Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 1068 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Jamiet99uk (808 D)
29 Jun 13 UTC
Pause error?
Two of my games just spontaneously went into pause without any of the players voting "pause". Is this happening to anyone else? Is there a bug?
16 replies
Open
NigeeBaby (100 D(G))
27 Jun 13 UTC
(+2)
Why is Obama loving the Gaylords.....
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-23076294

Why is he doing it? Maybe he is a batty-boy himself !!
20 replies
Open
2ndWhiteLine (2601 D(B))
16 Apr 13 UTC
(+2)
MAD MARX GUNBOAT CHALLENGE
MadMarx is, without argument, the best player on this site. He claims to be bored, though, with his regular rotation of classic Diplomacy games. So why not try something new? I challenge you, MM, to a single game of gunboat with some of the top gunboaters on this site. You can have final approval over pot size, phase length, and the other players in the game. What do you say?
187 replies
Open
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
(+1)
DOMA struck down
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/news/supreme-court-strikes-down-doma-140330141.html
32 replies
Open
rokakoma (19138 D)
28 Jun 13 UTC
Gord & Uptibrew - EoG
I just kicked Barnett's, Lando's and Fairfax's ass :D :D

gameID=119347
21 replies
Open
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
24 Jun 13 UTC
China, Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, Ecuador--Snowden's Idea of a "Free State?"
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/snowden-washington-reaction-182004272.html "The freedom trail is not exactly China-Russia-Cuba-Venezuela" I have to agree...explain to me again how this guy's a symbol for freedom again (and again, do so WITHOUT saying "Well, the NSA was wrong--" YES. YES IT WAS. That does NOT mean this guy's good...really? Why pick those states, if he couldn't stand what the NSA was doing...they're not exactly Paradises of Government Transparency either...)
Page 2 of 4
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
HumanWave (337 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
(+2)
I think his choice of Ecuador has little to do with a value choice and everything to do with going where anyone will take him. If you think otherwise than you are an idiot.
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
"Snowden is obnoxious. I was on the fence before leaning toward rooting for the guy, but now that he is obviously peddling us secrets for freedom to rivals robs him of any credibility. He is now without a doubt a traitor.

That being said obiwsn's entire posting style and world view is equally obnoxious. I just can't seem to stand this individual."

I'll take that trade-off, HW. ;)

"So, given that ALL jews are at least as annoying as obi-raham, who still has a problem with Hitler?"

Careful now, maple...one more word and I'll call Jew HQ and have them steal your blood--and worse, make you pay 30% interest to have it back.
Invictus (240 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
I'm grateful for Snowden bringing the NSA programs into the public light like this. Hopefully there will be some sort of reform now. Meaningful reform is only possible in the alternate universe where Rand Paul wins in 2016, but something will be done now and that's a great thing.

However

All this could have been done with him still in the country. Instead, he chose to basically defect. Now China and Russia have had first-hand access to at least some part of our secret intelligence technology in the four laptops he's been crating around. Even though his initial move to expose PRISM and the phone metadata was commendable, by exposing the actual technology to our foes is an unforgivable error.

No matter how bad things have gotten here it's nowhere near the levels of oppression going on in Red China or Putin's Russia. By going to these countries with the information and possibly technology he has with him he has harmed the United States and needs to be brought to justice.


And AGAIN, there is a distinction between his exposing the NSA programs as such and his deciding to do so from Hong Kong and then going on a world tour of contemporary authoritarian states. The first is good, the other quite bad. I don't want the government knowing what's on my laptop but I sure as hell want them to know what's on Xi Jinping's.
Invictus (240 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
"obiwsn's entire posting style and world view is equally obnoxious. I just can't seem to stand this individual."

A man after my own heart.
HumanWave (337 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
That being said. The Obama administration bungled this hard. This is coming from a (evermore lukewarm) Obama supporter. The objective here should have been to work quietly to bring snowden to trial while publically only stating that the us is attempting to bring him to justice (for future deterrence) and making it clear that snowden is an exile. Carrots should have been used to get him back if it was worth it.

Instead the administration launches another hamfisted blunder fest that does nothing but allows any nation interested to punch the us in the nose. Pathetic and embarrassing.
Invictus (240 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
To be fair, it's not as if they could send Batman to kidnap him from Hong Kong. And working at it quietly became impossible from the very first. This guy was made for immature internet manchildnre to idolize, and with the buzz they create, legitimate criticism in the media, and the Speaker of the House and others calling him a traitor in public there was no way to do anything quietly.

We could have been saved the embarrassment of groveling to Putin and the Hong Kong PD to hand Snowden over, though...
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
"Meaningful reform is only possible in the alternate universe where Rand Paul wins in 2016,"

1. Ha,
2. Ha,
3. Ha...
4. They said the same thing about Obama in 2008--I know, I was one of 'em.

Politics are politics, you really think one man will change things? Let's not even get into the fact I hate the Paulite ideals...

A GOP House with Religious Right and other Far-Right Republicans that don't necessarily all like Rand Paul, a Democrat Senate...

And Rand Paul is going to beat all that, eh, and bring about the Jeffersonian utopia of legend?

Right...and then the Cubs will win the World Series, the Bills will win the Super Bowl, and I'll be voted both The Pulitzer Prize and be praised for my concise, clear-cut style.
Invictus (240 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
Fucking learn to read. I said alternate universe.
Invictus (240 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
(+1)
As in can't happen here. And it's so obviously a joke anyway. Good God, you're insufferable.
steephie22 (182 D(S))
26 Jun 13 UTC
You have to admit: he's got swagger, you know, for the nerd he is...
mapleleaf (0 DX)
26 Jun 13 UTC
Our next Prime Minister is going to be Justin Trudeau.
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
I know what you wrote, Invictus--

I'm saying, why do you think that in ANY universe one man would sway such divided House, Senate and people, and that such a man is a Kentuckian who thinks there's a war on Christianity and who comes from a father who takes issue with the Civil Rights Act?
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
26 Jun 13 UTC
Obi, both Ron and Rand Paul are the exemplification of a Jeffersonian America. In a time like this when big government is getting us bullshitted into more debt than the entire world is worth, that might just be what we need. Don't underestimate the power of downsizing the feds to the point of halfway nonexistence, even if it doesn't appeal to you.
HumanWave (337 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
Bs, Ron and rand pick and choose their Jeffersonian policies, they are no friends if public education which Jefferson championed, they are bankrolled by businessmen driven by self interested desire to pay less taxes and increase profit margins, an impulse which although I'd aligned with Jeffersonian principles of small government, is certainly not inline with his hatred of self interest guiding political allegiance. Although business interests and mid level managers backing Paul might like to think that they are virtuous yeomen farmers. It spent make it true.
SYnapse (0 DX)
26 Jun 13 UTC
Where are the Snowdens of yesteryear??
Octavious (2701 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
There's a British one from a decade or so ago who did a similar thing regarding British Intel's plan to assassinate Middle Eastern leaders. He got caught and arrested, I think. The poor sod currently thinks he's Jesus...
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
(+1)
"Obi, both Ron and Rand Paul are the exemplification of a Jeffersonian America. In a time like this when big government is getting us bullshitted into more debt than the entire world is worth, that might just be what we need."

I strongly disagree, as I must hasten to say again--

Nice or no, Jefferson's America is as permanently dead and gone as Jefferson himself.

This isn't an 18th century agrarian state.
This isn't a world where we can afford--or even desire to be--isolationist.
This isn't a world where we can refuse to act (even if we can refrain from doing so.)
This isn't a nation where the population is mostly self-sufficient farmers.
This isn't a nation where the population doesn't need government intervention and aid.
This isn't a nation where the population can subsist largely on its own, free of government.

We are NOT a small, agrarian, 18th century Jeffersonian utopia.

Like it or not, we're a massive, urban, 21st century globalized superpower.

The food you eat isn't grown in your own backyard--sometimes not even your own state.
The clothes you wear, the car you drive, the laptop you own--it all came from somewhere else.
The streets and police and the infrastructure and military--that's government spending.
The many, MANY minorities that need protection can only get it from their government.

People don't free slaves because their conscience tells them to, not often--
They free them because, motives pure or no, the government tells them to.
Women and blacks don't gain the right to vote because bigotry and misogyny dissipates.
They are allowed to vote because they ultimately appeal to their government, and their government ultimately heeds that call, or is else left behind.

When your ideal state is the Jeffersonian state, one of well-off, white farmers...

Well, the rights of blacks and women and Latinos and everyone else doesn't quite leap into the minds of the public as something terribly important.

Government may not always be the answer--but when it comes to social change, more often than not, it not only has to be the answer, one way or another, but it SHOULD be the answer, it SHOULD be the hammer that forges new liberty upon the broken and half-fulfilled promises of a nation that began with the words "all men are created equal."

The closest threat isn't a month or more away in a British Man-of-War.

It's minutes away in a nuclear missile, or seconds away in a suicide bomb or cyber attack.

"Don't underestimate the power of downsizing the feds to the point of halfway nonexistence, even if it doesn't appeal to you."

I don't underestimate the effect of that--on the contrary, I view that power with the gravest sentiments possible.

I don't want a laissez-faire or small, downsized, weakened government.

I don't want a government that will leave gay rights, women's rights, religious and atheistic rights and immigration and all the social issues which matter to me so very much to someone else--

I loathe the government that looks at an issue of social reform or civil rights where MILLIONS of Americans are effected day in and day out and says "Well, it's not our place to interfere...let's leave it to the states and to businesses to decide."

If it were up to the states, we'd still have poll taxes.
If it were up to the states, who knows how much the color of your skin might STILL get in the way of your elementary rights as a human being, let alone as an American citizen.
If it were up to the states, we'd have (even more) kids being taught 2+2=The Bible and that science is a dirty word--a dirty word right up there with "homosexual."

Maybe it's not for the federal government to define love--

But it sure as hell isn't and shouldn't be up to 50 separate states to say your love is valid and legal in New Hampshire but illegal and immoral in Mississippi.

And (as the SCOTUS gets ready to rule on this) the same state should never, NEVER one day say you and your beloved are perfectly legal, loving partners and married, and the next having your rights and definition of love stripped away because the opinion polls changed and the people no longer consider your relationship valid or legal.

One day gay marriage is legal in California, the next Pro 8 comes along and shatters the lives of hundreds of thousands.

ALL while the federal government decides to idly and cowardly kick the can down the road and "let the states decide."

My goodness, I've gone on THIS long without a Shakespeare reference?

Let's fix that--Shakespeare was wrong about his astronomy, and Galileo was right.

The man was The Soul of the Age, the greatest and most quoted author in the English language, I'd argue that he's easily one of the 10 most important people in the history of the English-speaking world--

But Shakespeare was wrong. It happens to the best. Especially to the best.

He live 400 years ago, he could hardly help it.

Jefferson lived a little more than half that long ago.
He lived at a time when all the above tropes about an agrarian state were true.
He lived when all of that might have made sense, and good sense.
He also lived when women were little more than trophies for their husbands and the current President of this country would have been counted as 3/5 of a person, denied the right to vote, to organize, to do anything but the will of their master, and would have been viewed by many as a subhuman creature to be bought, sold, shackled and whipped.

Jefferson himself had some rather ugly (if sometimes inconsistent) views on blacks.

Jefferson was wrong. Just like Shakespeare. Again, it happens.

The man's face is immortalized on a mountain, rightfully so, and that face and his ideals of liberty will endure as long as the last Shakespearean sonnet or Mozart concerto--

But he was WRONG. Wrong then, and still wrong now.

The Jefferson ideal is a pipe dream, not a very inclusive one at that, and founded on ideals that are outdated--and America needs to realize that and get over the fact that it's founders, great as they were, were also flawed men, and their vision doesn't have to be THE vision for America's whole future--indeed, it shouldn't be.

The Jeffersonian utopia was great for the same folks for whom the 1940s and 50s was The Golden Age of Americana, one conservatives so badly want back--

The wealthy and white middle class.

Wasn't that great for blacks. Or for Latino immigrants. Or for women.

The situation for all three began to get better, but that came with struggling against the business-fueled status quo--the sort of status quo the GOP and Paul would have been proud of--and ultimately culminated in the 1960s...and the Civil Rights Act...

Which Ron Paul has repeatedly spoken out AGAINST.

Because, well, the CRA doesn't fit within the ideal of a Jeffersonian utopia.
That America is gone.
That utopia never existed.
And Ron and Rand Paul need to admit that and move on.

Business and the states didn't give us the CRA, didn't give those people their freedom--

Those groups and their government, after much turmoil and persuasion, gave them their freedom.

And what a surprise--who is it that votes overwhelmingly Democratic, the party of big government and of the Civil Rights Act?

Those who benefited from it--blacks, Latinos, women, and those among us who believe in the enfranchisement of those groups and of the power and capacity for change which can come from our highest ranks if only we push hard enough and long enough.

Let it not be an ugly, reviled thing to be a politician--let that be a badge of honor, let that stand for someone who is interested in his own well-being, sure, but is also willing and enabled to look out for the rights of those who need it most and who can ultimately become the engine of change and crucible of democratic empowerment in this country.

THAT is the true great blessing of big government--it has it's drawbacks and its curses, to be sure, but THAT is the great blessing it gives...

And I'll take that blessing every time...and I have to hope that Jefferson would want such a blessing for his people if he were alive today as well.

...Is my filibuster over yet...? Yes? Well, I'm sitting down and drinking some Coke, so I've already broken the rules, so yeah, I guess it is. :p
Yonni (136 D(S))
26 Jun 13 UTC
Here's a decent article on him from NYTimes for those interested.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/25/opinion/snowden-through-the-eyes-of-a-spy-novelist.html?smid=tw-share&_r=3&
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
26 Jun 13 UTC
(+1)
Obi, the only part of your post I read is the last sentence. Are you drinking Coke brand or snorting it?
FlemGem (1297 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
(+3)
I wonder if Shakespeare was wrong when he said "Brevity is the soul of wit"? ;-)
Timur (673 D(B))
26 Jun 13 UTC
In the early 1940's, they used to chuck up shiny, glittery material to fool the radar.
Timur (673 D(B))
26 Jun 13 UTC
(Wrongly translated.) 'Levity is a hole of shit'?
Straight-laced, straight-faced and straight-up-and-at-'em is the King's way. Follow Martin Luther Jnr.
(Maybe lost the thread partially, but I'm sure it'll make sense in the morning.)
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
"I wonder if Shakespeare was wrong when he said "Brevity is the soul of wit""

Well, who did he put those words in the mouth of?

Polonius--the great pompous windbag! So consider the source...

He gives his HERO, Hamlet, more lines than any other character in his longest play.

Words, words, words...

;)
Jamiet99uk (808 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
As one who usually considers obiwan's posts too lengthy, on this occasion I read every word of the above "Jefferson was wrong" essay, and I say +1 to you, sir. I fully concur with you on this occasion.
Al Swearengen (0 DX)
26 Jun 13 UTC
What puzzles me isn't that certain people don't appreciate Mr. Snowden. Everyone, after all has a right to their opinion and Snowden's actions have raised more than their fair share of controversy.

What puzzles me is why people are going so far out of their way to demonize someone who, in all likelihood, has the same emotional makeup of Nathaniel Hale or Mahatma Gandhi. Must be a slow week for news.
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
^I...I just...I can't even...

Comparing him to Gandhi...oy...

You now what? No. Not today.

It's too good of a day with the double-victory in the SCOTUS rulings to get going on this again...

Come back tomorrow, Al, and I'll take up the argument against him again...

For today, all is well and good! :)
Sbyvl36 (439 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
After reading "China, Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, Ecuador" one thought came into my head: Axis of Evil...
Gunfighter06 (224 D)
27 Jun 13 UTC
(+2)
Snowden isn't a dumbass. If he thought he would get a fair trial, he would have turned himself in. The irony of the situation is actually quite disturbing.
Octavious (2701 D)
27 Jun 13 UTC
Ah, here we go. Behold the fate of the British spy who tried a similar things ten years back...

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/meet-delores-the-exmi5-officer-now-living-as-a-woman-6801922.html

It should be pointed out that we Brits are a lot less harsh on people who do this sort of thing than you Yanks. Even so the presures of it all can break a man. It's all rather sad.
FlemGem (1297 D)
27 Jun 13 UTC
Polonius' remark is supposed to be ironic, and it must be true to be ironic, so I think the Bard was making a point of some sort...though I never thought he lived up to it himself. Maybe Polonius was a sort of autobiographical joke at his own expense...I can respect that, and it makes it even funnier.

Page 2 of 4
FirstPreviousNextLast
 

112 replies
goldfinger0303 (3157 DMod)
28 Jun 13 UTC
The Beginning of the End for Affirmative Action?
An interesting case came up in my research of the DOMA ruling that lays the groundwork for the nullification of all forms of racial preferences.

http://tinyurl.com/pzckk98
8 replies
Open
matingara (100 D)
28 Jun 13 UTC
I want to be a league Substitute Please
Hi! I have been here at WebDiplomacy since the start of the year. Have played a lot of fun games and have been doing OK. Someone suggested that league games were a lot more strategic and the "done thing" was to sign up via the forums. Can anyone help? Thanks.

Joel.
2 replies
Open
redhouse1938 (429 D)
27 Jun 13 UTC
Share your dream with me!
What is your dream in life? Which cloud do you follow?
29 replies
Open
redhouse1938 (429 D)
28 Jun 13 UTC
Kids teased in schools
So in Holland, as in all other countries, there are kids teased in schools. The government has gone through great lengths to "protect them", a dangerous development if you ask me.
8 replies
Open
nudge (284 D)
28 Jun 13 UTC
Rulers of Modern Diplomacy II
continuing my series, who are you playing, here are the rulers of modern diplomacy as at March 1, 1994
3 replies
Open
Lando Calrissian (100 D(S))
28 Jun 13 UTC
ALBERTA
Just out of curiousity, did the flooding register on American media?
16 replies
Open
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
28 Jun 13 UTC
Urgent Sitter or Replacement Needed
A member can't get onto the site because of flooding in his area. There is a world game (36 hour phases), and 2 Modern Varients (24 hour phases). Points to take over these positions will be provided. Reply or email [email protected] if interested
3 replies
Open
Mapu (362 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
Aaron Hernandez = so sad
A star pro athlete. Now charged with 1st degree murder. How hard is it to sit on your millions, enjoy your fiancee, baby, and career, and not do anything stupid?
20 replies
Open
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
27 Jun 13 UTC
NBA Draft
Anthony Bennett (who?) goes #1... and as Bonnie Tyler once said... WHERE HAVE ALL THE GOOD MEN GONE??!!!
0 replies
Open
Crazy Anglican (1067 D)
27 Jun 13 UTC
The Summer Road Trip
So how do you deal with "Are we there yet?"
1 reply
Open
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
27 Jun 13 UTC
Ecuador
Seriously, the United States has gotten the finger from two tiny, hardly important nations in our typical affairs in the past week... this is awesome. All over one guy.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/27/us-usa-security-ecuador-idUSBRE95Q0L820130627
8 replies
Open
mlbone (112 D)
27 Jun 13 UTC
interest in a 17 player world gunboat tourney?
I was thinking anywhere from 5-8 games depending on the interest. 5 pts. 24 hour turns.

If interested, please pm me, and I can set up a tournament. This seems to be the only way to get rid of metas....
0 replies
Open
LeonTrotsky (1188 D)
27 Jun 13 UTC
Need a new France! The game has not started yet
Hi, the France in this game got banned before he first move even went, and because France is such an important country, would someone please take over? The game is ruined without him especially at the beginning

gameID=121797
3 replies
Open
redpanda (100 D)
27 Jun 13 UTC
What does "Canecel" mean?
I am not an native speaker of English.
Could you tell me what "Cancel" mean?
What difference is there between "Draw" and "Cancel" ?
21 replies
Open
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
25 Jun 13 UTC
(+2)
A Question For My Not-So-Christian Chums
Are you tired of religion threads too?
197 replies
Open
MeepMeep (100 D)
08 Jun 13 UTC
(+1)
I have two questions to ask.
1. If I don't like a player and don't want to pause the game per that person's request, can the Mod pauses the game for that person?

2. If a person does not want to work and I don't want to give the person's my spare changes, can the government tax me then give the other person some welfare?
469 replies
Open
jcbryan97 (134 D)
19 May 13 UTC
New Gunboat Series
Not a tournament and no special rules. 36hr phases to avoid NMRs, but ready-up ASAP. 5 pt WTA games. I'll join as many as my points will allow. Last series was fun and hopefully this will be too. Anyone interested?
157 replies
Open
SYnapse (0 DX)
26 Jun 13 UTC
Kerbal Space Program
Check out this amazing indie space simulator.
8 replies
Open
smoky (771 D)
27 Jun 13 UTC
(+1)
Premade!
classic live gb-wta in this game England and Germany are playing as premade and talk with each other.
1 reply
Open
Laptop Recommendations
I want to buy a new notebook and I think a lot of people here are pretty knowledgeable about this stuff.
31 replies
Open
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
26 Jun 13 UTC
(+3)
Porn
Have fun with this one.

http://nesn.com/2013/06/boston-pornography-viewership-skyrocketed-immediately-after-bruins-stanley-cup-loss-photo/
1 reply
Open
Crazy Anglican (1067 D)
24 Jun 13 UTC
I AM A WEBDIPPER
join my tribe.
118 replies
Open
kaner406 (356 D)
26 Jun 13 UTC
Yay!
Go Rudd!!!!
20 replies
Open
Jack_Klein (897 D)
25 Jun 13 UTC
Blackhawks and the Stanley Cup
As a Chicagoan, I so rarely get to say this.
Chicago are the champions!
Amazing game.
47 replies
Open
Page 1068 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top