I was playing a live game recently as Italy and the Austria player was just being stupid.
Me: Sat 08 PM Spring, 1902: Ok moving to Ion. I hope we can maintain a DMZ of Tyrolia. I understand you have a working alliance with Turkey, but sooner or later on of the two of you must give - Turkey needs to move past you in order to expand.
Sat 08 PM Spring, 1902: Since I haven't heard from you, I will be forced to move to Tyr preemptively. If you reply I can reverse the move.
Him: Sat 08 PM Spring, 1902: retreat from tyrolia immediately
Me: Sat 08 PM Spring, 1902: Moving to Boh. Lepanto.
Sat 08 PM Spring, 1902: Just saying, even a basic amount of press would be appreciated.
Him: Sat 08 PM Autumn, 1902: betrayal is not pretty
[Note, I have not 'betrayed him' in the least.]
Me: Sat 08 PM Autumn, 1902: Are you agreeable with the Lepanto?
Sat 08 PM Autumn, 1902: neither is noncommunication, my friend. If you dont communicate, i take it you mean to stab
Sat 08 PM Autumn, 1902: I AM MOVING TO BOH. IF YOU COULD COMMUNICATE I WOULD BE ABLE TO ALLY BETTER WITH YOU.
Two points IM trying to get across and dont know if you can understand.
Him: Sat 08 PM Autumn, 1902: i have communicated. you are a liar and a rat.
Me: Sat 09 PM Autumn, 1903: Uh oh. Look where that got you.
Him: Sat 09 PM Autumn, 1903: rot in hell liar
Me: Sat 09 PM Autumn, 1903: Aww look at the poor baby it's crying. Go on, run to mommy dear.
---
Point of story - if someone doesn't communicate, they have no right to accuse you of all sorts of imagined 'betrayals'