MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Karma: 4804
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2281 Post by kgray » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:47 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:46 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:41 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:35 pm
And we’ve already established you didn’t like me asking you questions about how you’re playing, thus I must be scum because I am starting ‘drama’ and not contributing.
That's not true worcej. I don't like you continuing to berate me for saying I'm bad at the game, especially when I haven't recently been saying I'm bad at the game. It's just noise.

If you have questions about anything I'm doing that are both a) things that actually happened and b) alignment indicative, then go for it.
Catch up. I have already asked you this.
Did you just tell me to catch up on a crosspost?

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 18342
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Karma: 11677
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2282 Post by ghug » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:47 pm

kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:34 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:30 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:25 pm


I thought you scumread Hamilton because you thought he was acting fake?

Why don't you think scum!Jamie would push town!darg like this? It seems reasonable to me.
Scum usually aren't so bold as to waste political capital pushing someone they know is a PR.
Hey. I'm Rivera's spokesperson, you don't get to answer for him.

Also I think that depends very much on who is scum, and I think Jamie could easily do it.
Yes, I'm rivera's spokesperson.

It's definitely a WIFOMmy thing, and it's less strong of a point with Jamie than with most people, but it still sways me some.

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Karma: 4804
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2283 Post by kgray » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:49 pm

rdrivera2005 wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:42 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:34 pm
ghug wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:30 pm


Scum usually aren't so bold as to waste political capital pushing someone they know is a PR.
Hey. I'm Rivera's spokesperson, you don't get to answer for him.

Also I think that depends very much on who is scum, and I think Jamie could easily do it.
Ghug is tryng to get your job.

I think Jamiet could do it but not do it this game. I can see him doing it if he was all around the thread as a power wolf, but not in this game were his presence isn´t memorable at all.
Well he can't have it.

And okay, I think that's reasonable.

rdrivera2005
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 7459
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:17 pm
Location: Porto Alegre, Brasil
Karma: 2849
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2284 Post by rdrivera2005 » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:49 pm

kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:42 pm
rdrivera2005 wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:38 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:25 pm


I thought you scumread Hamilton because you thought he was acting fake?

Why don't you think scum!Jamie would push town!darg like this? It seems reasonable to me.
Maybe floating isn´t the right term. It´s not fake either. It´s like he want to look like he is making an effort. Today he looks a lot more organic, maybe because we interacted a lot more.

If Dargo is the cop, end hammering him will attract a lot of attention and not the good type (it has already atracted).
Thoughts on damo endhammering then?
I already scumread Damo, but not for this. It was in the context of Dargo´s message to get end votes to declare his scan.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 11643
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Karma: 6756
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2285 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:51 pm

kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:46 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:41 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:38 pm


Who do you know who actually posts a lot more as scum?

I think lack in quantity can be made up for if people actually have reads and original thoughts. When normally-active people don't have those things, it's suspicious.
Why are you trying to take my opinions and stir them in a direction not intended by the context?

What is defined as an original thought versus not?
I honestly have no idea what you're talking about with me trying to mischaracterize what you're saying.

And I can't believe you're asking me to define the word "original" when my point was clearly that people who are normally very present and active but are not contributing (in *content* not just in number of posts) is suspicious.
You are asking me to point at someone specifically who is posting more as scum. Where did I explicitly say I am seeing that behavior?

I am asking you what you define as an original thought. Like, how is this thought: “Kgray has demonstrated invalidating and deflective responses to people comparing her to her prior scum games.” Is this original or unoriginal to you?

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 11643
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Karma: 6756
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2286 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:52 pm

kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:47 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:46 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:41 pm


That's not true worcej. I don't like you continuing to berate me for saying I'm bad at the game, especially when I haven't recently been saying I'm bad at the game. It's just noise.

If you have questions about anything I'm doing that are both a) things that actually happened and b) alignment indicative, then go for it.
Catch up. I have already asked you this.
Did you just tell me to catch up on a crosspost?
Did I?

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Karma: 4804
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2287 Post by kgray » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:57 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:51 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:46 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:41 pm
Why are you trying to take my opinions and stir them in a direction not intended by the context?

What is defined as an original thought versus not?
I honestly have no idea what you're talking about with me trying to mischaracterize what you're saying.

And I can't believe you're asking me to define the word "original" when my point was clearly that people who are normally very present and active but are not contributing (in *content* not just in number of posts) is suspicious.
You are asking me to point at someone specifically who is posting more as scum. Where did I explicitly say I am seeing that behavior?

I am asking you what you define as an original thought. Like, how is this thought: “Kgray has demonstrated invalidating and deflective responses to people comparing her to her prior scum games.” Is this original or unoriginal to you?
Oh my god. I didn't say you said you saw it here. I was just asking who you know that does that, since it is apparently a metric you have for scumreading people, but it seems unlikely that many people would do that. You are trying so hard to start a fight with me.

That would be an original thought, yes, since you never once made an argument anywhere close to that. It would be a bad thought, though, since nobody here has made a comparison to my prior scum games so it'd be impossible for me to invalidate that or deflect away from it.

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Karma: 4804
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2288 Post by kgray » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:58 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:52 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:47 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:46 pm
Catch up. I have already asked you this.
Did you just tell me to catch up on a crosspost?
Did I?
ffs worcej if you have an actual relevant question, and not some hypothetical semantics question, let me know. Otherwise I'm done here.

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 23033
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Karma: 10252
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2289 Post by brainbomb » Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:59 pm

I feel like im gonna end up defending celaph now and hes gonna also flip scum just because the universe sucks

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 11643
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Karma: 6756
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2290 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:02 pm

kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:57 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:51 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:46 pm


I honestly have no idea what you're talking about with me trying to mischaracterize what you're saying.

And I can't believe you're asking me to define the word "original" when my point was clearly that people who are normally very present and active but are not contributing (in *content* not just in number of posts) is suspicious.
You are asking me to point at someone specifically who is posting more as scum. Where did I explicitly say I am seeing that behavior?

I am asking you what you define as an original thought. Like, how is this thought: “Kgray has demonstrated invalidating and deflective responses to people comparing her to her prior scum games.” Is this original or unoriginal to you?
Oh my god. I didn't say you said you saw it here. I was just asking who you know that does that, since it is apparently a metric you have for scumreading people, but it seems unlikely that many people would do that. You are trying so hard to start a fight with me.

That would be an original thought, yes, since you never once made an argument anywhere close to that. It would be a bad thought, though, since nobody here has made a comparison to my prior scum games so it'd be impossible for me to invalidate that or deflect away from it.
First, not starting a fight. Second, you bet I am interacting with you - you’re here and actively posting and are a voter making me the top wagon.

An example of someone who would post a lot suddenly and catch my eye and get a little scumdar is anyone who typically posts low quantities.

To the last paragraph - not true. I brought up you are capable of employing good scum theater and you got deflective and invalidating right away.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 11643
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Karma: 6756
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2291 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:03 pm

kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:58 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:52 pm
kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:47 pm


Did you just tell me to catch up on a crosspost?
Did I?
ffs worcej if you have an actual relevant question, and not some hypothetical semantics question, let me know. Otherwise I'm done here.
You don’t like sarcasm much do you?

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 11643
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Karma: 6756
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2292 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:04 pm

Here is another thought: kgray gets annoyed when she is asked questions, yet she always asks questions of others as her ‘content’.

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 23033
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Karma: 10252
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2293 Post by brainbomb » Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:04 pm

worcej is actually looking good in this debate

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Karma: 4804
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2294 Post by kgray » Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:06 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:02 pm
I brought up you are capable of employing good scum theater and you got deflective and invalidating right away.
Because it was completely irrelevant to this game. There was nobody I could have been performing scum theater with, so you just randomly brought up something I'd done in that past to shade me without it having anything at all to do with my alignment here.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 11643
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Karma: 6756
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2295 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:07 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:04 pm
worcej is actually looking good in this debate
Since your now here, I can poke at you. Your read of me is shit, but let’s call it a gun vote.

What are you going to learn, other than my alignment, from my death? Would my death influence any other alignment once you see I am town?

User avatar
ghug
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 18342
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:51 pm
Location: Seattle
Karma: 11677
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2296 Post by ghug » Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:07 pm

brainbomb wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:59 pm
I feel like im gonna end up defending celaph now and hes gonna also flip scum just because the universe sucks
Did you find his burst of participation earlier acceptable?

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Karma: 4804
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2297 Post by kgray » Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:08 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:04 pm
Here is another thought: kgray gets annoyed when she is asked questions, yet she always asks questions of others as her ‘content’.
I'm not annoyed with questions, I am annoyed with you intentionally trying to get me frustrated. Show me literally anywhere else that I've been annoyed by someone asking me a question.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 11643
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Karma: 6756
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2298 Post by worcej » Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:09 pm

kgray wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:06 pm
worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:02 pm
I brought up you are capable of employing good scum theater and you got deflective and invalidating right away.
Because it was completely irrelevant to this game. There was nobody I could have been performing scum theater with, so you just randomly brought up something I'd done in that past to shade me without it having anything at all to do with my alignment here.
This is absolutely not true - someone brought up if we were witnessing scum theater and I brought up yours and Chaqa’s performance in the past.

How is bringing up that someone is good at a task, that is subject of thread conversation, irrelevant?

Also - wouldn’t referencing you in that way be an original thought? I thought that is important and is contributing.

User avatar
brainbomb
Posts: 23033
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:20 pm
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Karma: 10252
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2299 Post by brainbomb » Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:09 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:07 pm
brainbomb wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:04 pm
worcej is actually looking good in this debate
Since your now here, I can poke at you. Your read of me is shit, but let’s call it a gun vote.

What are you going to learn, other than my alignment, from my death? Would my death influence any other alignment once you see I am town?
my entire goal was to antagonize you, get you into the mode where I know you are town. and it sometimes gets very toxic but it mostly looks town when it happens.

you got there

kgray
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 7667
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:34 pm
Karma: 4804
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 66: The Battle for Olympus - Game Thread [hidden]

#2300 Post by kgray » Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:09 pm

worcej wrote:
Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:04 pm
Here is another thought: kgray gets annoyed when she is asked questions, yet she always asks questions of others as her ‘content’.
And my 'content' has plenty of my own opinions so you can fuck right off.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: brainbomb, Google [Bot], Spartaculous, Wattsthematter and 173 guests