wait how - i couldn't tell

They are holding eachother.

Look at Bel and Hol, and then Germans Supported Brits into St. Pete

Holding each other does not mean they are cheating. The st.p. move is the only one which looks a bit interesting but even that is not a definite sign.

Its a no-ingame messaging, anonymous game.

It looks a little sketchy.

No-messaging does not mean people don't develop alliances through supporting each other. I am not England or Germany btw. The St.P. move could be interesting as said but support holding is cheating in a gunboat???

I didnt say it was cheating. I think the whole thing is sketch though

Not the holding. That one move on St Pete is questionable. There was already a fleet there and he supported the A Nor moving into it as the Fleet retreated. That is a REAL good guess, IMO. Or something else.

Looks legit to me. Just 2 good gunboat players that know what the best moves are.

how do i get a mod on it?

also a move to marsellies on Italy where he would have won it without british helping the german

@jimgov


That army in NOR could do 3 things: Stab Germany, Hold StP, Move into StP. Stabbing Germany made no sense. If Germany supported NOR to StP and NOR sh StP, then no harm done. If Germany sh StP and Nor sh StP it would be pointless.

But, this is an ongoing game, so we should probably stop discussing it.

If you read the orders to support there are some which have failed between the two when different moves have been used, so if there is cheating then they are going some way to hide it by putting in orders they know will not work.

@dep5greg:

http://www.webdiplomacy.net/rules.php

[email protected]

I may be wrong. But there are more moves than that to look at. It's not my job. I am just responding to the thread. There are others that are big whigs that can look into this for real. I'm just saying it looks sketchy.

I don't think thats cheating, but you all think otherwise, so hopefully Ghost can look 2moz for you

the game is now done... it drew.... so it really doesnt matter

This is why when I do gunboat games, I make it anonymous. Cuts down on anybody getting cute with the forum messaging system. :P

This one was anon, Jack.

That doesn't look like cheating at all. If I was in Gulf of Bothnia and England moved a fleet to Norway I would only assume it was because they wanted to use it in St. Petersburg. I think its pretty common for someone to take St. petersburg with a fleet in the NC. When they do that they will eventually need to replace it with an army if they want any chance at Moscow.

I don't see anything that looks like cheating, either. If they are cheating, why didn't the get rid of Turkey? There are no moves that look impossible, or even difficult, without chatting. They support-held early on and recognized that each other wanted peace. England still bounced fleets in Norway when Germany was in Sweden, so it wasn't total trust. There are failed moves, and they just support-moved old moves that didn't work without support, sometimes. I really wish that at least one of these "I think they're cheating" threads would be convincing...

@dep5greg, I also like how because, "the game is now done... it drew.... so it really doesnt matter." So you only cared when you thought you were going to lose?

na... i was just pointing it out... if i loose i loose... but a majority of people dont like playing with people who apear to be cheeting

Oh look another thread where someone has to point out cheating in an anonymous gunboat

how peculiar, you know? That we have to make a thread, definitely to point out the CHEATING, not to get around the anonymous gunboat situation...definitely not that.

://///////////

What a noob Russia

Stukus +1