M62: PEOPLE'S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF REVOLUTIONARY MAFIA GAME THREAD!

[Hellenic Riot]

They're just going to claim jailer anyway! And then actual jailer will have to out! Or, worst case, we don't have a jailer and they survive!

Yeah we basically spelt out exactly what Player X is going to claim, so unless we want to deal with a cc battle today (or a semi-clear scum if there's no jailer) there's not much point in not just executing Jamie

[ghug]

I guess something else to consider is saying "claim jailer by EoD time tomorrow or we won't believe you later". Then scum have to gamble on who claims.

[Hellenic Riot]

I guess something else to consider is saying "claim jailer by EoD time tomorrow or we won't believe you later". Then scum have to gamble on who claims.

This is a better plan. Though it'd be better to be EoN tonight so we can just kill it if they haven't claimed.

[Durga]

I will say I truly do think ghug is town. There's also a chance scum know exactly who I have the track on tho.

[Balki Bartokomous]

They're just going to claim jailer anyway! And then actual jailer will have to out! Or, worst case, we don't have a jailer and they survive!

Yeah we basically spelt out exactly what Player X is going to claim, so unless we want to deal with a cc battle today (or a semi-clear scum if there's no jailer) there's not much point in not just executing Jamie

I disagree. We would not have a "semi-clear scum" at all. We would have a "most likely caught red handed" scum. The absolute most likely scenario is that Player X is scum.

[aarodactyl]

I guess something else to consider is saying "claim jailer by EoD time tomorrow or we won't believe you later". Then scum have to gamble on who claims.

I like this, but also if Durga saw a scum role, won't this out actual jailer if we have one?

[Hellenic Riot]

They're just going to claim jailer anyway! And then actual jailer will have to out! Or, worst case, we don't have a jailer and they survive!

Yeah we basically spelt out exactly what Player X is going to claim, so unless we want to deal with a cc battle today (or a semi-clear scum if there's no jailer) there's not much point in not just executing Jamie

I disagree. We would not have a "semi-clear scum" at all. We would have a "most likely caught red handed" scum. The absolute most likely scenario is that Player X is scum.

If they claimed jailer and weren't cc'd, there's zero chance whatsoever that we'd end up going balls to the wall and killing them anyway over the actual conf scum.


ghug's idea is much better.

[Hellenic Riot]

I guess something else to consider is saying "claim jailer by EoD time tomorrow or we won't believe you later". Then scum have to gamble on who claims.

I like this, but also if Durga saw a scum role, won't this out actual jailer if we have one?

The point is that if Durga saw a scum role then they're going to claim jailer regardless.

[Durga]

Do we know if scum have all 4 of those roles?

[Hellenic Riot]

Do we know if scum have all 4 of those roles?

No

[Durga]

I should have just waited another day instead of jumping the gun lol. No way I was getting nk'd or rb'd.

[Hellenic Riot]

So the jailer has to out at some point during the night, preferably giving who they saved each night.


Durga outs her report at EoN. If they don't match up, we win. If they don't match up AND the wrong scum member has cc'd jailer, double-win.

[aarodactyl]

I guess something else to consider is saying "claim jailer by EoD time tomorrow or we won't believe you later". Then scum have to gamble on who claims.

I like this, but also if Durga saw a scum role, won't this out actual jailer if we have one?

The point is that if Durga saw a scum role then they're going to claim jailer regardless.

That's fair. I'm still getting used to these types of roles. The person games I played had much more straight forward roles.

I think Durga should go with ghug's strategy as long as tomorrow references to real days and not mafia days. Setting the deadline to be before the deadline for end of day 3 would be good. Especially since there's a chance that Durga isn't living past this round.

[aarodactyl]

I like this, but also if Durga saw a scum role, won't this out actual jailer if we have one?

The point is that if Durga saw a scum role then they're going to claim jailer regardless.

That's fair. I'm still getting used to these types of roles. The person games I played had much more straight forward roles.

I think Durga should go with ghug's strategy as long as tomorrow references to real days and not mafia days. Setting the deadline to be before the deadline for end of day 3 would be good. Especially since there's a chance that Durga isn't living past this round.

Oh, I forgot we have night discussions too before people are killed. Another difference from in person games

[Balki Bartokomous]

Yeah we basically spelt out exactly what Player X is going to claim, so unless we want to deal with a cc battle today (or a semi-clear scum if there's no jailer) there's not much point in not just executing Jamie

I disagree. We would not have a "semi-clear scum" at all. We would have a "most likely caught red handed" scum. The absolute most likely scenario is that Player X is scum.

If they claimed jailer and weren't cc'd, there's zero chance whatsoever that we'd end up going balls to the wall and killing them anyway over the actual conf scum.


ghug's idea is much better.

I like ghug's idea too. I did not propose an alternative to it, so I'm not sure why you are comparing my comment to ghug's.

I think your suggestion that Player X would be "semi-clear" is ridiculous.

[dargorygel]

##Call GM

If every living players votes for it to be added, can we have hammering back?

##GM answer
Y'all have not bribed President Eden and me NEARLY enough to be asking for alterations like this.

[Hellenic Riot]

##Call GM

If every living players votes for it to be added, can we have hammering back?

##GM answer
Y'all have not bribed President Eden and me NEARLY enough to be asking for alterations like this.

Boooooooooooooo

[dargorygel]

##Call GM

If every living players votes for it to be added, can we have hammering back?

##GM answer
Y'all have not bribed President Eden and me NEARLY enough to be asking for alterations like this.

By which bribery I mean, +1's. In case I was unclear.

[Balki Bartokomous]

I should have just waited another day instead of jumping the gun lol. No way I was getting nk'd or rb'd.

I believe they have 2 scum power roles.

[Hellenic Riot]

If you let us vote to reinstate hammers, I will go back and +1 every single post by both GM's