"No facts have been provided. Only opinions."
Many facts have been provided, BOG. You retreat to the point where the latest barrage of facts stops, point out that these facts are incomplete (as will *always* be the case in scientific endeavors), and proceed from there to claim that no facts have been provided. But just because you don't acknowledge them doesn't mean they aren't there.
I know your playbook. You'll respond by asking me to show you the facts/math/data supporting AGW, repeat the trite inanity that models can be surprised as if that invalidates all model-making, repeat the trite inanity that the climate changes naturally as if that invalidates all human influences, repeat the trite inanity that energy comes from the sun as if that invalidates the question of how much of that energy we capture, repeat the trite inanity that CO2 is a small fraction of the atmosphere as if that invalidates the particular influence CO2 has on heat capture, repeat the trite inanity that plants capture more CO2 when there's more CO2 as if that doesn't lead to a higher equilibrium CO2 concentration, and/or throw in one or two others I didn't bother to remember. (Something something communism.)
But you see, we don't have to show you anything. You put up a facade of reasonableness, but you won't be convinced by anything (despite your inevitable protest that you're just waiting for someone to "show you facts"). On the other hand, anyone else who reads this thread can see the complete dominance of arguments showing AGW exists over your baseless protests. Your protests prolong this display; they do not reverse it.
Having contributed my own understanding to the discussion, I'm satisfied to leave it here. Have a nice life, BOG.