Come on, Nigs, you're better than this.

I'm not .... honestly

What's the point of saying what everyone already knows?

No point....

He's not actually that stupid, is he?

Krellin is a bit of a racist, it's true. Let's not forget Latvian-hating Redhouse, though, he's a bit racist, too.

What we can all agree on is that Krellin is the forum member with the least intellectual integrity.

Jamiet are we excluding blankflag in this debate?

Blankflag is not a forum member, because he has been banned forever.

"What we can all agree on is that Krellin is the forum member with the least intellectual integrity."

Actually, I disagree. He's also not racist I think. He's not very diplomatic on the forums though :)

Say what you see ..... don't pander to bigots, if a person goes on a public forum and makes racist comments, out them as a racist.
Not someone who has poor diplomacy skills, that's different.
Racism is a cancer in our society, never give up on research into ways we can get rid of it.

Niger, he isn't racist. He, like me, is anti-special treatment to people based on race. Being anti-"affirmative action" is not racist but, in fact, the exact opposite.

Fucking auto correct. Nigee... How many times do I have to add that to the fucking phone!

I don't think krellin treats people differently based on skin colour, therefore I don't think he's racist.

For the record, I wasn't sure if you tried to nominate yourself or krellin in the first reply.

Are you saying your name isn't a one-off of a racially provocative term?

And I'm with Draugnar on what he just said.

"Affirmative action" based on race basically meets the very definition of racism, so it's rather odd that people that are against this form of racism sometimes get called racists for that very reason...

It's like feminists saying you can't hit a girl.

Denying the existence of PRIVILEGE, and it's resultant effects on society is racist. The application of your 2nd amendment is also racist, given that it overwhelmingly used to justify the murder of black people. Oh, and given that your country tortures ONLY MUSLIMS, I suppose every goddam one of you are bigots at the very least.

Draugnar, MichiganGirlieMan, kkkrellin and Guncoward are ALL racists.

steephie, on the other hand, is just one more Aspergers eunuch AND a moronic troll.

We torture many more people than just Muslims. This thread, for instance, is torture to read.

"The application of your 2nd amendment is also racist, given that it overwhelmingly used to justify the murder of black people"

Cite *one* example of a black person being murdered by the Second Amendment.

"Oh, and given that your country tortures ONLY MUSLIMS, I suppose every goddam one of you are bigots at the very least."

What about the people who oppose this torture? Are these people bigots too?

No one is denying privilege or it's effects as far as I can see. If your solution is to give different 'races' privileges, that's your choice, but it's still a solution based on 'race' and therefore racist.

Muslim isn't a race last time I checked.

^

I like how mapleleaf calls steephie a "moronic troll" immediately after accusing most of the Forum of being racist. God, these racism allegations are worse than Senator McCarthy.

Hey steephie, I called americans BIGOTS for torturing Muslims, not racist. You. Are. A. Moron.

I like how Guncoward06 compares me to an infamous american moron. PRICELESS.

+1 2WL

I agree it was a lazy troll, it's a bit like playing 'Come on Eileen' at a wedding when you want to get people dancing..... you know it may not be a floor filler but as sure as eggs are eggs there will be those that can't stop themselves.
Another one is 'Hi-Ho Silver Lining'.

@mapleleaf: I know what you said, and never claimed otherwise. You said bigots. You used that bit as an argument for your point of view that they are all racists though.

I'm pointing out that your conclusion can not be drawn from your argument, and your argument is completely off-topic, while you present it as a valid argument on this topic.

Also, I want to talk about monkeys flinging poo, but I don't want to be a copycat.

It's true though.

And @mapleleaf: you conveniently ignored most of my message and argue with me over a small and correct note I made. React to my actual post if it would please you.

steephie assumes that I would lower myself to argue with it.

Frankly, I dont have the patience to dumb myself down that much. Neither do I have any interest in its development.

Since you don't seem to understand the definition of racism, the feeling is mutual, but I don't give up that easily.

You know 'lower' as you say it just means more down to earth in this case, right?

You are looking at this from an emotional perspective, giving racism an emotional 'definition' so it fits your opinion, which is fine, but you claim your thoughts on it are rational, which is simply not true.

You clearly think that we need to fight inequality between 'races' with racism in favour of those 'races' who were treated unfairly before, which is a valid point of view, but it's a racist point of view. By definition.

Tell me where I'm wrong please. I beg you.