02 Jun 16 UTC | Spring, 1999: Hey, Texas! North/South truce/alliance? |
02 Jun 16 UTC | Spring, 1999: Lol hi mexico |
02 Jun 16 UTC | Spring, 1999: Good luck everyone! |
02 Jun 16 UTC | Spring, 1999: good luck all |
02 Jun 16 UTC | Spring, 1999: h |
02 Jun 16 UTC | Spring, 1999: Hello and good luck!!! |
07 Jun 16 UTC | Autumn, 2000: Well played Texas... I gotta say, this is a first for me |
08 Jun 16 UTC | Spring, 2001: texans migrating to cuba, theres a switch :/ |
09 Jun 16 UTC | Spring, 2001: I'll be indebted to anyone who bumps one of Texas' fleets |
09 Jun 16 UTC | Spring, 2001: Sorry, Cuba. |
12 Jun 16 UTC | Spring, 2002: i think we should all just draw now, we'll all net 1D |
16 Jun 16 UTC | Spring, 2003: A bit of poor sportsmanship, Texas, attacking the SCs of a player who has missed the last two phases. |
16 Jun 16 UTC | Spring, 2003: That's to be expected, IMO. Unfortunately, it's nearly impossible to play a game without someone leaving the game. Someone has to take those SCs. |
16 Jun 16 UTC | Spring, 2003: So if NY missed 2 turns, will you attack him? |
16 Jun 16 UTC | Spring, 2003: Yes... If I bordered him. :) |
16 Jun 16 UTC | Spring, 2003: He had been an active player from the beginning, so extending him the courtesy of two phases would not have been detrimental to your position or to the balance of the game. |
16 Jun 16 UTC | Spring, 2003: you may go to attack anybody who didn't defend the fact is you can't reach it only if you could, you would do so |
16 Jun 16 UTC | Spring, 2003: I'm not going to argue with you. I said what I needed to say. |
16 Jun 16 UTC | Spring, 2003: IMO Texas has the right to attack FL, not that I am happy with it |
16 Jun 16 UTC | Spring, 2003: so do I sir |