Commence boundry pushing Draug

Oh hell yeah

http://i.imgur.com/DVVO0U3.gif

See zultar, *this* is how you get +1s on the forum.

Define explicit sexual topics... Does "Is more than two shakes" count?

The girls to cup ratio must be 1:1.

Time for a dirty innuendo thread...

"Define explicit sexual topics..."

Use common sense, if you have to ask then just don't post it.

Or post it, but not in the OP

Does advertising a game with an explicit title count as an explicit thread?

Ok, so a slightly suggestive title with a "see inside" is acceptable?

Ahhh....I see, the topic should be White House, and then fill it with sexually explicit materials. Got it.

As the site inches ever closer to obsolescence. ..

@krellin, only if you're referring to the Clinton administration.

obsolescence....uh, how?

Ahhh...Clinton. How I miss the Clinton Adminstration...I still want to share a 'toke with YJ and Bill Clinton. I think that's now number 4 on my Bucket List.

A dirty innuendo thread would actually be quite amusing. But really these rules aren't anything new.

Wouldn't be much fun though, you know old Bubba don't inhale :p

To celebrate this re-establishment of the rules, I am off to post midget porn in the Bible Reading thread. Ciao!

Bravo, zultar.

And, if I may, when a dilemma arises just ask yourself, "WWKD?"

Only the cheaters had issues with Kestas.

So... as long as we don't spam the forum, we can create ENJOY ONTO LIVE GAME GO GO GO thread topics?

Thank you, mods. From the bottom of my heart.

"Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen."~ Einstein

@maple,
I thought the K in your WWKD was for Krellin. I was afraid.

"you know old Bubba don't inhale" which, to me, was the *worst* offense Bill Clinton ever committed! I mean, the world of toking is generally a bunch of laid-back, easy goin' dudes and dudettes. Unlike the alcohol culture, in which it's more like, "Come on dude, have another drinnnnnk!" until you are stumbling drunk, the green culture is more like, "Hey Dude, wanna hit this?" to which you can either share in the smoke, or pass it on. Either way, it's generally a polite low pressure situation. So if accepted the joint/bong but did not inhale (meaning took a puff and wasted a big cloud of smoke) he was just being a douche and a poser trying to fit it/look cool, because it would have been perfectly ok to pass on.

btw, a thanks to the mods for making a levelheaded decision. You guys as a whole do a fine job, despite all the griping.

I just want to emphasise the last part of the list of things that are still against the rules - "explicit sexual topics and links". Links is the main part of this. People can still get into a lot of trouble at their work for opening links to pornography or the like, so these are still not allowed.

Go ahead and post about sex all you want, but please refrain from posting links.

"The mods are going to take a less active approach in moderating the forum from now on."
What is j p morgan gonna do with his time now? :-)

"What is j p morgan gonna do with his time now? "

After seeing jmo in real action for about a week, I can tell you that you have no idea what you are talking about.

.......it's a joke
(you know, like when people don't take themselves too seriously)

I bet zultar volunteered to tell the news for the likes.

+1s*.

@Nigee Yeah, I know. It was more something on my mind than something you prompted. I think I'm usually one of the few to +1 you ;-)

But as a regular user, I tend to have seen mods silence some ppl, locking some threads, and the occasional ban. But from my perspective now, I never realised that the work on multis vs the work on forum seems to be split about 95/5. Just something I'd like to emphasise in all this... talking about how we talk.

Just for perspective on what TheMinisterOfWar mentioned. I've silenced 40 things on the forum since I've been a mod and handled 1,160 cases. The forum is an extremely small part of what mods do.

I'm a 5%er ? Nice!

@TMOW - sometimes it is good fun to take the mickey out of the Mods, not for any particular reason, just because you can.
For a long time now it seems we have had a robust response to meta-gaming and outright cheating, I've started to forget what it was like in the 'bad old days' before jmo et al but of course familiarity breeds contempt.
With regard to the 'new Mod policy with the forum' I think it has been good fun when various players have been silenced for a while or had points docked, it gives us mere mortals a great chance to 'kick out against the all-powerful Ruling Elite'. I'm not convinced a lot needs to be changed and I hope all the new and old Mods continue to participate as and when they see fit on the forum regardless of the banter and stick you all might take for having the funny symbol.
There is not a long wrong with the site at the (j)mo, I hope you newbies can keep up those high standards.
If people really objected to the way the forum/site is run they probably voted with their mouse click yonks ago so just keep on keeping on regardless.
You'll never stop the moaners, just remember that todays news is tomorrows chip wrapping
If we really thought the Mods weren't doing good there would be a a-howling and a-wailing and a gnashing of teeth :-)

I guess this makes me Rosa parks

People can still get into a lot of trouble at their work for opening links to pornography or the like, so these are still not allowed.

Its definitely the fault of the guy who put a xxxfreemidgetpornwithtrannysthetypethatdrauglikes.com and not the fault of the guy who copy and pasted the link in his address bar. I mean, whenever I see a link, I instinctively go on it. Also, the links aren't even in hypertext, you have to manually copy and paste them into an address bar instead of clicking on it, so someone who goes on an explicit link is going willingly. But it's still all the fault of the person posting the link. OK.

We all know draugnar uses a tor browser to navigate the dark side of the web anyways.

Nonesense, ILN. The guy who posts links is providing a product that is valuable to some, not valuable to others. Isn't it time for those who might click to take individual responsibility for their actions? It's not like there's any doubt where such a link might lead.

Stop your censorship.

"The mods are going to take a less active approach in moderating the forum from now on"
So we can write anything about wars in Afghanistan/Syria that involve disgusting and repulsive acts of sickening sexual violence and this is acceptable, but individuals on the forum passing comments on sexual thoughts or fantasies will be silenced.
What Mastermind thought this one through?