Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 920 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Zmaj (215 D(B))
04 Jun 12 UTC
EoG: Fast Gunboat WTA-2
gameID=90745

Who would have thought I'd be cooperating with achillies so nicely...
7 replies
Open
Draugnar (0 DX)
03 Jun 12 UTC
Discovered Slacker Radio...
I'm impressed! I never figured anything with the name Slacker in it would be something I would use.

I also discovered that my WiFi extender reaches the entrie .6 acres of my yard, so no data used while listening to Slacker on my cell phone and mowing the yard!
7 replies
Open
greysoni (160 D)
04 Jun 12 UTC
Riders on the storm
Great game on your part Zmaj...Waskel you idiot you lost both of us 50 D bailing at the last moment.
2 replies
Open
redhouse1938 (429 D)
04 Jun 12 UTC
Agent K got me thinking: Gunboat and Multiing
Here it comes. lol.
50 replies
Open
NigeeBaby (100 D(G))
04 Jun 12 UTC
You are posting too frequently please slow down......
......would you get this sort of message in a democracy?
6 replies
Open
Draugnar (0 DX)
02 Jun 12 UTC
Full Disclosure IV - Aborted due to CD Austria.
We should try this again but need a seventh to replace the asshole who never showed.
17 replies
Open
Chanakya. (703 D)
01 Jun 12 UTC
FINISHED 50 GAMES on WEBDIP !
I am happy that I have finished 50 games in a small time of 2 months!

Thank you all for playing with me! :)
9 replies
Open
Tru Ninja (1016 D(S))
04 Jun 12 UTC
Generating Noobs
I've got one or two coworkers I'm trying to introduce to the game. I'd like to find a group of guys willing to help show them the ropes in a low-pot, low-maintenance game that I would like to design to play about 3 or 4 years to give them a taste for how the game is played and everyone helps them learn the basics. At the end, all 7 powers would draw the game for a fun experience for all.
10 replies
Open
Tru Ninja (1016 D(S))
03 Jun 12 UTC
Juggernaut Fear, Reasonable or Oversubstantiated?
Ive been in quite a few games over the course of many years on this site and when I first started, the Juggernaut was deadly but people waited for it to develop. Now, it seems that even the hint of a Juggernaut is enough to kill Russia or Turkey or both.
35 replies
Open
Thucydides (864 D(B))
03 Jun 12 UTC
URGENT: CD replacements, good positions
Because of cheating and such two good positions have opened up. Strong Turkey and France. gameID=89757

Help out the players in there by breathing some life into their game, we appreciate it.
13 replies
Open
Stressedlines (1559 D)
03 Jun 12 UTC
EoG wta Gunboat 166
gameID=90610

My views. Italy handed Germany a win. England was not that great EITHER, but, his play had less effect on the outcome, than a very bad Italy
10 replies
Open
Gunfighter06 (224 D)
03 Jun 12 UTC
Great Movies, Awful Trailers
Name some of your favorite movies with terrible trailers. I will start with Full Metal Jacket.
15 replies
Open
Gobbledydook (1389 D(B))
03 Jun 12 UTC
EOG: If you CD, I Keeeel you
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=85893

Good game everyone, no CD's luckily. owait threats work?
2 replies
Open
krellin (80 DX)
26 May 12 UTC
All Asshole Game
Seeking fellow forum trolls and assholes for the anonymous All Asshole Game...Friends and enemies welcome. Will do Anon, WTA if we get the participants.
89 replies
Open
redhouse1938 (429 D)
03 Jun 12 UTC
This is so awesome
For the third year, this summer I'll be doing this stuff:
http://www.eurovelo.org/routes/
6 replies
Open
dD_ShockTrooper (1199 D)
02 Jun 12 UTC
EPIC CAGE MATCH! - GET TIX HERE $10!
ATHEISTS VS CHRISTIANS VS EXTREME LIBERTARIANS VS COMMUNISTS VS CONGO VS GUNBOATERS VS FULL-PRESSERS VS PPSC VS WTA VS EVERYONE ELSE!

FREE-FOR-ALL DEATH MATCH!
10 replies
Open
stranger (525 D)
02 Jun 12 UTC
England&Germany vs. Russia&France
I experienced, that in the scenario when England and Germany ally up France and Russia are quite helpless. At least they are weaker, especially if they don´t coordinate very well. Anyone ever seen France and Russia winning against England and Germany?
7 replies
Open
taos (281 D)
03 Jun 12 UTC
36 open free
http://www.webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=90478
1 reply
Open
flc64 (1963 D)
01 Jun 12 UTC
Daily Catch-22 Reading
Maybe something useful.
10 replies
Open
Stearns (148 D)
30 May 12 UTC
Using WebDiplomacy as a calculator.
Good day everyone. In my experience, one of the most frustrating things about playing Diplomacy in real-life is the period of order-processing. I was wondering if anyone knew of a way to utilise this website (or a similar platform) to essentially be an order-calculator for my real-life games. In my mind i see orders being written down, as standard, and submitted to the GM, who could then plug them into the system for calculation...Meaning the game could progress more rapidly. Any ideas?
36 replies
Open
cteno4 (100 D)
03 Jun 12 UTC
Private game needs two more - starts in one hour!
gameID=90480
70 D buy-in. PPSC, anonymous players, standard map, and 24-hour phases. It should be an interesting game. I've given the password to a lot of good players.
4 replies
Open
collegekid190 (100 D)
02 Jun 12 UTC
Diplomacy 2!
So I have been writing a variant of diplomacy where you have resources to bargain with, and use to score the game to see who wins in a timed game. Anybody ever hear about this kind of game?
13 replies
Open
collegekid190 (100 D)
02 Jun 12 UTC
Join my game!
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=90521
0 replies
Open
Andrew Wiggin (157 D)
02 Jun 12 UTC
A Failed Support?
Just a quick question as to the results of a turn made in a game I am playing.

8 replies
Open
Yonni (136 D(S))
02 Jun 12 UTC
Unique names? (Bug report, I guess)
I thought unique names are enforced when registering. userID=45009 and userID=44951 appear to have the same name. Perhaps the mods should give one of them the opportunity to change their names to avoid confusion ; )
6 replies
Open
MadMarx (36299 D(G))
10 May 12 UTC
Power of Diplomacy EoG
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=80847
39 replies
Open
MadMarx (36299 D(G))
23 May 12 UTC
Jim Fracking O'Kelley EoG
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=81663

The final F2F / webDip experiment, of the three I got going, and a non-anon one at that...
diplomat554 (2104 D)
23 May 12 UTC
Wow. Not every day do you see a stalemate line like that.
MadMarx (36299 D(G))
23 May 12 UTC
As Turkey, I opened anti-Russia, assuming the veteran player in charge of Russia would understand that a Jugg can often come about at a moment's notice, and that it would not entirely ruin our relations. Mistake! Russia immediatley cut a deal with Austria, and Austria moved into Bulgaria, while I took Rum, putting me in a tough position, but making it clear that Austria was coming after me. I had nice conversations with both Austria and Italy in 1901, but Italy was clearly being a pain in France's ass, while E/G was also going after France. By the end of 1901 it seemed pretty clear to me that a Jugg could not be better set up, especially since Austria was clearly after me, so I changed my build to Russia's recommendation in an attempt to get Russia on board with me. England convoying an army to Norway seemed like a bad sign for Russia, so I hoped that would also encourage him to join me, so neither of us would have to worry about the other and so we could work together to expand at Austria's expense while E/G/I were mostly focused on France. Negotiations in spring 1902 seemed to go well, with Russia, but all his press was full of lies, *and* he allowed England into StP free and clear. Suppose I had pissed Russia off more than I could have guessed, especially since I really hammered home the point that if he did not work with me, then Austria would kill us both since I'd certainly support Austria into his centers, that I'd take him out of the game with me. BUT, I figured that was certainly clear now, so again, I coordinated moves with Russia for fall 1902, only to see Russia had lied to me about everything for the second season in a row, and basically handed over all the power in the southeast to Austria, while also giving England extra strength in the north. Things were looking very bad, thank you Russia, way to be mature about the situation! ;-)

Finally, starting in 1903, Russia was at least neutral with me. England repeatedly lied about what he would do (though he never admitted to lying once, only that he repeatedly changed his mind and merely failed to notify me... sounds like England has played with Babak a few times!). Italy also liked to lie a lot in the next few years, but luckily that would evolve into minimal press that only came late each phase, or not, I actually preferred the lies. Anyway, Austria got sick of dealing with Italy as well, and eventually, after much stalling, Austria decided to join me against Italy while also giving Russia enough room to get help from Germany against England. Austria and I worked relatively well together for a few years, but things just sort of progressed in a way where Austria couldn't capitalize/grow and he even lost a unit to Italy in 1908, so the board pretty much pushed me into stabbing Austria (not my fault, honestly, and after the fact Austria told me that if I hadn't stabbed him then he would have told me I should have after the game was over, so, it really was out of my control, it's just how the game evolved this time around) and then working with France to prevent a German solo. Russia was a bit upset with me in the end, that I was in favor of him dying, but after 1902 and then years of not really doing much, I just didn't see where the charity was warranted, especially since he was unable to establish himself as a critcal part of the stalemate line.

As far as F2F versus webDip, this mainly felt like a webDip game, since all of the F2Fers had played quite a bit of diplomacy online, even if two had not played on webDip before. It appeared, on the surface, that the F2Fers were pretty willing to "buddy up" in the beginning, E and G working together, A and E working together (not to mention A going to Chicago during the game from Boston to visit E, come on now?! ;-) ), while the webDippers appeared to be more than happy to fight at the beginning, Italy messing with France while I moved against Russia initially and then Russia lied to me repeatedly in response. The line between webDip and F2F eventually got a bit blurred, the game took on its own life. It was kind of cool that France and I each only had three units in 1905, yet we both took part in a three-way draw, though I may be a bit biased.
MadMarx (36299 D(G))
23 May 12 UTC
Maybe I better PM everyone, to insure they saw this...
Ah, I'll get something written up tomorrow for this, I've had a crazy couple of days. I really enjoyed this game, I feel very lucky to have come out as well as I did.
MadMarx (36299 D(G))
27 May 12 UTC
Tusky?
JimTheGrey (968 D(S))
28 May 12 UTC
I owe one as well.
MadMarx (36299 D(G))
28 May 12 UTC
Yeah, a lot of people owe one, but I figured most would not be good for it... Kudos to those that step up and give their side of the story!
The Czech (39715 D(S))
29 May 12 UTC
This game was a train wreck for me. My intention was to ally with Germany and England and wipe out France early. Secure the west Med and at the same time leave Austria to fight Turkey so Turkey and I could ally. What could go wrong with my plans!?! It did look like things would go well. Then Germany pulled back and I didn’t get Mar. I tried unsuccessfully a few more times, and then headed east out of frustration. Austria was more than accommodating and I believe this was my biggest mistake by not just working the AI with him. I really wanted to try the IT, however, and thought MM was the guy to try it with. I almost gave up on the IT dream then Austria built that 2nd fleet. Ultimately my wishy-washiness and lack of committing to anyone left me alone and isolated. Such is life.
coeus559 (278 D)
30 May 12 UTC
I started this game worried about how I was next to MadMarx and TheWizard, but as I learned soon enough, neither of them seemed to want to work with the other. I had talked up plans with each against the other. With Italy moving west, and the juggernaut non-existent, I really just had to find one of the two and work for a while.

However, I saw an opportunity to take Rumania in '02. After chatting with Italy, who didn't have great avenues of growth in the west, we agreed that the delayed A/I should work and I took the opportunity to knock Russia down one. However, Italy never quite jumped on board and flip-flopped for several years in a row, sometimes helping me and sometimes helping Turkey.

I eventually got frustrated with that and went back to Turkey and basically told him that I would do anything for him just to make some progress with something on the board. I later told Russia that I was worried about making a deal with the devil, since I'm usually not a fan of the A/T as Austria, but it seemed like the only option I had to actually do anything more in the game. Unfortunately, I never quite made the progress I had hoped for - I think there was one turn where Germany cut a crucial support, and another where I tried to cover Vienna and that allowed Turkey to walk into Trieste, and these led to the inevitable stab from Turkey. I did indeed tell him in messages that I would have criticized him after the game if he hadn't taken it, so I couldn't really be mad.

I tried to throw in with Germany at that point, to try to worry Turkey into letting me survive, but in the end Germany pushed to maximize his own dots by himself and I was eliminated.

Looking back on things, I know it's usually unwise to stab your Russian ally in 1902, but it honestly looked like the A/I was going to be the right play. It ended up not working out as I had hoped, which led to the slow, painful death that I inevitably experienced. Alas.
coeus559 (278 D)
30 May 12 UTC
Also, to respond to criticism from MadMarx - I didn't go to Chicago to visit Jim. I was going there for other reasons, and happened to meet up with Jim while there. :)
MadMarx (36299 D(G))
02 Jun 12 UTC
Hey, that wasn't criticism, I merely found it... ironic?! ;-)


11 replies
Zmaj (215 D(B))
01 Jun 12 UTC
EoG: Marabunta
I should have won, really...
8 replies
Open
martinck1 (4464 D(S))
18 May 12 UTC
Top 50 GR game
Time for a Game - Anyone interested in a Top 50 GR ranked game? Semi-Anon, Full Press, WTA, 48 hour phases, say 200 D. First 7 people who qualify will play, you won't be bumped. can you add your name and GR ranking below.

1. martinck1 (7)
88 replies
Open
ScottS (100 D)
02 Jun 12 UTC
how does one report bots?
I don't see anything on the help page or FAQ.
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=90475
18 replies
Open
Page 920 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top