MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

[BunnyGo]

Chaqa, stop this, you're acting like you're making sense.

Ooooh, oooh I know. Can we kill one of worcej's other bounty claims? That would work well for hunting the agent and RP too. We're down to a what 2/5 chance of hitting scum there?

Don't we have to worry the Alliance will decide they can't win and (legally) throw as revenge?

[BunnyGo]

I would actually prefer to lynch worcej as well.

It works for either the Goldie!Investigstor or Goldie!RP theory

Whyyyy? Doesn't lynching Goldie work for those theories?

[xorxes]

I mostly believe worcej is BH. Alliance had to kill one of his targets to guarantee that Goldie wasn’t outed.

ND is a PR claimant who may have been protected

Bozo was widely scum read, so why kill him!

Because worcej other target must be Agent

I.e. Fox

Possible. Let's see what they come up with for N4.

I agree Fox could be Agent, but Temasek is still more likely to me. Worcej's flip should shed some light in deciding between them.

[BunnyGo]

I was visited... But no one tried to kill me, apparently

You watched yourself? And you're giving away that I commuted you? Duuude...

He said your wife visited him late at night...alone. you might want to have words with her, Bunny. She's cheating on you.

Zoe and I are doing fine thank you. Tom? I'm no longer worried you're a reaver....Can we "snuggle"?

[BunnyGo]

You watched yourself? And you're giving away that I commuted you? Duuude...

He said your wife visited him late at night...alone. you might want to have words with her, Bunny. She's cheating on you.

We had tea. Nothing more.

I really don't like you, Badger

[BunnyGo]

People that we know could not possibly have been reavered N1:

xorxes ((used +2 on D2)
teacon (redirection claim at a time he had to be town)
Jamie (saved dargo N2)
Tom Bombadil (unless dargo is a Reaver too)
darg (helped clear Jamie/xorxes/Tom, unlikely he would be so helpful as Reaver)

Am I missing anyone else?

I may have commuted that night. I may not have...

[xorxes]

@Bunny, can you please remove your end vote?

Why would we not want time to study the posts that triggered the warning and see if we can figure out something about the Reavers?

Also, we can't end before damo enters his orders.

[xorxes]

People that we know could not possibly have been reavered N1:

xorxes ((used +2 on D2)
teacon (redirection claim at a time he had to be town)
Jamie (saved dargo N2)
Tom Bombadil (unless dargo is a Reaver too)
darg (helped clear Jamie/xorxes/Tom, unlikely he would be so helpful as Reaver)

Am I missing anyone else?

I may have commuted that night. I may not have...

I don't believe you were Reavered N1, but it's not provable. Even if you now claimed you commuted it wouldn't prove anything. So better not claim anything. Save your commutes for when it matters.

[BunnyGo]

I was visited... But no one tried to kill me, apparently

You watched yourself? And you're giving away that I commuted you? Duuude...

WTF? Why would you do that?

Seriously? I thought you were smarter than that. You tell me when and I’ll take a shift protecting our River (reader). Until then, let me continue casting shade about when and who I commute?

[BunnyGo]

Yes we do, darg. He wouldn't have been able to visit you if he was reavered.

I'll give another fun little breadcrumb to everyone. Vote damo to make sure Alliance has to kill another VT tonight.

....this doesn't actually deserve a response, but here it is:

##END (once our reader is ready)

Voting to end before damo has said he has entered his order is anti-town.

##unend. It was symbolic. I did say I was intending to wait.

[Foxcastle]

Reaver press violation happened pretty quickly... Did we get an answer on whether there was a delay in when press violations were announced? Because if not, that's a pretty short window and list of people from EOD to then...

[xorxes]

You watched yourself? And you're giving away that I commuted you? Duuude...

WTF? Why would you do that?

Seriously? I thought you were smarter than that. You tell me when and I’ll take a shift protecting our River (reader). Until then, let me continue casting shade about when and who I commute?

Oh dear, maybe I should have added a smiley...

[BunnyGo]

We're not lynching damo on the advice of a non-town.

Lynch today is probably ##VOTE worcej

But we need to think about it some more.

Seriously? I think we can safely say that goldie needs to go (as much as I'm enjoying his wiggling)

How is that safe? If we kill River Prime, then River Secundus is free to recruit. As long as goldie is alive, the Reavers can be contained. We can't lynch goldie until we have found out who Reaver2 is.

There may not be one

[Foxcastle]

##VOTE worcej

I am not sure if Goldfinger's BH claim is real, but I don't see any way that Worcej's is.

[xorxes]

Reaver press violation happened pretty quickly... Did we get an answer on whether there was a delay in when press violations were announced? Because if not, that's a pretty short window and list of people from EOD to then...

No conclusive answer. Just that there are rules in place, but they are part of the closed setup.

[BunnyGo]

I mostly believe worcej is BH. Alliance had to kill one of his targets to guarantee that Goldie wasn’t outed.

ND is a PR claimant who may have been protected

Bozo was widely scum read, so why kill him!

Because worcej other target must be Agent

I.e. Fox

That’s....surprisingly coherent and deductive. +200

[BunnyGo]

See guys, how could you kill me? Look at all this valuable Intel I'm giving town. If town wins, you should give me a medal.

What intel?

[xorxes]

Seriously? I think we can safely say that goldie needs to go (as much as I'm enjoying his wiggling)

How is that safe? If we kill River Prime, then River Secundus is free to recruit. As long as goldie is alive, the Reavers can be contained. We can't lynch goldie until we have found out who Reaver2 is.

There may not be one

True. There may or may not be one. Why gamble when we don't need to?

[xorxes]

##VOTE worcej

I am not sure if Goldfinger's BH claim is real, but I don't see any way that Worcej's is.

And in the unlikely case it is real, we can't let Mafia keep shooting his bounties.

[BunnyGo]

@Bunny, can you please remove your end vote?

Why would we not want time to study the posts that triggered the warning and see if we can figure out something about the Reavers?

Also, we can't end before damo enters his orders.

Yes yes yes no more end. It was symbolic. I’m all for triggering another reaver issue.