Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 1143 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
SYnapse (0 DX)
28 Feb 14 UTC
Some thoughts on my article
the-philosopher.co.uk/republicanism.htm

Comments please?
6 replies
Open
Al Swearengen (0 DX)
27 Feb 14 UTC
The Live Game Promotion Problem
as per below

23 replies
Open
Orka (785 D)
27 Feb 14 UTC
(+3)
Iron Maiden
Who else loves them?
8 replies
Open
oscarjd74 (100 D)
25 Feb 14 UTC
(+2)
Who's up for a game of Backseat Driver Diplomacy?
See inside.
67 replies
Open
kasimax (243 D)
27 Feb 14 UTC
new egypt in modern gunboat needed
unfortunately, we lost egypt in an ongoing modern gunboat game. two-day phases, buy-in 15.
gameID=132764
the position is far from perfect, but it can be game-changing!
0 replies
Open
nfowler562 (100 D)
26 Feb 14 UTC
New
So I am newish; where do I go?

Curious about Gunboat but can't find rules or info on it.
22 replies
Open
semck83 (229 D(B))
25 Feb 14 UTC
(+1)
Pseudoscience
An article on the left and pseudoscience. (Focusing on Whole Foods). Comments?

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/02/23/whole-foods-america-s-temple-of-pseudoscience.html
91 replies
Open
abgemacht (1076 D(G))
27 Feb 14 UTC
(+4)
It's (almost) my webDip Birthday!
In under 2 hours I'll be 6 years old! In lieu of presents, please contribute to the site, either with a donation, volunteering to help with a tournament/SoW, opening a Chase bank account, or just starting an interesting discussion on the Forum.

Thanks to everyone for making this my favorite site on the Internet for 6 years running!
6 replies
Open
Dharmaton (2398 D)
27 Feb 14 UTC
This is nuts, glad i got ousted lolol
... ?gameID=136595 live now pffff
27 replies
Open
Jacksonisboss (30 DX)
27 Feb 14 UTC
a new live game
join "another practice game live ppsc" . it is ppsc and it starting 2 minutes
4 replies
Open
Jacksonisboss (30 DX)
27 Feb 14 UTC
join
join my game for new player/pros who like helping others. it is "another practice game live ppsc"(exactly that) btw starts in 15 minutes
2 replies
Open
Lord Baldy (100 D)
26 Feb 14 UTC
(+1)
BIG FAT HAIRY BUMHOLES
Need I say more?...
12 replies
Open
Lord Baldy (100 D)
26 Feb 14 UTC
(+1)
FLUFFY WHITE CLOUDS
Aren't they lovely?...
7 replies
Open
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
23 Feb 14 UTC
(+1)
A Jewish State? Israel? YES. YES IT IS.
http://news.yahoo.com/israeli-demand-sparks-39-jewish-state-39-debate-192744221.html It's a Jewish State. As surely as Ireland's an Irish state and Iran's an Iranian state, Israel is a JEWISH state...THE Jewish state. Make the Palestinians recognize that, and in turn, make the Israelis stop the terrible, TERRIBLE expansion plan into the West Bank. As surely as there must be a Palestine, Israel MUST be THE Jewish state.
181 replies
Open
Orka (785 D)
25 Feb 14 UTC
Variants
How do we get variants on this site?
14 replies
Open
krellin (80 DX)
25 Feb 14 UTC
Designer (Rich) Babies. Someone...
...won't be a ditch-digger.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-25/dad-may-join-two-moms-for-disease-free-designer-babies.html

Yes, the elite are already making their push for designer babies. I'll take my girl 5'7" with "c" cups, blonde (strawberry) and green eyes, please. And Wicked smart...
53 replies
Open
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
25 Feb 14 UTC
Guys - I Found Us a Life Hack
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/relationships/10658271/Automated-texts-to-your-girlfriend-Theres-an-app-for-that.html

Anyone that uses this shouldn't have a girlfriend, but at the same time, damn, that could be useful.
31 replies
Open
mapleleaf (0 DX)
25 Feb 14 UTC
Son: "Dad, what's SILVER?"
Dad:..........
54 replies
Open
Putin33 (111 D)
25 Feb 14 UTC
Timewarner - Comcast Merger
Will it go through and what does it mean for Net Neutrality, especially since the courts vacated FCC rules governing the internet?

0 replies
Open
PiC (2166 D)
25 Feb 14 UTC
join you have three builds as italy
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=136521&msgCountryID=0&rand=18504#chatboxanchor
1 reply
Open
ILN (100 D)
25 Feb 14 UTC
Most peaceful philosophy
http://mises.ca/posts/blog/libertarianism-they-only-peaceful-philosophy/

Curious about what people will say on this...
6 replies
Open
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
07 Feb 14 UTC
The Good Old International "FUCK YOU!"...I mean, The Good Old Hocke Game...
...is the best game you can name, and the best game you can name, is a US-Gold Medal game! Anyone else pulling for Team USA to kick some Russian ass and win the Gold at Sochi? Any of our Canadian WebDippers proud of their awesome squad looking to defend their title? Any chance Putin wants to stand by Real Putin and that big, bad, high-powered Russian squad?
326 replies
Open
ILN (100 D)
25 Feb 14 UTC
Dirty Internet tactics
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/
3 replies
Open
redhouse1938 (429 D)
24 Feb 14 UTC
(+1)
Obama's first good decision
Like a dead clock that's right two times a day, Obama made a good decision.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/24/us/politics/pentagon-plans-to-shrink-army-to-pre-world-war-ii-level.html?hp&_r=0
Congratulations Americans.
63 replies
Open
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
19 Feb 14 UTC
The Liberal (AKA Anti-NRA/krellin) Gun Club
http://gma.yahoo.com/gun-club-liberals-un-nra-010923198.html
"She has no use, however, for the NRA's conservative political agenda... Its mission, she says, is to provide "a place for gun owners to talk to other owners about neat gun stuff, without having to hear how the president is a Muslim-usurper-socialist running a false-flag operation." Clearly, Ms. Hoeber's been reading our posts...clearly.
Page 2 of 3
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
semck83 (229 D(B))
20 Feb 14 UTC
I said a very large amount.

And, I wouldn't call it that large an amount, at least relative to what the YJ's and Oscars of the world claim exists. Oscar was implying that there is a substantial probability that a given "homophobe" will commit anti-gay violence. He must think there are awfully few homophobes in the US, percentage-wise, if that's true.
oscarjd74 (100 D)
20 Feb 14 UTC
@semck
'In your first post that I responded to, you said, "If the gays were to pick up arms and start putting homophobes like yourself down then you'd be okay with that."'

Lol yeah that's what I said. And a great troll bait it was seeing as how we're still discussing it. U mad bro taking that shit so seriously? Quoting Texas law. That's awesome dude. I couldn't have hoped for a better result from this troll. Thanks for playing.
semck83 (229 D(B))
20 Feb 14 UTC
Likewise, should've checked your numbers. Well, obviously these are even much smaller.
semck83 (229 D(B))
20 Feb 14 UTC
Like I said, Oscar, works for both of us. You get forced into the "Only trolling ha ha" move for those who care, and I get to rip your rhetoric and any future credibility for serious arguments to shreds. Happiness for us all.
oscarjd74 (100 D)
20 Feb 14 UTC
Oh yeah, my credibility is hurting so much and I'm bleeding from my rhetotic. Give me a band aid please.
Yellowjacket (835 D(B))
21 Feb 14 UTC
The specifics regarding the Zimmerman case (perhaps it was foolish for me to bring up such a politically charged incident where I didn't have to) are actually irrelevant. "Kill the faggot," is still a real sentiment and motivator for assault (whether or not they actually intend to kill), and over half of all gays and lesbians report having been the victim of a physical attack because of their sexual orientation (Haggerty, 2000). So anti-gay violence is unarguably a very real thing.

Your point with the fatality rates, is valid, Semck, and I did estimate high. Still, even a 0.01% fatality rate (closer?) is still "significant," to the person who's being attacked. I guess I was trying to highlight what I mostly feel is an inherent foolishness of taking the shooter's mental state into account. When that fight or flight kicks in, humans aren't very well able to tell the difference between what constitutes a life-threatening situation and what is "merely" a physical assault.

Anyways, I'm not sure I really have a point here. I guess I just sympathize with victims of hate crimes who lose their ability to make that distinction.
abgemacht (1076 D(G))
21 Feb 14 UTC
"I do find fallacy fun, but that's not relevant here. I also enjoy setting troll baits. Thanks for biting semck."

Watch out guys, we've got a krellin jr running around.
oscarjd74 (100 D)
21 Feb 14 UTC
Wow, that's clever abge. A little gay, but still clever.
Yellowjacket (835 D(B))
21 Feb 14 UTC
(+5)
^^ What a tool.

Nothing more pathetic than a person who fails to defend a terrible argument and then pretends to be "trolling." Son, I know trolling, and that ain't it. I believe what you are doing is called "douchbaggery." It's a subtle difference. Familiarize yourself with it.
Gunfighter06 (224 D)
21 Feb 14 UTC
^
Gunfighter06 (224 D)
21 Feb 14 UTC
@ bo_sox48

The Constitution doesn't say anything about marriage. The Constitution says a lot about arms. Clearly, one is more important than the other.
semck83 (229 D(B))
21 Feb 14 UTC
Wait what?
Gunfighter06 (224 D)
21 Feb 14 UTC
Marriage is not a power of the federal government. DOMA should have been struck down by the Supreme Court the week it was signed under the Tenth Amendment. Then again, the National Firearms Act of 1934 also should have been struck down the week it was signed.

Everyone loses when the federal government does things that it is not supposed to do.
semck83 (229 D(B))
21 Feb 14 UTC
Do you know what DOMA actually said?
Gunfighter06 (224 D)
21 Feb 14 UTC
I know what Section 3 said. Unconstitutional as hell, just like the NFA.
semck83 (229 D(B))
21 Feb 14 UTC
(+1)
Huh.

So Congress can't define the words it uses in its own acts?
Putin33 (111 D)
21 Feb 14 UTC
(+1)
Why doesn't Congress have the power for itself to define what marriage means? Surely there are federal agencies which have to determine who is and who is not married for various purposes. DOMA did not define for states how it should define marriage, only the federal government.
Putin33 (111 D)
21 Feb 14 UTC
Constitution mentions keeping and bearing arms which connotes military usage, not personal non-military use of arms. See: historical usages of phrase 'keep and bear arms'. The reference to militia makes this clear.
semck83 (229 D(B))
21 Feb 14 UTC
Justice Scalia addressed that argument in DC v. Heller. It was used, in that era, to connote nonmilitary as well as military use of arms.
Putin33 (111 D)
21 Feb 14 UTC
I trust the 15 historians who filed a brief in favor of the law over Scalia's interpretation of history.
semck83 (229 D(B))
21 Feb 14 UTC
"I trust the 15 historians who filed a brief in favor of the law over Scalia's interpretation of history."

Well, OK, but 15 is hardly that impressive. It's not like it's an overwhelming consensus, or large enough to rule out political motivation. Moreover, Scalia gave a crystal clear example (i.e., quotation) of the phrase being used non-militarily, so there's hardly a need for "interpretation."
Putin33 (111 D)
21 Feb 14 UTC
According to William Blackstone "Words are generally to be understood in their usual and most known signification; not so much regarding the propriety of grammar, as their general and popular use" for the purpose of interpreting law. How does one idiosyncratic use of the phrase fit that criteria? And did Congress ever use that phrase in that way?

The overwhelming popular usage of the phrase 'keep and bear arms', from the American press, political pamphlets, and Library of Congress show it used in a military context.
semck83 (229 D(B))
21 Feb 14 UTC
So, I looked at the historians' brief in DC v Heller, and it contains very little discussion of the phrase. I didn't see another historians' brief. But maybe I'm missing it. You seem to be very familiar with it, so could you please direct me to it? Thanks.
semck83 (229 D(B))
21 Feb 14 UTC
(Incidentally, Blackstone's very words that you quote would imply that "keep and bear arms" should be interpreted as an ordinary conjunction, and not as a term of art or unitary phrase, unless there is strong evidence *in favor* of the latter; in fact, the phrase wasn't used that commonly at all. But I await the promised brief.).
Putin33 (111 D)
21 Feb 14 UTC
BTW please let me know if others find this list of historians 'unimpressive'.

http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/07-290_amicus_historians.pdf

Jack Rakove, Professor of History, American Studies, Law @ Stanford; past president of Society for the History of the Early American Republic

Saul Cornell, Professor of History of The Ohio State University, where he directs the 2nd Amendment Research Center, winner of Langrum Prize of Historical Literature

David Konig, Professor of History and Law at Washington U in St Louis

William Novak, Assoc Professor of History at U of Chicago, winner of Littleton Griswold Prize for best book of American legal history

Lois Schwoerer, Professor of History Emerita at George Washington, past president of North American Conference for British Studies.

Fred Anderson (I own his wonderful book on 7 years war), Professor of History at U of Colorado, aforementioned book won Francis Parkman Prize, another one of his books won the Jamestown Prize

Carol Berkin, Presidential Professor of Baruch College, Prof of History at CUNY and Baruch College.

Paul Finkelman, President William McKinley Distinguished Professor of Law and Public Policy at Albany Law

R Don Higginbotham, Dowd Professor of History at Chapel Hill, past president of southern historical association and society for the history of the early american republic

Stanley N Katz, bicentential professor of history of american law at Princeton, past president of American Council of Learned Societies, formerly Professor of Law at Univ of Chicago.

Pauline Maier, William Rand Kenan Professor of American History at MIT

Peter Onuf, Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation Professor at University of Virginia
also past president of society for history of early american republic.

Also included: Robert E Shalope, Oklahoma
Alan Taylor, California
John Shy, Michigan

Putin33 (111 D)
21 Feb 14 UTC
"You seem to be very familiar with it, so could you please direct me to it? Thanks."

I linked to it in the above post.

"keep and bear arms" should be interpreted as an ordinary conjunction, and not as a term of art or unitary phrase"

Meaning what?
semck83 (229 D(B))
21 Feb 14 UTC
OK, this is the brief I looked at. It includes no discussion on general early usage of the phrase "keep and bear arms."
semck83 (229 D(B))
21 Feb 14 UTC
"Meaning what?"

Meaning one would look at usage of the phrases "keep arms" and "bear arms" separately.
Putin33 (111 D)
21 Feb 14 UTC
Forest for the trees. Most of the analyses of this phrase has focused on the bear arms portion.

"It includes no discussion on general early usage of the phrase "keep and bear arms.""

They don't parse the phrase but the entire article talks about how the usage of that phrase in other early American documents was done in the context of military purposes.
Chaqa (3971 D(B))
21 Feb 14 UTC
How did a thread about a liberal NRA turn into a gay marriage debate? O_o

Page 2 of 3
FirstPreviousNextLast
 

80 replies
oscarjd74 (100 D)
24 Feb 14 UTC
Shouldn't draw votes be anonymous?
I don't mind that cancel and pause votes are out in the open, but I'd expect draw votes to be anonymous. That's how it was when I played FtF and on the email judges. Any particular reason why they are not anonymous on this site?
44 replies
Open
dyedinthewool (240 D)
25 Feb 14 UTC
settings
Trying to join anon game not sure how to set settings for this or will it automatically hide my user name
3 replies
Open
shield (3929 D)
25 Feb 14 UTC
Public Press Gunboat
More akin to real life gunboat where we can chat about anything except the game. Does anyone do this? I prefer gunboat because diplomacy just takes a lot of time that I'd rather spend doing other things in my life. However sometimes it would be nice to have the option of sending a public shout out on some topic.
1 reply
Open
Jacksonisboss (30 DX)
24 Feb 14 UTC
new game
join my game of "practice not for points". it is for new players or pros who need practice. it is ppsc, clasic, and one day turns
3 replies
Open
Lackbeard (55 D)
24 Feb 14 UTC
World missing Argentina
Just need someone to full Argentinas spot. gameID=134431

He was doing really well, on 11 SCs
0 replies
Open
Page 1143 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top