Tiny Hunt I Game Thread

[damo666]

Y2K - I can't trust someone who misreads the rules.

[damo666]

Exclude Worcej due to no lynch advocacy, Bo_ due to self admitted mechanics weakness and Yav because of his list plan'. So, leaves 6 potential lump candidates.

[damo666]

Lump situation:
Decent 6
Rdr 2 votes (me,rdr)
Vecna 2 votes (Worcej, Jamie)
Bozo, ND, DT, me NO votes

Indecent 7
Ezio 1 vote (Y2K)
Rest NO votes

8 people yet to vote.

[Squigs44]

Lump situation:
Decent 6
Rdr 2 votes (me,rdr)
Vecna 2 votes (Worcej, Jamie)
Bozo, ND, DT, me NO votes

Indecent 7
Ezio 1 vote (Y2K)
Rest NO votes

8 people yet to vote.

Ezio also voted himself for lump. I'm not sure what you are doing with this lump list. When you say you don't trust players who misread/misinterpret the rules, is that because you think they are scum, or think they can't properly scumhunt? It almost looks like you are trying to vote for a specific scumbuddy while looking for every possible reason you can to justify that vote.

I'm torn between lumping Ezio and Vecna right now. They both seem townie in their arguing of their different strategies.

[y2kjbk]

##VOTE Squigs44

Something strikes me wrong about him so far. Being seemingly helpful with logical opinions about mechanics but very reserved about initial impressions of players, waiting for others to make their opinions of others known first, i.e. scum waiting to join town voting town.

[y2kjbk]

His vote for bozo reinforces the suspicion for me, as an easy place to put his vote while the active players make their opinions more fully known.

[yavuzovic]

I lumped Ezio because I liked his come-out logic and I would doubt scum would be so bold to immediately self-claim the lump like that.

It's too early to scumread but if one of these guys is scum, the other one is likely scum too. I will avoid lumpvoting them.
##lumpvote damo666

I'm okay with staying out of lump pool. I don't want to be lump.

[yavuzovic]

And I think I will vote for y2k for now.
I'm unsure if it's permanent.

[y2kjbk]

Yep you nailed it, as scum my obv play is to lump my scum-buddy right out the gate, witches win, game over.

[Squigs44]

##VOTE Squigs44

Something strikes me wrong about him so far. Being seemingly helpful with logical opinions about mechanics but very reserved about initial impressions of players, waiting for others to make their opinions of others known first, i.e. scum waiting to join town voting town.

In the post just previous to this I said I was townreading Vecna and Ezio.
Also, it's pretty hard to get reads on people when they aren't interacting or answering my questions.

@y2k - I have two outstanding questions for you

[Squigs44]

As for scumreads, I haven't particularly liked DTs play nor Yavs.

[y2kjbk]

I said why I lumped Ezio. I think without VT's, the town play from townies will be a bit more deliberate than when a whole lot of players have zero to go on beyond the public thread, which I think is the main instigator to everyone screaming at each other scrambling for info. I've never played a game with all power roles and I'm optimistic about the change in game dynamic helping my typically horrible scum-hunting when i'm town.

[Vecna]

Rdrivera, how do you feel about the following players so far:

Ezio
Damo
Y2k
Yavuz
Thomas

[Squigs44]

Also Jamie hasn't posted much but I think he is leaning more towards scum Jamie than town Jamie.

[rdrivera2005]

About the lump, I think we shouldn't openly decline on it as it could give witches some clues. I think Vecna could also be a good lump target, he is my first townread. Ezio is bold as scum, I know it well, so I don't think we should give him a town read just for self voting

[rdrivera2005]

Rdrivera, how do you feel about the following players so far:

Ezio
Damo
Y2k
Yavuz
Thomas

Will answer only with my gut feeling as I didn't made any re-read (miss the bot)

Ezio I have already answered a bit. Didn't gave much of an impression with his first posts. He can be really good as scum, so maybe he is town.

Damo is kinda budding me and I like it. I don't see scum Damo doiing It, but with witch QT open it's harder to read it

Y2K seems off, different from last game where he was Vig. I didn't like his answer to Squigs, seems just excuses. I would give him a slight scum now.

Yavuz looks like Yav, hard to read. His suggestion to acolyte list targets was so atrociously bad that it's almost too scum to be scum.

Don't have any impression on Thomas. And also on Jamiet, Bo and Bozo and ND and this is weird as they are usually loud players.

[Vecna]

Alright, tnx bae

[damo666]

LUMP

Squiggs - didn't interpret Ezio'z self vote. I guess he meant it as a vote which also puts him on 2.

I am talking about the lump because I think it is important that witches not get it. I am just trying to narrow the pool of potentials and not giving the extra vote to someone who misread the rules seems a decent way to go.

[worcej]

Can you go more into detail in this in a way that makes sense if you're town? I'm simplistic and can't get past the fact that you actually proposed a no lynch with the blatant intent of letting the witches steer the direction of the game as opposed to proposing it like most morons do in other games where they simply argue that it's a way to avoid getting a townie killed on day 1.

Because town gains no benefit from a D1 lynch - We gain no new information, no roles or anything. We have a 3/13 chance of running up a scum. We are all PRs, so each person has inherent value. The only benefit of mislynching a town is they become an angel, but it is a little early to force that. Also, factor in that if we mislynch the D.O.B., we could lose two roles right away.

The witches are stuck with a choice - get a N1 kill or information gather via soup. Either direction, town gains definitive information from them.

It makes the most sense that the witches should be the first to act with the fact that no role is revealed on death. This game is vastly different from Mafia, so the same 'no lynching is dumb' logic needs to be thrown out the window.

[DoubtingThomas]

@doubting Thomas
Say something useful rather than making a dumb joke post.

have you done anything useful?

i skimmed the first 3 pages but all i remember you doing is self lump vote yourself, tbh