Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 438 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
superkeiko (239 D)
22 Dec 09 UTC
Cheap, fast, and silent, gunboat 5 min round(live), please join...
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=17341
1 reply
Open
superkeiko (239 D)
22 Dec 09 UTC
Live Game, WTA, and Anon, please join....
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=17332
4 replies
Open
WhiteSammy (132 D)
22 Dec 09 UTC
CPU and WMP Network
Details Inside....
7 replies
Open
general (100 D)
22 Dec 09 UTC
Live game (10 min/round)
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=17326
8 replies
Open
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
22 Dec 09 UTC
As We Near December 25th... What Better Time To Wonder About HIM?
Let me ask this, in the spirit (not really) of the holiday:

WHY do you like/follow Jesus/Biblical Teachings or dislike/go against those two? We always discuss them... but we never say WHY we feel good or bad about Jesus/God/Moses/Muhammad, or WHY not... go!
Page 3 of 3
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
22 Dec 09 UTC
@checkmate:

From that period of history we have precious few real proofs of anything... we get Exodus largely because, with the obvious exception of the miracles, which require faith, the rest of the story seems reasonabl enough, and would fit with understandings from the generations when we DO have our first real writings and evidence we can trust... Jews as slaves and opressed fits their role in every other such situation (Babylon, Persia, Rome) in antiquity that we know of them, and enough Jewish/Non-Jewish writers seem to write about the story that the basic story (Jews in Egypt, opressed, man named Moses led them out somehow) that it is a reasonable assumption that the essence of that story is true.

@UOSnu:

What is a Kalam? I have NO IDEA what that is, and it has nothing to do with Spinoza's idea... or mine.

To streamline:

-Do you believe that life is cause and effect, and logical as we understand it?

If not- expalin why, but if SO:

-Everything is a cause-effect leading to cause-effect and so on...
-This can be traced backward
-Eventually you would, going back, find that there is an original cause, or even an original series of causes, that started the chain, analogous to a finger or fingers knocking over the first domino in a long, long chain ot the first motion in a game of Mousetrap
-Logically this is impossible as we understamd logic, for this contradicts what we have established, namely "Everything is caused by SOMETHING" and "Something did, in fact, exist without a prior cause"
-Nothing that operates logically in this logical spectrum as we know it can accomplish this, THEREFORE:

-Something outside or beyond this spectrum of being, unhampered by the "cause-effect" rule, was the first cause.

That is the creator of all we know, a "God" or "force" or whatever... but what and who and where and why this thing works and what it's like we do NOT know.
-
UOSnu (113 D)
22 Dec 09 UTC
Otto, what's good enough? We've got what we've got, and barring more sophisticated measuring tools that's all one can posit we'll have, and it convinced me well enough that I honestly have little to no quarrel with Dawkins and Co. Beyond any reasonable doubt works well enough for me.

Thucydides: http://godhatesfigs.net/ Check Matthew 5:18-19, Luke 16:17, 2 Timothy 3:16, or Mark 7:10 for evidence that the New Testament god is about as vengeful as the last time someone wrote down his exploits. Try to whitewash the bible all you want, but it's a pretty foul and offensive document that bears witness to the depths of human depravity. But what else can one expect from a cult based around prophets suffering from dehydration-induced delusion?

Also, the implications of the Kalam directly contradict the Torah and New Testament. If Yahweh is removed from causality then the changes of heart he shows regarding the Flood and the Israelites' indiscretions make no sense. A god removed from causality shouldn't be able to interact with a causal universe at all, much less realize he ****ed up.
lattenwald (157 D)
22 Dec 09 UTC
May I, may I?
quote
To streamline:

-Do you believe that life is cause and effect, and logical as we understand it?
/quote

No.

There is quantum theory.
Quantum theory
a) tells, that nothing is predefined in small scale
b) works under your fingers (any computer should not ever work if quantum theory is not working)

Quantum theory has some troubles and uncertainties, as does any known scientific theory. But it is working.

By the way, about "cause and effect", a question:
What, in your opinion, is cause of effect called "god" ?
UOSnu (113 D)
22 Dec 09 UTC
Obi: If you have no ideal what the Kalam [cosmological argument] is how can you say it's irrelevant to what's under discussion? It's what we're talking about, and the fact that you don't know that kind of leads me to believe it's not worth arguing with you about this in the first place.

In any event, I'm not going to let you rope me in into arguing you into circles. You've assumed from the beginning what you've set out to prove, which is to say that you've gone into this argument assuming that God exists, and I really don't see any point in continuing the discussion.

I ask these questions: /Why/ is a natural uncaused first cause illogical "as we understand logic"? Because you say so? That's hardly a reason. How can a being outside of causality interact with the universe, anyway?
ottovanbis (150 DX)
22 Dec 09 UTC
You are fairly certain God doesn't exist, that really has no barring on actuality (if there is such a thing). I do not believe in God for the same reason you don't I believe anyway... I was commenting that in order for me to believe, the "good enough evidence" would have to be some sort of giant thing coming out of the sky and talking to me (which i guess could also be explained if i was high or drunk, but that's unlikely to happen either way). UOSnu, I agree with your last response to Obi in the sense that the God argument, or the argument of most theists is faulty at best. You can counterproof by assuming what you want to prove, but if you prove your design to be true that does nothing. God is an assumption, doesn't mean its right or wrong, I choose to believe that God is unnecessary in my personaly definition of the universe and so life goes on. I'm getting bored with this thread. Goodnight all.
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
22 Dec 09 UTC
I@UOSnu:

I was not saying the Kalam was irrelevant to the discussion, or did mean to come off that way- I meant it that the Kalam was not part of MY argument... if YOU want to explain that thing to me, by all means...

@lattenwald:

Can you reword b) in your response... that is so grammatically convoluted I cannot derive what you are attempting to get at with it.

And to answer your question, what caused "god" or "the creating force" or whatever it is:

Nothing- THAT's the big deal. Everything, according to MY (Spinoza's) argument is cause-effect-cause-effect ad nasuem... EXCEPT FOR that first cause, which started it all and had nothing prior, and thus is THE first cause.

This is ILLOGICAL. That CANNOT HAPPEN AS WE KNOW LOGIC.

To put it another way... it'd give Spock a fit. ;)

BUT that's the point- BECAUSE this thing, in the context of this theory, both allows for the logci of the theory to work and yet contradicts it, it is something outside logic.

It can't exist... and yet in the confines of the argument, it must.

And as nothing we know can do that, and nothing that operates in any logical pattern we know can do that...

It is thus NOT within that logical plane of existance we know- hence, it is something that can, for all intents and purposes, warp reality and logic.

THAT is the "God" or "Creating Force" of Spinoza's argument.
lattenwald (157 D)
22 Dec 09 UTC
b) Quantum theory is the one theory that made computers possible. Specifically, transistor. And then microprocessor.

Spinoza did not do anything but talking. You are working with a computer now, not Spinoza's words.
Pete U (293 D)
22 Dec 09 UTC
Blimey - you don't log on for a day, and it gets all metaphysical (again). And insulting, which always adds flavour to the debate.

To some extent, I would like to have the faith displayed by the religious (of all stripes), shown here. But I don't. And it all comes down to the 'e' word - evidence. As far as I can tell, there are robust scientific theories (in the 'consturcted through evidence and observation sense' not the 'I have an idea' sense) that explain life, the universe (and therefore pretty much everything) to some degree. I am unaware of any evidence that requires the presence of the creating deity of your choice, that doesn't require hand-waving special causes.

I don't reject the moral philosophy of Christianity (I was raised a Methodist / Church of Scotland), as it looks like a pretty good set of rules (don't kill, don't steal, be nice etc). Living a good life doesn't require belief/submission whatever. That would be silly.

And if evidence (not clues, not the 100s of of 'reasons' which aren't) turned up that a deity existed, i woudl change my mind. Just don't hold your breath.
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
22 Dec 09 UTC
@lattenwald:

You're going to have to do better than to tell me your theory made the PC possible to convice me Spinoza's theory, which has been analyzed and debated since it's inception, is dead wrong.

A computer seems to wrok by cause and effect- I just hit the "I" button, and lo and behold, what was the effect?

A "J" popped up (I kid... but you see where I'm going with this...)


69 replies
superkeiko (239 D)
22 Dec 09 UTC
Yes, you guess it, another live game, please join.
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=17321
14 replies
Open
Chas Diamond (316 D)
21 Dec 09 UTC
is my game a WTA or a points-per-supply-centre?
I'm sure this used to be obvious - but I can't see it on my current game.

http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=15061
3 replies
Open
superkeiko (239 D)
22 Dec 09 UTC
Live game, gunboat, small pot, come right in.
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=17318
19 replies
Open
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
22 Dec 09 UTC
Diplomacy World Cup- US West!
Come on and join, let's form up our team, guys!
9 replies
Open
bbdaniels (461 D(B))
22 Dec 09 UTC
Live Game Tonight?
Anybody interested?
9 replies
Open
The_Master_Warrior (10 D)
05 Feb 10 UTC
Prejudiced Jokes
Ready, set, go! Nothing is off limits, as long is it is prejudiced in some way.
134 replies
Open
jireland20 (0 DX)
22 Dec 09 UTC
come play
3 more spots!!! http://www.webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=17310
2 replies
Open
ottovanbis (150 DX)
20 Dec 09 UTC
Good Essay on Preventing Stabs I just Read, New Players Should Read This
I have enclosed the article.

23 replies
Open
Primerafik (264 D)
21 Dec 09 UTC
Need a Player to Pick Up the Pieces of a Shattered Germany
Looking for a player to finish out a game as Germany. Country is not in complete disrepair. Game ID: 16511.

more . . .
2 replies
Open
jireland20 (0 DX)
21 Dec 09 UTC
Two more people
http://www.webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=17297
1 reply
Open
zrallo (100 D)
21 Dec 09 UTC
live game now
http://www.webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=17297
1 reply
Open
baumhaeuer (245 D)
19 Dec 09 UTC
Types of forum threads
I've noticed something...
24 replies
Open
OMGNSO (415 D)
17 Dec 09 UTC
Diplomacy in real life?
Any examples you can think of where the game of diplomacy has features applicable to real life?
6 replies
Open
idealist (680 D)
21 Dec 09 UTC
A quick question.
If you close your web browser but leave your account logged on, is there still a dot next to your name?
4 replies
Open
Bob (742 D)
20 Dec 09 UTC
Dash Next to Country Name
This is probably a really dumb question...but, what is the "-" next to the country name of any given game mean?
15 replies
Open
Perry6006 (5409 D)
21 Dec 09 UTC
WTA Live game! 10D! 5 min deadline! Join up!
"War again...":
http://www.webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=17278
8 replies
Open
jeromeblack (129 D)
21 Dec 09 UTC
5 minute phase
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=17293

Join and Post!
3 replies
Open
Gnome de Guerre (359 D)
21 Dec 09 UTC
Game is over, and this is what happened next; please discuss.
http://webdiplomacy.net/map.php?gameID=16078
http://webdiplomacy.net/forum.php?threadID=507544
The game is over, so you can talk about it now. :)
13 replies
Open
Serioussham (446 D)
21 Dec 09 UTC
Live Game?
Anybody up for a live game tonight? WTA?
2 replies
Open
Join this game plz :D
http://www.webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=17272

:D
3 replies
Open
Xapi (194 D)
21 Dec 09 UTC
I broke my home page (And someone else's)
See inside, particularily Kestas.
5 replies
Open
Stukus (2126 D)
20 Dec 09 UTC
Open Germany, 5 SC, Wilson Game
http://www.webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=16511

Germany has 5 SCs in our game but has CD'd. It's not a terrible position, and we could use a new Germany. If anyone's interested, please join.
4 replies
Open
zrallo (100 D)
21 Dec 09 UTC
live game now
http://www.webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=17165
2 replies
Open
general (100 D)
21 Dec 09 UTC
Join FAST game: 10 mins/round - Quickie-4
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=17266
0 replies
Open
Kyrios (100 D)
21 Dec 09 UTC
A Little Live Game
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=17260

Join!
0 replies
Open
Page 438 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top