Well, I'll take all the cruelty off this one... I am the accused...
So allow me to tell my side of the story. I am very disappointed that ONCE AGAIN, Noodlebug, you have taken our conflict to the public forum. I re-iterate that I have never had any problems with any other players on this site, and it seems you are the only one who is consistently corrosive.
The game in question is titled "For Fun" and was a game in which ALL players fell into civil disorder. As you may recall, fastspawn, drew attention to this game by lamenting of his poor luck when he drew a doom Russia in a game where he thought he would have a free win. I immediately jumped at this oppurtunity, knowing that others would as well. I unfortunately drew a doomed Italy as well, but played as well as I could against the overwhelmingly dominant Turkey, Noodlebug.
As some of you may know, I, as a habit, do not finalize my orders. Noodlebug knows this, and has admitted that I have respectable reasons for doing so. I was quite absent-minded that day, and I retreated in Autumn despite that I would have to disband during the unit building phase anyways, because as a habit I retreat, and as a habit I do not finalize. I was later contacted with a message from Noodlebug requesting me to not retreat but to disband and finalize in order to save time. Unfortunately, I was not on the site when he sent me the message, nor was I until the next day. When I returned to the game, I found that Noodlebug had written me a very personal accusation that I had selfishly and spitefully intentionally held up the game, and that I was a hypocrite, who's purpose was to deliberately annoy other players... I found this very upsetting, in that it was an incredible overreaction to the fact that I forgot to finalize, and that it was a personal attack, and not a neutral notification. I responded promptly and harshly, after which I DID finalize.
The next point of conflict lies in that, he claims I did NOT finalize after I wrote my response, while I am sure that I did.
I would like to point out that Noodlebug is incredibly selfish when he insinuates that I actually take time out of my life to not only stalk him in his games, but to intentionally not finalize JUST to annoy him... I find this completely irrational, yet he insists that I actually have a grudge against HIM.
Let me start out by saying, I have no reason to have any grudge against him. We have argued in past games, but it has always been because I have stabbed him, and he felt that it was stupid for me to have done such a thing, while I feel otherwise. He did not stab me, why would I hold any sort of grudge. All he did was make sure that if I ever wanted to stab him in the future, I would have to be damn prepared to deal with his whiny absolutist arguments.
To even suggest that I would intentionally, and "maliciously" hold up the game is a preposterous accusation, and a serious overreaction at best. I would like to also point out at this point that neither of the other players confronted me about my apparent incredibly dishonorable actions.
In every one of our games, he immediately questions my actions with a strong personal attack. In our first games together, I reprimanded him for immediately moving to personal attacks, and attempted to bring him back to the realm of debate and rationality. He instead, pulled me into his world of opinionated "uh huh" vs. "nuh huh". I don't see how he expected anything less than an "offensive" personal rebuke, when he consistently initiates and engages in personal attacks. I have spoken in other players in our games together, and one of they very reasons that they even agreed to orchestrate with me was because they disliked his attitude and his sore loser-ish personal attacks. Never have I initiated a cycle of personal attacks, never.
Sorry for writing such a long message, but I do not take unwarranted personal attacks lightly. Noodlebug, don't worry about the stalking or having to avoid or ignore me, because I assure you, I will meet you halfway. I hope that in the future, you do not take any of our conflicts to the public forum, because THAT really is childish.