Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 696 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
MadMarx (36299 D(G))
12 Jan 11 UTC
Congrats IKE
For winning my college football bowl pool. Six people paid their entry fee via PayPal, so $30 got donated to Kestas.
2 replies
Open
TitanX7 (134 D)
11 Jan 11 UTC
Ok, I'm a little confused here and any help would be great.
Let's say I have an army in munich and it is ordered to give support. However, someone wants to cut the support and orders a move into munich. If I arrange a standoff by ordering a move into munich from another region does the support move still go through?
8 replies
Open
Eggzavier (444 D)
11 Jan 11 UTC
GET SOME!!
0 replies
Open
Stenrosen (1110 D)
11 Jan 11 UTC
BUG?
The egyptian player moves from Jerusalem to Syrian Sea in 'spring 6' with support from Tyre. Syrian Sea moves to Tyre. The attack is not succesfull though its two against one?
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=43264
2 replies
Open
abgemacht (1076 D(G))
11 Jan 11 UTC
Mods Please Check your Email
I need two GFDT games paused ASAP
Thanks
5 replies
Open
Inspector Rex (0 DX)
11 Jan 11 UTC
Emergency sitter
Needed due to evacuation from queensland floods- pls help- good plaits only
5 replies
Open
steephie22 (182 D(S))
11 Jan 11 UTC
via land/convoy
if you're moving on a coast with an army and there is a fleet adjacent to the begin place and the target you can choose between move via land or via convoy, my question: is there any way it could be better to convoy un such a situation where you can choose??
9 replies
Open
TrustyFriend (260 D)
11 Jan 11 UTC
Convoy problems!
Has anyone else been having problems with convoys? This is the second turn now where the site keeps giving me ¨Parameter 'toTerrID' set to invalid value '39'.¨ The value changes with the territories, but it won´t let me save any convoy moves. What do I do?!
4 replies
Open
general (100 D)
11 Jan 11 UTC
Live games
I've joined a couple of live games and looking for more people...
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=46669
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=46668
1 reply
Open
joey1 (198 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
Wikileaks game
As an experiment in diplomacy and how a diplomatic society works without secrets, I propose a public press game.

gameID=46260
27 replies
Open
joey1 (198 D)
11 Jan 11 UTC
Anyone interested in a public press game.
Looking for a couple of more people for a public press game. (hopefuly good communicators, so we have lots of public press). 24 hour turns.

gameID=46601
0 replies
Open
principians (881 D)
10 Jan 11 UTC
unitarian universalism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitarian_Universalism
what do you think?
22 replies
Open
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
08 Jan 11 UTC
The NFL Playoffs Are Upon Us! WHO YA GOT?
The Patriots, Steelers, Colts, Chiefs, Ravens, and Jets in the AFC!
The Falcons, Bears, Eagles, Seahawks, Saints, and Packers in the NFC!

12 Teams, 1 Dream...make your playoff picks, people! WHO WILL WIN SUPER BOWL XLV?
106 replies
Open
Serioussham (446 D)
05 Jan 11 UTC
Opinions about organ and tissue donations?
see inside.
121 replies
Open
gjdip (1090 D)
10 Jan 11 UTC
Leagues registration delayed one week
I told several people that the leagues registrations would start last weekend but this being webDiplomacy I found myself compelled to lie. I will start the registrations NEXT weekend after the registrations for the Masters close because TrustMe said it would hurt his brain to have multiple registrations going simultaneously.
33 replies
Open
stratagos (3269 D(S))
06 Jan 11 UTC
Vaccine Panic Fakeout
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/05/AR2011010507052.html
71 replies
Open
abgemacht (1076 D(G))
10 Jan 11 UTC
What is this?
In-game, there is a colored banner below the game info and above your country. It almost looks like the country SC banner, but it is different. In all of my games, this banner is different. Does anyone know what this is, or even what I'm talking about?
13 replies
Open
McChazza (134 D)
10 Jan 11 UTC
new game - 10 mins.
Hi all

#46585 10 min phases. All welcome but (relative) newbies especially so...
2 replies
Open
Putin33 (111 D)
03 Jan 11 UTC
Debate: Israel / Palestine
So we don't hijack a perfectly good thread on games and because I think this is a good discussion.
Page 4 of 7
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
Putin33 (111 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
"Ah, so now wikipedia is suddenly a definitive source? I thought you didn't like wikipedia? The fact is that Israeli-Palestinian conflict articles on wikipedia are so heavily contested by the partisans of both sides (there are even seminars for Rightists in Israel on how to manipulate the wikipedia process) that I wouldn't rely on it as far as this subject is concerned."

I don't like wikipedia, but there is no reputable and commonly accepted statistic on the matter (as you even admit, of course blaming it on Israeli bookkeeping), so I used it because there was nothing else. But here you go, is this better? It says the same thing. http://www.onwar.com/aced/nation/ink/israel/fisrael1948.htm

"Benny Morris says that 348 Palestinian villages were depopulated; others put the number over 500. Considering just the well-known massacres and deaths from the refugees' journeys, I would consider an average figure of 10 deaths per village to be both extremely conservative and already exceeding the figure you grabbed from Wikipedia."

It's totally shocking that figures you divine out of thin air would exceed the estimates of wikipedia.

"As for the Palestinians "fleeing as the invading Arab armies came in", that claim is complete and utter bullshit."

Which is why the Palestine Arab Higher Committee demanded that neighboring countries refuse visas to Palestinian refugees who were fleeing the country in anticipation of the war, because so many were leaving. And which is why numerous Arab newspapers criticized people for fleeing, and which is why the commander of the Jordanian Arab Legions said "Villages were frequently abandoned even before they were threatened by the progress of war" (London Daily Mail, (August 12, 1948).

Shockingly, there are no contemporary reports of these massive forced evictions by the Israelis during 1948 by any notable newspapers. On the contrary, the British representative at the UN, in response to reports that Arabs had been massacred and deported from Haifa, claimed these reports were 'erroneous'. (London Times, April 24, 1948).

"Massacres and expulsions of Palestinians started in early 1948 (Deir Yassin, which happened in April, was merely the most infamous of a string of massacres, and not the largest by a long shot)."

Right, you can remember Deir Yassin. You can't remember the Hadassah medical convoy massacre, the multiple massacres at Kfar Etzion, the Hebron and Safed massacres or anything else.

"(safeguarding the lives and property of people who are being deprived of it by a foreign invader is hardly an invasion, but whatever) "

What a remarkable claim. So foreign Arab armies can't possibly 'invade' Israel, only Jews can be invaders. And legally acquired Jewish property is irrelevant. And Jewish victims of massacres are irrelevant.

And these so-called rag-tag Arab armies ( which supposedly 'didn't invade') managed to inflict losses on Israel which doubled that of any of the Arab armies. http://www.onwar.com/aced/nation/ink/israel/fisrael1948.htm
So if these armies sent troops with no rifles then they must be good superheroes when it comes to unarmed fighting.

"until Israel declared its independence in May of 1948 (which was five months prior to the date the Israelis had agreed upon in the partition agreement)"

I don't see how attacks and reprisals on both sides negates the documented reports by their own leadership, the documented reports by newspapers reporting on the conflict, and the documented reports by UN officials that they fled. The date set by the partition plan for British withdrawal and Israeli independence was a deadline. It's completely disingenuous to claim that somehow Israel wasn't abiding by the plan because this occurred before the deadline. The reason why this happened earlier is because of Arab attacks and rejection of the plan, so the British were forced to unilaterally withdraw in May. To continue to suggest that the plan wasn't implemented because of anything Israel did is absurd.

"Even the IDF admits that 70% of the Palestinian exodus was caused by Israeli forces, not mysterious radio messages from the diabolical Arab overlords."

A citation of this would be nice. There are documented quotations for the Arab Higher Committee that, for example, the exodus of Haifa was done at their request. There are also quotes from Arab leaders claiming that they invited Palestinians to flee to neighboring Arab countries.

Khaled al-`Azm, who served as Prime Minister of Syria in 1948 and 1949, wrote in his memoirs (published in Beirut, 1973), that among the reasons for the Arab failure in 1948 was "the call by the Arab Governments to the inhabitants of Palestine to evacuate it and to leave for the bordering Arab countries, after having sown terror among them...Since 1948 we have been demanding the return of the refugees to their homes. But we ourselves are the ones who encouraged them to leave...We have brought destruction upon a million Arab refugees, by calling upon them and pleading with them to leave their land, their homes, their work and business..." (Part 1, pp. 386-387).

"I also care about Jewish life, too."

You hide it so well. Comparing Israelis to Nazis (the PA are 'kapos'), citing websites that claim the Holocaust was grossly exaggerated, equating Jewish immigration to armed invasion, and defending terrorist groups that celebrate killing Jews wherever they are.

"We're talking about Israel, because YOU BROUGHT IT UP."

So now we're TALKING IN CAPS. You go on this tirade, expecting me to believe that your demonization of Israel isn't unique to Israel, and that you'd make these kinds of extreme comparisons you're making about any number of countries who have done much worse. That's a crock. There's only so many countries with which you can invoke comparisons to "kapos" without trivializing the Nazis. (Ironically you accused me of this kind of trivializing, for pointing out the *fact* that the Washington Report openly promotes Holocaust denial, which is commonly defined far more broadly than simply saying no Jews were killed by Nazis. By your definition, David Irving isn't a Holocaust denier, but whatever).

Jamiet99uk (808 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
Can you guys try to avoid using the terms 'Israeli' and 'Jew' interchangably? Israel does not represent all jewish people. Indeed, I have jewish friends who find the actions of the Israeli government abhorrent and who get very annoyed when people assume they will be pro-Israel just because they are from jewish backgrounds.
Octavious (2701 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
@ Jamie
"Because innocent people are dying. Because innocent people are suffering. Because we're their fellow human beings and we can empathise with their suffering, and want it to stop. That's why we give a damn about it."
As much as I admire your passion to aid your fellow man, you cannot help someone who doesn't want to be helped. Yes, there are many innocents who are living through hell, but as long as the majority of their fellow countrymen refuse to look reality in the face and keep on electing the same sort of people with the same policies of stubborn pride and idiocy there's really not a damn thing we can do about it. Elsewhere in the world are countless examples of people in need who are actively asking for help and are willing to do something positive about it themselves. We should focus our efforts in the places where we can actually achieve some good.
Jamiet99uk (808 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
@ Octavious - Don't you see that electing Hamas WAS a cry for help? The Palestinians had spent years supporting the more moderate party, Fatah, but they were still being fucked in the ass by the Israelis on a daily basis. Feeling they were getting nowhere, they voted Hamas out of sheer frustration.
fulhamish (4134 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
Jamiet99 wrote- ''Don't you see that electing Hamas WAS a cry for help?''

It is time to wake up and smell the coffee bro. That murder in Lahore the other day, for examplle was greeted by an almoat deafly silence -

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/06/pakistan-salman-taseer-assassination

Take a look at the bombing in Egypt last week -

http://www.economist.com/blogs/newsbook/2011/01/strife_egypt


We are moving into a new, likely very unplesant, world.
Octavious (2701 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
@ Jamie
Frankly, no. Electing Hamas is no more a cry for help than the Germans electing the National Socialists was. It was a cry of frustration and anger and vengeance that has simply made things worse. Feeling they were getting nowhere, they opted to go backwards. It is impossible to help people when they are in this mindset.
Jamiet99uk (808 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
@ Octavious: Ok then, what would you do if you were a Palestinian?
Jamiet99uk (808 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
@ fulhamish, Have you actually read the economist article?

As Yasir az-Za‘atira's comments in the article you cited make clear, the current tension in Egypt must be interpreted against a background of sustained corruption and lack of democracy in Egypt. Egypt, dominated by its armed forces, is becoming alarmingly stagnant, and is certainly a future troublespot.
Octavious (2701 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
@ Jamie
I would draw upon my many years experience of living there and being a Palestinian to come up with a plan os positive action. C'mon, mate, I don't have a bloody clue as you well know. No one can answer such questions.
fulhamish (4134 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
@Jamie

It is very easy to throw around accusations of denial, but I do wish that you reread the Guardian article at least, and have a modicum of openess.

What we have here is something on a worldwide scale. It is bounded by the borders of Pakistan, Egypt, Turkey, Gaza, Saudia Arabia etc.... Indeed that is the avowed aim of the perpetrators.
Jamiet99uk (808 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
Fulhamish: I'm honestly not sure what you mean by 'denial' in this context? Are you accusing me of denying something?

What "perpetrators" are you referring to? A global islamist conspiracy? Please actually say what you mean, rather than making vague references which could be misinterpreted.
Jamiet99uk (808 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
@ Octavious: "C'mon, mate, I don't have a bloody clue as you well know. No one can answer such questions"

So you're happy to blame the people of Palestine for the situation they find themselves in, but you can't say what you would do differently in their place? Doesn't that undermine your criticism of them somewhat?
Octavious (2701 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
@ Jamie
No, not really. The whole "what would you do if you were a Palestinian" nonsense is a huge nature vs nurture debate that I wouldn't touch with a bargepole. If I was a Palestinian I would not be me and the whole thing becomes pointless.
steephie22 (182 D(S))
06 Jan 11 UTC
@putin: Gelderland, mid-east of holland...
but the first language-thing is not the problem, i'm just a slow reader, i don't know how you call it in english but i have dislexy (i guess it has to be something like that in english...) i can read english and know what everything means (but all the shortcuts and some weird words i just haven't heard ever...) and i can explain things good but i just don't know how you type some words or speak out other words... and besides that i make much typo's (that is a word i never heard but i knew immediatly whats meant with it...
fulhamish (4134 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
@ Jamie

Some exam[ples of denial:

I do not think that there is an organised Islamic conspiracy in a conventional sence. What I do thinlk is that there a lot of Muslims (certainly a significant minority, if not a majority) are extremely hostile. To deny this is a form of denial.

We always read headlines blaming overseas radicalisation, but invariably this is a home-grown process. This is a form of denial.

The Guardian article link I posted, which you have so studiously ignored, is another.

The worst denial of all comes from thiose on the left who, on the one hand, demonstrate for soliditary with Hamas etc, and on the other hand defend gay rights. This, in my opinion, is denial par excellance; a case study in believing exactly what you wish depending on the particular circumstances.

Draugnar (0 DX)
06 Jan 11 UTC
typo = slang for typographical error. It's too damn long to type, so we just type "typo".
Draugnar (0 DX)
06 Jan 11 UTC
@fulhamish - Believing one side has the right overall idea but not agreeing with every single policy is not denial. It is realism. It's called picking the lesser of two evils. I heard this recently in another argument. But it is bogus to say someone is either in denial or a hypocrite because they support a side that they mostly agree with but have some differences when they view the other side as have even more differences or more important differences.
Putin33 (111 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
"The Palestinians had spent years supporting the more moderate party, Fatah"

How do we know this? There have only been 2 elections. The first, in 1996, only had Fatah competing. Hamas boycotted it. The PA was essentially ruled as a one-party state for a decade. The first actual competitive election, in 2006, led to resounding Hamas victories.

"the current tension in Egypt must be interpreted against a background of sustained corruption and lack of democracy in Egypt."

The terrorizing and killing of Copts in Egypt has been going on for a long time. Yes the government is corrupt and undemocratic, but why do Copts bear the brunt of these supposedly anti-government attacks? They aren't in the government. And anyway Egypt's economic growth rate has been quite high, even in this global recession - 4.7% last year.
Putin33 (111 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
"Believing one side has the right overall idea but not agreeing with every single policy is not denial"

I agree with this overall statement, but the idea that the ideological issues between the progressive left and Hamas are a matter of minor quibbling over an issue or two is completely far fetched, as is the idea that the progressive left has more ideologically in common with Hamas than, say, the Israeli Labor Party and other similar groups.
Putin33 (111 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
"@putin: Gelderland, mid-east of holland..."

Nice. Do you support NEC or Vitesse? Or maybe the Superboeren?
steephie22 (182 D(S))
06 Jan 11 UTC
no, i don't support any footballclub, and if you mean the shop Super de Boer (super the farmer or something in english :)), i don't care much about what shop, if you meant something else say...
why do you know so much about the netherlands while there are enough english people that doesn't know it exists or think it is a province or something from germany or france??
steephie22 (182 D(S))
06 Jan 11 UTC
but could someone tell me the most of the discusion in 10 sentences??
of course i know where it goes about but i don't want to read all the posts so i don't know what the discussion is now particularly...
israël and palestine are big and the war between them is much to say about but where goes the discussion about??
Putin33 (111 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
I've been studying west European politics for the purposes of teaching a class and I follow the major football leagues in Europe. Plus, I have a fascination with Frisian since it's the closest related language to English and seems to connect all the Germanic languages. Of course I can't find any books on it though.
Jack_Klein (897 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
Ah, the Netherlands, land of my forefathers. :)

I have fond memories of doing the Sinterklaas thing in Pella. However, we did choose to not put the Piets in blackface here. :P
Putin33 (111 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
A 10 sentence summary, I'll try:

Essentially it's been an argument over every aspect of the Israel-Palestine conflict, but the main points of argument seem to be the following.

1-The pro-Palestinian side says the Palestinians were forced off their land or killed in order to achieve a state in 1948. The pro-Israeli side says the Arabs mostly fled right before the war and that before 1948 massacres happened on both sides.

2-The Palestinian side says Israel is not interested in peace or giving Palestinians a state and always claims to be interested in peace talks while doing something to provoke the Palestinians, like digging under mosques or building settlements. The Israeli side says the Palestinians rejected partition in 1947, didn't care about a Palestinian state while they were under Arab occupation from 1948-1967, and rejected the proposal for a state in 2000.

3-In terms of the current problem and stoppage of negotiations, the Palestinian side says that Israel is building illegal settlements in East Jerusalem in order to provoke the Palestinians and break off negotiations. The Israeli side says these settlements are not illegal since they're in already existing neighborhoods within the city of Jerusalem, and that settlements have never been a barrier to peace before.

That's the long and the short of it, I think. Probably other points, but these are the main ones.
Putin33 (111 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
There was also a big point about the Oslo Accords and whether Palestinian terrorism increased or decreased after Oslo. The Palestinian side says it decreased, the Israeli side says it increased.
Graeme01 (100 D)
06 Jan 11 UTC
Sounds like neither side has moved much.
Tolstoy (1962 D)
08 Jan 11 UTC
* 'Jews!=Israelis'

I completely agree. Most Jews, in fact, don't live in Israel. And there is a broad range of opinion among Jews about Israel, ranging from the radical kill-em-all Gun Zionism espoused by folks like Putin to the "Israel is an offense against God!" of Neturei Karta and everything in between. The problem with sticking to the term Israelis or Zionists is that not all of them are Jewish, and it is impossible to discuss the inherent discrimination of Israeli law and society without dealing with the fact that the beneficiaries happen to be Jewish. The phrase "Israeli only settlements" is inaccurate, for example, because non-Jewish Israelis aren't allowed to live there.

* "I think the Camp David proposal of 2000 by Ehud Barak was a great solution"

What charity. "Here. You can have 80% of the 22% of the land we agreed to leave you six years ago. Oh, and that land is essentially cut up into four pieces. We'll give you 10% back in a few years if we feel like it. We also have a few minor additional conditions for you, like we get to keep most of the military bases and settlements we built on your land. You're also not allowed to have a military yourself, control your airspace, and you can't complain about us sucking your water wells dry to fill our swimming pools. We're willing to make a huge sacrifice and give you a few ghetto areas in what used to be Palestinian East Jerusalem, and we'll squeeze a US embassy in there so you can call it your capital, but these ghettos are going to be completely surrounded by Jewish-only neighborhoods. And don't even think about policing your own borders - we'll do that for you. I see you're looking at me funny. What's that? You don't like this? Why, you're such an obstructionist! Why do you hate peace so much?"

http://www.socialismtoday.org/50/camp_david.html
http://www.palestine-studies.org/journals.aspx?id=7317&jid=1&href=fulltext
http://www.gush-shalom.org/generous/generous.html

* 'Israel never forced anyone to leave'

Yitzach Rabin wrote in his memoirs:

"We had to grapple with a troublesome problem, for whose solution we could not draw upon any previous experience: the fate of the civilian population of Lod and Ramle, numbering some 50,000...B[en]. G[urion]. waved his hand in a gesture which said, "Drive them out!"

"The population of Lod did not leave willingly. There was no way of avoiding the use of force and warning shots in order to make the inhabitants march the ten to fifteen miles to the point where they met up with the [Jordanian] Legion. The inhabitants of Rami watched and learned the lesson. Their leaders agreed to evacuate voluntarily, on condition that the evacuation was carried out by vehicles."

Interestingly, this passage (which I've edited for brevity) was censored from the first edition of Rabin's memoirs, and only appeared in the second edition (which I'm reading from) as an appendix. One of the Palestinians expelled from Lydda was a young George Habbash, a Christian who would go on to lead the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), and the most feared anti-Israel terrorist of the 60s and 70s.

Joseph Weitz, Land Director for the Jewish National Fund (and responsible for managing the settlement of Jews in Palestine) wrote in 1940 in his diary:

"We shall not achieve our goal of being an independent people with the Arabs in this small country. The only solution is a Palestine, at least Western Palestine (west of the Jordan river) without Arabs.... And there is no other way than to transfer the Arabs from here to the neighboring countries, to transfer all of them; not one village, not one tribe, should be left.... Only after this transfer will the country be able to absorb the millions of our own brethren."

There are tons of other very clear proofs of deliberate explusion. See particularly Benny Morris' "The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947-1949", which is entirely devoted to this question. (This is also the source for the IDF admission that 70% of Palestinians were driven out by force)

* 'Only 3000 Palestinians were killed by Israel in 1948'

7-800,000 Palestinians were driven from 350-500 villages by force or threat of force. There were a number of massacres, many with body counts in the hundreds. Many of the refugees were elderly, and died during the lengthy forced marches to unoccupied territory. It is true that a number is impossible to reach, but to suggest that it was less than half of one percent of the affected population is absurd. The website you reference doesn't bother to source the claim (it also gives two completely different numbers for Israeli deaths in the '67 War), so I'm still wondering where this magical 3,000 number comes from. As I've said, a real number is impossible to derive, but the suggestion that twice as many Israelis than Palestinians died when there were no mass expulsion of hundreds of Jewish villages and settlements is absurd.

* "Why can't Jews have 1 Country, when the Arabs have 22? The Palestinians have never had and didn't want a country until it became a way to hurt Israel."

I'm not a big fan of nationalism, so I really couldn't care less about which flag flies over which particular piece of dirt. I wouldn't necessarily care if there were 22 Jewish and 1 Arab countries. I just want people to be treated justly with respect to their lives, property, and freedom. If that can be done under under an explicitly Jewish state, that's fine with me. To some extent, this has already been done with the Palestinians who were granted Israeli citizenship (although there are obviously still many problems with the inherently racial/sectarian foundations of Israeli law and society, and many still view the citizenship of Arab Israelis as a betrayal of the Zionist ideal). I think granting full citizenship to Palestinians in the occupied territories would be a step forward in the situation, but of course that kind of limited equality is considered synonymous with "destroying Israel".

* "Hamas wants to kill all Jews! It's in their manifesto!"

The Hamas charter can be read here: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hamas.asp
Some (though not all) of the negative characterizations of it here seem to be false. I highly recommend that anyone interested enough to be reading this far take a gander at it. Interestingly, I see some Marxist influence in parts of it. While it does explicitly call for the destruction of Israel and its replacement with an overtly Islamic government, it also says that "Under the wing of Islam, it is possible for the followers of the three religions - Islam, Christianity and Judaism - to coexist in peace and quiet with each other. Peace and quiet would not be possible except under the wing of Islam. Past and present history are the best witness to that." History does indeed witness that; it was under the care of an overtly Islamic Ottoman state that the seeds of Zionism first sprouted and started to bear fruit (see below).

I would also note that Hamas has moderated its positions over the years; in recent years it has hinted that it might be willing to accept a two-state solution:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/22/israelandthepalestinians.usa

* "Please provide a cite [for the Ottomans enforcing and protecting Zionist land purchases]."

See "The Gun and the Olive Branch" by David Hirst. Page 142:

"[The Palestinian tenant farmers] naturally resisted the eviction itself. Sometimes Turkish troops had to be brought in to enforce it; this happened in 1910 when, in another Sursock sale, the disposessed tenants from Lower Galilee were arrested and thrown into prison."

Page 143:

"Smilansky recalls '...The Bedoin neighbours, the Damireh and the Infiat tribes, rose up in protest... Where would they pasture their cattle and sheep? But the [Turkish] mudir came from Caesarea with a detachment of police and dispersed them.'"

"Characteristic, too, was the reliance of the settlers on the Turkish police for driving off neighbors whose livelihood they had put in jeopardy."

Page 149, quoting a Zionist settler:

"It was then that, for the first time, I came in contact with Arab nationalism. Rashid Bey the Vali [governor], who was a Turk, cared very little whether the Tiberias district was inhabited by Arabs or Jews, and was thus prepared to order the eviction of the tenants. But Emir Amin Arslan, the Kaimakan of Tiberias, who was an Arab Druze, not only insisted on the payment of compensation to the evicted Arabs, but also as I was later informed, resisted the de-Arabization of the district."

Hirst also notes that appeals by local Palestinian notables to Constantinople to restrict immigration were largely ignored (p.148-149). Without the active assistance of the Ottoman government and its governors in Palestine, there never would've been an Israel.

"So all Jews are nutjobs eh? Now we're getting somewhere. And how you comments reconcile with the fact that 20% of Israel is Arab, Arabs who have full citizenship, who vote and form political parties?"

I didn't say all Israelis are nutjobs and all Israelis=Jews. I said quite clearly that the nutjobs in question are those promoting the settlement and foreign policy of Israel.

"Jews have been completely driven out of their homes in all of the Arab countries. "

The circumstances of the Jewish exodus from Arab countries after the '48 War varied a great deal from country to country. In Egypt, widespread repression of Jews didn't begin until the '56 war and after Israel had been caught red-handed using Egyptian Jews to perpetrate false flag terrorist attacks in Egypt to drive a wedge through US-Egyptian relations (the Lavon Affair). Lebanon actually saw its Jewish population increase until the Lebanese civil war, and a synagogue in Beirut was recently rebuilt (with support from Hizbullah, among others) after the Israelis bombed it in the '06 War. In Iraq, less than 10% of Iraqi Jews expressed an interest in leaving the country in 1950; it wasn't until after a series of bombings of Jewish and American targets in Baghdad (As in Egypt, perpetrated by Israeli agents) that Iraqi Jews started to emigrate en masse. The Israeli government at every turn encouraged the 'driving out' of Jews from Arab countries - Israel needed warm bodies to farm those fields and do all the menial labor the Palestinians had been doing before being driven out.
Putin33 (111 D)
08 Jan 11 UTC
The finale there says it all. The Iraqi government had medieval style mass celebrations of executions of Jews in the 1960s but, yet again, like everything, it's "Israel's fault'. No amount of repression and ethnic cleansing can ever be blamed on Arabs. Forever blameless, forever the victims.
Putin33 (111 D)
08 Jan 11 UTC
"And there is a broad range of opinion among Jews about Israel, ranging from the radical kill-em-all Gun Zionism espoused by folks like Putin"

ROFL, so promoting Ehud Barak's peace proposal is "kill 'em all gun Zionism"?
Please, please take what Hamas and Nazi quisling apologists like Tolstoy say on the opinions of Jews with a grain of salt. The guy thinks Hamas's charter - with all its ravings about the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, rotary clubs, and Jewish conspiracies, is truthful when it says that Jews who live under their ideal Islamic state will be treated well. This is the same organization that called upon Muslims to kill Jews wherever they are.

If anything like this was written by a mainstream Israeli organization, Tolstoy would be having conniptions. As it is, he thinks the most pro-peace Israeli prime minister ever - Ehud Barak, wasn't generous enough. It's ridiculous.

Page 4 of 7
FirstPreviousNextLast
 

201 replies
youradhere (1345 D)
09 Jan 11 UTC
Ghost Rating Question
Are live games counted in the Ghost Rating system?
5 replies
Open
Jimbozig (0 DX)
09 Jan 11 UTC
gb-37
Game was cancelled. In case anyone has any comments here is the place for them.
9 replies
Open
McChazza (134 D)
09 Jan 11 UTC
first visit
Hi all
Am I missing something on system requirements? When I set up a game or join a new game I just see a plain empty board with no icons, buttons, etc etc. Can't see any tech help/support on the site, so pointers would be appreciated. Using Firefox 3.6.13.
Thanks
10 replies
Open
Spryboy (103 D)
09 Jan 11 UTC
Seahawks beat Aints
The thread for discussing the embarassing lost by the Aints (which I predicted). Let us all point and laugh at their failure.
45 replies
Open
Crazyter (1335 D(G))
10 Jan 11 UTC
GFDT
Where is the 7th player? Several games have not started yet
1 reply
Open
Crazy Anglican (1067 D)
09 Jan 11 UTC
New Game
500 buy in
anon
regular press
classic board
9 replies
Open
EOG - Chris (43685)
See inside.
2 replies
Open
peterwiggin (15158 D)
29 Dec 10 UTC
New Press WTA anon challenge game!
My games are winding down, and I'd like to start one good game. Bet negotiable, but I think 60 is a good number. Challenges will be issued soon.
26 replies
Open
McChazza (134 D)
09 Jan 11 UTC
new game
Am assuming this is the way we help ourselves to finding new players if we're new round here.
Just want to test out controls as have never played online. Not very experienced Diplomacy player, but can hopefully manage.
gameID=46515
3 replies
Open
salamanda (100 D)
09 Jan 11 UTC
How to differentiate the nationalities of the units
How do you tell which units belong to which Great Power? All fleets are grey; all armeis are green.
3 replies
Open
salamanda (100 D)
09 Jan 11 UTC
Joining a locked game
Some games have a password, and I understand why. But if there's a game where a player has left, and I want to take over his NMR'd Power, how does one get in without the password?
5 replies
Open
Page 696 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top