Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 137 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Xyathn (0 DX)
11 Sep 08 UTC
Draw Requested
All 4 remaining players agree to a draw on game: http://phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=5162.
2 replies
Open
Treefarn (6094 D)
30 Aug 08 UTC
Police raid headquarters of "anarchist/anti-authoritarian" group at RNC
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/30/rnc.protest/index.html
158 replies
Open
Sagefire135 (100 D)
10 Sep 08 UTC
Quick question
what do the crosses and checks mean by peoples names?
2 replies
Open
valoishapsburg (314 D)
11 Sep 08 UTC
Anyone here a die hard Meat Loaf Fan?
I love Meat Loaf! The singer. This has nothing to do with Diplomacy, but I'm curious.
2 replies
Open
Treefarn (6094 D)
10 Sep 08 UTC
Obligations to ally when they don't submit moves
There are two scenarios. One is that the turn has ended with no moves from your ally. The other is the phase is about to expire and your ally hasn't logged in to submit moves. WHat do you do?
17 replies
Open
abgemacht (1076 D(G))
10 Sep 08 UTC
In need of some players!
A few of my friends that I play FTF with and I started a game, but we need a couple more people. Is anyone interested? No metagaming--promise.

The game is in my profile. Password: cipe
3 replies
Open
MajorFopa (1409 D)
09 Sep 08 UTC
Please pause this game Kestas
Hi Kestas,
Can you please put this game on hold for about 4 days?
http://phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=4544
We have been battling hard for many years and now one player has had a problem submitting orders.
...
10 replies
Open
Thucydides (864 D(B))
10 Sep 08 UTC
How about spectator bets on games?
Maybe not for the normal Diplomacy points, but for something else. I don't know I think the idea is cool though. Betting on who you think will win. Too complicated and unecessary to incorporate as a feature though, I wager. I mean, I bet. I mean, I reckon. Lol how punny.
11 replies
Open
Talus Proteus (1961 D)
10 Sep 08 UTC
Error?
I guess this question is for Kestas. I'm playing as England in the game "Happieness" and I think there might have been an error. I'm pretty sure one of my orders was a support hold from the English Channel to the Mid-Atlantic but it's not showing up on the post-season map. Is there a way to confirm what my orders were? Because I'm pretty sure my fleet in the Mid should have been able to withstand the attack with its support in the Channel.
9 replies
Open
shayol_ghul (100 D)
10 Sep 08 UTC
just some questions from a newbie
hey, i'm totally new to the game and there are some questions the tutorial left unanswered. I'd appreciate if someone could help.

1. Support Move. As I got it, the supporting unit has to be in an adjacent territory to the one where the supported unit starts its move. It does not matter if its adjacent to the target of the move. There is no point to move into a territory with two armies (from different sides etc). All of it correct?

2. Convoy. How does this work? The order refers to a sea territory I assume? Can I order an army to travel over that territory then? Does the territory have to be empty?

3. Move. What happens if two opposing armies move to the same territory? Do both get destroyed or do they just stand and stare at each other? What if there is a defending unit in this scenario(assuming both attacks are supported and would normally win the encounter)?

4. Retreat. When exactly does this occur and how does it work?

Is there a link to a more complex introduction or something?

Thanks in advance
7 replies
Open
spyman (424 D(G))
10 Sep 08 UTC
Negotiating and back stabbing
I recently played my first diplomacy game online. Could someone please help me with Diplomacy etiquette? Did I back stab another player on my second move?
12 replies
Open
Hat-trick (0 DX)
10 Sep 08 UTC
Viva España!
90 to join. PPSC game.

Please join :)
0 replies
Open
Draw request in awesome-2
We are requesting a draw in awesome-2

The others will set theirs messages.

Thanks
1 reply
Open
scaael04 (100 D)
10 Sep 08 UTC
Wrong fleet deleted
http://phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=5426

I chose to destroy the fleet at the adriatic sea, not the one in Greece!
Is there any way I can change it?
0 replies
Open
TheGhostmaker (1545 D)
09 Sep 08 UTC
Leagues Please respond to the email
Group D is missing responces from Jaco and Shishuren
Group E is missing responces from alamothe, Ivo_Ivanov and Piazza.

Please resond within 24 hours or I shall give people on the waiting list your places.

Thank you.
14 replies
Open
Yaniv (1323 D(S))
10 Sep 08 UTC
Question re convoys
To get a better sense of this question, you may want to refer to game 5300 (Turkey and Italy), Spring of 1907.

Turkey 'requested' that Italy assist in the convoy of a unit from Rome to Greece. Italy was located in the Tyrrhenian Sea at the time. Italy 'agreed'. But given the two nations' history during the game, Italy would have much rather slit Turkey's throat (or its own) rather than be of assistance.

Why is it not possible for Italy to agree to the convoy, but rather than actually sailing to the agreed upon destination to hand over the troops within her holds to the Turkish fleet in the Ionian, to either drop the Turkish troops over the side into Davey Jones' Locker, or at least strand them elsewhere (so long as this elsewhere were somewere that Italy could readily access)?

The way the game is set up, because army being convoyed defines the final destination, rather than all the intermediate steps to get it to its final destination. This could have implications in that a convoy could fail at any stage. Were a convoy to fail near the tail end of a multi step convoy, the forces in the fleet's hold could disembark at any unoccupied, readily accessible territory closer to the final destination, rather than remaining at its point of origin.

In the above example, Turkey defined the move of Rome to Greece via convoy, and the only possible monkey wrench open to the Italians was to fail to show up for the pick up. Which is what the Italians elected to do.
5 replies
Open
synthesis8 (121 D)
10 Sep 08 UTC
2 units retreating to same place
What happens if two different players attempt to a single unit to the same place? Does it simply fail (or do they disband), or if one player has an option to retreat elsewhere, will it simply move their unit to the other place?
3 replies
Open
EdiBirsan (1469 D(B))
09 Sep 08 UTC
Names and Identities
One of the underlining things in the current vogue of PbEMail game systems like this one is that players hide their identities as a matter of course. Being an old timer I find this rather odd. One of the really attractive aspects of the Diplomacy hobby was the social side of things. However, the main websites seems to attract people who are rather uptight about using their real name or having people know who they are. It is like playing the game anonymously and it loses so much of the charm and appeal of the game.
After all the key to a well played game of Diplomacy is the interaction between the people around the board not the faceless/anonymous handles or aliases of people.
Maybe it is a generational issue, and as a grandfather from the hobby's start I grew in the hobby where the idea that you were playing under a hidden name was not only strange but was normally against all the house rules of the zines/GM's that hosted the games. Yet people here seem to relish the anonymous aspect and become down right paranoid when you ask the simplest and oldest social question: Hi, I am ---- who are you?

If you had to play under your own name, how many would refuse to play?
Would playing under your own name make a major difference in the drop out rate here which seems to be a real major problem?
Sicarius (673 D)
09 Sep 08 UTC
My name is bryer logan baumgartner, born in toledo hospital on july 10th. my social security number is 285-92-3861

anonymity sucks
dangermouse (5551 D)
09 Sep 08 UTC
The anonymity here has almost nothing to do with Diplomacy and everything to do with the internet. I suspect that most people here use pseudonyms simply because that is the standard. Online gaming practically requires players to invent nicknames for themselves. I know that I've used the moniker Dangermouse for over a decade now. It simply moves with me from site to site.

I gather you are of an older generation than most here. Perhaps that is the difference. People my age (29) and younger grew up with the web and find nothing unusual about having an alias. You ask, "Who are you?" There's nothing dishonest in my answering "Dangermouse". I could just as easily answer "Tim"; but on the net they're really pretty synonymous.

On the flip side, using your real name online is practically begging someone to intrude on your privacy. Given 20 minutes, someone you don't know in the least could potentially have your full name, home address, school and/or work location, etc.

To answer your original question, no, I don't think that using real names would make any difference in the number of civil disorders.
flashman (2274 D(G))
09 Sep 08 UTC
ditto...

Except that I have a different monicker.

I do not hide my real name from those I get to play decent games with but I rather like having a tag to put a character behind.
DeliciousWolf (112 D)
09 Sep 08 UTC
I think aliases are a necessity of the internet, I guard my privacy very closely, but photo profiles would be a nice touch for those who like the in-person feel.
Braveheart (2408 D(S))
09 Sep 08 UTC
Agreed with everyones comments and alas it is a sign of the times in which we live. I appreciate that it does to a certain extent detract from the spirit of the game... but the benefits of being able to play with people from all over the world with such regularity in my opinion far outweighs the disadvantages of online play.

Plus I have definitely got to know quite a few people on this site reasonable well as time goes by... we even managed to organise a face to face game recently in HK, directly as a result of this site.
flashman (2274 D(G))
09 Sep 08 UTC
And another one soon I hope...

sean (3490 D(B))
09 Sep 08 UTC
yes i have to agree, i dont think people hide their names deliberately . Its just natural...the site asks for a log on name...younger people use handles. i might not know peoples true name but whats a name? danger mouse is dangermouse, knowing his parents choose the name...tom? a set period of time before he choose the net name dangermouse changes nothing.

btw edi, i had a look at stabberfou(?) site you mentioned. i havent played a game on that site but i prefer the layout/map of phpdip. whats your view? i see you are playing 2 low point games, fun?
i hope you can play a game with some of our senior level players soon, some of our younger lower point players don't quite gasp the "diplomatic" nature of diplomacy im afraid.
Ivo_ivanov (7545 D)
09 Sep 08 UTC
Oh, I am totally against using real names :)
kestasjk (95 DMod(P))
09 Sep 08 UTC
I've always used my first name, but I don't think I would if it was a more common one. I used to try and hide my surname online because, as dangermouse said, it's generally the done thing, but eventually the inconvenience outweighed the warm snuggly feeling of privacy (which is always a bit of an illusion)

On the Facebook phpDip port everyone's username was their first name, but there were dozens of Marks and Johns etc, and everyone wanted to change to an alias simply for that reason, I think.
Treefarn (6094 D)
09 Sep 08 UTC
I met my wife in an online chat room over a decade ago. She knew me by my screen name, and for many years after that, she would still on occasion call me by the shortened form of my screen name. Its not that a screen name provides us with anonymity, its part of our identity.
flashman (2274 D(G))
09 Sep 08 UTC
So, it's Mr and Mrs Tree then?
Gobbledydook (1389 D(B))
09 Sep 08 UTC
Mr. Kestas,
Your personal website has your name, surname, as well as names of family members.
For example, I can easily find out what name your father was called.
CJ 92 (179 D)
09 Sep 08 UTC
Well Edi racism is still a problem in our societies and with players from about anywhere playing Diplomacy online a degree of annoymity is necessary to avoid abuse but I digress that's only a tiny aspect of internet Diplomacy. Richard Sharp prefered postal Diplomacy stating the results give a more accurate picture of the strength of countries which in my opinion is extremely important. The main advantage of the "faceless" version is availability- the face to face aspect would have been a put off for ugly people and shy people for the obvious reason. Still, we can debate politely or argue viciously all day long but at the end of the day the choice all comes down to what sort of person the player facing the choice is.
I think most, if not all, of phpdip's users are above letting ethnic backgrounds alter the way they play a game.
Chrispminis (916 D)
09 Sep 08 UTC
Well, I've made no attempts to hide anything about my identity so far. I'd answer most any question asked of me, except perhaps my exact address...

My pseudonym is practically my name, and hardly acts as a mask. It's just rather my unique online alias that I can be very sure will not be taken by anyone else.

There is still a sizable difference between online and face to face play, especially one played with friends or familiar acquaintances. More so than the anonymity is the lack of non-verbal cues, and other mediums of communication which bring at the same time other mediums of deception.
orathaic (1009 D(B))
09 Sep 08 UTC
it's odd that i used this particular username for phpdip,
if you google it i'm sure you'll be able to find my full name, if you google that you can find my family tree, and if you did a little you will likely be able to find where i'm from, and possibly pictures of my family.

I really like it because it's fairly unique. (ok some of the hits google returns aren't me, but the majority are.)

I really like playing Dip in person, but i'd say the major reason for larger drop rates here than other places is how simple it is to start up a game and play. Some people aren't too interested, but there are no barriers in place to stop them playing. any... i'm going to go rid the net of personal information about me...
flashman (2274 D(G))
09 Sep 08 UTC
Face-to-face is very different from on-line play and presents aspects completely missing from here, namely:

speed: there is a whole level of panic as the clock runs down and people are pestering you to talk;

gamesmanship as you pester someone who you know is running out of time to talk/think;

errors as orders are written wrongly (fog of war, very realistic);

subterfuge as orders are deliberately written wrongly to leave treachery hidden...

and a lot more. Names/identities are small in comparison.
I think that anyone choose what he wants. Several times is interesting play with an different name as Superman, Obi-Wan, etc.
fidel (886 D)
09 Sep 08 UTC
I myself use the nickname Fidel since 1989, when I was at the University and my mates started calling me that. When internet came, it was natural to use it, because all my friends called me that way.

Regarding the matter of age and the use of nicks, I am from a generation that grew up playing role-playing games (face-2-face D&D, in those times when the clock went soooooo slooooowly... *sigh*), and so, having several "personalities" is just commonplace. What internet brings to that is the immediacy and availability to everyone, but no more (well, the problem of security is important! Anyone around the world can attempt to enter your computer, at least... So, it is wise to disguise oneself).
But I share some information via email, if anyone asks (I have myself asked to some people here).
Jann (558 D)
09 Sep 08 UTC
aye,i agree,i like getting to know the people that i will conquer. the name that you see is my name. Jann. hell,look me up on facebook if you all want. i play diplomacy on there too.
EdiBirsan (1469 D(B))
09 Sep 08 UTC
Thank you for your comments. As many of you guessed I am from the older generation of Diplomacy players (I started in 1965) at that time I was the youngest player in the hobby.

The odds of me playing in the higher rated games is probably zero since to get there you have to wade through a lot of games where people just keep dropping out. The drop out rate is why I gave up on play by email over 15 years ago. I have played in a few invitational games.
I got involved with helping stabbeurfou develop because the designer asked me to help and I believe that a lot of the structure there is vastly superior to the judges which I really disliked. I personally like the email notifications on Stabbeurfou and the order checking aspect. I also like that they have the ability to make games of short game years and they have run some very enjoyable events like the 7x Gunboat event.
I disagree strongly with the idea that misorders somehow improve the game. There are plenty of ways to disguise mis moves in the game without doing a misorder. Misorders ruin the games most of the time. For example in one of the games I took over as a stand by every misorder and there has been nearly one every turn, has seriously hurt the player who made them and of course anyone who is allied with that player to a lesser extent. In face to face games there are misorders, but most of those should be in a social structure that allows for a reasonable approach for new players (in the Bay Area Dip we read the new players orders first and allow them to make one of each type of error and get it corrected before going on with reading orders). Tournament Face to Face is a whole different world.
I am familiar with D&D and even ran campaigns. Hell, Gary Gygax was a Diplomacy player I played with before he and Arnenson turned the Chainmail miniature rules into the first version of D&D.


CJ 92 (179 D)
09 Sep 08 UTC
El Perro Artero; I know that but there's always a few racists around. Anyway, that's not a significant issue in Diplomacy so let's ignore it.Moving on, a major advantage of postal/internet is you don't get beaten up. I'm serious. Sharp has known or did know games in which stabbed players got annoyed and opened up a can of violence on the stabber. In one game a petite man attacked a man twice his size! The big man was deeply upset for a while after.
DrOct (219 D(B))
09 Sep 08 UTC
I get what you mean about anonymity and all, but honestly, I don't see any difference here between you knowing my real name and my screen name (which I use all over the place so it's practically synonymous with me anyway). Assuming you don't know me in real life, then it's pretty meaningless anyway. Whether you know me as Frank or George or Bill or DrOct, it's still me, and it has about equal meaning to you. You can still follow me on the site and see how I play and play in games with me or avoid me in the future on this site.

As to your not being able to make it to the "big leagues" on this site because people keep dropping out of games... well that should help you rise pretty quickly. If everyone drops out, you can win very easily, and make it up to the ranks of people who don't go into CD quite quickly, at which point you will be playing with more competent and experienced players.

As long as the game isn't face to face I don't really think it matters whether anyone uses their real name or an alias, if you don't know me in real life, knowing me by another name is pretty much the same as knowing me by my real name!
philcore (317 D(S))
09 Sep 08 UTC
so I looked you up Edi because the people who know you seem really impressed. Now I see why, you have your own page on diplom.org. I do see that you have a nickname though, BirSauron. So you clearly get the nickname concept. I understand though what you're saying about knowing who people are. Everybody would know you from your nick.

Here's the link for people who don't want to google. Pretty impressive and indeed an honour to have on the site. Welcome

http://diplom.org/NADF/edi.htm
aoe3rules (949 D)
09 Sep 08 UTC
Sicarius: okay, got it. and what about your PIN?
Ming (100 D)
09 Sep 08 UTC
Hi Edi. It was great to meet you at the con in Santa Clara. You got me back into Diplomacy after a 22 year hiatus. The nice thing about using your own name is that people might actually know you from offline games.

-Ming
TheGhostmaker (1545 D)
09 Sep 08 UTC
I have had a number of pseudonyms on the internet. "Anteater" being the first, followed by the scientific name for the anteater family "Myrmecophaga", it would have been "Myrmecophaga_Tridactyla" but for the fact that it is too long for most username boxes. TheGhostmaker was relevant to a war-game, and hence.

As for covering up my name, my email is fairly obvious, and flashman has taken the step of calling me by my real name in the forums.

@Edi, if you are interested in high standard non-CD games, then try out the league system :D
EdiBirsan (1469 D(B))
10 Sep 08 UTC
As a little info, I fully understand the nickname business. However in the 1960's most the nicknames came from the press release (in the postal days with your moves you wrote stories, press releases in the true sense) in those stories you created characters which sometimes got associated with you.
For example I had BirSauron, Nasrib of Ide, and others. There was also a Middle Earth/Midgard variant that was popular at one of the early conventions and played a particular nasty and very effective Mordor so the nickname of BirSauron came into play.

Anyway, that's the brief hobby history...I now return you to your regular scheduled phpwhatever dot com program...
Polar Bear (1038 D)
10 Sep 08 UTC
Edi, join the leagues! These are a magnet (we hope) for the more communicative and committed players. The pot is only 25 each per game, so anyone can afford to play.

I agree the dropout rate is hideous around here, but don't judge everyone by that. I am a traditionalist myself. I write to every player ever turn, I only play one game at a time, and I never drop out.
Gobbledydook (1389 D(B))
10 Sep 08 UTC
I'll play with my real name or not.
However, I believe that since most of us here do not know each other there would be no difference between identifying them with an alias or their real name.


30 replies
Bumbly (100 D)
09 Sep 08 UTC
why no airplanes
there should be airplane unit that can move two time on a turn
19 replies
Open
CATS (100 D)
09 Sep 08 UTC
ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US
http://phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=5590
4 replies
Open
EdiBirsan (1469 D(B))
10 Sep 08 UTC
What happens if you do not finalize
If you put in orders put do not finalize when the deadline comes will your orders be accepted or does finalize really mean to submit?
4 replies
Open
Yaniv (1323 D(S))
10 Sep 08 UTC
Question re when are the SC tallies adjusted
When is the tally of supply centres under the control of a country updated?

If one refers to game 5412, after the moves have been successfuly adjudicated but prior to the builds, the tally of SCs under controlled by each country does not add up to what it should be.

Example - Italy has four SCs, but only three are reflected.
Austria-Hungary has seven SCs, but only six are reflected.

Are the tally's only updated once the builds have been finalized, and if so, why aren't the tallies adjusted as soon as it is clear that a SC is now under a nation's control?
2 replies
Open
abgemacht (1076 D(G))
10 Sep 08 UTC
Private Game Links
I just made a private game and I usually give the given link to people I want to join. For some reason, the link isn't complete. I think it's missing the www.phpdiplomacy.net part and nobody can join it. Is this a new feature or an error?
0 replies
Open
mansea (2945 DX)
09 Sep 08 UTC
Miss the build, why?
Hello. Kestas,
ID5174, I have 3 build in this term, Army build in Paris, Army build in Mar, and Fleet build in Blast. but only one build in Paris. Can you build up back to me please. The order was very clear.Please.
1 reply
Open
Blackheath Wanderer (0 DX)
08 Sep 08 UTC
Brown... Time to go?
BG as PM=0

Add one or delete one :)
25 replies
Open
Bumbly (100 D)
09 Sep 08 UTC
what is meaning
what is civil disorder meaning
8 replies
Open
sean (3490 D(B))
08 Sep 08 UTC
coz there are so many hong kong players on this site
CONGRATULATIONS to Emily Lau, Audrey Eu and Leung Kwok-hung!
the democrats won 23 of the 30 seats. im proud of you hongkong!
11 replies
Open
Rasputin31 (100 D)
09 Sep 08 UTC
Scientists on the Verge of Creating New Form of Life
http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/09/biologists-on-t.html?npu=1&mbid=yhp
0 replies
Open
alamothe (3367 D(B))
09 Sep 08 UTC
wta
is anyone interested in a 100+ wta game?
0 replies
Open
keeper0018 (100 D)
07 Sep 08 UTC
how to change your email address...
???
11 replies
Open
Page 137 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top