MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2261 Post by xorxes » Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:46 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 7:56 pm
damo666 wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 5:36 pm
damo666 wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 5:34 pm


DUP
OH SUGAR

I thought party whip returned Con/Non Con not actual party.

I hard claim I am not CHIEF WHIP
damo is a good choice for the conservative lynch today since it will not risk outing the party cop. Also, I think there is a good chance damo is one of the scum based on when and how he claimed conservative.
Or, we lynch Neph and let the Journalist expose damo.

The journalist needs to be careful not to expose the Party Cop, so damo would be the perfect choice if they need to expose someone tonight. If they feel safe it may be better for them to wait, but since we don't know who they are we don't know how exposed they are to a Mafia NK.

Squigs44
Developer
Developer
Posts: 4003
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2262 Post by Squigs44 » Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:48 pm

Nephthys wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:15 pm
I dont particularly think it matters who we kill on the con side. Unless all the scum are caught we're all gonna die.

That being said I do think damo is a good bet ##vote damo
Well it actually does matter. Its the difference between auto win with a mass claim and (close to?) lylo.

Squigs44
Developer
Developer
Posts: 4003
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2263 Post by Squigs44 » Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:51 pm

Back to ##vote Nephthys

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 11715
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2264 Post by worcej » Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:51 pm

So I see three options for voting currently:
  • Neph
  • Damo
  • Ike
Here is my take on the three:
Neph - I also think his voters are a majority of lurkers (ND, Percy, and Fox) and xorxes just sheeped Ezio post-PR reveal. ND/Percy/Fox are all non-cons, so I think this is lazy town more than scum influenced, being that xorxes and one of the above are the only scum options.

Damo - His wagon looks similar to Nephs, 3 non-cons and two con (Neph and Ike). Similar scum issues present as Nephs, but also unlikely. I don't scum read Ike currently, so maybe one scum vote is here, two if you actually scum read Neph. This seems mostly town pushed currently.

Ike - Also in the same boat. Flash as the only con, which I town read currently. So this one is mostly all town.

Other comments:
I don't like how Squigs, based on my read, made Flash's claim more obvious than it already was.

Anyways, honestly I am liking the spread of votes currently. I think the remaining voters in cons (rdr and Durga) probably can't swing this too much, so if they are scum they would be easily exposed on how they vote from here on.

I'll go with my traditional vote of ##vote Damo - You are not providing value currently and your list did come off as artificial.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2265 Post by xorxes » Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:52 pm

I am slightly townreading flash at this point based on the people voting for him.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 11715
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2266 Post by worcej » Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:56 pm

thamrick wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:15 pm
What? Flash explicitly said he crumbed and pointed out what he crumbed...

:? :eyeroll: :?
He pointed out how - but the connection of 'whip it' was not as obvious to what his role was unless you read the roles heavily.

thamrick
Posts: 1958
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:48 am
Location: South Carolina, US
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2267 Post by thamrick » Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:58 pm

worcej wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:51 pm
So I see three options for voting currently:
  • Neph
  • Damo
  • Ike
Here is my take on the three:
Neph - I also think his voters are a majority of lurkers (ND, Percy, and Fox) and xorxes just sheeped Ezio post-PR reveal. ND/Percy/Fox are all non-cons, so I think this is lazy town more than scum influenced, being that xorxes and one of the above are the only scum options.

Damo - His wagon looks similar to Nephs, 3 non-cons and two con (Neph and Ike). Similar scum issues present as Nephs, but also unlikely. I don't scum read Ike currently, so maybe one scum vote is here, two if you actually scum read Neph. This seems mostly town pushed currently.

Ike - Also in the same boat. Flash as the only con, which I town read currently. So this one is mostly all town.

Other comments:
I don't like how Squigs, based on my read, made Flash's claim more obvious than it already was.

Anyways, honestly I am liking the spread of votes currently. I think the remaining voters in cons (rdr and Durga) probably can't swing this too much, so if they are scum they would be easily exposed on how they vote from here on.

I'll go with my traditional vote of ##vote Damo - You are not providing value currently and your list did come off as artificial.
I.... don't really get what you're saying here? You're saying that all three wagons are mostly town? Wouldn't this be true of pretty much any wagon? Where do you think the scum votes are?

thamrick
Posts: 1958
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:48 am
Location: South Carolina, US
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2268 Post by thamrick » Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:00 pm

xorxes wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:52 pm
I am slightly townreading flash at this point based on the people voting for him.
So you scumread Tom, rdr, and damo? Or at least some combination of those 3

thamrick
Posts: 1958
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:48 am
Location: South Carolina, US
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2269 Post by thamrick » Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:02 pm

worcej wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:56 pm
thamrick wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:15 pm
What? Flash explicitly said he crumbed and pointed out what he crumbed...

:? :eyeroll: :?
He pointed out how - but the connection of 'whip it' was not as obvious to what his role was unless you read the roles heavily.
As far as obscure crumbs go, that one is pretty mild once pointed out as a crumb.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2270 Post by xorxes » Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:02 pm

thamrick wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:00 pm
xorxes wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:52 pm
I am slightly townreading flash at this point based on the people voting for him.
So you scumread Tom, rdr, and damo? Or at least some combination of those 3
I scumread rdr and damo, and I'm slightly suspicious of Tom. Unlikely that all three would be voting together if they are all scum though.

Squigs44
Developer
Developer
Posts: 4003
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:50 pm
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2271 Post by Squigs44 » Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:03 pm

worcej wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:56 pm
thamrick wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:15 pm
What? Flash explicitly said he crumbed and pointed out what he crumbed...

:? :eyeroll: :?
He pointed out how - but the connection of 'whip it' was not as obvious to what his role was unless you read the roles heavily.
I forget that I'm the only one who actually reads the set up.

Okay, so you don't like what I did. Why don't you like it? Did I help out scum by showing them fake crumbs? Or do you not like it because my comment drew more attention to flash, your scummate?

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2272 Post by xorxes » Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:04 pm

Squigs44 wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:03 pm
worcej wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:56 pm
thamrick wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:15 pm
What? Flash explicitly said he crumbed and pointed out what he crumbed...

:? :eyeroll: :?
He pointed out how - but the connection of 'whip it' was not as obvious to what his role was unless you read the roles heavily.
I forget that I'm the only one who actually reads the set up.

Okay, so you don't like what I did. Why don't you like it? Did I help out scum by showing them fake crumbs? Or do you not like it because my comment drew more attention to flash, your scummate?
worcej is not scum, just silly town.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2273 Post by xorxes » Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:09 pm

xorxes wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:04 pm
Squigs44 wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:03 pm
worcej wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:56 pm
He pointed out how - but the connection of 'whip it' was not as obvious to what his role was unless you read the roles heavily.
I forget that I'm the only one who actually reads the set up.

Okay, so you don't like what I did. Why don't you like it? Did I help out scum by showing them fake crumbs? Or do you not like it because my comment drew more attention to flash, your scummate?
worcej is not scum, just silly town.
A good rule of thumb is to townread anyone that worcej scumreads, and viceversa. Historically proven to be 99% effective.

Which makes me think damo may be town after all, which is still a good target for the journalist as a cleared con backbencher would be just as valuable if not even more valuable than an exposed scum.

thamrick
Posts: 1958
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:48 am
Location: South Carolina, US
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2274 Post by thamrick » Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:10 pm

xorxes wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:04 pm
Squigs44 wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:03 pm
worcej wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:56 pm
He pointed out how - but the connection of 'whip it' was not as obvious to what his role was unless you read the roles heavily.
I forget that I'm the only one who actually reads the set up.

Okay, so you don't like what I did. Why don't you like it? Did I help out scum by showing them fake crumbs? Or do you not like it because my comment drew more attention to flash, your scummate?
worcej is not scum, just silly town.
https://imgflip.com/i/2ve00n

thamrick
Posts: 1958
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:48 am
Location: South Carolina, US
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2275 Post by thamrick » Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:11 pm

xorxes wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:02 pm
thamrick wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:00 pm
xorxes wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:52 pm
I am slightly townreading flash at this point based on the people voting for him.
So you scumread Tom, rdr, and damo? Or at least some combination of those 3
I scumread rdr and damo, and I'm slightly suspicious of Tom. Unlikely that all three would be voting together if they are all scum though.
I guess that was more my question - which of them do you scumread

Why rdr?

thamrick
Posts: 1958
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:48 am
Location: South Carolina, US
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2276 Post by thamrick » Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:12 pm

And while you're at it xorxes, why do you scumread damo?

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2277 Post by xorxes » Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:15 pm

thamrick wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:11 pm
xorxes wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:02 pm
thamrick wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:00 pm


So you scumread Tom, rdr, and damo? Or at least some combination of those 3
I scumread rdr and damo, and I'm slightly suspicious of Tom. Unlikely that all three would be voting together if they are all scum though.
I guess that was more my question - which of them do you scumread

Why rdr?
I already explained it, but: his vote for brainbomb seemed very scummy to me, and with Attorney practically outing himself as scum, it makes a lot of sense of brainbomb's EOD1 behavior if his two competing wagons were more valuable scum roles.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2278 Post by xorxes » Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:18 pm

thamrick wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:12 pm
And while you're at it xorxes, why do you scumread damo?
His reads list was truly awful, and his catching up posts where he did nothing but correct people's grammar and such were equally awful. Also some other things he said that I'd have to read back to point out.

I don't want to lynch him now though, I want the journalist to expose him.

Attorney
Posts: 349
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2019 7:45 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2279 Post by Attorney » Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:23 pm

oops
invalid vote
##Vote Nep

Attorney
Posts: 349
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2019 7:45 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#2280 Post by Attorney » Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:24 pm

damo666 wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 5:21 pm
Squigs44 wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 5:14 pm
damo666 wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 5:10 pm


Why? Attorney could well be Arlene Foster.
In which case, our best strategy would be to give the party cop a chance to investigate Attorney before we consider lynching him.

I feel like I have been through this same argument more times than there are players...
Party cop scans Attorney who (say) is revealed as non-con. Party cop is outed and nothing really learnt as he could still be Arlene Foster. What am I missing?
party cop is basically something that says the parties, so if I am scanned i would show up as labour
but if i was arlene foster i would be outed and then town would have autowin

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Spartaculous, sweetandcool