I vote aye to SD's amendment to use nomic pointz instead of npmic points.
I also vote aye to amendment to change "rule proposal" in rule 11 to "rule proposal and rule change proposal".

1. No dice rolling.
2. First player to accumulate *exactly* 500 nomic pointz wins
3. The winner can only win on a BST weekday.
4. The current players are to be tracked.
5. All proposed new rules, proposed rule changes, or proposed rule deletions require a simple majority (more than half) of those playing, in order to pass - with the proposer automatically presumed to vote in favour unless they state otherwise.
6. Current Players are referred to as Nomic Members.
7. game isn't turn-based.
8. To be a Nomic Member, new players must have backing by at least one Nomic Member.
9. Each Nomic Member may only propose one rule change / amendment / deletion per hour.
10. any rule proposal that has not passed or been rejected within 24 hours of being suggested becomes rejected automatically.
11. Only one rule proposal may be open for consideration at any one time. Once a rule proposal has been made, voting on that proposal must be concluded before any other proposal can be made.
12. nomic pointz can be accumulated through +1s on this thread.

finally passed the amendment!

1. No dice rolling.
2. First player to accumulate *exactly* 500 nomic pointz wins
3. The winner can only win on a BST weekday.
4. The current players are to be tracked.
5. All proposed new rules, proposed rule changes, or proposed rule deletions require a simple majority (more than half) of those playing, in order to pass - with the proposer automatically presumed to vote in favour unless they state otherwise.
6. Current Players are referred to as Nomic Members.
7. game isn't turn-based.
8. To be a Nomic Member, new players must have backing by at least one Nomic Member.
9. Each Nomic Member may only propose one rule change / amendment / deletion per hour.
10. any rule proposal that has not passed or been rejected within 24 hours of being suggested becomes rejected automatically.
11. Only one rule proposal may be open for consideration at any one time. Once a rule proposal has been made, voting on that proposal must be concluded before any other proposal can be made.
12. nomic pointz can be accumulated through +1s on this thread.

i propose to amend rule 10 so that it states any rule proposal/rule amendment/rule deletion....

current standing:
guak: 1
kasimax: 1
all others: 0

we need to clarify this rule though. with the current wording, everyone could have 0-2 .

aye to socs amendment.

wait, soc, you're not yet allowed to propose a new amendment under rule 9, are you?

aye to Soc's amendment

can anybody list all current amendments proposals?

why not kasi? i thought we said that rule couldn't be applied retroactively, which would mean that i hadn't made one since it was passed?

alright, didn't remember.

guak had one about changing 5 from aye to yay (aye: guak)
you have one to change 11 to include rule amendments (but not deletions) (aye: kasi. nay, guak, soc)
i have one to change 10 to include rule amendments and deletions (aye: soc, jamie, kasi)

yyour amendment also has an aye from atrum

alright, nay to guak.

guak had one about changing 5 from aye to yay (aye: guak. nay: kasi)
you have one to change 11 to include rule amendments (but not deletions) (aye: kasi, atrum. nay, guak, soc)
i have one to change 10 to include rule amendments and deletions (aye: soc, jamie, kasi)

nay to guak

aye to kasimaxi's proposal about rule 11

I vote nay to guak's amendment, and aye on kasi's amendment to change rule 10.

guak's changing 5 from aye to yay (aye: guak. nay: kasi, jamie)
kasi changing 11 to include rule changes (aye: kasi, atrum. nay: guak, soc)
soc changing 10 to include rule amendments and deletions (aye: soc, jamie, kasi)

the rule proposal on 50 pointz to those who have usernames not starting with a capital needs 2 votes for either side to pass or be rejected.

guak's changing 5 from aye to yay (aye: guak. nay: kasi, jamie, atrum)
kasi changing 11 to include rule changes (aye: kasi, atrum, jamie. nay: guak, soc)
soc changing 10 to include rule amendments and deletions (aye: soc, jamie, kasi, atrum)

the rule proposal on 50 pointz to those who have usernames not starting with a capital needs 2 votes for either side to pass or be rejected.

i vote aye on all three

it actually needs just one vote on either side to be passed or rejected. only semck hasn't voted for it yet.

jamiet: All Nomic Members whose username does not start with a capital letter gain 50 nomic pointz (aye: jamiet, ag, kasi, guak. nay: socrates, pe, atrum)
so 1 needed for the 'ayes', and 2 needed for the 'nays'

soc's amendment of rule 10 got passed.

1. No dice rolling.
2. First player to accumulate *exactly* 500 nomic pointz wins
3. The winner can only win on a BST weekday.
4. The current players are to be tracked.
5. All proposed new rules, proposed rule changes, or proposed rule deletions require a simple majority (more than half) of those playing, in order to pass - with the proposer automatically presumed to vote in favour unless they state otherwise.
6. Current Players are referred to as Nomic Members.
7. game isn't turn-based.
8. To be a Nomic Member, new players must have backing by at least one Nomic Member.
9. Each Nomic Member may only propose one rule change / amendment / deletion per hour.
10. any rule, amendment or deletion proposal that has not passed or been rejected within 24 hours of being suggested becomes rejected automatically.
11. Only one rule proposal may be open for consideration at any one time. Once a rule proposal has been made, voting on that proposal must be concluded before any other proposal can be made.
12. nomic pointz can be accumulated through +1s on this thread.

guak's changing 5 from aye to yay (aye: guak, ag. nay: kasi, jamie, atrum)
kasi changing 11 to include rule changes (aye: kasi, atrum, jamie, ag. nay: guak, soc)
soc changing 10 to include rule amendments and deletions (aye: soc, jamie, kasi, atrum, ag) PASSED!

no soc, we need one for a nay, since we're only eight players, and a perfect equilibrium thus means nay.

i was going to ask, can there not be vote changes? i was going to propose a rule, but i obviously can't

What is a "vote change", SD?

and somebody got me 8 nomic pointz on this page!
kasimax: 9
guak: 1
all others: 0