Did I say anything about Trump supporters not being vocal ghug? I don't understand what you're getting at.

Demon said that her Clinton supporters needed to be more vocal, to which I replied that they are already vocal and a majority here. Are either of those statements wrong?

She was arguing that they were being drowned out in the thread. Y'all just circlejerked for several pages of forum, so I don't think that's at all inaccurate The argument she was making was clearly one of relative vocality, and you attempted to refute it, so yours was de facto one of relative vocality as well.

Don't do that weaselly shit on me. It's below you.

The liberal faction on this forum circle jerks several pages all the time, and they can do it more often because there are far more of them.

I'm very uncomfortable around most people, so I don't know if I'd get in on a circle jerk. I'd have to say no.

Hell, brianbomb circlejerks himself

Clinton surges back to +7 in Virginia

"She was arguing that they were being drowned out in the thread. Y'all just circlejerked for several pages of forum, so I don't think that's at all inaccurate The argument she was making was clearly one of relative vocality, and you attempted to refute it, so yours was de facto one of relative vocality as well.

Don't do that weaselly shit on me. It's below you."

What circlejerk and what weaselly shit? I'm not kidding. Is me talking to ND about how to handle threats like Ogion's a "circlejerk" now? Or me and a couple of Trump supporters being happy about voting for him?

Frankly it seemed like the mere presence of happy Trump supporters is what was "scary" to Demon, and I noted that there are plenty of Clinton people here too. We're outnumbered in the forum. What's there to be scared of?

A circle jerk is where several men gather to mutually masturbate. Are you implying that I gather around a circle with clones of myself stroking my own penis(es)

It sounds like you inherently think something is wrong with male sexual experimentation; as you added a flavour of homophobia to your tone.

Would you feel the same about a group of females gathering to have a scissor party for Hillary for example? Or was it just male homophobia.

whoa i'm late.

where's the gay sex at -.-

"I will be better for the gays than Hillary Clinton" -Donald Trump

http://www.usatoday.com/pages/interactives/2016/election/poll-tracker/

Wait what. Who's homophobic. I'm ready to sjw him.

I do not see the intelligence of kow-towing to those who put round pegs into square holes.

For the young members: 'When you are young, if you are not liberal you have no heart; When you are older, if you are not conservative, you have no brain.' - Churchill.

OK, I actually read this thread, and this is starting to get scary. The discourse has devolved so much, into bitter hate filled lingo making generalizations. (Not everyone in this thread.) It's not just here it's getting worse. It's everywhere.
There is going to be no winners in this election. Only losers.
The hate between both sides and violence has drastically gone up. Heck, I'm even seeing violence in Canada over the American election. (Freaky thing to witness)
(http://www.metronews.ca/news/calgary/2016/10/16/fight-breaks-out-at-university-of-calgary-over-trump-hat.html)
I'm pretty young, so this is really the first election I've ever followed closely, but is the tension between both sides usually this extreme?
Both sides as a whole seem to gather behind their lines and circle jerk (forgive my homophobia?) anyone who disagrees with them, while the reasonable ones so rarely have a voice.

You have no idea. You should see how the american electorate was in the 1850's. Check out "Bleeding Kansas".

@Fluminator

hasn't been this bad since the civil rights era, from what I can see

And the american revolution, one third patriots won control, one third neutral just hid and complied, and one third became canadians or returned to britain.

"There is going to be no winners in this election. Only losers."

I had a good discussion with a historian last night, who basically thinks Clinton will be terrible for the world (in terms or her warmongering with Russia and willingness to use force) and Trump is nothing short of a Fascist (with no brown shirts, instead he uses red caps... )

So indeed, i feel this sentiment more closely.

Yeah. Clinton's track record with being good to other countries is very low at the moment, and there's no reason to think it will change.
Meanwhile Trump's statements about nukes and his track record of being a bully would probably not be great for the world either.

yes... we have found a center. let's stay here for a while. sunshine and happiness

I gotta go but when i return i am up to pummeling some ass in a rip roaring game of Diplomacy!

1. Trump does not need to win PA to 'win' the election. He does need to win FL.
2. One poll had Trump up 3 in VA and another has Clinton up 7. VA polling is terrible. The 2014 polling average had Warner (D) up 12 points and he won by .05 in VA. 538 did a big report on that 'shocker' after the election. Look it up.
3. Clinton supporters are already a majority on the boards.

Not like this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/11/03/no-you-cant-text-your-vote-but-these-ads-tell-clinton-supporters-to-do-just-that/

Sad to see how less educated while males are so afraid of having a female President. I wonder if even American women are prepared to accept a female president. The gender issue seems to way too important. The real issues should be policies and competence and if those had been the issues, Clinton would have won this circus election easily.

I would like to refer you back to Hillary's history as a warmonger and the expectation that, as the first woman to become president, she will feel the pressure from critics to prove she has the halls to do the job. Likely resulting in a hawkish foreign policy. Isolationist Trump may be better for the rest of the world - but horrible for Americans of multiple minorities...

What a wonderfully imaginative world you live in Peter, if you think Hillary is at a disadvantage because she is a woman. If anything it is a massive, UNDESERVED benefit to her. Anyway, she's going to jail, dimwits.