Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 64 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
T B0NE (100 D)
21 Jan 08 UTC
Delete game
Hey is there any way to leave a game I accidently created???
1 reply
Open
Rasputin31 (100 D)
20 Jan 08 UTC
Letsgoagain!
60 point game. Click on my name and find it.
0 replies
Open
Rait (10151 D(S))
17 Jan 08 UTC
Request for draw - game 'Damage'
http://phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gid=1943

Participants, please post Your confirmations here
3 replies
Open
Google (131 D)
20 Jan 08 UTC
How to find the old posts?
I was wondering if we could read some old posts. It seems there are only a small part of the posts viewable in the Forum. Where are those disappeared ones?

Anyone could help? Thanks!
2 replies
Open
positron (1160 D)
20 Jan 08 UTC
Kestas Help. Site is hung at the "Due now" stage.
Currently there are no games with "end of phase:" of 18 thru 24 hours.

Looks like the site stopped advancing out of the "Due now" stage 6 to 7 hours ago.
12 replies
Open
Thucydides (864 D(B))
20 Jan 08 UTC
Post New Topic
I have been having trouble posting a new topic; it always ends up in the thread on top. So this is a test. If you are reading this inside a thread and not as a separate topic the test failed... lol
2 replies
Open
Karkand (2167 D)
20 Jan 08 UTC
Civil Disorder?: How long does it take?
Hi All

How long does it take for a country to go into CD?
3 replies
Open
isbian (106 D)
20 Jan 08 UTC
Stuck Game - Ptkb4
This game appears to be stuck in due now. Please, can someone fix this problem? Thanks.

http://phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gid=2610
0 replies
Open
Majaii (825 D)
20 Jan 08 UTC
Game stuck in "due now"
Game http://www.phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gid=2696 has been stuck in the due now order phase for over an hour. If anyone can fix it that would be great.

-Majaii
0 replies
Open
opripom (2853 D)
19 Jan 08 UTC
«error» End of phase: due now
Hi kestas! Please unblock the game
http://www.phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gid=2496

Thanks a lot!
5 replies
Open
yeunghauyip (1654 D)
20 Jan 08 UTC
Game stuck at "Due now"
Kestas, please, unblock the game & let us continue, the game is stuck at "Due now" for a few hours.

http://www.phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gid=2754
1 reply
Open
Wombat (722 D)
18 Jan 08 UTC
Nice big game
Pot's 200. A proper diplomatic smash.

For those who have a few huindred and want to become pros- come and dare this game
7 replies
Open
Smithereens (153 D)
19 Jan 08 UTC
Low Stakes Game
I just created a 10D game called "Yankee". I'm still new at this, so I figured I'd make it low stakes.
0 replies
Open
warrenthegreat (147 D)
18 Jan 08 UTC
Possible multi in Come on Down
kobalt and bazin joined today within 30 mins of each other and signed up for same game. Are they the same guy or did one guy find this game and tell a friend. What say u?
18 replies
Open
Bazin (527 D)
19 Jan 08 UTC
New Game: The Blitz
I'm excited to get playing, so I've started a low stakes game here:

http://phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gid=2769

Only a bid of only 15! Good Luck.
0 replies
Open
Sarge (262 D)
19 Jan 08 UTC
Supporting a landing convoy?
Can this be done? For instance, I have an army in Belgium and want to support my army landing in Holland after convoying from Yorkshire. But the game doesn't offer a choice 'support to Holland from Yorkshire'.
4 replies
Open
oziodip (297 D)
15 Jan 08 UTC
metagaming?
Satao, enigmaMV and poweron are friends in real life?
at first poweron backstabbed me, then satao, then enigmaMV in this game
http://phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gid=2449
they play a lot of game together, they joined phpdiplomacy toghether...
and now what i see? after a lot of suggestion i give to france to let him survive he starts to give to germany SC for nothing back! whitout a reason!
he can take back edinburg but he didn't.
i move back pic so germany can move in....now he moved out from paris so germany can take it...
he don't make a move against germany but he let germany take all his SC!
it's not funny to play in this way!
if france will give to germay al his SC germany will win!
is this fair? this is a game...if people play in this way there is no fun... :(
sorry for my bad english....

25 replies
Open
pokemon trainer (721 D)
16 Jan 08 UTC
GaryOak and Smellymcg3e3
I have a suspision that these two accounts are the same people. In one of my games, JumpRightIn, I noticed that GaryOaks e-mail was [email protected] I asked him about this he said it was not but then he changed his e-mail to hidden so no one could see it. Any comments?
figlesquidge (2131 D)
17 Jan 08 UTC
Well, there isn't really anything that any of _us_ can do about it then. We can come up with lists of suspected cheaters, but without Kestas' hidden information we cannot know if we are correct or not...
Thucydides (864 D(B))
17 Jan 08 UTC
Lol. Circumstantial evidence. My favorite.
Comrade (100 D)
17 Jan 08 UTC
way to call the guy out.
ComputerMonger (100 D)
17 Jan 08 UTC
GaryOak, GaryOak2, GaryOak3, GaryOak4, Sweens18 and Sm3llymcg3e3e are definitely the same person, same start dates and yes GaryOak's email was the [email protected] or w/e and their creation dates are all the same, and they are in games together. I also have suspicion that Fool422 and Plasma are him too because the dates are right there too and they are in games together too (but I might be wrong about the latter two). Also Comrade (who commented here to protect his friend) is also Tsar, Spetznatz, Jesse James, and Putin. These are only a few of their accounts, I am sure they have another dozen.
ComputerMonger (100 D)
17 Jan 08 UTC
And just putting it out there, Sorel and batbat45 are in several games with at least one of the following: GaryOak, Sm3llymcg3e3e, and Sweens18. The creation date is similar too.
Comrade (100 D)
17 Jan 08 UTC
look pal, if you havent noticed, my multi accounts have been inactive for weeks now. next time you wanna play a little snitch go cry to mommy, and remember your not the moderator. what a little bitch you are. similar dates means nothing, god hopes you never become a lawyer because you would suck balls at it. not that it would be anything new to you.
Thucydides (864 D(B))
17 Jan 08 UTC
Well now that each side has all the slander, libel, mudslinging, and wild accusations out of the way... let's just calm down...
Raga (140 D)
17 Jan 08 UTC
"GaryOak, GaryOak2, GaryOak3, GaryOak4"

comrade, even you must agree that those are pretty obvious.

and please guys (and/or gals) lets try to keep the name calling at a minimum...cant we be civilized about it?
Karkand (2167 D)
17 Jan 08 UTC
Comrade, your multi account user status is duly noted. Shut thine piehole , please.
GaryOak (0 DX)
17 Jan 08 UTC
Okay this has gotten a little ridiculous.
Computermonger, stop trying to be a detective, it doesn't make you cool.
I'll admit that Me and Smellymcg3e3 are the same, but I only have one game left where I'm using both of them, and after it is over It will never happen again.
I am not Sweens18, Fool422, Plasma, Sorel, or batbat45.
Just because someone is in a game with someone else doesn't make them the same person....
and If you didn't get GarkOak, GaryOak2, and etc. you're officially retarded, but notice who they played against.
We just wanted to do a multi-account game against one another.
I'm really not stupid enough to flood a game with 4 GaryOaks and have people think they were different people.
ComputerMonger, please die.
</thread>
GaryOak (0 DX)
17 Jan 08 UTC
and I just noticed that computermonger just joined us yesterday.
Welcome to phpDip, I hope you don't stay long.
alamothe (3367 D(B))
17 Jan 08 UTC
please ban multiaccounts
mightyrobot (202 D)
17 Jan 08 UTC
Ban the officially retarded multiaccounter.
Comrade (100 D)
17 Jan 08 UTC
how about you go kill yourself mightyrobot? a holier then thou attitude does not get your wishes done. gary is right, we just wanted to play a couple of games, and we were originally multiing against ourselves. so we played a couple of multi games with others. we are stopping or stopped. move on go find the next witch to burn.
Sweens18 (690 D)
17 Jan 08 UTC
woah...why would you bring me into this...why the hell would i be smellymcgee? lol...
Comrade (100 D)
17 Jan 08 UTC
you sir, are a victim of a witch hunt.
ComputerMonger (100 D)
17 Jan 08 UTC
Well, GaryOak's irl last name is Sweeney, so stop trying to pretend it's not you.
Sirither (100 D)
17 Jan 08 UTC
This is ridiculous. What motivates people to create multiple accounts for a dishonest advantage in a meaningless game?
Sm3llymcg3e3 (0 DX)
17 Jan 08 UTC
ComputerMonger, really.
I came out as sm3llymcg3e3 (me)
and GaryOak.
What's to stop me from coming out as Sweens18?
one thing.
It's not me. So go die.
Though I'd like to know how you know my name.
Thucydides (864 D(B))
17 Jan 08 UTC
Well this is all very interesting and all... but what is it accomplishing? I am personally in a game with GaryOak and Comrade and neither of them are multi-accounting in it. I say give them a week and see if they reform... don't hyperventilate over this... seriously the forum is becoming a witch-hunt forum. Let Kestas do the banning the deciding on all this, and don't start up on the whole "I have a suspicion," thing. In the end, your suspicion doesn't matter. My first post stands. This evidence is circumstantial. The best the prosecution has is a confession and an apology. So obviously the way to proceed, unless you have some kind of unjustified personal beef with Gary (this means you ComputerMonger) is to drop your charges and wait for a result pending the judge's (Kestas') decision. I would really prefer in the future if we could keep the whole mood of these forums, and this site, nice and jovial, like you might think a game-playing website would be.
mightyrobot (202 D)
17 Jan 08 UTC
I don't think the claim was that GaryOak and Comrade are the same person. I think the claim was that GaryOak was using multiple accounts. ComputerMonger got carried away and started mentioning other people who assumed were multiaccounters, such as Comrade.

GaryOak has admitted to using mutiple accounts: "I'll admit that Me and Smellymcg3e3 are the same, but I only have one game left where I'm using both of them, and after it is over It will never happen again." And, also implied that he was playing games with only himself. (I assume to increase his points.)
Thucydides (864 D(B))
17 Jan 08 UTC
No those were with comrade's former multis. But like I said they are dropping them, partly at my pressure.
GaryOak (0 DX)
17 Jan 08 UTC
I never played a game with only myself.
It was against comrade's old multis and only with the blatantly obvious names of GaryOak2, 3, 4 etc.
It wasn't to raise points, it was because we thought it would be fun.
And it was.
But I'm done multi accounting.
mightyrobot (202 D)
17 Jan 08 UTC
I see. I misunderstood.
Please no more multi accounting.
The Mahatma (1195 D)
17 Jan 08 UTC
Thucydides:
-"This evidence is circumstantial. The best the prosecution has is a confession and an apology."

I think a freely-given confession is sufficient proof that there has been an issue. It is, in fact, better proof than is normally presented here.

The apology and commitment to cease and desist multi-accounting is also sufficient, but the sincerity is clouded for me by the rude comments of the (soon-to-be) reformed multi-accounters. Comrade and GaryOak: You did something wrong; do not tell people who have a problem with this to kill themselves.

Thucydides again: "So obviously the way to proceed, unless you have some kind of unjustified personal beef with Gary (this means you ComputerMonger) is to drop your charges and wait for a result pending the judge's (Kestas') decision."

I emailed Kestas directly 2 to 3 weeks ago alerting him to the issue with Comrade and GaryOak. He is clearly too busy to chase down and "investigate" every situation. The fact Comrade stated on the Forum that he is currently using two accounts in one game, and yet neither account has been frozen, illustrates the extent of the problem - people are brazenly multi-accounting, and Kestas does not have the time to ban their extra accounts even when they admit it.

1. People need to be accountable for themselves. If you created multiple accounts, and now see it was wrong to do so (Comrade), then please immediately stop using any account other than your main one. Allow the other accounts to go into CD in all games.
2. I still believe a reliable players' list, maintained by the community, is the best way to ensure accountability. There would be a mechanism for new players to get on the list, but, for the most part, reliable players would only play with other reliable players. This should create a strong incentive not to multi-account, without penalizing relatively newer players with fewer points, who, at present, seem to be regularly exposed to bullshit.
3. I truly hope the next version will have an "abandon game immediately" option. That way we can avoid some of this stuff on the forum, and people can simply leave games where someone is using multiple accounts or there is otherwise unfair gameplay taking place.
Comrade (100 D)
18 Jan 08 UTC
finally some reason, the above requests directed at me have been noted and carried out.
vitaminC (102 D)
18 Jan 08 UTC
lately, i have more fun reading these posts than playing the game.
alamothe (3367 D(B))
18 Jan 08 UTC
multiaccounts need to be banned...
Comrade (100 D)
18 Jan 08 UTC
that comment is being detrimental to our conversation alamothe. it has been dealt with now let it die.
Thucydides (864 D(B))
18 Jan 08 UTC
Lol that's fine by me Mahatma. I haven't been adversely affected by this so far so im willing to let slide these kinds of things, but I understand the angry sentiments of both parties. I was trying to be a bit of a third-party here. Anyway, I suggest (if you'll pardon this oxymoron) that no one give any more suggestions and let this play itself out.
Chrispminis (916 D)
18 Jan 08 UTC
Wow. Just wow.

First of all, to Comrade and GaryOaks, and all of their other aliases... please calm down. There's no need to lash out at others, especially if they are correct. Nobody's being "holier than thou", you just need to learn how to take criticism. The fact is, you guys did multi account, for whatever reasons. There's no sidestepping that with any excuses. However, a second chance is in order, because I do believe that you wanted to play a game together. However, the other accounts should be frozen.

Secondly, I do believe that we need a tougher stance versus multiaccounting, seeing that it seems to be getting worse and worse, which is strange, because I can't imagine why anyone would do it. However, I don't agree to a reliable player's list. The intentions are good, but it would consequently alienate newer players, forcing them to prove themselves. Players should be assumed to be reliable and be proven unreliable, rather than assumed to be unreliable and be proven reliable. I have always thought of phpDip as a project to create a userfriendly environment in which anyone can learn and enjoy Diplomacy.

When accounts are created, it should be made very plain and clear that multi-accounting is not allowed. Anyone who uses multiple accounts will be banned. Simple. This will probably be made more effective when Kestas implements moderators who will have more time to address these issues.
Sweens18 (690 D)
18 Jan 08 UTC
uh...i think i would know if i was smellymcgee, and if i was him..i think i would have come out when he said he was both of them...soo really. just be quiet and play the GAME! You are freading out about a game. Sure its fun and everyone likes it, but honestly its not that big a deal and you are making it one.
figlesquidge (2131 D)
18 Jan 08 UTC
chris: totally agree. What would be nice would be if could have an unreliable list somewhere, with players/pairs that had been suspected with reasonable proof. This could be hidden if wanted, allowing modorators to collect enough data to find someone guilty before taking action.
Sweens18 (690 D)
18 Jan 08 UTC
By the way mister holy mahatma man. Shove it. you dont get to tell people what to do. so just go live your happy little fake life and leave us alone. Thanks! =]
The Mahatma (1195 D)
18 Jan 08 UTC
Thanks for not telling me to go die, Gary - I mean Sweeney.


35 replies
bc2000 (990 D)
16 Jan 08 UTC
stoni90 and mightyrobot
Someone has informations about these 2 accounts and the possibility they belong to the same person?
Not an accusation, just a curiosity.
5 replies
Open
ryanwsmith (108 D)
18 Jan 08 UTC
convoy support
Is it a limitation of phpdiplomacy or can you not support a convoy in diplomacy?
1 reply
Open
nero111 (110 D)
15 Jan 08 UTC
private games
i apologize for my unfamiliarity, but how is it that i let people join private games?
3 replies
Open
warrenthegreat (147 D)
08 Jan 08 UTC
Real time Dip
anyone interested in playing real time diplomacy this saturday 12/01/2008 at about 20:00 hours GMT. maybe 20 mins per move, we need 6 other guys who are serious then we can talk, once it's whittled down to about 3 or 4 active players they can mutually agree to revert to normal game time or not, what say U, how many points should we bet?
17 replies
Open
Raga (140 D)
18 Jan 08 UTC
New Game: Forward March
http://phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gid=2761

Bet is 10, lets have a good game!
0 replies
Open
Big_Al (101 D)
13 Jan 08 UTC
Same person?
i'm in a game at the moment and to me it looks like russia, england and turkey are the same person, the game is http://phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gid=2686 they always log in within minutes of each other and never attack each other.
18 replies
Open
mapleleaf (0 DX)
18 Jan 08 UTC
Kestas...
Could you please investigate the concern outlined by Big Al in the thread entitled "Same person?"? This is the game.

http://phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gid=2686
0 replies
Open
roger941994 (430 D)
17 Jan 08 UTC
To: GameMaster
they have exam so they have been cd
sorry!
1 reply
Open
RobKohr (100 D)
17 Jan 08 UTC
All orders?
Why doesn't the game show the text for all players orders after a turn is complete. In a typical game of diplomacy you would have access to this sort of information.

I want to know what my opponents are trying to do!
4 replies
Open
jk1974 (100 D)
14 Jan 08 UTC
there's a great bug...
the game is :http://www.phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gid=2456


Spring 1911, Diplomacy: Your fleet at Norwegian Sea moving into Barents Sea recieved move support from the fleet at St. Petersburg.

Spring 1911, Diplomacy: Your fleet at Norwegian Sea engaged the fleet at Barents Sea head on; both units were equally matched so there was a stand off.

i'm russia in this game and france should have lost a fleet...he still has it :(
14 replies
Open
keeper0018 (100 D)
16 Jan 08 UTC
Disrupting Convoys
Last time I checked, you could disrupt a convoy by attacking the fleet that is convoying the army... Is this still true, or has this been fixed?

Game Name: O Captain My Captain
Game #: 2614
Link: http://www.phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gid=2614&orders=on
7 replies
Open
mastadisasta (100 D)
16 Jan 08 UTC
Why do people always do this?
Whenever I log in to check if any rounds have ended, I always see that the players logged in and decided not to move. It especially pisses me off when they are the last one remaining to go. For example, Gsharp in http://phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gid=2739 during the first move of the entire game.

Note to players: Please don't be gay, and just go when you log in...
12 replies
Open
Page 64 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top