Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 84 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Captain Awsome (100 D)
26 Mar 08 UTC
All or nothing
somebody join so we can start the game please it's only 7 points to join
0 replies
Open
Farcus189 (505 D)
26 Mar 08 UTC
"All Or Nothing"
Anyone interested in trying out a winner takes all game? Just a small pot of 7 point buy in. It can be a new whole new experience for just a few points, so JOIN NOW!
3 replies
Open
figlesquidge (2131 D)
25 Mar 08 UTC
Bogus Players
Recently I've seen a rise in people with close names to those of respected members. The most obvious one of these is "Civil Disorder Kestas" - #5088
There have also been many accounts that have names similar, but in many cases I don't think this is due to cheating, more down to the fact that when people use slight variations on their real names others are likely to have similar variations if they share the name. What do you think should be the treatment for this issue?
I think that forcing a player to rename his account if it is virtually the same as another might not be a bad idea, but warning should be given. When someone makes an account like that noted above I am rather less sympathetic. I hope the player in question will explain themselves, but I am very suspicious. After all, it seems unlikely to me that they would know how confusing that name was if they didn't already have an account here, not to mention that it seems to be deliberately deceitful to me...
1 reply
Open
Stagger (2661 D(B))
26 Mar 08 UTC
Kestas - Draw Request
Hi Kestas,

Myself and the other 2 remaining players in "Nation vs. Nation" (gameID=3057) have agreed to a draw. They will confirm below.

Thanks for your time & care!!
4 replies
Open
bc2000 (990 D)
25 Mar 08 UTC
[New Game] WinnerTakesAll
101 bet.
Anyone who is not a cheater, a multiaccounter, a metagamer, a pathologic stabber, a rude chatter is welcome...
...is there left anyone?
4 replies
Open
canaduh (1324 D)
26 Mar 08 UTC
Is there such a thing as an FAQ?
I thought that - given the right priority - this might be something that can be added. (Sorry Kestas!)
1 reply
Open
Kenneth I (206 D)
21 Mar 08 UTC
Backstabing
Considering that there is that many experienced players in phpDip, who do you thing to be the most frequent backstabber? When and how frequent do you backstab others?
24 replies
Open
MarekP (12864 D)
25 Mar 08 UTC
What is new here?
Hello all,

I came back after a two-month break and noticed a lot of good news here -- WTA games, new adjudicator, new graphics etc. I tried to find a summary of all changes in the forum, but it isn't accessible any more. Would anyone be so kind and tell me the most important changes, especially in adjudicator?

Thank you very much!
6 replies
Open
DeathOfRats (182 D)
26 Mar 08 UTC
Game Over - Game Won By xxxxx
Any chance that this text could be WHITE instead of BLACK as it doesn't show up on the map.

Obviously this is a very unimportant request :)

It would be even better if the text was White with a black shadow (or vice versa)

:)

Mark
0 replies
Open
jasperleeabc (100 D)
23 Mar 08 UTC
Meta-gamers/Multi-accounter?
Game: http://www.phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=3122

I suspect player(s) 1357, slcl and bernielau. They have helped each other so many times and germany could have gone into france with get france's SCs, though this is not the major reason for me to suspect him/them. I have at least two screenshots about the "Last logged in" times. It has been times when their "Last logged in" times were within the same 10 mins, so that's what makes me suspect them. Kestas, could you please investigate? No matter it proves me right or wrong, I think an investigation is necessary. Other players agree with me?

Thanks.
24 replies
Open
arthurmklo (879 D)
26 Mar 08 UTC
highest pot game
Pot 750, lol, just to see whether anyone is interested
Points per SC, feel free to join
http://phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=3356
0 replies
Open
Medi (280 D)
25 Mar 08 UTC
Possible new features?
Now that the adjudicator is pretty much perfect, it's time for people like me to total jerks my suggesting more things for kestas to do once he's done everything he already wants to do.

Thing #1 I'd suggest is perhaps an option for anonymous games (e.g., games in which the identity of every player is hidden until the end of the game). This would allow players who acquire a... reputation for unsavory play to get into fairer games, and would make researching your opponents impossible.

(The only problem is the higher risk of multi-ing, but I would think that simply putting a limit on how many games you have to have played to participate would make that not so much a problem.)
14 replies
Open
Tucobenedicto (100 D)
24 Mar 08 UTC
The Magic of the Past!
ITT we debate history.

Was the American Civil War a conflict necessary in the preservation of the union or was it a "war of Northern aggression" that could have easily been averted?

GO!
36 replies
Open
BrianJSmitty (334 D)
25 Mar 08 UTC
Cowrdly play or strategic alliance?
I would like the opinions of veteran players here. I am in a game where I have 16 scs, a player has 5 another has 13. The player with 13 is asking for a draw, but could easily win the game and eliminate the player who has 5. Is this a weak, cowardly move or somehow noble and I am missing the point?
13 replies
Open
Wombat (722 D)
25 Mar 08 UTC
JOIN GAME
Game name 'Catch 18'

101 bet pts per supply centre

Only a few mins left!!!
0 replies
Open
DeathOfRats (182 D)
25 Mar 08 UTC
Retreat Rules?
Dear all,

Can someone explain the way retreats are handled on php dip.

In the 'real' game you can retreat to any unoccupied Province as far as I recall.

If two units retreat to the same province (either both your own units, or yours and another players) then they are both destroyed/disbanded.


However there have been occasions where my retreat options are more limited than they should have been (ie I cannot retreat to a province where an attack came on - which makes sense I guess) but on some occasions I have not been able to retreat to, for example, a connected (but free) SC Province.

However I notice that sometimes I CAN retreat to a similar province, so really I was wondering if anyone had the full 'breakdown' of the retreat phase.

I have checked the FAQ and it doesn't really mention retreats (other than it being a phase) and I have checked the 0.70 adjudication code but I ain't clever enough to work it out from that.

Any help appreicated :)

Mark
7 replies
Open
MajorTom (4417 D)
25 Mar 08 UTC
Interesting Retreat Senarios
What happens if 2 units belonging to 2 different nations are dislodged and both only have one space to retreat to?

What if one of the units has only one space to retreat to while the other has an available second option but chooses the contested space?
2 replies
Open
amathur2k (100 D)
25 Mar 08 UTC
will this work ??
Your orders have been finalized.
Build a fleet at St. Petersburg (North Coast).
Build a fleet at St. Petersburg (South Coast).
Build a fleet at Sevastopol.
8 replies
Open
anlari (8640 D)
22 Mar 08 UTC
Criteria for Game
What do you think about adding more criteria to join a game that you create?

At the moment, we only have the password and the point requirements, but more things could be done:

for example:

1- allow only players of certain ranks (yes, we have minimum limits with the points system, but what if one is a new player and does not want any experienced people?)
2- Allow only players before/after a certain creation date (I must say I'm not fond of many of the newer players..)
3- perhaps things related to win/defeat/draw ratios, and so on
8 replies
Open
canute (0 DX)
25 Mar 08 UTC
forgotten password
I am permanently logged into my home computer with password manager, but do not know my password anymore. So how can i find it and or change it so that its one i can remember? Sometimes i log in at work.:-)
2 replies
Open
figlesquidge (2131 D)
25 Mar 08 UTC
New game
http://www.phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=3342
Just a small WTA, 5pts. I know there's a minimum point count you have to have to start one of these, but obviously this one is open to everyone. Main reason for it is that I haven't played winner takes all for nearly a year, and so I really need to get back into it!

Btw, whats the current view on advertising games? I know it says to on the 'new game' page, but I think we'd do better if that was removed, or if we had a single thread for all games people wanted to share...
2 replies
Open
Gamemaster2006 (100 D)
25 Mar 08 UTC
New game WWI
the real ally in WWI
Triple alliance:Germany,Austria-Hungaryand Italy, also Turkey
Triple Emtente:France England and Russia

http://www.phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=3341
11 replies
Open
arthurmklo (879 D)
25 Mar 08 UTC
Anyone in for a 500 pot points per SC game?
anyone interested?
0 replies
Open
Tucobenedicto (100 D)
25 Mar 08 UTC
Oh my yes...
KESTAS, I HAVE AN ASSIGNMENT FOR YOU!

http://www.diplom.org/Online/maps/imperial-small.gif

So... if you could get on this pronto, that would be awesome.
20 replies
Open
keeper0018 (100 D)
24 Mar 08 UTC
Suspicious Game/ Possible Metagamers
all- look at this game. there are 4 people in CD (Artamonova, Uranus, EuropeKing, and NewHero), each with 100 points, all of which went into CD on the same turn, and whose last logon times are all on saturday at 3-4 am.

http://phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=3186

kestas, this is so blatant, its ridiculous. can you please do something about them and send me an email at what you are going to do. some form of action needs to be taken. if no action is taken, i will seriously consider leaving the site for good.
6 replies
Open
canute (0 DX)
24 Mar 08 UTC
All forms of Organised Religion- what do you think?
I despise it. It has done nothing but cause war after war, and divides the Human race...
GaryOak (0 DX)
24 Mar 08 UTC
Well.
Religion comes with the good and the bad.
It comforts people about death and where they and their loved ones go after they die. Also, when people believe there's someone watching out for them no matter what happens, they tend to be happier. I'm sure someone else here will think of something else good it does.
The bad is mainly just cause conflict in between people of different religions, and it gets in the way of our political leaders willingness to fund necessary research on things like stem cell research. Also, causes huge controversy over basic human rights such as gay marriage and abortion.
In b4 flamewar.
canute (0 DX)
24 Mar 08 UTC
I have nothing against religion per se... More organised religion telling people that their religion is the only way. If i had my way it would be banned.:-) Spirituality is great, and as far as i am concerned, a better alternative. I truly cant think of one decent thing organised religion has done in at least the last 50years for example.
Noodlebug (1812 D)
24 Mar 08 UTC
Oh I don't know, they do some pretty good jumble sales round my way.

Organised religion has great sway over millions, possibly billions of people. Imagine if the Catholic Church ordained that use of condoms was not a sin but a moral imperative, how many African lives would be saved from HIV? Imagine if the Moslem authorities demanded that all extremist and violent interpretations of their religion be disassociated from true Islam?
canute (0 DX)
24 Mar 08 UTC
well as far as i am aware, Islam does not condone violence... Yet how many wars and deaths stem from religion? Hmmm... One need only look at the middle east, and the Balkans, for a start... Individual spiritality is the way to go.
tester5 (267 D)
24 Mar 08 UTC
Although one could make the case that religion divides people, it did a good job of reuniting Europe during the Dark Ages. Happy Easter everyone!
canute (0 DX)
24 Mar 08 UTC
Easter is over in this part of the world.
Stevelers (3084 D(G))
24 Mar 08 UTC
Christianity did not unite people in Europe, in 1204, a western european army sacked the city of Constantinopol, the capital of the Orthodox Christian kingdom. They called it a crusade similar to the ones against Islam in Spain and the Levant. A holy war being waged on Christians, by Christians... LOL
lukes924 (1518 D)
24 Mar 08 UTC
ok, there have been religious wars, but also basically every foreign outreach or recovery or aid programs have been started or funded by religion, you cannot say that they haven't caused good.
Stevelers (3084 D(G))
24 Mar 08 UTC
We'll give you aid... If you worship like us. Why is it necessary to include bibles with food and water?
Shisuren (587 D)
24 Mar 08 UTC
Why not? Missionaries don't generally [sarcasm;)] force the people to read said Bibles before feeding them. And they're actually trying to help, unlike most of the rest of the civilized world.
Putin (102 D)
24 Mar 08 UTC
As a Catholic, I think that the Catholic church needs to move into the 21st century, and as stated above, another doctrine of the Church is no premarital sex and planning, that includes testing and such, I understand that Africa is different, but that is an example of how it needs to update itself.
Also, religion has offered the world MORALITY, without that we would not have a sense of right and wrong and probably would have destroyed ourselves.
And lastly, with the whole science vs religion, cant we compromise? Can't God have CAUSED the Big Bang?
lukes924 (1518 D)
24 Mar 08 UTC
yeah, even if they do give them their religion, it's not shoved down their throat and you saying that proves that religous people do help, that's good that they help, even if they are also sharing their faith.
Stevelers (3084 D(G))
24 Mar 08 UTC
And also... before we give you food, why don't you build us a great big, brick building with a cross on top. If you live through it, then we'll finally give food and water to you and you're family. (Until we leave for the next village)
sean (3490 D(B))
24 Mar 08 UTC
not a fan of hierarchically structured organised religions. but i wouldn't be too quick to put the blame on them for Balkans conflict and various other wars that people say are caused by religion. I think if you looked into them you would find they are more socio-economic reasons for the conflict made easy by xenophobia and augmented by religion.

islam has no hierarchical pyramid style (unlike the catholic church) structure, thats why some imams can declare fatwahs against violence and extremism and other imans can promote it.

lukes- "basically every" ?
heard of the UN? Unicef? doctors without borders? oxfarm?
its true that a lot of them started out as concerned Christian groups b ut most have outgrown that infantile stage and are more mature now. but i detest aid groups handing out bibles rather than well making instruction guides.
sean (3490 D(B))
24 Mar 08 UTC
putin, ever heard of HUMANISM? it is possible to be an athiest and be moral.
religion gave the world morality? thought pride was meant to be one of your sins
shad08 (183 D)
24 Mar 08 UTC
I agree with sean. Organized religion isnt about morality or spirituality even. It is about the leaders of each religion obtaining power and maintaining that power for as long as possible. Have you noticed that millions of ppl around the world would do anything that the pope says? He may be viewed as the most "holy" thing on earth, but he has huge amounts of power. And how can a religion be moral especially catholicism that doesnt even allow women to participate in anything...that seems kinda immoral to me.
Prince Caspian (100 D)
24 Mar 08 UTC
I would like to repley to all of the comments that people have made about organised religion. First, i will say that i do not belong to any religion and any ideas that i have about the gods or the divine, are simply that...ideas. i have no proof one way or another that the gods exist, still let us not forget all of the wonderful things that religion has done for humanity over the years. Fellowship and community, wherefore has that vanished from our world? On this server all of us form a virtual community but it isnt the same as seeing eachother face to face. Religion provided people with a way to feel belonging in their community and it gave people meaning to their lives. Sadly as religion is vanishing from our world to be replaced by other ideas and ways of life, nothing yet has come to replace the funcition of religion in that it created community and fellowship. Also let us not forget all of the wonderful works of art that have been produced in the name of god. Michelangelo who painted the sistine chapel, or Johann Sebastein Bach who wrote all of his music for god. Bach's music is divine perfection itself manifested in music. Sure, many people have done awful things in the name of religion, the crusades, the inquisition, countless numbers of wars. but dont forget that people have done as many good things in the name of relgion as bad things. many people in the world want to focus on the bad, and forget the good, because that is what is easy. it is also easy to critisise the people who believe in organised religion too. But remember they are rational human beings just as you and I, and have the faculty of reason as well. They choose to believe in a way of life that gives them a purpose, that makes them feel better about themselves and their place in the world. And yes there are extremists within religion, but no more so than in politics or on wall street. I think that we should cut them some slack and let them have the right to choose how they want to live their life. And if they try to push their religion on you, remember too that you are a rational being and have a choice to listen or not. nobody can force you to belive in god. that being said, happy easter everybody!!!
shad08 (183 D)
24 Mar 08 UTC
I agree..religion should be a personal choice 100%, all of your own interpretations and choices for your sake only.
Kangaroo (0 DX)
24 Mar 08 UTC
I agree that Organised religion is bad. It should be no wonder that people are leaving in droves, finding their own spiritality and beliefs... Not archaic like say Catholicism is... Oh. And i am supposed to be Catholic
bajeezus (574 D)
24 Mar 08 UTC
Religion shaped humanity, and that's all anyone can say for certainty. One can argue that religion has been cause of countless deaths and terrible acts. One can also argue that it brought early human beings together, gave them a moral code and a fear of retribution and a repercussion for their actions. At times religion has made mankind forget about the real world, and other times has spurned great humanitarian acts to help suffering and death.

To say that the world is better or worse as a result of religion is to not think about all sides. It simply shaped the world. Good or bad, it was necessary for mankind to have belief in order to cope with the thoughts, feelings, and emotions that (dependent on your views) God and/or evolution has given human beings alone. To say that you wish religion had never existed is to wish that we as a civilization were completely altered, if not already extinct. That is of course, if it were even possible for our species to have progressed at all without everything that religion has given to us.

I know most won't even read this, and just spout their opinions. I believe that because, well, I haven't read half the posts above me. But this is my opinion, take it if you'd like I don't care at all lol!
canute (0 DX)
24 Mar 08 UTC
Evolution and God, as in the religious sense of Organised religion do not mix, one is Science and one is Faith... As for good or bad. Humanity is now leaving organised religion in droves, and thats what frees us up to become better people. That freedom allows us to change not just our nasty violent self-destructive nature, but repair problems we have created.
Noodlebug (1812 D)
24 Mar 08 UTC
Religion doesn't kill people. People kill people.

Religion is probably an inevitable product of a nascant civilisation seeking to understand where they came from and how the world works. In practical terms it has of course been entirely superceded by science. Morality of course isn't the exclusive gift of religion, but what it did was fill people with fear at the consequences of immorality (eg burning in everlasting hell). And of course the concept of morality was stretched to include lots of petty rules, prohibitions, rituals and superstitions which have nothing to do with conventional morality and more to do with advancing the interests of one doctrine of belief as the expense of others.
Individual spirituality may be based on fantasy just as much as organised religion, but at least it does not draw lines of separation between "us and them" - resulting in the people who are not allowed to eat pork on a Thursday massacring the people who believe that blessed bread turns into human flesh in their mouths.
Tetra0 (1448 D)
24 Mar 08 UTC
I agree with noodlebug. Religion is not the cause, merely the tool. It is something that has origins rooted in peace and love, and if political and religious leaders can warp even that to pursue power through wars and death, what makes you think they would stop if religion wasn't a factor?
Stevelers (3084 D(G))
24 Mar 08 UTC
In response to Noodlebug

Religion DOESN'T kill people. Religious people kill people. =)
Sirither (100 D)
24 Mar 08 UTC
I find it interesting that you also despise the US...
warrenthegreat (147 D)
24 Mar 08 UTC
Organized religion has set mankind back 1000 years. Good men will do good and bad men will do bad. But for good men to do bad requires religion.
lordnivlak (205 D)
25 Mar 08 UTC
The entire purpose of any organized religion is to stabilize a society. People will listen to the king if they think that god(s) are telling them to. Without religion, most people just show their own philosophy...
Chrispminis (916 D)
25 Mar 08 UTC
Stability through forceful or conditioned homogeneity is a false stability, hardly the "moral" stability a society might hope to attain.

Morality does not come from religion, it is merely enforced by religion, as an unseen, inexplicable power. One person can only have so much power, but a person with a God behind them is apt to convince anyone what constitutes morality.

Religion and science are unfortunately mutually exclusive. God may have caused the Big Bang, but in science, parsimony is golden, and if there is no need for any God(s) to have had a hand in anything; from abiogenesis, to evolution, to the lunar cycle, then why postulate the existence of one? Of course, science may not be the accurate representation of "Truth", but it's doing a damn good job of it so far, and if there were any way to approximate the "Truthfulness" of any model of belief, I would have to pick the one that lets us fly, enjoy central heating, and play Diplomacy over the internet, namely, science.

In the end, I disagree with the more rabid atheists, bent on destroying organized religion as well as simple theism. Live and let live, worship and let worship (or not worship). I don't approve of anyone pushing their religion (or non-religion) on others, and that is my only beef with organized religion. Wars have many causes, evil comes independently of religion. Moral vigilance does as well, and I don't care whether someone is Christian or a believer in the Teutonic pantheon; if they're willing to do what is right, then the rest is irrelevant.
Gobbledydook (1389 D(B))
25 Mar 08 UTC
Religion is supposed to be good. Those which weren't only exist in small primitive tribes. The major religions in the world all advocate good things, like forgiveness, righteousness, etc.
The problem with religion is the way people interpret it. Those terrorists don't 'believe' in the religion. They actually take it as a goal, a goal that has many obstacles in front of it. They kill to remove the obstacles, whereas normal people believe in the religion. They understand the driving motive behind the religion. Sure, they may have customs as well, but they are introduced to make the world a better place. The terrorists fight for the religion for the sake of fighting for it.


29 replies
Justinator (100 D)
23 Mar 08 UTC
What exactly is the criteria for posting off subject messages....
such as this one?
Also...what is a successful post's common attributes?
5 replies
Open
canaduh (1324 D)
24 Mar 08 UTC
How are starting nations decided?
I had thought it random, but now I am less convinced.
14 replies
Open
keeper0018 (100 D)
24 Mar 08 UTC
new tournament
i would like to see the start of a new tournament on this site. does anyone else agree with me?
10 replies
Open
Hyperactive Jam (299 D)
24 Mar 08 UTC
Metagaming?
http://www.phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=3100#orders

Turkey is not only allowing Russia to win when he could have easily crushed him, he is so obviously setting it up so that Russia will win with as many SC as possible. Italy told me that they are friends, but he won't specify if he meant in real life. Join dates are 2 days apart, and they are in a number of games (of which they don't always ally). It seems to me like a "hey buddy I'll let you win this one then you let me win the next one" type of situation, or just really really bad sportsmanship and Turkey not wanting to win for some peculiar reason.
3 replies
Open
Page 84 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top