@phil – Been working on my RL for almost an hour due to work distractions lol…
A lot has been going on since my last readlist, especially the new xy4 vs. Bancroft wagons, so I’ll post it with my thoughts below
TOWN
- phil_a_s – You’re continuing to do what I originally posted: digging for info. As DrCJG mentioned, you are putting pressure on people to respond (damo and myself for sure) and making them justify their opinions. This isn’t striking me as deflecting, which I would expect from scum, because you’re not pointing or implying guilt as you’re challenging these people, which I would also expect from a scum.
- teacher2 – I haven’t noted anything different about how you’re carrying yourself from my first list, but one thing I am not liking now is you’re trying to start new wagons on xy4 and Bancroft with, imo, little purpose behind it at first. Once xy4 posted more, it made some sense, but initially it felt weak. Your anti-Damo wagon stance didn’t seem to contain much concrete reasoning other than it’s been the only wagon, so is this you trying to save him intentionally? I have a heavy town lean for you still, but wanted to at least express the question I have of the shift off Damo to the other two.
- DrCJG – I think the leading driver of scum reads on you have been why are you acting different in this game vs. the last mafia game. The votes for you, imo, are the negative side of a WIFOM and the people defending you are noting your contributions and seem to be on the other side of the WIFOM, which I agree with more. Your vote changes have been due to dialogue and relatively closely timed posts (most notably the last one today) to other voters, so I don’t think you’re wagoning to deflect. I disagree with xy4’s stance and will get into that more below.
- sheepsaysmeep – Your recent responses are very… passionate… and it strikes me as almost an over-reaction. DrCJG commented you were not over-reacting before with votes, but now you seem to be. I still believe the first comments of the hypo strategy is strong town focus. I am starting to lean you more scum, but I think it is more passionate over-reaction to the votes on you than trying to deflect away. You’re definitely on my scum-radar now more than you were earlier though…
- BancroftS – I think you’re addressing any concerns people have about your lurking, so I am okay with it. I think my overall read, based on your posts, is you’re feeling sheep is the scum, which isn’t where my read is right now for sheep but I can understand the reasoning. I haven’t gathered much else from you due to limited stints of posts and in the you vs. xy4 wagoning, I see xy4 as more scum than you.
- Marneus – No posts still. I will consider this yavu now pretty much and since there is nothing to go off of I will keep this headcount here.
- Damo666 – phil dissected your explanation and I already posted an add-on to his opinion as well. You made yourself look really strange with the explanation of votes (by your own definition it made more sense to vote someone else) and now you put forward a no lynch at first, which arguably makes no sense.
- xy4 – Your read list contained reasoning for your towns and town leans, but beyond that I am seeing no good information for negative reads. Phil is scum lean for unknown reasons (your words) and DrCJG’s read is because he talks more, but I don’t seem him standing out more than phil or teacher. The 2nd point you have for him makes no sense based on post timing – his post for a vote for you looked like an agreement to teacher’s comments to change the wagon and he did confirm the same feelings for damo, but you’re posting more now comes off as ‘oh shit, I am being wagoned – must deflect!’