MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
Vaporwave
Posts: 2308
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:21 pm

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1741 Post by Vaporwave » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:06 am

emc, time to update your scheme picture

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1742 Post by xorxes » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:06 am

Vaporwave wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:04 am
so Ezio claimed prime minister

Attorney claimed party cop

and I'm leader of opposition

3 confirmed, if you are 1 of these mentioned, speak up or accept this reality
Attorney retracted his claim. Party Cop should definitely NOT out himself.

Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1743 Post by Durga » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:07 am

i'm genuinely confused. why are you lynched attorney

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1744 Post by xorxes » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:08 am

Vapor, you need to read the thread more thoroughly.

Attorney pretty much outed himself as scum.

Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1745 Post by Durga » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:08 am

xorxes wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:08 am
Vapor, you need to read the thread more thoroughly.

Attorney pretty much outed himself as scum.
how??

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1746 Post by xorxes » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:09 am

Durga wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:07 am
i'm genuinely confused. why are you lynched attorney
Why are poeple not reading the thread?

Attorney is now claiming that his conservative claim was false.

Vaporwave
Posts: 2308
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:21 pm

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1747 Post by Vaporwave » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:09 am

what? this is 2nd time he retracts something

claimed conservative, for a comedic feel retracted and called himself non-con

now he comes out as party cop and backs away from his claim?

his tone is weird, what he posts feels manufactured

Vaporwave
Posts: 2308
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:21 pm

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1748 Post by Vaporwave » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:11 am

xorxes wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:08 am
Vapor, you need to read the thread more thoroughly.

Attorney pretty much outed himself as scum.
that's because I really don't get a thing of what this dude says

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1749 Post by xorxes » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:11 am

Durga wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:08 am
xorxes wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:08 am
Vapor, you need to read the thread more thoroughly.

Attorney pretty much outed himself as scum.
how??
He retracted his conservative claim, arguing that he had claimed conservative just to confuse Mafia, which is a pretty obvious lie, given that that part of the plan came after his original claim.

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 5884
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1750 Post by Foxcastle » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:13 am

xorxes wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:05 am
Foxcastle wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:02 am
Oh, exciting. (Referring to Attorney's scan and retraction.)

RIP Vecna.

Ezio, was there a reason you appointed Rdrivera? You barely mentioned him Day 1, you ended up voting him after saying you wanted it to be him versus Attorney for the lynch, and you didn't seem to change your view of him over the night. (I'm not questioning your claim.)
Makes sense to appoint someone very unlikely to be NK'd
My view of the Brexit/EU chat was that, ideally, two town could coordinate for Ploys and Maneuvers. Obviously there's a risk that scum get appointed. But if Ezio thought Rdrivera was scum (as indicated by his vote, but maybe he changed his mind and didn't say anything, which is reasonable if didn't want to draw attention to the appointment), I don't see the point of appointing him.

User avatar
Foxcastle
Posts: 5884
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:48 pm
Location: Night Vale
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1751 Post by Foxcastle » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:15 am

##VOTE ATTORNEY

My original choice Day 1 gets a second go, now that he's besmirched himself even further.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1752 Post by xorxes » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:15 am

Foxcastle wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:13 am
xorxes wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:05 am
Foxcastle wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:02 am
Oh, exciting. (Referring to Attorney's scan and retraction.)

RIP Vecna.

Ezio, was there a reason you appointed Rdrivera? You barely mentioned him Day 1, you ended up voting him after saying you wanted it to be him versus Attorney for the lynch, and you didn't seem to change your view of him over the night. (I'm not questioning your claim.)
Makes sense to appoint someone very unlikely to be NK'd
My view of the Brexit/EU chat was that, ideally, two town could coordinate for Ploys and Maneuvers. Obviously there's a risk that scum get appointed. But if Ezio thought Rdrivera was scum (as indicated by his vote, but maybe he changed his mind and didn't say anything, which is reasonable if didn't want to draw attention to the appointment), I don't see the point of appointing him.
The only real use of his apointee is to confirm his claim, which he must do even if he is scum because if he doesn't he pretty much gives himself away.

Ezio
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2017 6:54 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1753 Post by Ezio » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:16 am

Foxcastle wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:13 am
xorxes wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:05 am
Foxcastle wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:02 am
Oh, exciting. (Referring to Attorney's scan and retraction.)

RIP Vecna.

Ezio, was there a reason you appointed Rdrivera? You barely mentioned him Day 1, you ended up voting him after saying you wanted it to be him versus Attorney for the lynch, and you didn't seem to change your view of him over the night. (I'm not questioning your claim.)
Makes sense to appoint someone very unlikely to be NK'd
My view of the Brexit/EU chat was that, ideally, two town could coordinate for Ploys and Maneuvers. Obviously there's a risk that scum get appointed. But if Ezio thought Rdrivera was scum (as indicated by his vote, but maybe he changed his mind and didn't say anything, which is reasonable if didn't want to draw attention to the appointment), I don't see the point of appointing him.
nah just wanted to give it to the person I thought was least likely to be the NK. I don't think mafia ever have NK'd the competing wagon N1.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1754 Post by xorxes » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:17 am

It would be lovely if rivera does not confirm though. Then we have a 1v1.

Ezio
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2017 6:54 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1755 Post by Ezio » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:18 am

xorxes wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:17 am
It would be lovely if rivera does not confirm though. Then we have a 1v1.
Exactly. Targeting scum seems optimal. Rivera was nice b/c even if he's not scum he still would never get Nk'd.

Durga
Posts: 9486
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1756 Post by Durga » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:19 am

Ezio wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:18 am
xorxes wrote:
Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:17 am
It would be lovely if rivera does not confirm though. Then we have a 1v1.
Exactly. Targeting scum seems optimal. Rivera was nice b/c even if he's not scum he still would never get Nk'd.
no scum is dumb enough not to confirm.... :?

User avatar
Jamiet99uk
Posts: 30393
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:42 pm
Location: Durham, UK
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1757 Post by Jamiet99uk » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:19 am

VOTE COUNT 2.1

Foxcastle (2) - Worcej, Attorney
Attorney (2) - Xorxes, Foxcastle
RagingIke (1) - Flash
Flash (1) - Squigs
Nephthys (1) - Ezio

Currently NOBODY is set to be lynched.

We're less than two hours into D2.

Ezio
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2017 6:54 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1758 Post by Ezio » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:22 am

I'd much rather leave Attorney for today and let cop scan him tonight to confirm him or not. Godfather is not immune to the party cop (he still comes as conservative), so if Attorney is lying now he's guaranteed lynch later.

Neph should hang today.

Ezio
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2017 6:54 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1759 Post by Ezio » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:23 am

Last night, Vecna had a similar reaction to Neph after his reads post.

"
Surprised you(Neph) didnt question my(Venca) defending of brainbomb in the slightest. If anyone put in the most effort to divert the lynch from him, surely it has to have been me?
"
-Vecna

Ezio
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2017 6:54 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 43 - GAME THREAD

#1760 Post by Ezio » Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:25 am

@xorxes
@Durga
@squigs
@tom

y'all are the ones who get people lynched around these parts, therefore you're the ones I need to convince. How are you feeling about Neph.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aristocrat, Google [Bot], Spartaculous