Prado. I disagree with that 100% there is several trigger points that would kick it off

Cool

Q

I’m glad modship entitles some asshat to make blanket statements. Prado shut the fuck up Moron

1% means it is still mathematically possible. And no a second civil isn’t likely or close at hand. That’s from someone who’s American if you’re concerned about nationalities. It would have to happen over some singular issue, and there quite simply isn’t a singular issue that has a likelihood of getting Americans so enraged that they feel they could kill their neighbors over it on a nationwide scale.

Ksako. Can i ask your nationality? Cw2 is not just possible bit may be not far off

End to Brexit (including Brexit in name only): 50%
Break of EU within 10 years: 5%
Civil war in the USA within 10 years: 1%

Underestimate the deadly power of a sharpened avocado at your peril, Jamie.

There may be half a chance if the left was perceived to remove Trump undemocraticly (unlikely) and then cracked down hard on pro Trump demonstrators (very unlikely), but it takes a fair amount of imagination. It's considerably less likely than both an end to Brexit or the break up of the EU.

So, unpopular politicians being heckled in restaurants is a sign that civil war is looming? Ok.

another kid —-wow.

[quote=ssorenn post_id=22544 time=1530561339 user_id=105]
[quote=TrPrado post_id=22540 time=1530560736 user_id=65]
While not a liberal, my thoughts are that it’d be best not to continue reading the Daily Wire.
[/quote]

I like the daily wire. That point aside. If you’d like to make a comment on the possibility of civil war 2.0. I’d love to hear it
[/quote]

I did have a comment, and I made it.

[quote=Incrementalist post_id=22589 time=1530589165 user_id=1305]
Your prose is becoming inscrutable.

EDIT: OK I see what you mean after the correction. Nevertheless... the president does not control the economy, which is why presidents are so often at the economy's mercy.
[/quote]

Presidents are at the crux of the economy. Policy, is driven through the Whitehouse. While the fed is supposed to be an independent body, chairmen Yellen was a puppet for Obama. One of the main reason why we were held back for 8 years. Trump and his tax cuts were direct policy influencing the massive rally we’ve seen in the first 18 months of trumps presidency. While he hasn’t cured healthcare yet, if he does, another leg\ up will be coming.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/1/us-really-did-have-manchurian-candidate-white-hous/

Did this come through?

Your prose is becoming inscrutable.

EDIT: OK I see what you mean after the correction. Nevertheless... the president does not control the economy, which is why presidents are so often at the economy's mercy.

[quote=TrPrado post_id=22540 time=1530560736 user_id=65]
While not a liberal, my thoughts are that it’d be best not to continue reading the Daily Wire.
[/quote]

AHAHAHA

The president controls more than you can think. He left much of his voting base in the cold. Created a staggering class disparity in wealth

Diplomacy (in real life) proceeds by an accumulation of nuances, not consistent aggression toward adversaries. Obama wasn't particularly good at this, and Clinton was straightforwardly bad at it. They cut Iran and Russia some slack in approving the movement of money or materials; this isn't automatically wrong, but they got too little for it. Nevertheless getting swindled is not the same thing as betraying the country. And the impact of these actions was not catastrophic in the grand scheme of things.

As far as helping the African American community... the economy does what it does. No president controls it.

(I have facebook blocked in my /etc/hosts, I can't get to the last link you posted).

:eyeroll: :eyeroll: :raging:

Early in Obama’s presidency he was at the 40th %. Reagan had the same thing. Sorry to inform you. He is a traitor, in many facets. The Iran deal. Circumventing our own sanctions to help the Iranians move currency around as well.dont Forget Hillary and uranium 1.trump gave up nothing for NK, while it cost us $400+. Million to Iran.

Forget not helping the African American community. The highest jobless rate in history for them, while trump has their highest employment in recorded history.

Obama's Iran deal was a bit of a joke, but so is Trump's policy toward North Korea. Not every puzzle has a solution.

Obama was a 61st percentile president, Trump is looking to be about a 43rd percentile, judged merely on outcomes rather than intent in both cases.

EDITED TO ADD: Neither of them are "traitors", if that word is to have any meaning.