Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 1108 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
SYnapse (0 DX)
07 Nov 13 UTC
Predict the next 200 years.
Maybe in the future they will read this thread in awe.
159 replies
Open
Jamiet99uk (808 D)
08 Nov 13 UTC
(+1)
Real life mute function
Wouldn't it be great if there was a mute function in REAL LIFE?

Like, if I could choose not to hear any "news" story or generally any mention whatsoever of Miley Cyrus. That would be great.
11 replies
Open
dipplayer2004 (1110 D)
08 Nov 13 UTC
Recruiting a few players for a World variant game
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=128633
1 reply
Open
orathaic (1009 D(B))
08 Nov 13 UTC
Where do anatomists get their bodies?
www.slate.com/articles/life/history/2013/11/nazi_anatomy_history_the_origins_of_conservatives_anti_abortion_claims_that.html
**trigger warning: Nazi history/medical history contained within**
3 replies
Open
SYnapse (0 DX)
07 Nov 13 UTC
British Intelligence Committee Transcript
I'm sure some of you are crazy enough to read the whole thing like me :D
4 replies
Open
philcore (317 D(S))
07 Nov 13 UTC
this is not an apology or a good bye ... or a statement, its an EOG!
EOG for "Cherry Poppin' Gunboaters"

gameID=127203
37 replies
Open
Celticfox (100 D(B))
29 Oct 13 UTC
(+1)
The Art of Stabbing
I realized after reviewing some of my games I have a problem with stabbing an ally. I hate to do it. So for you veteran stabbers out there.. how do you decide to stab. Or have you ever decided to just take the draw instead?
38 replies
Open
Yellowjacket (835 D(B))
07 Nov 13 UTC
This sucks.
Draugnar is quit forever, Tettleton's chew is banned, Mutejus has me mutejusted, and krellin and I are getting along.

I'm bored.
15 replies
Open
krellin (80 DX)
06 Nov 13 UTC
(+1)
Full Video Press - The Draug Memorial Game
In honor of our fallen comrade Draug, please consider joining
FULL VIDEO PRESS - the Draug Memorial Game.
Details to follow:
82 replies
Open
ccga4 (1831 D(B))
07 Nov 13 UTC
Friend makig account
If a friend of mine, who also lives close to me, makes a webdip account, would it find out we are so close, and say we are cheating? Would be able to be in the same game, as long as we were not talking outside the game about it, and it was anon so we didn't know who each other were.
8 replies
Open
abgemacht (1076 D(G))
03 Nov 13 UTC
(+7)
If you don't like a thread...
If you don't like a thread, here are two things you can do:
1) Mute it
2) Refrain from continually bumping it to the top of the site.
That is all
23 replies
Open
SYnapse (0 DX)
06 Nov 13 UTC
How to quit my job?
I hate my job but the thought of resigning to my (angry) boss terrifies me. How do I go about this?
25 replies
Open
SYnapse (0 DX)
07 Nov 13 UTC
Chinese man sues his wife for being ugly
http://rt.com/news/shinese-man-sues-ugly-wife-353/

She had cosmetic surgery and deceived him into having ugly kids. He won $120,000 of damages. Discuss
13 replies
Open
krellin (80 DX)
07 Nov 13 UTC
Global Warming - Rocking AWESOME for the Oceans!
http://www.cracked.com/article_20636_5-shockingly-creative-ways-animals-are-using-our-garbage_p2.html?wa_user1=3&wa_user2=Weird+World&wa_user3=article&wa_user4=feature_module

Suck on this you silly lefties while you knit your blankets and put them in storage for your dream-scenario when we live in Frozen Earth...
1 reply
Open
SYnapse (0 DX)
05 Nov 13 UTC
(+1)
Draugnar, Jmo, YJ, Krellin, Bo sox, see inside
More to come
Page 3 of 3
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
05 Nov 13 UTC
(+5)
Actually Draugnar, what I said was that your rants seem unhealthy for you and that while I don't want to see you go, it might be better for you if you really get this worked up over a gaming site.

Despite that fact that I wasted an hour at work trying to reason with you instead of simply going along with your request to be banned (after you sent this to TheMinisterOfWar), which is somehow threatening on my part.

"HOW ABOUT I THREATEN TO FIND YOU AND ASS RAPE YOU WITH A FUCKING BASEBALL BAT! BAN ME!"

But no, despite that, we're trying to work with you, and you continue to blow us off and make threats. Seriously Draugnar, how is this email threatening? I don't need to threaten, I could have just taken you up on your offer to ban you.

"Hi Draugnar,

First off, know that I wouldn't bother messaging you right now if I didn't care about finding a solution. I'm writing this at work when I have other things I should be doing, and I'm bothering because most of the time you're a positive contribute to the forum. A while ago you asked me to give you a night to cool down when you went off on a rant and then tell you if you were over the line. This is me telling you that this is absurd man. It'd be so much easier for everyone if you'd deal with the consequences of pushing the rules or if they are absolutely too much for you to take then leave. I don't want to see you leave, but honestly, this just seems unhealthy for you to get this worked up over a game.

Anyways, let me clear a few things up, that don't seem to have been communicated to you correctly. The first, is you were not silenced for failing to reply to the last set of emails. You were silenced for posting two sexually explicit links in a thread where I had just warned everyone that doing so would result in a silence.

Hell, you posted those links on a thread that YellowJacket made complaining about being warned for posting sexually explicit links. And you knew better, which I know, because you said so yourself.

"And there was nothing pornographic at all in the first two links (Denis Leary's I'm an Asshole and Puddle of Mudd's SheHates Me) unless you count foul language as pornographic. The third link was to Robin Thicke's unrated version of Blurred Lines that required you to sign in to Youtube with an unrestricted account to watch it."

There was no condition in the sexually explicit rule saying it's okay if you have to sign into youtube. It has naked girls dancing around to a song about the blurry lines between consensual sex and rape, that's sexually explicit by any terms.

Zultar, goldfinger0303, theMinisterofWar, and I were all discussing this before your silence and we gave the post to theministerorwar because it was a simple training silence. You admitted your own post was inappropriate, and you knew it would get you silenced, since I told everyone in the thread that sexual links would end in a silence. You can't get much more open and close with a case then that.

I can tell you that running to vDip won't solve anything though. Oli doesn't allow anti-mod rants at all. He is far less tolerant of that kind of behavior and so is the rest of their mod team (I know because I'm on it).

Now, as for the not replying to emails, that is a separate issue, but we decided to give you the chance to end your silence early by being reasonable and talking to us about something that's become a big issue with you on the site, your mod abuse. The only reason we would put that condition in is if we cared enough about working out an amicable solution with you to end a silence early. I'll ignore that issue for now, but if you decide to stay it's one that will have to be worked out.

Anyways, I'll lay out your choices here so everyone's on the same page.

-You can start talking to me until we can work something out
-You can take a self imposed break from the site to cool down until you're willing to talk with us.
-You can continue playing games without using the forum, I think I saw something in here about a self imposed silence. If that would make the site easier for you to use for playing diplomacy then that's an option.
-You can force us to ban you by breaking any variety or rules.

But this cycle isn't working. You pushing the boundaries, eventually crossing them, getting punished via the rules, going off about the punishment. It's not healthy for you to be that worked up, and it's not fair to us to have to deal with that for years on end. So take some time, cool down, and when you're up for talking you know where to find me, either here or via pm works.

-jmo"
Gen. Lee (7588 D(B))
05 Nov 13 UTC
Yes, I would love to. And there would be no appeal, the last thing Kestas needs is your incessant whining in his ear.

The moderation team serves to keep his site functional, as well as to be a buffer between him and all the crap that goes down here. Banning you with no appeal would be the essense of keeping the site functional and keeping the crap away from his desk. ;-)
NigeeBaby (100 D(G))
06 Nov 13 UTC
(+2)
Actually Draugnar, what I said was that your rants seem unhealthy for you and that while I don't want to see you go, it might be better for you if you really get this worked up over a gaming site.

Despite that fact that I wasted an hour at work trying to reason with you instead of simply going along with your request to be banned (after you sent this to TheMinisterOfWar), which is somehow threatening on my part.

"HOW ABOUT I THREATEN TO FIND YOU AND ASS RAPE YOU WITH A FUCKING BASEBALL BAT! BAN ME!"

But no, despite that, we're trying to work with you, and you continue to blow us off and make threats. Seriously Draugnar, how is this email threatening? I don't need to threaten, I could have just taken you up on your offer to ban you.

"Hi Draugnar,

First off, know that I wouldn't bother messaging you right now if I didn't care about finding a solution. I'm writing this at work when I have other things I should be doing, and I'm bothering because most of the time you're a positive contribute to the forum. A while ago you asked me to give you a night to cool down when you went off on a rant and then tell you if you were over the line. This is me telling you that this is absurd man. It'd be so much easier for everyone if you'd deal with the consequences of pushing the rules or if they are absolutely too much for you to take then leave. I don't want to see you leave, but honestly, this just seems unhealthy for you to get this worked up over a game.

Anyways, let me clear a few things up, that don't seem to have been communicated to you correctly. The first, is you were not silenced for failing to reply to the last set of emails. You were silenced for posting two sexually explicit links in a thread where I had just warned everyone that doing so would result in a silence.

Hell, you posted those links on a thread that YellowJacket made complaining about being warned for posting sexually explicit links. And you knew better, which I know, because you said so yourself.

"And there was nothing pornographic at all in the first two links (Denis Leary's I'm an Asshole and Puddle of Mudd's SheHates Me) unless you count foul language as pornographic. The third link was to Robin Thicke's unrated version of Blurred Lines that required you to sign in to Youtube with an unrestricted account to watch it."

There was no condition in the sexually explicit rule saying it's okay if you have to sign into youtube. It has naked girls dancing around to a song about the blurry lines between consensual sex and rape, that's sexually explicit by any terms.

Zultar, goldfinger0303, theMinisterofWar, and I were all discussing this before your silence and we gave the post to theministerorwar because it was a simple training silence. You admitted your own post was inappropriate, and you knew it would get you silenced, since I told everyone in the thread that sexual links would end in a silence. You can't get much more open and close with a case then that.

I can tell you that running to vDip won't solve anything though. Oli doesn't allow anti-mod rants at all. He is far less tolerant of that kind of behavior and so is the rest of their mod team (I know because I'm on it).

Now, as for the not replying to emails, that is a separate issue, but we decided to give you the chance to end your silence early by being reasonable and talking to us about something that's become a big issue with you on the site, your mod abuse. The only reason we would put that condition in is if we cared enough about working out an amicable solution with you to end a silence early. I'll ignore that issue for now, but if you decide to stay it's one that will have to be worked out.

Anyways, I'll lay out your choices here so everyone's on the same page.

-You can start talking to me until we can work something out
-You can take a self imposed break from the site to cool down until you're willing to talk with us.
-You can continue playing games without using the forum, I think I saw something in here about a self imposed silence. If that would make the site easier for you to use for playing diplomacy then that's an option.
-You can force us to ban you by breaking any variety or rules.

But this cycle isn't working. You pushing the boundaries, eventually crossing them, getting punished via the rules, going off about the punishment. It's not healthy for you to be that worked up, and it's not fair to us to have to deal with that for years on end. So take some time, cool down, and when you're up for talking you know where to find me, either here or via pm works.

-jmo"

only 1 +1 for all this, you guys are so mean.......
Jamiet99uk (808 D)
06 Nov 13 UTC
Nigee why did you repost JMO's entire message? Not necessary.
krellin (80 DX)
06 Nov 13 UTC
I agree, it is absolutely unnecessary to repost this:

"Actually Draugnar, what I said was that your rants seem unhealthy for you and that while I don't want to see you go, it might be better for you if you really get this worked up over a gaming site.

Despite that fact that I wasted an hour at work trying to reason with you instead of simply going along with your request to be banned (after you sent this to TheMinisterOfWar), which is somehow threatening on my part.

"HOW ABOUT I THREATEN TO FIND YOU AND ASS RAPE YOU WITH A FUCKING BASEBALL BAT! BAN ME!"

But no, despite that, we're trying to work with you, and you continue to blow us off and make threats. Seriously Draugnar, how is this email threatening? I don't need to threaten, I could have just taken you up on your offer to ban you.

"Hi Draugnar,

First off, know that I wouldn't bother messaging you right now if I didn't care about finding a solution. I'm writing this at work when I have other things I should be doing, and I'm bothering because most of the time you're a positive contribute to the forum. A while ago you asked me to give you a night to cool down when you went off on a rant and then tell you if you were over the line. This is me telling you that this is absurd man. It'd be so much easier for everyone if you'd deal with the consequences of pushing the rules or if they are absolutely too much for you to take then leave. I don't want to see you leave, but honestly, this just seems unhealthy for you to get this worked up over a game.

Anyways, let me clear a few things up, that don't seem to have been communicated to you correctly. The first, is you were not silenced for failing to reply to the last set of emails. You were silenced for posting two sexually explicit links in a thread where I had just warned everyone that doing so would result in a silence.

Hell, you posted those links on a thread that YellowJacket made complaining about being warned for posting sexually explicit links. And you knew better, which I know, because you said so yourself.

"And there was nothing pornographic at all in the first two links (Denis Leary's I'm an Asshole and Puddle of Mudd's SheHates Me) unless you count foul language as pornographic. The third link was to Robin Thicke's unrated version of Blurred Lines that required you to sign in to Youtube with an unrestricted account to watch it."

There was no condition in the sexually explicit rule saying it's okay if you have to sign into youtube. It has naked girls dancing around to a song about the blurry lines between consensual sex and rape, that's sexually explicit by any terms.

Zultar, goldfinger0303, theMinisterofWar, and I were all discussing this before your silence and we gave the post to theministerorwar because it was a simple training silence. You admitted your own post was inappropriate, and you knew it would get you silenced, since I told everyone in the thread that sexual links would end in a silence. You can't get much more open and close with a case then that.

I can tell you that running to vDip won't solve anything though. Oli doesn't allow anti-mod rants at all. He is far less tolerant of that kind of behavior and so is the rest of their mod team (I know because I'm on it).

Now, as for the not replying to emails, that is a separate issue, but we decided to give you the chance to end your silence early by being reasonable and talking to us about something that's become a big issue with you on the site, your mod abuse. The only reason we would put that condition in is if we cared enough about working out an amicable solution with you to end a silence early. I'll ignore that issue for now, but if you decide to stay it's one that will have to be worked out.

Anyways, I'll lay out your choices here so everyone's on the same page.

-You can start talking to me until we can work something out
-You can take a self imposed break from the site to cool down until you're willing to talk with us.
-You can continue playing games without using the forum, I think I saw something in here about a self imposed silence. If that would make the site easier for you to use for playing diplomacy then that's an option.
-You can force us to ban you by breaking any variety or rules.

But this cycle isn't working. You pushing the boundaries, eventually crossing them, getting punished via the rules, going off about the punishment. It's not healthy for you to be that worked up, and it's not fair to us to have to deal with that for years on end. So take some time, cool down, and when you're up for talking you know where to find me, either here or via pm works.

-jmo" "
NigeeBaby (100 D(G))
06 Nov 13 UTC
Tis one's much better, this got +4...... a more robust moderation policy I think you'll agree, how would you feel if a Mod posted this message about you?

"Draugnar, it is fucking idiots like you that ruin the site. Grow the fuck up, normally I go out of my way to treat members nicely in the forum. But I've given you more chances then I can count so from now on I'm going to fucking answer you exactly like you answer everyone else. Like they are fucking morons who don't deserve my fucking respect."
krellin (80 DX)
07 Nov 13 UTC
I still fail to see how the site is "ruined". What a ridiculous assertion made by ridiculous people.

The site would truly be ruined if these censor-whores had their way and everyone's post had to be screened by libtard thought police...
krellin (80 DX)
07 Nov 13 UTC
"Draugnar, it is fucking idiots "
"'m going to fucking answer you"
"they are fucking morons who don't deserve my fucking respect." "

Once again, why aren't all the libtard morons around here screaming and yelling when the name calling is from someone they agree with????

Huh?

Huh huh huh???

The Czech (39715 D(S))
07 Nov 13 UTC
(+2)
There were mod changes on Nov 1st? Back to my rock.
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
07 Nov 13 UTC
Are you joking krellin, half the forum came out and yelled at him for the rant, it's not you specifically, people just have a low tolerance to being cussed out or watching others being cussed out over non issues
krellin (80 DX)
07 Nov 13 UTC
jmo.....my point is not about draug or this discussion in general. My point is about all the fucking hypocrite asshole around here that whine and complain about "name calling"....for example if I call someone a fucktard/libtard...and they act like name calling is so beneath them....

...and then this happens, and the name calling starts BY THEM against people they disagree with, and then calling people names is all the rage.

You honestly can't see the hypocrisy?

Either name calling is OK, or it's not. I just want the libtard morons that complain about name calling to complain about all the names Draug has been called, for which they have been silent or supportive of.
mapleleaf (0 DX)
07 Nov 13 UTC
jmo posted, "Hi Draugnar....most of the time you're a positive contribute to the forum"

If ever there was a soft lob that I could knock out of the ballpark, that was it......
krellin (80 DX)
07 Nov 13 UTC
(+1)
Well, he positively contributes to the forum.....so does that mean his contributions are "positive", which is a wholly subjective statement, or does the statement simply mean he "positively" contributes....meaning he adds content to the forum, as opposed to hacking the site and deleting content?


73 replies
Maniac (189 D(B))
05 Nov 13 UTC
A competition to see who can get silenced/banned for the most innocuous of reasons
My entry inside
7 replies
Open
spyman (424 D(G))
06 Nov 13 UTC
Moderation Poll: how much moderation do site members want?
Please +1 one of the options below.
134 replies
Open
Draugnar (0 DX)
05 Nov 13 UTC
YouTube as forum communication method...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBAl9cchQac
2 replies
Open
Maniac (189 D(B))
06 Nov 13 UTC
(+12)
This is not an apology or a goodbye. This is a statement.
Opening Balance £21,034.89
Interest in Year------------0.02
Closing Balance--£21,034.91
20 replies
Open
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
31 Oct 13 UTC
(+2)
The WebDip Halloween Poem
Same sort of shtick as the "Create a Community Story one Sentence at a Time" threads, but with poems and lines...

And since Halloween is--to me, at least--unofficially Edgar Allan Poe day, let's start with that most obscure of his openings...
63 replies
Open
SYnapse (0 DX)
06 Nov 13 UTC
Yasser Arafat Poisoned by Mossad
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-24838061
23 replies
Open
2ndWhiteLine (2601 D(B))
07 Nov 13 UTC
Pitch Drop
Any watchers on here?
0 replies
Open
Brewmachine (104 D)
06 Nov 13 UTC
(+1)
http://www.timecube.com/
that is all.
14 replies
Open
krellin (80 DX)
06 Nov 13 UTC
(+1)
Chicks with Ducks
http://www.backyardchickens.com/t/664117/cooping-chickens-and-ducks-together-please-help

Nothing like fresh eggs
3 replies
Open
Maniac (189 D(B))
06 Nov 13 UTC
Please do not open link if easily offended
The link below contains pictures of two girls dressed inappropiately - you can't see any nipples or anything but still - someone should ban the BBC
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-24835322
10 replies
Open
Dharmaton (2398 D)
07 Nov 13 UTC
Live game timeouts
Lame. always 5-10 secs. too late before I hit ready - argh
2 replies
Open
shadowplay (2162 D)
06 Nov 13 UTC
(+2)
any Southern Slavs out there? No internet flame war wanted but...
Is anyone interested in a Yugoslav language only game? OR
Is anyone interested in a Slovenian, Croatian, Bosnian, Serbian, Montenegrin, Macedonian, Serbo-Croatian/Croato-Serbian language only game?
37 replies
Open
steephie22 (182 D(S))
06 Nov 13 UTC
(+1)
How do I survive a co-worker and my boss?
You'll never guess what just happened.
4 replies
Open
Bob Genghiskhan (1233 D)
06 Nov 13 UTC
I think I enjoy castrating someone who attacks me more than attacking someone else.
This probably is not good for my Diplomacy record.
10 replies
Open
Jamiet99uk (808 D)
06 Nov 13 UTC
(+1)
How to fire an employee?
How do I go about this?
5 replies
Open
Page 1108 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top