Rules confusion

Forum rules
This is an area for new members or members looking for help with the site or Diplomacy. Off topic threads and replies will be moved to the appropriate category.

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:points: :-D :eyeroll: :neutral: :nmr: :razz: :raging: :-) ;) :( :sick: :o :? 8-) :x :shock: :lol: :cry: :evil: :?: :smirk: :!:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is OFF
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Expand view Topic review: Rules confusion

Re: Rules confusion

by White_Phosphorus » Fri Feb 23, 2018 2:25 am

Thank you

Re: Rules confusion

by Foxcastle » Fri Feb 23, 2018 2:19 am

The army in Burgundy can cut support from Ruhr by attacking it, without being dislodged by the (unsupported) attack from Munich. The attack from Munich on Burgundy does not prevent Burgundy from attacking Ruhr and cutting support for Holland. The outcome of your scenario is that Munich bounces against Burgundy, Burgundy bounces against Ruhr, Ruhr's support for Holland is cut and Ruhr stays in place.

Rules confusion

by White_Phosphorus » Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:58 am

I have read the rules both on here and on wiki, and I just encountered a scenario that I don't know the answer to. Lets say you're germany and you have an army in the rurh and an army in munich. France has an army in Burgundy. Lets say you wanted the rurh to support an army in holand, but you were worried about it getting cut. So you order munich to attack burgundy so France can't cut the support. Would that work? What would happen?

Top