Hey, Bob's starting to get the hang of this.BobMcBob wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2020 9:58 amAnd yeah, I do have a problem with your case on me. Most parts of it actually. You state my role-play as part of the reason you vote for me. Seems like just a contrived extra reason to me. Then you accuse me of pocketing, although it was really just me agreeing that Neph's Bunny case was bad. Which it was. I made no attempt at pocketing, nor did I remember it existed at that point in time.Squigs44 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2020 8:42 amI'm starting to get really annoyed that you are painting me a villain. If you take issue with the case I put on you, then tell us what was wrong with it. If you think my case on you had ulterior motives, then call me scum, vote for me, and convince others of that. But dont shade me, paint me as a bad guy, characterize me as someone who delights in your pain. I saw some aspects of your play that were questionable, so I questioned you, I pushed you, I got a conversation going. That's how you play the game.
And then you blame me for my reads being bad. You say that you would like to townread me based on seeming genuine, but that you can't because my reads are bad? And why would that stop you? Maybe I just, y'know, don't have strong opinions or understand the game well yet. And yet you focus on how bad my reads are and call it scum-indicative. And then tell me to put together a good case as though it's something easy.
Yeah, I do have a problem with your case. It sucks. It assumes that I should have the same level of skill as everyone else and relies on that assumption as its foundation. And you're smart enough to realise that the assumption is wrong. You happy now? FWIW, I consider this pretty well thought out.
Role playing was one of several reasons I scumread you. In my experience roleplaying has been employed by scum more than town. It's not condemning by any means, but it was a brick in my case against you.
The buddying was another brick, and it wasnt just the Neph/Bunny thing, you agreed with 2 of my posts, the other one being about Xorxes and Vecna. Your posts were agreeing with me and then restating what I said without adding any new insights.
It's okay to have incorrect reads. It's okay to be wrong about something. What is scummy is when you dont commit to your reads. When you hedge, you set yourself up so that you can reverse and backpedal. Your case on me here, this I consider to be a genuine, but incorrect case. It shows you are actually looking into me, questioning me, thinking independently. Theres a logical consistency to them. Your reads before were surface level.
So no, my case didnt require you to be skilled at the game. My case relies on how you have approached the game, how you interact with others, the situations you set yourself into.