MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

[xorxes]

bunny was the one leading the rule vio investigation, which means we might want to look into his lists - was he keeping accurate records of who did what?

It makes sense now why he ignored my question about votes. I'm still catching up, but imo we may want to look into that.

Can you do two bare votes, please?

[Jamiet99uk]

@jamiet - Congrats! That sounds like a big achievement. Was your textwall from the thesis?

@peter - hunh. I guess I missed the conditions for the vengeful shot in your role desc. I wasn't attempting to misrepresent you - I misread it.

Thanks. No, that was just the result of going to Wikipedia and clicking "random article".

[xorxes]

Or someone should do it once, someone twice, someone three times and someone four times. Then the number of warnings should tell us who the infractor is.

Can someone explain?

Are Reavers not allowed to move their vote?

Are you pulling my leg? I just reposted the theory for you.

[Jamiet99uk]

We can't have everyone do it though, or we won't learn anything.

Or someone should do it once, someone twice, someone three times and someone four times. Then the number of warnings should tell us who the infractor is.

What Xorxes, this?

This isn't a theory. I don't know what the theory is, at all.

[xorxes]

Third time for Jamiet:

##Vote Xorxes

If that's what triggered the D1 level 1 warning (a post with a bare vote) then this:

##VOTE GOLD

Should be what triggered the second level 1.

Jamie had made a bare vote before that, so that would clear him.

damo and Jamiet have also made several bare votes since, but there has been only one more warning, so they should be clear (if this is the criterion).

Then we have:

##vote kalel

##VOTE KALEL

##vote Goldie

##Vote worcej

that could have triggered the last warning.

[damo666]

BAM. Ace shot @Assasin.

http://bit.ly/30fE4Tx

Finally some crossfire. I think scum is hosed at this point? Unless there's a deep threat, it's almost autowin now.

Not quite. We still need to ID the last reaver and only have room for 1 mislynch so it's kinda 50/50

[Jamiet99uk]

Oh I see Xorxes, thank you.

I'm glad to be clear.

[damo666]

@Jamie looking dodgy now.

@Teacon who is your best guess as last reaver and why?

[damo666]

Oh I see Xorxes, thank you.

I'm glad to be clear.

You are not clear. You are clear given Xorxes' theory correct which I'd assess as about 0.0000000001% probable. [Sorry Xorxes, but you realise it's quite unlikely, although you are right to test it.]

Delete a few zeros if you like!

[xorxes]

Oh I see Xorxes, thank you.

I'm glad to be clear.

You are not clear. You are clear given Xorxes' theory correct which I'd assess as about 0.0000000001% probable. [Sorry Xorxes, but you realise it's quite unlikely, although you are right to test it.]

Delete a few zeros if you like!

It's the only theory we have so far, so better than anyone else's

[xorxes]

Why did teacon ask if anyone was onlune if he was not intending to engage?

[xorxes]

Possible scenario:

N1: Tem recruits Vecna/Fox (no info from D1, good cover)
N2: Tem fails to recruit Bunny (Bunny commutes)
N3: Tem recruits Bunny

Chaqa Assassin.

Another scenario:

N1: Tem fails to recruit teacon
N2: Tem recruits teacon
N3: Tem recruits Bunny

Fox Assassin.

[Chaqa]

As much as I want to lynch Fox, I want to progress this game more.

##Vote Temasek22
##END

Gonna go back to sleeping and being ill

[damo666]

##end

[dargorygel]

time to find out
##end

[teacon7]

Finally caught up. Sorry for delay - I'm at work and had to, uh, work. bare votes inbound

[teacon7]

##vote teacon7

[teacon7]

##vote foxcastle

[xorxes]

time to find out
##end

Find out what?? We already know what he will flip.

Reaver does not want test completed.

Teacon needs to vote...

[xorxes]

##vote foxcastle

Thank you