to tell you this. Every time you say "epic fucking fail" it is really never anything of the sort. You should stop.

@DRaug / JMO -- my point exactly...by my requesting the thread be declared pre-offense as a spam thread (because we all knew it would become one...just as all guns are meant to murder...), JMO's failure to put an end to it means that this thread, by definition, can contain no offensive spam. I am free to flail away on your collective psyche's at will, whoever and whenever I please. Yay!

@JMO: ""Try to keep replies relevant to the conversation and don't start too many threads at once. "

Since the conversation is "Krellin's Bullshit", and *I* am the only true arbiter of Krellin's bullshit...I am therefore free, by definition, to do whatever I please. I can *not* ever be considered spam, as *whatever* I do will be *directly* relevant to Brew's requested topic.

I *am* forum Batman! INVINCIBLE!!!

@YJ - Draug is right...JMO did an epic fail...he *empowered* the Krellin....mwaaaa ha ha ha ha ha!

@Krellin,
I have to agree. It's "Krellin's Thread," therefore you become the arbiter.
If it had been "Krellin's Bullshit Thread" there would be some ambiguity (ie, Krellin's Thread for Bullshit vs. Thread for Krellin's Bullshit). But yeah... I think Krellin gets to decide what's on topic here.

Krellin is the moderator of this thread.

Abandon all hope, ye who enter here.

@jmo - I was just yanking your chain, dude. But seriuously, krellin didn't state the mods instructed himt o do it. He stated simply that he was instructed. It could have been the voices in his head instructing him to. Fact is, the OP *did* instruct him and you just admitted he has tacit approval. So his statement was accurate.

By the way....Bo-Sux saying "I have an IQ of..." is the stupid kid admitting he's stupid, isn't it? The same way the racist says, "But look, I have a black friend..."

lol