One of my neighboring countries was attacked today, and was left in a shambles, though was still capable of mounting some defense. I offered this country my assistance, in return for ceding a territory to me. In response, I was told: "Not here to win..I am giving my builds away". Meaning, I took it, that (s)he was actively giving away territories for the benefit of another without any benefit in return. Below I am putting the response I sent, verbatim. I do hope that some few others of you will respond to this, either to join my opinion on this practice, or to defend the person who sent me this message.
"I've heard a lot of stupid comments from a lot of different Diplomacy players, but I must say that this is the single most provocative statement I've had anyone type to me.
"If you're not here to win, why play? What is the point, other than to ruin the experience for other players? The only possible conclusion I can come to is that you are participating in meta-playing rather than actual playing of the game; you help others in games where you do not hope to win in order to build or influence alliances in separate games. If this is true, it is the most shocking and abhorrent admission I've heard another Diplomacy player make. Such behavior is banned from tournament play, and could easily get you kicked out. And as for casual play, it does nothing but ruin an otherwise perfectly enjoyable game.
"Of course, there is also the slight possibility that you are playing according to different diplomat personalities--role-playing, if you will. In which case you must be currently playing the insane diplomat who gives away the keys to his country for nothing in return. At least there, I may be able to understand the concept of you giving builds away, but only in that you are actively playing with a completely different goal in mind, which is completely against the spirit of the game.
"I have no desire to affect the outcome of games outside this one, so I will not be using your name in public, but I do plan to bring up this issue on the message board, to see who else agrees with me that this sort of play is unsportsmanlike. You may admit to it there if you like, but in the interests of not creating an undue meta-game effect, I suggest you do not."
So I ask everyone else: what do you think? Shouldn't meta-playing be frowned upon? Shouldn't every player play by the rules of the game, one of which being that the intent should be to win, or at least to do as well as possible in each given game? Keep in mind that I'm not talking about a situation where a country has a single SC left; I mean a situation where one actively engages in losing one's own SCs for another when they could easily mount an effective defense against invasion--in this circumstance, the country had 5 SCs left. I'm really curious as to others' opinions on this.