Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Karma: 5120
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2861 Post by Durga » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:26 pm

ChippeRock wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:25 pm
Durga wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:21 pm
100% EP would claim a PR role or leave it open to doing so if he was scum
Yes, now we're responding. Why would you wait until so late? You were requested to do so quite a few times, and now you do it? You're not helping me townread you.
Omg no one cares!!! This game isn't entirely about you!!! Get over yourself

EspressoPatronum
Posts: 892
Joined: Sun May 12, 2019 5:07 pm
Karma: 42
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2862 Post by EspressoPatronum » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:26 pm

@Chippe
So, my analysis of Espresso's Day 1 is as follows: He appears to be trying to appear like he's contributing to the discussion (with his questions and opinions about things that are mostly unrelated to the current game - e.g., my VT claim, online vs IRL Mafia, & policy lynching) while also minimally contributing with reads. For the read he did make, I don't know how the fuck he made that read so early. His policy lynch vote on me is a safe vote. Overall, his first day looks very scummy.
12 pages is sufficient to make a read based off of consistency of play. Somebody was criticizing teacon's play, so I chimed in to say it was consistent with his town play from m1007.
It wasn't really a safe vote on you. I was the only one who stuck to it, and I had a somewhat divergent reason for staying there. Your VT shenanigans helped some people townread you, but I stayed on you because I think your play went past the spirit of the game.
I'm really not sure where his burst of anger came from, though its sudden jump from 0 to 100 makes it look scummy. Not much else during N1 though.
This is laughable. You consistently antagonize people in the forum and then play the victim card when they respond to you. Wake up, man.
Overall, his Day 2 participation is mostly, in my opinion, a result of him being on the chopping block. I'm sure he would've participated more since he said he now had more time to participate, but I think his neck being on the chopping block has led him to participate more. I disagree with his reasoning behind his VT claim, and I just don't think that his Day 2 was nearly enough to overcome his scummyness in Day 1.
My participation started ramping up even before the judge move. I completely agree that the judge caused me to participate far more than I normally would have.

ChippeRock
Posts: 1167
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2017 5:36 pm
Karma: 117
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2863 Post by ChippeRock » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:27 pm

damo666 wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:25 pm
Squigs44 wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:22 pm
EspressoPatronum wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:20 pm


Agreed.

All of his scum reads are people who either dislike or disagree with him. Whether he's town or not, don't take what he says too seriously.
Coincidentally when you gave your readslist, you townread everyone who was voting et except Connor who you put as null.
Hardly surprising given that he said he thought the entire scum team on him.
Which scum would never be stupid enough to all vote onto 1 wagon. 4-2 is probably the worst case scenario.

User avatar
Balki Bartokomous
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 3417
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 5:15 am
Location: Island of Mypos
Karma: 629
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2864 Post by Balki Bartokomous » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:28 pm

@Espresso, what’s your Tom read again? Give me as much detail as possible.

et
Posts: 365
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2018 6:48 am
Karma: 13
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2865 Post by et » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:28 pm

damo666 wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:21 pm
et wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:19 pm
damo666 wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:15 pm


sideloped?
Sorry, sideroped.
I'm sorry, I still don't understand.
I mean, in the early, EP and me get nearly votes. But afterward, EP get much more votes than me. I said about that as sideroped.

Squigs44
Developer
Developer
Posts: 4003
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: OKC
Karma: 2010
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2866 Post by Squigs44 » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:28 pm

ChippeRock wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:09 pm
How the fuck does someone already get a read in the first 12 pages? Everyone's still in "not serious mode" - including teacon (as far as I can tell, he's really not done much in terms of playing the game seriously. You're off to a bad start, you already look scummy.

...

Now's a more reasonable time to make a town read on teacon7. Still suspicious as hell to make it so damn early.

...

It's all fun and games to have conversations like this, but you still haven't provided reads (emphasis on plural)!
I'm on mobile so refuting you point by point is going to be difficult for me right now, but here is a small example.

The first two points are criticizing EP for having reads too early.
The last point is criticizing EP for not having reads yet.

These are directly contradictory.

ChippeRock
Posts: 1167
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2017 5:36 pm
Karma: 117
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2867 Post by ChippeRock » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:28 pm

Durga wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:26 pm
ChippeRock wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:25 pm
Durga wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:21 pm
100% EP would claim a PR role or leave it open to doing so if he was scum
Yes, now we're responding. Why would you wait until so late? You were requested to do so quite a few times, and now you do it? You're not helping me townread you.
Omg no one cares!!! This game isn't entirely about you!!! Get over yourself
OMG, why the hell would you wait until the last hour, when Espresso is on the chopping block, to finally state he's not scum, I swear! What is up with your flip flopping? And if that's good enough proof to prove to you Espresso isn't scum, than why did you even flip flop between them multiple times??

Tom Bombadil
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 2927
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2017 1:52 pm
Location: Detroit, MI
Karma: 2524
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2868 Post by Tom Bombadil » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:28 pm

That’s a dangerous assumption I’ve made before, it’s not always true. Particularity when there are only two allowable wagons

ChippeRock
Posts: 1167
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2017 5:36 pm
Karma: 117
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2869 Post by ChippeRock » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:29 pm

Squigs44 wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:28 pm
ChippeRock wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:09 pm
How the fuck does someone already get a read in the first 12 pages? Everyone's still in "not serious mode" - including teacon (as far as I can tell, he's really not done much in terms of playing the game seriously. You're off to a bad start, you already look scummy.

...

Now's a more reasonable time to make a town read on teacon7. Still suspicious as hell to make it so damn early.

...

It's all fun and games to have conversations like this, but you still haven't provided reads (emphasis on plural)!
I'm on mobile so refuting you point by point is going to be difficult for me right now, but here is a small example.

The first two points are criticizing EP for having reads too early.
The last point is criticizing EP for not having reads yet.

These are directly contradictory.
Directly? How are they directly contradictory? One comment is for making a read 12 pages in!! The other is coming up with only 1 read - and that read was originally made 12 pages in!!

The 2nd one supports the 1st one.

damo666
Posts: 17108
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Karma: 5604
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2870 Post by damo666 » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:30 pm

ChippeRock wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:27 pm
damo666 wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:25 pm
Squigs44 wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:22 pm


Coincidentally when you gave your readslist, you townread everyone who was voting et except Connor who you put as null.
Hardly surprising given that he said he thought the entire scum team on him.
Which scum would never be stupid enough to all vote onto 1 wagon. 4-2 is probably the worst case scenario.
Not the point. EP said he thought all scum on him so you would expect et voters to be his townreads. The actual split is totally irrelevant. I'm just pointing out that Squigs post doesn't really say much.

EspressoPatronum
Posts: 892
Joined: Sun May 12, 2019 5:07 pm
Karma: 42
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2871 Post by EspressoPatronum » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:30 pm

Squigs44 wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:22 pm
EspressoPatronum wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:20 pm
Squigs44 wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:18 pm
The tldr of Chippes reads is that he scumreads EP because EP pushed on Chippe and he townreads et because et helped him push Bozo.

Okay not really, but his reads are terribly biased.
Agreed.

All of his scum reads are people who either dislike or disagree with him. Whether he's town or not, don't take what he says too seriously.
Coincidentally when you gave your readslist, you townread everyone who was voting et except Connor who you put as null.
I believe he had 5 votes at the time. One was me, the other was Connor!null. I'm not sure if 3 townreads being on et says anything.

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 29803
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Karma: 18611
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2872 Post by Jamiet99uk » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:30 pm

VOTE COUNT:

EspressoPatronum (9) - TrPrado, damo666, Foxcastle, et, Nephthys, FlaviusAetius, xorxes, Percy Williams, Balki Bartokomous
et (7) - rdrivera2005, connorcompton, EspressoPatronum, Squigs44, ND, Durga, Tom Bombadil

EspressoPatronum is scheduled to be lynched.

There are 30 minutes left.

Teacon and Peterlund must vote.
1

Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Karma: 5120
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2873 Post by Durga » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:31 pm

who in gods name is connor and where does he stand on anything

EspressoPatronum
Posts: 892
Joined: Sun May 12, 2019 5:07 pm
Karma: 42
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2874 Post by EspressoPatronum » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:31 pm

damo666 wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:30 pm
ChippeRock wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:27 pm
damo666 wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:25 pm


Hardly surprising given that he said he thought the entire scum team on him.
Which scum would never be stupid enough to all vote onto 1 wagon. 4-2 is probably the worst case scenario.
Not the point. EP said he thought all scum on him so you would expect et voters to be his townreads. The actual split is totally irrelevant. I'm just pointing out that Squigs post doesn't really say much.
"most - if not all" is what I wrote.

4-2 is most. 5-1 is most. 6-0 is all.

ChippeRock
Posts: 1167
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2017 5:36 pm
Karma: 117
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2875 Post by ChippeRock » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:32 pm

EspressoPatronum wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:26 pm
@Chippe
So, my analysis of Espresso's Day 1 is as follows: He appears to be trying to appear like he's contributing to the discussion (with his questions and opinions about things that are mostly unrelated to the current game - e.g., my VT claim, online vs IRL Mafia, & policy lynching) while also minimally contributing with reads. For the read he did make, I don't know how the fuck he made that read so early. His policy lynch vote on me is a safe vote. Overall, his first day looks very scummy.
12 pages is sufficient to make a read based off of consistency of play. Somebody was criticizing teacon's play, so I chimed in to say it was consistent with his town play from m1007.
It wasn't really a safe vote on you. I was the only one who stuck to it, and I had a somewhat divergent reason for staying there. Your VT shenanigans helped some people townread you, but I stayed on you because I think your play went past the spirit of the game.
I'm really not sure where his burst of anger came from, though its sudden jump from 0 to 100 makes it look scummy. Not much else during N1 though.
This is laughable. You consistently antagonize people in the forum and then play the victim card when they respond to you. Wake up, man.
Overall, his Day 2 participation is mostly, in my opinion, a result of him being on the chopping block. I'm sure he would've participated more since he said he now had more time to participate, but I think his neck being on the chopping block has led him to participate more. I disagree with his reasoning behind his VT claim, and I just don't think that his Day 2 was nearly enough to overcome his scummyness in Day 1.
My participation started ramping up even before the judge move. I completely agree that the judge caused me to participate far more than I normally would have.
The first 12 pages of this game was mostly part of the joke stage!! You can't come up with a read based on mostly the joke stage!

I still don't understand how one goes from 0 to 100 and gets all pissed off at me after appearing to be calm towards me the post minutes before. Makes no sense.

damo666
Posts: 17108
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 1:04 am
Location: London
Karma: 5604
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2876 Post by damo666 » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:32 pm

Tom Bombadil wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:28 pm
That’s a dangerous assumption I’ve made before, it’s not always true. Particularity when there are only two allowable wagons
What assumption?

Squigs44
Developer
Developer
Posts: 4003
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: OKC
Karma: 2010
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2877 Post by Squigs44 » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:32 pm

damo666 wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:30 pm
ChippeRock wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:27 pm
damo666 wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:25 pm


Hardly surprising given that he said he thought the entire scum team on him.
Which scum would never be stupid enough to all vote onto 1 wagon. 4-2 is probably the worst case scenario.
Not the point. EP said he thought all scum on him so you would expect et voters to be his townreads. The actual split is totally irrelevant. I'm just pointing out that Squigs post doesn't really say much.
I just thought it was a little funny that EP was agreeing with my criticism when he himself was guilty of the same thing recently.

Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Karma: 5120
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2878 Post by Durga » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:33 pm

The first 12 pages of this game was mostly part of the joke stage!! You can't come up with a read based on mostly the joke stage!
WTF are you talking about. yes you can! you can come up with a read in ONE page. jfc

Tom Bombadil
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 2927
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2017 1:52 pm
Location: Detroit, MI
Karma: 2524
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2879 Post by Tom Bombadil » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:33 pm

damo666 wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:32 pm
Tom Bombadil wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:28 pm
That’s a dangerous assumption I’ve made before, it’s not always true. Particularity when there are only two allowable wagons
What assumption?
About the mafia splitting their vote as least 4-2

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 5882
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Karma: 1874
Contact:

Re: Mafia 46 - Ace Attorney - GAME THREAD

#2880 Post by Foxcastle » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:34 pm

I am following along on mobile but will be in a car for EOD. I think an Espresso flip is preferable to a tie at this point.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], TheMadMonarch and 593 guests