I think that represents a pretty serious case of misplaced priorities, Chaqa. Consider: About 4,500 accounts have had their water shut off since March, according to the article. These were account that were more than $150 overdue or more than two months delinquent. For the sake of argument, let's say that the average of those delinquent accounts wasn't the minimum of $150, but more than double that, $400. Again, just to add some fudge factor.
Now let's consider the smallest of the corporate delinquent accounts from the article, the Detroit Lions NFL franchise, which owns Ford Field. As of August, 2013, they were the NFL team with the highest payroll, having spent $76 million on one player alone. The gate receipts from Ford Field were around $46 million. Setting aside for the moment the odd inability to scrape up $55,000 to pay the water bill while finding $76 million for Matthew Stafford's contract, let's look at what would happen if the water company cut off the water to Ford Field.
First, I think we all know that, automagically, the money would appear and services would never actually be interrupted. But what difference would that make? Well, $55,000 / $400 = around 137 homes, presumably already somewhat disadvantaged, could be spared from having their water cut off. The $80,000 that the Red Wings, a debt-free NHL franchise, owe would alleviate the need to cut off water to another 200 homes, again using our above-the-minimum past-due balance value. $2.2 million? Just from the golf club's bill, that solves the immediate problem, paying 5,500 bills of $400 each.
So, instead of making a freakin' country club pay its bill, we've cut off the main source of clean water for drinking, bathing, washing, and cooking for *4,500* homes? I don't care what the U.N. thinks about it. The rest of us should be hopping mad.