Eden+1
I am actually intrigued by your reasoning. I would think the dominance of the English speaking world was established by
-Allies conquering axis in WW1 and WW2,
-America "winning" the cold war.
You go back even further, to the glory days of the British empire. That's around 1800, right? Do you think this cause-and-effect relation can be carried over 2 centuries (2 rather lively centuries, one might add)?
But perhaps you're right. You're the history major, not me :).
@Draugnar: "@Bas - So I guess my use of "y'all" and "wanna" is "gonna" keep use from being allies?"
Yes, it probably does. I'm not proud of it, but it's true. First impressions are always a subconcious judgement, and in my book it's beneficial to properly spell out your words.
One reason why: When I write a message, I ponder each sentence, rewrite them sometimes, to make sure my words reflect the message I want to convey. While I'm at it, I can correct spelling mistakes and so on. So if I see spelling errors, I (correctly or incorrectly) assume you didn't reread your message.
For example, your previous statement. Did you put much thought about it? Was is exactly what you wanted to say to Neb? I see two simple spelling errors in there (are-argue, sove-shove). Therefore, I guess you wrote the text, and just clicked 'send'.
@The situation: "defining it as the main language in the world is incorrect as that would require a majority of the world to speak it"
This is where we differ, but it's a matter of definition. My definition of the "main language" would be something like this:
Take two random people on earth, and see which languages they both speak. Repeat this for many pairs of people, and see what language gets picked most often. Sort of a "correlation function", if you're familiar with those.
I think English would score highest in the test, because many people speak it as a second language.